Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Gower

Gower Convalescent Center, Inc

323 South Highway 169, Gower, MO 64454 · Clinton County · (816) 424-6483

82 certified beds, about 70 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265800 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 27 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $6,351 in the last three years; the largest was $6,351, and the latest is dated October 23, 2023.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.70 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.27 of those hours.

17.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
4D
20E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 21, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when the facility staff thawed sausage in the refrigerator on a wire rack shelf above a box of sausage rolls and ground beef, when [NAME] B did not wash hands between glove changes while preparing and serving food, and additionally when [NAME] C sat two frozen chicken strips on a package of hamburger buns that still contained hamburger buns while waiting for the air fryer to heat up. This had the potential to affect all resident's. The facility census was 67. Review of the facilities Storage-Refrigerated Foods policy, not dated, showed: Place meat, poultry and seafood items on the lowest shelf to minimize leakage onto other stored foods. [...]
  2. E
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and/or their responsible parties, in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care. When the facility failed to obtain written consent before beginning psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for three Residents (Resident #8, Resident #9, and Resident #19) of the 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. The facility did not provide a Psychotropic Medications policy. 1. Review of Resident #8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 04/24/26, showed:- Moderate cognitive impairment;- Independent with activities of daily living (ADL's);- Diagnoses: [...]
  3. E
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    F567 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure resident trust accounts (RTF) were credited with interest monthly for three residents (Resident #33, #49, and #55) and failed to obtain written authorization for the disbursement of funds from the RTF for two residents (Resident #49 and #55). The facility census was 67. Request for facility policy on the Management of the RTF not provided.1. Review of Resident #33's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 04/01/26, showed: - He/she had severe cognitive impairment;- Diagnoses: non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease and anxiety disorder. [...]
  4. E
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    F568 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a system to ensure the resident trust fund (RTF) account was managed in accordance with proper accounting principles by not maintaining a monthly written reconciliation of all monies held in the resident trust fund account. The facility managed funds for 9 residents. The facility census was 67. Request for facility policy on the Management of the RTF not provided.1. Review of the monthly bank statements from April 2025 through March 2026 did not contain a written record of a reconciliation of the RTF account with the bank statements. During an interview on 05/21/26 at 9:25 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said:- She reconciles the RTF account monthly but does not record the reconciliation or have paperwork showing the account funds reconcile with the bank statements. [...]
  5. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care when staff failed to document the date when oxygen tubing was replaced for four residents (Resident #9, #11, #31, and #44), failed to ensure clean concentrator filters for one resident (Resident #11), and failed to provide proper storage for tubing (Residents #44) resulting in possible exposure to bacteria during oxygen usage and possible adverse effects. This affected four of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. [...]
  6. D
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    F675 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the 17 sampled residents, (Resident #10) received care which would allow the resident to achieve his/her highest practicable well-being. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy revised 8/25 showed:-As a resident, you have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with access to people and services inside and outside the facility. -The facility must treat you with respect and dignity and care for you in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of your quality of life, while recognizing your individuality. [...]
March 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident #1's right to be free from abuse when Resident #2 grabbed Resident #1 by the hair and jerked his/her head around. Facility census was 78. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect, dated 9/29/2017, showed: -The residents of the facility have the right to be free from physical abuse. Residents of the facility must not be subjected to abuse or neglect by anyone. It is the responsibility of our employees, facility consultants, attending physicians, family members, visitors, etc., to promptly report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and theft or misappropriation of resident property to the facility management team. Our facility will not condone resident abuse by anyone. [...]
February 21, 2025Standard inspection · 12 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to date the receipt of incoming products in the dry storeroom, label and date used products in the freezer and refrigerator, label, date and dispose of leftovers in the refrigerator, monitor refrigerator and freezer temperatures on a daily basis, and follow sanitation requirements for cleanliness, handwashing and hairnets in the kitchen and dining room. This affected all residents by putting them at risk for a food borne illness. The facility census was 78. Review of facility policy Hair Restraints for Dining Service, revised 10/26/21, showed: - Hair restraints shall be worn by all Dining Services staff when in food production, dishwashing areas or when serving food from the steam table. [...]
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assure staff treated residents in a manner that maintained their dignity, when staff did not serve all residents who sat at the same table during meals, which affected any resident who ate in the dining room, and failed to ensure one of the 18 sampled residents, (Resident #47), was free of facial hair. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 8/22, showed staff were directed to do the following: - The resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility; [...]
