1635 East 154th Street, Dolton, IL 60419 · Cook County · (708) 841-9550
197 certified beds, about 144 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145798 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 31, 2025, inspectors cited 22 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 58 health citations since October 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.58 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.
42.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Extended Care Clinical, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 58 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow their Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedures by failing to protect a resident (R1) from physical and verbal abuse, failed to immediately report allegations of abuse to the state agency, failed to initiate a timely investigation, and failed to take immediate actions to ensure resident safety. These failures resulted in psychosocial harm of R1 who is fearful and scared of another altercation with V5 and fearful he will be abused again. Failure of the facility not following their abuse policy puts all 147 residents at risk of being abused. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 07/05/2026 when R1 and V5 were involved in a physical altercation in the facility. V1 (Administrator) was notified on 07/20/2026 at 3:00 PM of the Immediate Jeopardy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse and care plan (comprehensive) policy by failing to develop an individualized plan of care with measurable interventions to address a resident's episode of aggression and failed to implement the care plan interventions for aggression resulting in a physical altercation between V5 C.N.A (Certified Nurse Assistant) and R1. This failure affects one (R1) resident of four reviewed for care plan implementation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse and care plan (comprehensive) policy by failing to revise the care plan approach (interventions) after a physical altercation between R1 and V5 C.N.A (Certified Nurse Assistant) occurred. This failure affects one (R1) resident of four reviewed for care plan revision.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of practice by not following their charting and documentation policy and the Licensed Practical Nurse Job Description. The facility failed to document an altercation between R1 and V5 C.N.A (Certified Nurse Assistant) in R1's medical record and complete an incident report per the facility policy. This failure to document the staff and resident altercation caused a lack of investigation into the incident and report of suspected abuse to the state surveying agency by administration. This failure affects one (R1) resident of four reviewed for charting and documentation of incidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that staff are aware of minimum staffing requirements, failed to follow staffing requirements, failed to schedule adequate Nursing staff, failed to replace scheduled staff when call off/NCNS (No Call No Show) occurs, failed to monitor shower/skin sheets to ensure that required care/skin assessments were provided, failed to document/provide required showers/skin assessments, and failed to ensure that adequate staff were available to meet the needs of three of three dependent residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. These failures have the potential to affect 146 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that (R2's) skin assessments were endorsed by a Nurse, and failed to document and/or provide required showers/skin assessments for three of three dependent residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its enhanced barrier precautions policy and don appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) prior to entering resident rooms with enhanced barrier precautions and providing wound care treatments. This failure affected three residents (R4, R5, and R6) out of three reviewed for infection control in a sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy in notifying resident representative of a cognitively impaired resident of changing the resident's room for one (R4) of three residents reviewed for resident rights in a sample of five.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to ensure that 2 of 5 medication carts were locked while unattended while being reviewed for medication storage per policy and procedure.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff are properly certified for food handling. This failure has the potential to affect all 153 residents who receive food by mouth from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and handle food in a manner that prevents food borne illness by failing to ensure that garbage is properly disposed, failed to date opened cooking seasonings, failed to remove a scoop from a flour bin, failed to allow cooking equipment air dry before use, failed to ensure that the ice machine was kept clean and failed follow proper hand hygiene protocol during food preparation. These failures have the potential to cause food borne illness to 153 residents at the facility that receives oral diet from the kitchenFacilityFindings include:On 7/28/2025 at 9:35AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, there were two staff members, V18 (Cook) and V17 (Cook/Dietary aide). Surveyor noted three bags of garbage that are full and in the middle of the floor close to where the V17 (Cook) was preparing some food. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their water management policy by 1. Failed to implement the facility's water management program by failing to educate team members on the principles of an effective water management program, 2. failed to maintain documentation that describes the facility's water system, 3. failed to annually conduct a risk assessment and identify control points to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the water system, 4. failed to ensure control measures were applied to address potential hazards at each control point, 5. failed to evaluate the effectiveness of the water management program annually using infection control surveillance data, water quality data, and rounding data, 6. