300 North St., Columbus, TX 78934 · Colorado County · (979) 732-2347
137 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675996 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 9, 2025, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since March 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,412 in the last three years; the largest was $8,412, and the latest is dated July 9, 2025.
56.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 (Resident #5) reviewed for pharmaceutical services.-The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's medications on 01/13/2026 were documented as given during the night shift. -Resident #5 did not receive pain medication on 03/05/2026 at 8:00p.m. per physician orders. This failure could cause residents to have unnecessary and avoidable pain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement.-The facility failed to ensure residents' lunch was served at a safe temperature on 3/31/2026. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness and disease. In confidential interviews with residents in the facility, residents stated food was always cold when it arrived and they would prefer food to be warmer. Observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 3/31/2026 at 12:30pm revealed, she took the temperature of the mixed vegetables consisting of peas and carrots which was 114.6F. The Dietary Manager brought a second bowl of mixed vegetables which she measured at 105.8F. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) observed for infection control.-The facility failed to ensure CNA GG washed her hands or used hand sanitizer after doffing gloves during incontinent care observation on 3/31/26. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #20) whose records were reviewed for pain management. LVN H/Treatment Nurse, failed to ensure Resident #20 received a PRN pain medication prior to wound care. LVN H/Treatment Nurse failed to stop wound treatment when Resident #20 was grimacing and quizzing in pain on 7/8/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #20 and Resident #74) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure TX Nurse used the required PPE for Resident #20, who was on enhanced barrier precautions on 7/8/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA RS used the required PPE for Resident #74, who was on enhanced barrier precautions. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infection.1. Record review of Resident #74's face sheet reflected an admission date of 01/17/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to encode a resident's assessment within 7 days and complete and electronically transmit a resident's completed discharge MDS within 14 days for 2 ((Residents #36 and #67) of 2 residents reviewed for MDS transmittal.-Resident #36 passed away 3/8/2025 and Resident #67 passed away 4/11/2025 and their discharge MDS' were not encoded within 7 days after death and were not transmitted within 14 days after death. This failure could cause a resident's significant change such as their MDS to not be accurately reflected in their medical records. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #6) out of eight residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide skin care to Resident #6 which resulted in patches and dry flaky skin from below the knee to her feet. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of skin breakdown and reduced feelings of self-worth. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 07/08/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA G cleaned Resident #11 properly during incontinent care on 7/8/25. This failure could place residents at risk for pain, infection and hospitalization. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 7/7/25 reflected date of admission was 4/8/22 and re admitted on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and must provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #41) of 5 residents reviewed for accurate documentation and pharmaceutical services. -Resident #41 was documented as receiving his Invega suspension prefilled syringe for his bipolar disorder on 7/4/2025 when he did not receive the medication. The medication was not in the building. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving the needed treatments they need to promote their mental and physical well-being. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater for. There were 2 errors out of 29 opportunities, which resulted in a 6 percent error rate involving Resident #28 and Resident #39 observed for medication pass in that: -Medication Aide FF did not administer Resident #28 Tylenol ES as ordered by the Physician.-Medication Aide RR did not check Resident #39's blood pressure prior to administering blood pressure medication hydralazine 10 mg 2 tablets by mouth. These failures placed residents at risk for increase pain and decrease in quality of life. Resident #28Record review of Resident #28's face sheet dated 07/07/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that its residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1(Resident #39) 7 residents reviewed for significant medication errors.-Medication Aide RR did not check Resident #39's blood pressure prior to administering blood pressure medication hydralazine 10 mg 2 tablets by mouth. This failure placed residents at risk for dangerous drop in blood pressure, organ damage, increase risk of falls, and hospitalization. Record review of Resident #39's face sheet dated 07/07/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 07/03/25. Resident's diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure) and urinary retention (difficulty urinating and completely emptying the bladder). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements and kitchen sanitation.-The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the walk-in cooler were labeled and dated.-The facility failed to ensure the kitchen back door was closed.-The facility failed to ensure the dry storage room floor did not have black build up on the floor and the walk-in-freezer did not have an accumulation of ice on the floor. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination. During an observation on 07/07/2025 between 8:21 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to store foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption for 1 of 1 resident fridges in the facility.-There was unlabeled and undated food was stored in the residents' refrigerator.-The residents' refrigerator had items belonging to nursing staff. This failure has the potential to place all the residents at risk for consuming food that has not been handled in a safe and sanitary manner. Observation on 07/08/25 at 2: 40 p.m., revealed there were items in the resident refrigerator near the front lobby which contained staffs' personal food items including: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1of 5 residents (CR#1). The facility failed to ensure that CR#1's Lorazepam was ordered, received, and dispensed when CR#1 was admitted to the facility. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications, decreased quality of life and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5 percent (5%) or greater for 3 of 30 opportunities resulting in a 10 percent medication error rate for 2 (Residents #11 and #67) of 6 residents observed for medication pass. Facility failed to ensure Resident #11 Sertraline dosage (Medication that works by increasing levels of a mood-enhancing chemical called serotonin in your brain: many people recover from depression and has fewer unwanted side effects than older antidepressants) was administered as per physician order. Facility failed to ensured Resident # 11 received Potassium Chloride as ordered. MA A initialed on MAR that Potassium Chloride was administered. Potassium Chloride ( ( medication use to prevent and treats low levels of potassium in your body. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for medication administration were free of significant medication errors. Facility failed to administered Potassium Chloride Microencapsulated Crystals ER for 7 Days to Resident #11 This failure could place residents at risk of harm, injury, illness or hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food procurement. 1. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. 2. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated. 3. The Facility failed to ensure food is properly stored in designated areas at all times. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of food borne illness and disease. Findings Included: Observation of the facility kitchen on 05/29/24 at 8:15 AM revealed the following. 