  3. E
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the privacy of two of the 18 sampled residents, (Resident #43 and #73), when staff failed to post signage at the front door or outside each sampled resident's room to indicate 24 hour camera surveillance was in progress and failed to obtain consents from the responsible parties of the sampled residents. The facility census was 78. The facility did not provide a policy for video surveillance with or without audio. 1. Review of Resident #73's care plan, dated 9/20/24, did not address the use of video surveillance with audio. Review of the Resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, completed by facility staff, dated 11/20/24, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Dependent on the assistance of staff for toilet use, and transfers; [...]
  4. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and updated care plans consistent with resident's specific conditions and needs which affected five of eighteen sampled residents (Resident #23, #47,#71, #6 and #12 ), and failed to invite and document quarterly care plan meetings were held for three residents (Resident #23, #6, and #12). The facility additionally failed to provide an accurate care plan when a resident had multiple transfer types listed in the care plan and did not reflect the resident's current non-ambulatory status for one resident (Resident #47) and failed to ensure wheelchair use was care planned for one resident (Resident #71). The facility census was 78. Facility did not provide a policy on comprehensive care plans. 1. [...]
  5. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided professional standards of quality in care. when staff failed to utilize the electronic medical record to verify orders when providing wound care for one of the 18 sampled residents, (Resident #72) and when obtaining blood sugars and administering insulin for two residents (Resident #49 and #11) and additionally when staff failed to obtain physician's orders for wound treatment for Resident #5. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration, showed staff were directed to do the following: - Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so; [...]
  6. E
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided quality of care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to reposition two residents and provide incontinent care to dependent residents (Resident #47 and #72) This affected two residents out of eighteen sampled residents. The facility census was 78. Facility did not provide policy on positioning. 1. Review of Resident #47's Quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 12/26/24, showed: - Cognition severly impaired; - Dependent on a wheelchair for mobility and dependent of staff for turning, repositioning and transfers; - Total assist of all ADLS; - Diagnoses included: [...]
  7. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents remained free from accident hazards when staff pushed residents in their wheelchairs without foot pedals for four (Resident #1, #68, #71, and #58) residents. This affected four of eighteen sampled residents. The facility census was 78. Facility did not provide a policy on accidents. 1. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 12/19/24, showed: -Cognition severly impaired; -No impairment to upper or lower extremities; -Required assistance for Activities of Daily living to include transfers, mobility, hygiene needs. -Diagnoses included: Alzheimer's osteoarthritis , low back pain, unsteadiness on feet, and dementia Review of care plan, revised 9/12/24, showed: -He/She was ambulatory with assist; [...]
  8. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care when staff failed to date when oxygen tubing was cleaned and left oxygen tubing lying on the ground for two residents (Resident #44, #21) resulting in possible exposure to bacteria during oxygen usage. Additionally the facility failed to keep water in the oxygen humidifier for proper humidity control for one resident (Resident #44) resulting in minor discomfort. This affected two of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's Oxygen administration policy not provided; 1. Review of Resident #44's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff), dated 12/2/24, showed: - Cognitive skills intact; [...]
  9. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained a medication error rate of less than five percent when nursing taff made two medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, which resulted in a medication error rate of 8%, which affected two of the 18 sampled residents, (Resident #64 and #11). The facility census was 78. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Administration, showed staff were directed to do the following: - Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so; - Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after sufficient information regarding the resident's condition and expected outcomes of medication therapy is known; [...]
  10. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store medications in a locked storage area to ensure medications for two residents (Residents #5, #44) were inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents and failed to keep medications secured when the key was left in the lock of the medication treatment cart. Additionally the facility, failed to destroy expired and loose medications in the medication room and cart. This affected two out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 78. Review of facility Policy and Procedure for Physicians Orders, revised 1/15/12, showed - An interdisciplinary team determines the resident's ability to self-administer medications by means of a skill assessment; - If the resident demonstrates the ability to safely self-administer medications, a further assessment of the safety of bedside medication storage is conducted; [...]
  11. E
    Ensure that paid feeding assistants have the training they need.
    F948 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide required state approved training for paid feeding assistants which affected 18 residents. The facility census was 78. 1. A policy on paid feeding assistants was not provided for review. Review of a list of paid feeding assistants provided by the facility, dated 2/20/25, showed 5 feeding assistants with no state approved formal paid feeding assistant training. During an interview on 2/20/24 at 3:30 P.M., Nurse Aide (B) said: - He/she did not attend any formal state approved course for feeding assistant but instead got one on one training with the DON and experienced staff members; - He/she has been a feeding assistant for a few months and assists residents on the floor with meals; During an interview on 2/20/24 at 5:00 P.M., Director of Nursing (DON) said: [...]