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that advance directives were accurately completed and consistently maintained for 5 residents (R17, R55, R69, R92, and R145) reviewed for Advance Directives in a sample of 68 residents, resulting in discrepancies between documented wishes and care provided. R17 is [AGE] years old and have resided at the facility since [DATE], past medical history includes, but not limited to type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, unspecified bipolar disorder, essential primary hypertension, iron deficiency anemia, etc. [DATE] 11:42 AM, per record review, R17 had an advance directive in the system that was signed [DATE], but there was no selection for the type of treatment indicated in the form. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures related to the Identified Offenders Program (IOP) for 10 out of 10 residents (R37, R43, R90, R162, R163, R164, R165, R166, R167 and R168), failed to perform criminal background checks for new residents within 24 hours of admission for 4 residents (R37, R164, R166, and R168), and failed to obtain fingerprint orders within 72 hours of a hit on the preliminary criminal history for 10 out of 10 residents (R37, R43, R90, R162, R163, R164, R165, R166, R167 and R168). These failures affected 10 residents (R37, R43, R90, R162, R163, R164, R165, R166, R167 and R168) in the sample of 68 residents reviewed for abuse policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that that prescribed medications were administered within regulatory requirements and failed to document medication administration timely for 14 of 68 residents (R3, R5, R7, R14, R23, R46, R51, R66, R76, R109, R114, R127, R140, R150) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision, failed to implement fall prevention interventions, and/or failed to address safety hazards for five of 68 residents (R2, R139, R141, R144, R161) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to meet the needs for 20 of 68 dependent residents (R2, R3, R5, R7, R8, R14, R23, R36, R46, R51, R66, R76, R109, R114, R127, R139, R140, R141, R150, R161) in the sample and failed to ensure a licensed nurse had the required training/coursework to manage the facility restorative program. These failures have the potential to affect 158 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program and failed to ensure the facility remained free from flying insects. This affected two residents (R127, R139). These failures have the potential to affect 158 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's urinary drainage bag was covered in a manner that promotes dignity. This failure affects 1 resident (R150) in a sample of 68.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident's (R92) personal and medical information was kept confidential. This failure affects 1 resident (R92) out of a sample of 68 residents reviewed for personal privacy and confidentiality of records.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures and failed to provide a clean, homelike, odor free, and functional environment for three of 68 residents (R127, R129, R140) in the sample and failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the community bathrooms, hallways, and other common areas.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer 1 resident (R9) with a possible serious mental disorder for Screening and Resident Review to the appropriate state-designated authority for further assessment as required. This failure affects 1 resident (R9) reviewed for pre-admission screening in the sample list of 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, document, and treat 2 wounds on 1 resident reviewed for skin conditions. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R106) out of a sample of 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have the low air loss mattress (LAL) at the correct weight settings for one resident (R13) with a chronic wound, who is also at high for developing pressure ulcers. This failure has the potential to affect 1 resident (R13), reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention interventions, in a total sample of 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedure and ensure the tube feeding syringe was changed daily on 1 resident (R13) and failed to label 1 resident's (R13) tube feeding syringe with the resident's name. These failures have the potential to affect 1 resident (R1) reviewed for tube feeding management in the total sample of 68 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that respiratory equipment was labeled with a name/date and failed to contain it in a plastic bag for two of 68 residents (R127, R161) in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased upon interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations for medication gradual dose reduction and/or discontinuation were received, and failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were implemented for one of five residents (R8) reviewed for unnecessary medications, chemical restraints/psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow policy procedures, failed to follow physician orders, and failed to ensure that 2 of 68 residents (R34, R161) in the sample remained free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staffing information contained the required information. This failure has the potential to affect all 153 residents that reside within the facility. Facility census documents the current census is 158 residents. On 7/28/2025 at 10:25 AM, observed a staffing schedule posted in the hallway near the entrance to the lobby. The staffing schedule does not include the facility name, census, or total number/the actual hours worked by of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. V28 (Assistant Director of Nursing) affirmed that the document is what the facility posts for the required nursing staffing posting. V28 affirmed that the document did not contain the facility name, census or any value of numbers to indicate hours worked by direct care staff. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medical director participated in the facility's QAA/QAPI programming. This failure has the potential to affect all 158 residents that reside within the facility. Facility census documents an active census of 158 residents. Facility QAA committee meeting sign-in sheets (4/30/2025, 7/17/2025) do not document any signature from the facility's medical director affirming the medical director's attendance. On 7/30/2025 at 10:04 AM, QAA meeting minutes were reviewed with V1 (Administrator) and V1 affirmed that the facility's medical director was not at the QAA meetings. V1 affirmed that the medical director is required to be at the QAA meetings. On 7/30/2025 at 11:55 AM, V38 (Nurse Consultant) affirmed that V38 is a member of the governing body of the facility and sometimes attends QAA meetings. