Home / North Carolina / Aberdeen
915 Pee Dee Road, Aberdeen, NC 28315 · Moore County · (910) 944-8999
90 certified beds, about 88 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345509 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 4, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 33 health citations since May 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.26 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
32.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
CMS links it to Alliance Health Group, an affiliated group of 13 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to dispose of a stained urine collection hat stored underneath a sink on the floor in a resident's bathroom. This deficient practice affected 1 of 7 residents on the 400 hall memory care unit who were reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment (Resident #74).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and Nurse Practitioner, Pharmacist, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of narcotic medication (methadone) prescribed to treat pain. This affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation (Resident #17).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a request for an evaluation for a Level II Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) determination for a resident with a newly diagnosed serious mental illness for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #4).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff assistance for nail care received assistance when needed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) (Resident #14).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to post accurate staffing information as compared to the daily staff schedule for 32 out of 32 days (11/01/25 through 12/02/25) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the area of rejection of care (Resident #35) for 1 of 19 MDS assessments reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to place a resident's (Resident #83) call light within reach to allow for the resident to request staff assistance this was for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19), for his right to be free from physical abuse as evidence by another resident (Resident #9) slapping him with an open hand to the side of his head.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, Nurse #2 failed to implement the reporting portion of the abuse policy after Nurse Aide #3 (NA #3) told her Resident #19 slapped Resident #9 on the right hand/forearm. The facility also failed to notify Adult Protective Services (APS) regarding an allegation of abuse. This was for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #9) reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff, Medical Director (MD) interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) after 2 areas of significant decline. This was for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #24).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide abuse training to Nurse #2 prior to her working at the facility. This was for 1 of 5 employees reviewed for abuse training.
Inspectors wrotec. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #42's most recent MDS assessment was dated 7/20/24 and was coded as a quarterly assessment. The electronic medical record indicated the assessment was in progress and had not been completed. d. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #24's most recent MDS assessment was dated 7/23/24 and was coded as a quarterly assessment. The electronic medical record indicated the assessment was in progress and had not been completed. Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required time frame for 5 of 19 resident MDS assessments reviewed (Residents #17, #81, #24, #42 and #19).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were in good repair. Rooms #304 and #308 had several patched areas of sheetrock putty exposed on walls and room [ROOM NUMBER] had a missing plank panel on wall behind the headboard. This was for 3 of 8 rooms reviewed for comfortable, clean, and homelike environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required time frame for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for MDS assessments (Residents #9).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required time frame for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for MDS assessments (Residents #61).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, physician and staff interviews, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the areas of urinary status, and upper extremity range of motion. This was for 2 of 19 MDS assessments reviewed (Resident #37 and Resident #49).
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for 2 of 2 residents investigated for resident-to-resident sexual abuse (Resident #1, resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure leftover food items were labeled and dated in 1 of 1 walk-in refrigerators and failed to ensure the low temperature dish machine a reached a minimum temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit during the wash cycle. This practice had the potential to affect food served to all residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans in the areas of pneumonia (Resident #79), infection (Resident #45), ambulation (Resident #3) and level 2 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) (Resident #57). This was for 4 of 17 residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews with staff and Medical Director, the facility failed to provide physician ordered behavioral health services for 1 of 1 (Resident #18) reviewed for behaviors.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the annual recertification survey completed on 05/04/23. This was for 5 deficiencies that were cited in the areas of resident rights, notice requirements before transfer, accuracy of assessments, care plan timing and revision, and drug regimen review. The duplicate citations during two federal surveys of record show a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience by referring to a resident who needed assistance with meals as a feeder (Resident #59) .This was for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. Based on the reasonable person concept residents would not expect to be identified as a feeder.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to place a resident's call light (Resident #15 and #79) within reach to allow for the residents to request staff assistance for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the areas of behaviors for Resident #59 and continence for Resident #5. This was for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to request residents with a newly diagnosed mental illness be reevaluated for a level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #57 and #59).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 of 1 dependent resident (Resident #79) reviewed for activity of daily living (ADL).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and staff interviews the failed to maintain air mattress at residents weight for 3 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #5, Resident #79 & Resident #26).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident, staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Medical Director (MD) interviews and record review, the facility failed ensure continuous oxygen was in use and obtain oxygen saturation percentages as ordered (Resident #77). The facility also failed to maintain bedside suction equipment in a sanitary condition as ordered by the Physician (Resident #3) This was for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff, Consultant Pharmacist, and Medical Director (MD) interviews and record review, the Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify the need for an annual MD or psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) documented rationale for the continued use of a prescribed antipsychotic medication (Geodon) at the current prescribed dosage for 1 (Resident #10) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to reconstitute (the process of adding a diluent to a dry ingredient to make it a liquid) an intravenous (IV) antibiotic prior to administration for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #17) reviewed for IV antibiotic administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to label medications with the date they were opened on 1 of 2 medication carts (the Greenbrier Hall Medication Cart).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, Responsible Party interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the responsible party (RP) in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents #14 and #10).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to transmit to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) database quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required time frame for 4 of 8 residents selected to be reviewed for submission of Resident Assessments (Residents #10, #17, #77, and #79).
13 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 8, 2024, 10 on May 4, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.26 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.98 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.91 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.99 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 32.4% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.75 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.38 on weekdays and 2.98 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.48 in April to June 2025 to 3.26 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.36 | 3.38 | 2.98 | 0.0% | 3 of 90 | 88 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.30 | 0.32 | 3.39 | 3.06 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.33 | 0.32 | 3.40 | 3.13 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 88 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.48 | 0.38 | 3.56 | 3.29 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 86 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.9 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 32.3 | 18.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.8 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.0 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.9 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Dahlia Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilitati's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (36.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
36.0% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · North Carolina: 93 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · North Carolina: 1 better, 4 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
7.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · North Carolina: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.
45.2% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina54.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: North Carolina2.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: North Carolina97.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PEE DEE ROAD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC. CMS links this home to Alliance Health Group, a group of 13 nursing homes averaging 1.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emanuel, Yosef | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Alliance Health Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/07/2025 | |
| Fink, Lauren | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Vera, Trinity | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Fink, Lauren | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Vera, Trinity | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.