  12. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide proper infection control when facility staff did not immediately place one resident (Resident #23) on contact isolation precautions after readmitting to the facility with a positive test for influenza (a highly contagious respiratory illness of nose, throat, and lungs) A, did not have signage in place for (Resident #23) when on transmission based precautions, and did not cover clean laundry during transportation to prevent contamination. The facility census was 78. Review of facility policy, infection prevention and control policy and program, dated 3/12/21, showed: -Staff will reference the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guide and Center for Disease Control and Prevent (CDC) guidelines. These references will serve as the facilities guidelines to infection control. [...]
October 26, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This had the potential to impact all residents in the facility. The facility census was 68. Facility posted meal times included: Breakfast 7:00 A.M., hall trays at 9:00 A.M.; lunch at 12:00 P.M., hall trays start at 11:30 A.M., and supper at 5:00 P.M. with hall trays at 4:30 P.M. Review of facility policy- Three Sink Method of Sanitizing, dated 10/31/16, included: -In using a chemical sanitizer, the sanitizer must be mixed at the proper concentration of 200 parts per mission (PPM). During an observation on 10/23/23 at 11:15 A.M. showed sanitizer bucket tested at 0 parts per mission (PPM). [...]
  2. E
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a base line care plan consistent with the resident's specific conditions, needs and risks to provide effective person centered care that met professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of admission to the facility and failed to ensure the resident and representative, if applicable, were informed of the initial plan for delivery of care and services by receiving a written summary of the baseline care plan for two of the 17 sampled residents (Resident #45, and #18). The facility census was 68. The facility did not provide a policy on Baseline Care Plans. 1. Review of Resident #45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS: A Federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicated significant cognitive deficit. [...]
  3. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address the specific needs of the residents, for two of the 17 sampled residents (Residents #58, and #67). The census was 68. The facility did not provide a policy on Care Plans. 1. Review of Resident #58's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS: A Federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 7/18/23., showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicated severe cognitive deficits. -He/she wanders 1-3 days. -Independent for Activities of Daily Living. -Always continent of bowel and bladder. -Diagnoses of : [...]
  4. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wrote3. Review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 9, indicated some cognitive deficit. -No shortness of breath and no use of O 2. -Limited to extensive assistance of staff with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's: [...]
  5. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure they assessed residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to ensure the bed's dimensions were appropriate for the resident's size and weight for four of the 18 sampled residents (Residents #17, #19, #27 and #40 ). The facility also failed to review the risk and benefits with the resident or the resident's representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation on one of eighteen sampled resident (Resident #19). The facility census was 68. The facility did not provide a policy on side rail assessments or entrapment assessments. 1. Review of Resident #17's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 9/6/23, showed: [...]
  6. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to failed to implement their water management policy and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella (bacteria that causes Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia) when they failed to develop and implement a water management plan. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy for Legionella Disease, dated October 1, 2023, showed: -This policy outlines measures to prevent and control Legionella disease; -Management: o the facility management is responsible for implementing and maintaining and effective Legionella disease preventions and control program; o Designate a Legionella control officer responsible for overseeing the program; -Prevention and Control Measures: o regularly assess and maintain the facility's water systems, including plumbing, and water heaters; [...]
  7. E
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    F909 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to complete regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for four of the 18 sampled residents with side rails placing these resident's at risk for injury (Residents #17, #19, #27, and #40). The facility census was 68. The facility did not provide policy on side rail assessments or entrapment assessments. Review of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) document entitled Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment dated March 10, 2006 showed: [...]
  8. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to revise comprehensive person centered care plans, when the facility failed to develop and revise an oral intake dietary care plan for Resident #67 who was previously dependent upon nourishment by a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (PEG-tube, a tube inserted through the belly that brings liquid nourishment, hydration and medication directly to the stomach). The facility census was 68. The facility did not provide a policy on care plans. 1. Review of Resident #67's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), A Federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 8/25/23, showed: -Brief interview mental status (BIMS) score, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents upon admission into long term care facility, showed level 9, indicating moderately impaired cognition; [...]