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by failing to keep a resident (R2) free from being hit with a tool by another resident, failing to keep a resident (R5) free from being hit in the face, and a resident (R6) from being pushed by another resident, for three residents out of seven reviewed for abuse in a total sample of seven. Findings Include: A. R1 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to bipolar disorder, hemiplegia affecting the left side, and dementia. R2 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of but not limited to dementia, heart failure, and Parkinson's disease. On 6/17/25 at 11:49AM, R1 was sitting in a separate dining room from R2 waiting for the lunch meal. When first asked, R1 denied having any physical altercations but then remembered once the surveyor gave R1 more details. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for behavior and substance abuse management by not adequately monitoring and communicating suspected or observed substance use in the facility; not conducting room searches per the facility's protocol of reported suspicion of substance abuse; not referring suspected substance abuse to law enforcement; and not identifying or implementing personalized care plan interventions for prevention of suicidal/self-harming behavior and substance use. This failure applied to two of two (R1, R4) residents reviewed for supervision and resulted in R1 and R4 testing positive for drug use while in the facility and R1 engaging in self-harming behavior.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their behavior management policy and procedures for ensuring a resident's safety by attempting to physically restrain an alert and oriented resident who refused to return to the facility after eloping. This failure applies to one of one resident (R1) reviewed for resident rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for behavior and substance use management by not ensuring residents with a significant history of self-harm, suicidal behavior, and substance use received therapeutic mental health or substance abuse counseling or services; not establishing personalized care planned interventions for these behaviors based on identified causes of behaviors, preferences and individual interests; and not performing timely assessment of substance abuse history to apply knowledge and understanding of past and development of person-centered treatment interventions. This failure applies to two of two residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for behavioral health services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility policy on conducting background and fingerprint checks for four employees (V11, V12, V13, V14) at time of hire. This failure has the potential to affect 144 residents currently residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its staffing policy by not having four nurses working on the overnight shift on 12/31/24. There was no nurse present in this facility from 2:00AM until 6:04AM on 1/1/25. This failure resulted in 4 residents (R8, R9, R10, and R16) not receiving 6:00AM scheduled medications until more than one hour later or not at all; 5 diabetic residents (R7, R11, R13, R14, and R15) not having 6:00AM blood sugar level checked, and insulin administered; none of the residents received scheduled assessments and/or vital sign monitoring on the night shift. This failure has the potential to affect all 155 residents residing in this facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its medication administration policy and consistently monitor the effectiveness of pain medication and accurately document the administration of controlled substances for four of residents (R3, R17, R18, and R19) out of four reviewed for receiving high alert medications in a sample of 19.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify resident's representative of a change in condition. This failure applied to one (R1) of five residents reviewed for change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a follow-up appointment was scheduled with specialists physician for a resident as ordered; they failed to administer prescribed medications and monitor and document resident's respiratory and oxygen status per physician orders and plan of care; and failed to ensure that staff accurately assess and document emergency response for a resident. This failure applied to one (R1) of one resident reviewed for nursing care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a professional standard during G-Tube medication administration for one (R27) of one resident observed for G-Tube medication administration in a sample of 29 residents. Findings Include: On 9/11/2024 at 01:15 PM - Observed V16 (LPN) administer medication to R27 via G-Tube. V27 did not check the G-Tube placement before administering the medication. On 9/11/2024 at 1:21 PM, V16 said that she checks the placement by observing and palpating G-Tube placement site. On 9/11/2024 01:38 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said that she expects the staff to check G-Tube placement either by auscultation or residual before administering medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide feeding assistance, nail care and foot care for resident who need assistance with Activity of Daily Living (ADL). This deficiency affects one (R91) of three residents in the sample of 29 reviewed for ADL care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall preventive measures to resident who is at high risk for falls. This deficiency affects two (R91 and R141) of three residents in the sample of 29 reviewed for Fall Prevention Program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician order in administration of enteral feeding. This deficiency affects one (R108) of three residents in the sample of 29 reviewed for Enteral feeding management.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its pain management policy and reassess for pain for 1 of 3 resident's (R141) reviewed for pain management in a sample of 29. Findings Include: On 9/11/2024 at 1:30pm R141 said that his left knee is very painful from a fall in the hallway and the nurses will only give him acetaminophen. On 9/11/2024 at 1:40pm V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) said that R141 does not ask for pain medication and the only thing he has ordered is acetaminophen, I'll call the physician for a stronger pain medication. On 9/11/2024 at 2:10pm V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) said I expect the nurses to assess for pain every shift and as needed, and if a resident complains of pain, I expect for the nurses to follow up with the physician. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to collaborate coordinated care by failure to ensure that resident's updated hospice medical records are available and accessible to all interdisciplinary team (IDT) in the facility. This deficiency affects one (R91) of three residents in the sample of 29 reviewed for Hospice care services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection control policy for resident who is on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP). This deficiency affects one (R108) of three residents in the sample of 29 reviewed for infection control.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and ensure that medical records were released in a timely manner when requested by legal representative for one (R4) resident. This failure affected one resident (R4) in a sample of 5 residents reviewed for policy and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident to resident abuse. This affected two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R1, with a history of aggressive behavior, exhibiting verbal aggression towards R2 which escalated to physical aggression with R1 swinging his arms at R2 and pushing R2 onto the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep a resident (R3) free from abuse by another resident (R5) and failed to keep a resident (R5) free from verbal abuse by staff. These failures applied to two (R3, R5) of five residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for identifying and reporting an injury of unknown origin to the State agency. This failure applied to one (R3) of five residents reviewed for resident injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor a high fall risk resident (R2) while in bed, failed to put in additional interventions to address R2's behavior of moving/wiggling around the bed, and failed to keep the call light within reach. This affected one of three residents (R2) reviewed for fall prevetion interventions. This failure resulted in R2 suffering a brain bleed in two areas of the brain after the fall. Findings Include: R2 is a [AGE] year old with the following diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. The admission Hospital Records, dated 2/17/24, documents R2 was sent to the hospital for altered mental status. R2 was noted with elevated blood pressure, has poor attention, span, and has severe encephalopathy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not physically abused by another resident for 1 of 5 residents (R10) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse was reported immediately to the Administrator for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident by transferring him with a mechanical lift for 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for injuries of unknown origin the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented for a resident experiencing a behavior, and failed to identify a trigger for a resident's behaivor for 1 resident (R1) reviewed for behaviors in the sample of 11.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical resident to resident abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R11) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new Level I screen for a resident who stayed longer than the approved stay, for one of two residents (R133) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) in a sample of 29.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to sanitize equipment before obtaining blood pressure for two residents (R79 and R119), and failed to perform hand hygiene before obtaining a blood glucose measurement for one resident (R98), of eight residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 29.
39 fire safety citations on file: 12 on September 13, 2024, 10 on October 6, 2023, 17 on October 7, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2025 | Payment Denial | 12 days from June 11, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.58 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.41 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.30 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.47 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.71 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.3% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.8% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 5.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.69 on weekdays and 2.30 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.38 in April to June 2025 to 2.58 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.58 | 0.41 | 2.69 | 2.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 144 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.56 | 0.37 | 2.70 | 2.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 145 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.43 | 0.33 | 2.56 | 2.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 152 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.38 | 0.28 | 2.47 | 2.15 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 161 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 71.3 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 33.7 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.0 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Countryside Nursing & Rehab Ctr's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 29 eligible stays.
59.3% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
2.2% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: COUNTRYSIDE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Extended Care Clinical, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B & Z Grandchildren Tr | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 01/01/2015 |
| N & S Rothner Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 88% | 01/01/2015 |
| Aronin, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/03/2010 | |
| Rothner, Eric | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2009 | |
| Merritt-James, Aasta | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/30/2015 | |
| Extended Care Clinical LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| N & S Rothner Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Roth & Co, LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Anand, Chandra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/30/2015 | |
| Merritt-James, Aasta | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/30/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.