Home / Illinois / Edwardsville
1095 University Drive, Edwardsville, IL 62025 · Madison County · (618) 656-1081
118 certified beds, about 101 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 145985 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 11, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 71 health citations since September 2023, 15 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 8 fines totaling $399,548 in the last three years; the largest was $158,110, and the latest is dated February 11, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.93 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.26 of those hours.
63.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Evercare Skilled Nursing, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 71 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor and provide interventions to prevent pressures ulcers for 3 of 3 (R1, R7, R9) residents reviewed for skin breakdown in a sample of 47. This failure resulted in R7 who was admitted to facility without a pressure acquiring an avoidable stage III pressure ulcer/injury, R1 acquiring a pressure a pressure ulcer and R9 experiencing pain from pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform timely incontinent care for 1 of 3 (R9) residents reviewed for incontinent care in a sample of 47. This failure resulted in R9 feeling embarrassed, ashamed, and miserable. This failure also resulted in R9 obtaining opening areas to her right buttock and experiencing pain as a result. R9's Care Plan, dated 10/27/2025, documents that Resident experiences bladder incontinence. It continues Provide incontinence care after each incontinent episode. It also documents that Apply moisture barrier to skin. R9's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents that R9 is cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting. On 2/2/26 at 8:25 AM observed V5, Certified Nurse Assistance (CNA), provide incontinent care for R9. Upon entering room, a strong, foul urine odor in room. R9 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight hours daily. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication and discard expired medication for 5 of 5 (R4, R12, R79, R92, R109) residents in reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to offer and provide influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for 4 of 4 consenting residents (R31, R36, R64, R81) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess for use of and review the risk versus benefits for 1 of 2 (R55) resident reviewed for restraints in a sample of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to complete quarterly smoking risk assessments for 2 of 3 residents (R5 and R88) reviewed for assessments in a sample of 47. Findings Include:1. R5's Face Sheet, admit date : [DATE] (current), documented he has diagnoses of but not limited to Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type II diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis of liver, and acute hepatitis C without hepatic coma. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R5 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and requires supervision or touching assistance, and partial/moderate assistance with his activities of daily living (ADLs). R5's Care Plan, not dated, documented R5's preferences are to smoke while at the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, supervise and implement interventions for 2 of 6 (R9, R31) residents reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food was provided in a form to meet individual needs for 2 of 2 residents (R64, R95) reviewed for food and nutrition services in the sample of 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the Facility failed to post nurse staffing information in a prominent place that was readily accessible to residents and visitors. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 being sexually abused by R3 on 10/5/25 and again on 10/6/25. This Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/5/25 at 5:30 PM when V7, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), witnessed R3 sexually abusing R2. The Facility did not report or investigate this, and no interventions were put in place to protect R2 from R3. The following day, on 10/6/25 at approximately 9:00 AM, R3 entered R2's room and sexually abused R3 again. V1, Administrator, was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/17/25 at 12:02 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to follow its abuse policy in preventing, reporting and investigating allegations of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R2 being sexually abused on 10/6/25 after previous allegation was not reported or investigated and no interventions were put in place to prevent further abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in witnessed sexual abuse on R2 by R3 the day after a sexual abuse allegation for the same two individuals was not thoroughly investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide adequate supervision following an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R3 entering R2's room without staff supervision and sexually abusing R2.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to report allegation of sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify resident's representatives of a fall in 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to completed physician's ordered wound care for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for wound care in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to treat resident's pressure ulcers per physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 4.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the Facility failed to assess and treat a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change of condition. This failure resulted in R2 having a significant change in condition for several hours without interventions that ultimately required an emergency transfer in which her family called 911 and R2 experienced respiratory distress, was intubated en route to the hospital and placed on a mechanical ventilator. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/2/2025 when R2 began to experience respiratory/breathing issues and was not sent to the hospital in a timely manner. On 5/8/2025 at 12:43 PM, V1, Administrator, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), V17, Regional Nurse Consultant/ VP Clinical Services and V18, RDO/CEO (Regional Director of Operations) and CEO were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to report a hip fracture of unknown origin for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care as ordered and appropriate tracheostomy supplies for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for Quality of Care in a sample of 13. Findings Include: R4's Face Sheet, undated, documents R4 was admitted [DATE] with a medical diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R4 is cognitively intact, needs substantial/maximal assistance with personal and oral hygiene, and requires intermittent oxygen therapy, suctioning and tracheostomy (trach) care. R4's Care Plan does not address R4's tracheostomy needs. R4's Progress Note by V10, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), dated 3/5/25 at 4:50 AM, documents R4 was sent to hospital. R4 had pulled out trachea. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure physician visits were completed within 30 days of admission and at least every 60 days thereafter for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R5) reviewed for physician visits in the sample of 13.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled in the facility for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This had the potential to affect all 99 residents who reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medication, label insulins vials, and discard expired medication. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to label and store foods appropriately, failed to wear hair restraints, perform hand hygiene in between glove changes and keep personal open drink containers away from where food was being prepared. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to follow their policy and prevent the potential spread of infection by not utilizing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing direct care, as well as complete hand hygiene between glove changes for 5 of 5 residents (R52, R8, R45, R27 and R60) reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide storage that locks for residents smoking materials, including vapes, lighters and tobacco and failed to provide supervision during smoking times for 8 of 8 (R32, R38, R68, R69, R76, R82, R148 and R149) residents reviewed for smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure blood sugar levels were documented for tracking, trending and monitoring of a chronic condition for 1 of 32 residents (R78) reviewed for medications, in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform complete incontinent care for 2 of 4 (R27, R94) residents reviewed for incontinent care, in a sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to monitor/document episodes of behaviors for which psychotropic medications were prescribed, as well as follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 3 residents (R83) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure preventative health vaccines such as Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Pneumonia (PNU) were administered to those who gave consent and wished to receive them for 2 of 5 residents (R8 and R78), reviewed for immunizations, in the sample of 59.
Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and assess blood sugar levels for residents with diabetes, for 1 of 3 residents (R2) were reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 14. This failure resulted in R2 requiring emergency intervention for blood glucose level 24 and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to address a significant weight loss for 1 of 3 residents (R2) who were reviewed for weight loss in a sample of 14. This failure resulted in R2 experiencing a significant weight loss of 20% over a four-month period.
Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of changes in condition related to weight loss and blood glucose readings for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of 14.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to locate and/or replace missing clothing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for loss of property in the sample of 17. On 1/22/2025 at 1:40PM V19, R10's family member, stated Dad lost clothes, jackets, a brand-new pair of white leather shoes, hearing aids, and two blankets. I took him a blanket and the blanket disappeared. I took him another blanket and the next day that blanket was gone. It was unbelievable. On 1/22/2025 at 2:00PM V16, Social Services Director, stated I don't know anything about R10's missing clothes. I thought we found everything and returned it. On 1/22/2025 at 2:30PM V1, Administrator, stated I thought his items were found. I'm not sure. I don't think they filed a grievance. On 1/23/2025 at 2:00PM V19 stated We didn't get any missing items back from the facility. They have not contacted us for reimbursement either. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure abuse did not occur for 1 of 3 residents (R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 17.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate and thoroughly investigate alleged violations of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R9) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 17
Inspectors wroteBased on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to administer ordered medications to 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medications in the sample of 17. R2's Facesheet documents an admission date of 3/2/2024. Diagnosis include Osteomyelitis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Acquired absence of other right toe(s), Chronic Kidney Disease, Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, Type 2 Diabetes. R2's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE] documents R2 has no cognitive deficits. R2's Care Plan updated 10/24/2024 documents I have chronic pain related to Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Neuropathy, and Idiopathic gout. Interventions include: Report to Nurse my complaints of pain or requests for pain treatment. Pain Assessments quarterly and as needed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to provide medication as ordered by the Physician. This applies to 1 resident (R1) of three reviewed for medication administration in a sample of three.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and provide medication for pain management for 2 of 3 residents (R4 and R7) reviewed for pain in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in R4 being in pain and R7 being unable to participate in therapy.
Inspectors wrote-- Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R2 ) reviewed for falls in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wrote- Based on observation interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide medications as ordered for 2 of 3 residents (R4 and R7) who were reviewed for medications in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wrote- A-Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to provide additional nourishment when ordered for 1 of 3 residents (R15) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 20.
Inspectors wrote-- Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility failed to implement current interventions and initiate progressive interventions to prevent falls for 4 of 4 (R1, R2, R4, R5) residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have pain medication available as ordered for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for pain in the sample of 5. This resulted in R3 not receiving his narcotic pain medication as ordered for 10 out of 30 days in September 2024.
