1301 Myers Road, Celina, OH 45822 · Mercer County · (419) 584-0100
25 certified beds, about 22 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2001
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366224 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 24, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 21 health citations since November 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.92 of those hours.
58.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Lionstone Care, an affiliated group of 24 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received ordered medications timely after admission to the facility. This affected (#31) of five residents reviewed for medications. The census was 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with an open wound. This affected one (Resident #01) of three residents review for EBP. The facility census was 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were handled in a hygienic manner. This affected five residents (#01, #02, #13, #14, and #25) of five reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 25.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of staffing tool and staff interview, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty for eight consecutive hours daily. This affected all 22 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting system (CASPER), the facility failed to have an effective quality assurance program to address repeated concerns identified during three consecutive annual surveys. This affected all residents in the facility. The facility census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner, failed to completely cover hair during meal service, and failed to accurately monitor sanitizer levels in the sanitation buckets used to clean the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except one (#5) who was identified as receiving no food by mouth. The facility census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician or the non-physician practitioner (NPP) and failed to notify the residents representative when a change of conditions occurred. This affected two residents (Resident #14 and #6) of two residents reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin. This affected one resident (#6) of twelve records reviewed. The facility census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately complete baseline care plans. This affected two residents (#14, and #175) of the four residents review for baseline care plans. Facility also failed to complete baseline care plans for residents. This affected one resident (#126) of four records reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure finger nail care was provided to a resident that was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. This affected one resident (#5) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with staff and resident's representative, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed to treat edema. This affected one resident (#4) of the one resident reviewed with edema. Facility also failed to initiate interventions for treatment of a fistula (an abnormal connection between two body parts). This affected one resident (#13) of the four residents reviewed with wounds. The census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a gastrostomy tube stoma (insertion site of gastrostomy tube) dressing was in place as ordered. This affected one resident (#5) of one resident reviewed with g-tubes tubes. Resident #5 was the only resident in the facility with a gastrostomy tube. The census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to have accurate diagnoses for psychotropic medications. This affected two residents (#14, and #124) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview and review of online resources from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control techniques were performed during wound care. This affected one resident (#124) of the three residents reviewed for wounds. Facility census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident's received influenza vaccinations upon request and failed to offer pneumococcal vaccinations per the facility policy. This affected two residents (#14 and #127) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The census was 22.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, family interview, review of Centers for Disease Control and Infection guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to decrease the risk of the spread of an infection when staff and family members failed to wear personal protective equipment when entering the room and providing care to Resident #13. This affected one (#13) of one resident reviewed for transmission based precautions and had the potential to affect all the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to have her personal care products close at hand in her bathroom. This affected one (Resident #20) of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 ingested her physician ordered medication in the presence of the administering nurse and failed to ensure medications were secured when not in the presence of a nurse. The facility identified two residents, #22 and #123, as being independently mobile and confused. The facility census was 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure the as needed anti-anxiety medications were given the required stop date. This affected one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This had the potential to affect three residents the facility identified as using as needed anti-anxiety medications. The facility's census was 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. There were five medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in a 20 percent medication error rate. This affected two (Resident #9 and #20) of two residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 23.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitary measures were being used during the making of pureed meals by removing soiled gloves before touching food. This had the potential to affect three residents (#1, #10 and #124) who eat pureed diets. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure foods were transported throughout the facility in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect six residents who were being served a room tray (#1, #12, #13, #16, #20 and #123). The facility census was 23.
8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on December 24, 2025, 4 on November 23, 2022, 3 on November 21, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.56 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.92 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.96 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.97 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.67 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.1% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.81 on weekdays and 2.96 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.43 in April to June 2025 to 3.56 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.92 | 3.81 | 2.96 | 9.1% | 0 of 90 | 22 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.50 | 0.82 | 3.75 | 2.85 | 3.0% | 0 of 92 | 23 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.51 | 0.94 | 3.77 | 2.87 | 7.4% | 0 of 92 | 23 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.43 | 0.75 | 3.71 | 2.74 | 13.8% | 0 of 91 | 24 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.3 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.8 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Gardens at Celina's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 49 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
3.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GARDENS AT CELINA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC. CMS links this home to Lionstone Care, a group of 24 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lionstone Hz Opco Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2023 |
| Kazarnovsky, Solomon | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 01/01/2023 |
| Stein, Abba | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 01/01/2023 |
| Cusner, Adam | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/27/2025 | |
| Degyansky, Jeffrey | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Goldish, Eliezer | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Kazarnovsky, Solomon | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Stein, Abba | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Cusner, Adam | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/27/2025 | |
| Degyansky, Jeffrey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Goldish, Eliezer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Kazarnovsky, Solomon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Stein, Abba | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Cusner, Adam | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/27/2025 | |
| Degyansky, Jeffrey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Goldish, Eliezer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/09/2023 | |
| Kazarnovsky, Solomon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Stein, Abba | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.