1. A Plastic Container of Sliced American Cheese was dated 5/21/24 use by date 5/23/24 2. A Plastic Container of sliced Bologna had no label and was not dated. 3. A Plastic Container of sliced deli ham had no label and was not dated 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #67). The facility did not administer Resident #67's Divalproex Sodium (medication used to treat certain types of seizures, to treat manic episodes of bipolar disorder, and to prevent migraine headaches) as per pharmaceutical recommendation . These failures could place residents at risk of experiencing side effect of medications which could result in the exacerbation of their medical conditions and a decline in health status.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge was documented in the resident's medical record and appropriate information was communicated to the receiving health care institution or provider for 1 (Resident #1) of 18 residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to have the resident's physician document their discharge and all other necessary information in the medical records. This failure could place residents at risk of not getting the necessary care and services in a new facility to meet their physical and psychological needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the discharge notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman and failed to record the reasons for transfer or discharge in the resident's medical record for 1 (Resident #1) of 18 residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of Resident #1's discharge status after hospitalization. This failure could place residents at risk of being improperly discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and the appeal process.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. - The facility failed to promptly identify skin redness to the peri area and buttocks, which had tiny openings on Resident #1, and failed to ensure interventions were implemented to treat and prevent skin deterioration. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay of care or treatment, pain, and suffering.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility only kitchen, in that: The facility failed to ensure: One food item in the freezer was not secured in package. Several food items in the refrigerator were not secured in package. Several food items in the refrigerator were not labeled/had a use-by date. These failures have the potential to affect all residents who ate food from the facility's kitchen placing them at risk of foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, which included procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, for 3 of 4 medication carts (100-200 Hall Medication Nurses Cart and 300-400 Hall Nursing Cart,100 and 4 00 hall medication aide cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. - The facility failed to discard an expired medications located in the 300-400 Hall Medication Nurse Cart. - The facility failed to ensure accurate count of control medications in the locked box in 100 - 400 Hall Medication Aide Cart. - The facility failed to discard an expired medications and store medication in it's original packet located in the 100 and 200 hall nurse's medication cart. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 7 of 8 Staff (Housekeeper F, LVN B, and CNA C, Treatment Nurse, Housekeeping supervisor, Laundry Aide E) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Laundry Aide E followed proper use of PPE and infection control procedure while picking dirty linen from 400 hall to 200 hall. 2. The facility failed to ensure Housekeeper F followed proper use of PPE and infection control procedure while picking up trash from residents' rooms in 400. 3. The facility failed to ensure proper infection procedure when clean linen was stored in 400 hall clean linen closet. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during personal care for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #175) reviewed for privacy in that: -The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Nurse and CNA C provided privacy during wound care for Resident #1. -The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Nurse and RA D provided privacy during wound care for Resident #175. These failures could place residents at risk of having their bodies exposed to the public, resulting in low self-esteem and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for two (Resident #1, and Resident #175) out of four residents reviewed for ADLs, in that: The facility failed to provide personal hygiene to Resident #1 and Resident #175, which resulted in Resident #1 toenails being overgrown and Resident # 175 feet being dry and having patches of dry skin. These deficient practices placed residents at risk of a decline in hygiene, at risk of skin breakdown, and reduced feelings of self-worth.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to monitor resident during smoke breaks. These failures could place residents at risk for accidental fire hazard. Findings Include: Record Review of Resident #19's Facesheet dated 03/16/23 revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #1) of 2 residents observed for indwelling urinary catheters. LVN B failed to provide appropriate care for Resident #1 during Foley catheter care. This failure could affect residents, who were incontinent or had a catheter, and placed them at risk for urinary tract infection, discomfort, skin breakdown and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings, for 1 (Resident #175) of 1 resident that was reviewed for feeding tubes, in that: -The facility failed to ensure LVN B appropriately verified placement and amount of fluid to be used for Resident #175 during medication administration and unclogging the feeding tube. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse reactions, inadequate therapy, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured and stored properly for one of six medication carts (400 Hall Nurse Medication Cart) reviewed for drug storage. - LVN B failed to ensure 400 hall Nurse medication cart was locked when left unattended on 03/16/23. - LVN B failed to ensure a bottle of Aspirin was left on top of the 400 hall Nurse medication cart when left unattended. These failures could place residents at risk for possible drug diversions or accidental ingestion.
12 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 9, 2025, 4 on May 31, 2024, 5 on March 17, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 9, 2025 | Fine | $8,412 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | not reported | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | not reported | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | not reported | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | not reported | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | not reported | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 83.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS note on this home's staffing data: The accuracy of the staffing data for this measure could not be validated by CMS.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.35 on weekdays and 2.74 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.05 in April to June 2025 to 3.17 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.17 | 0.14 | 3.35 | 2.74 | 2.0% | 22 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.33 | 0.23 | 3.48 | 2.96 | 0.5% | 8 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.54 | 0.74 | 3.76 | 2.98 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 78 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.05 | 0.75 | 3.22 | 2.61 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 78 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.1 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.1 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Columbus Oaks Healthcare Community's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
43.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 58 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
39.1% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
12.5% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SWEENY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweeny Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2021 |
| Park, Kelly | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Riddle, Ciara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2025 | |
| Sweeny Hospital District | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2021 | |
| Sweeny Hospital District | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/25/2025 | |
| Klaus, Bart | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/29/2025 | |
| Riddle, Ciara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.