Inspectors wrote- Based on the interview and record review, the Facility failed to document necessary assessments of wound conditions per its policy, complete treatments as prescribed by a physician, and ensure the resident was assessed in a timely manner after a referral for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for wound management in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wrote- Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure medications were readily available for administration per physician's orders to ensure residents' highest well-being, comfort, and pain control for 3 of 7 residents (R1, R4, and R8) reviewed for medications in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure medications were readily available for administration per physician's orders for 3 of 7 residents (R1, R4, and R8) reviewed for medications in the sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to allow phone access to facility and residents for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. This has the potential to affect all 86 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed, physician orders followed and residents repositioned timely for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure pain was assessed, recognizing the onset, presence, and duration of pain, and assessing the characteristics of the pain and provide pain management for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for pain. This resulted in R3 experiencing pain during dying process.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for residents (R1, R2, R3, R12) of 4 residents reviewed in a sample of 12. This failure resulted in R1 and R3 experiencing severe pain.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing on 5/20/24 for 4 of 6 (R1, R2, R3, R4) residents sampled for medications and blood glucose testing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions and precautions were in place for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for falls in a sample of 7.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to protect residents from employee misappropriation of resident funds and exploitation for one of 7 residents (R51) reviewed for misappropriation of resident property in the sample of 42. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when V22, Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA), began using R51's debit card without his permission on March 2, 2023, accruing more than $11,000.00 in charges. When R51 became aware, he was upset and worried about taking care of future expenses and needs. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 3/02/23, when V22 began using R51's debit card without R51's permission. On 1/26/24, at 4:00 PM, V1, Administrator, V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and V47, Registered Nurse, RN, were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe beverage serving temperatures to prevent thermal burns and adequate supervision to prevent falls for 3 of 9 residents (R60, R62, and R68) reviewed for accidents/hazards in the sample of 42. These failures resulted in R62 and R68 sustaining second degree abdominal burns and R60 falling and sustaining nasal fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess and ensure a resident receiving continuous Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) feeding did not experience significant weight loss for 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 42. This failure resulted in R13 having an insidious significant weight loss of 12 pounds in three months while receiving nutrition via G-tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in a manner that prevents potential foodborne illness. This has the potential to affect all 89 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an Infection Preventionist has the professional training and qualifications to perform in this role. This has the potential to affect all 89 residents living in the Facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 6 of 7 residents (R10, R49, R50, R51, R62, R293) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and the resident's care plan to ensure proper placement of gastrostomy tubes (g-tubes) and ensure the correct enteral formula is provided for residents with g-tubes for 1 of 2 residents (R13) reviewed for g-tubes in the sample of 42.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store medication properly for 6 of 7 residents (R2, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 8.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care per current standards of practice to prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for UTI's in the sample of 3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to enforce work restrictions for employees that were positive for COVID-19 to aid in the prevention/progression of COVID-19. This failure has the potential to affect all 90 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent visitor to resident mental abuse for 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 9.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refill medications timely for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 10. This failure resulted in R2 being admitted to the hospital for breakthrough seizure activity.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the Facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner for 3 of 3(R1, R2, R3) residents reviewed for call lights in the sample of 12.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the Facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, homelike environment for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R4) reviewed for physical environment in the sample of 12.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medication to a newly admitted resident for 1(R2) of 10 residents in the sample of 12.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was clean, comfortable, and homelike for 5 of 5 residents (R7, R8, R16, R17, R19) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 20.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents with hygiene and incontinent/toileting care for 4 of 4 residents (R7, R8, R9, R16) reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) in the sample of 20.
17 fire safety citations on file: 8 on February 27, 2025, 4 on January 31, 2024, 5 on March 17, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 11, 2026 | Fine | $39,950 |
| October 21, 2025 | Fine | $158,110 |
| May 9, 2025 | Fine | $43,729 |
| February 20, 2025 | Fine | $51,307 |
| October 4, 2024 | Fine | $11,485 |
| April 29, 2024 | Fine | $46,715 |
| January 31, 2024 | Fine | $25,186 |
| October 18, 2023 | Fine | $23,066 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.93 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.26 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.51 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.72 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.95 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.2% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 5.07 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.10 on weekdays and 2.51 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.85 in April to June 2025 to 2.93 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.93 | 0.26 | 3.10 | 2.51 | 3.7% | 0 of 90 | 101 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.79 | 0.26 | 2.95 | 2.38 | 5.4% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.69 | 0.22 | 2.85 | 2.28 | 4.7% | 0 of 92 | 97 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.85 | 0.20 | 3.06 | 2.34 | 8.6% | 2 of 91 | 99 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.9 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.5 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.7 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.3 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Evercare at University's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (37.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 42 eligible stays.
10.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
15.6% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: EVERCARE AT UNIVERSITY LLC. CMS links this home to Evercare Skilled Nursing, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 1.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosenblatt, Yehuda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Weinberger, Shmuel | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Eu SNF Holdings LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2024 | |
| Ampadu, Charles | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Hults, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Rixie, Teresa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Rosenblatt, Yehuda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| David a Berkowitz Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2024 | |
| Eu SNF Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/13/2025 | |
| Rks Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/13/2025 | |
| Rks Manager LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/13/2025 | |
| Yosef Meystel Delta Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2024 | |
| Ampadu, Charles | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Hellman, Yosef | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Hoffman, Joshua | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Hults, Ashley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Rixie, Teresa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Rosenblatt, Yehuda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Seitler, Dovid | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 | |
| Weinberger, Shmuel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/13/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.