Fire safety inspections

17 fire safety citations on file: 10 on May 21, 2026, 3 on February 21, 2025, 4 on October 26, 2023.

Every fire safety citation17 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
    K 354 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · May 21, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · February 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · February 21, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · October 26, 2023 · Waiver
  15. F
    Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
    K 342 · October 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · October 26, 2023 · Waiver
  17. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · October 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
October 23, 2023Fine $6,351

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.703.433.86
Registered nurses0.270.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.293.013.42
Nurse aides2.89
Licensed practical nurses0.54
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)17.4%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.14 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.87 on weekdays and 3.29 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.46 in April to June 2025 to 3.70 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.700.273.873.29 0.0%0 of 9070
Oct to Dec 20253.820.283.993.39 0.0%0 of 9267
Jul to Sep 20253.560.263.753.08 0.0%0 of 9270
Apr to Jun 20253.460.243.633.06 0.0%0 of 9173
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Gower Convalescent Center, Inc. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.318.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.71.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.82.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.94.13.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.817.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.24.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.623.515.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.92.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.62.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Gower Convalescent Center, Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

46.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

5.2% this home

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GOWER CONVALESCENT CENTER INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Gower Convalescent Center Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%08/03/1967
Moore, AmberlyW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2021
Ingle, JerryCorporate directorIndividual02/06/2006
Johnson, BarbaraCorporate directorIndividual10/10/2012
Moore, AmberlyCorporate directorIndividual06/23/2020
Snyder, CharlesCorporate directorIndividual02/06/2006
Ingle, JerryCorporate officerIndividual10/14/2005
Johnson, BarbaraCorporate officerIndividual10/10/2013
Perry, JasonCorporate officerIndividual06/18/2024
Snyder, CharlesCorporate officerIndividual10/10/2012
Spaeth, LindaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2021
West, NatalieCorporate officerIndividual06/18/2024
Moore, AmberlyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/07/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on February 21, 2025: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 21, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Gower Convalescent Center, Inc's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Gower Convalescent Center, Inc 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Gower Convalescent Center, Inc get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 21, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Gower Convalescent Center, Inc been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $6,351 in the last three years.
Does Gower Convalescent Center, Inc accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Gower Convalescent Center, Inc?
CMS lists 13 owners and managers. Legal business name: GOWER CONVALESCENT CENTER INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection