Home / Pennsylvania / Pottsville
1 Matthew Drive, Pottsville, PA 17901 · Schuylkill County · (570) 644-0489
48 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 396086 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 18, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since December 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,033 in the last three years; the largest was $10,033, and the latest is dated March 28, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.69 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.71 of those hours.
54.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of select facility policies and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food and failed to record and maintain food temperature logs to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments accurately reflected the status of two residents out of 15 sampled (Residents 16 and 34).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality by failing to ensure that licensed nurses accurately administered prescribed medication for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 12 and 36).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility's plan of correction from the survey ending December 18, 2025, the documented outcomes of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure its quality assurance program effectively identified and addressed recurring deficient practices related to nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality to ensure that licensed nurses properly evaluated and provided nursing care according to physician orders (Residents 1, 2, and 3).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, a review of select facility policy, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure personnel must handle, store, process, and transport linens in order to prevent the spread of infection in one out of one laundry room.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policies, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Adult Vaccine Schedules, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and/or provided recommended influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for two of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents 6 and 16).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and arrange for treatment by a professional specializing in the provision of vision assistive devices as needed for one out of 15 residents sampled (Resident 16).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to assess, evaluate, and monitor the nutritional parameters of a resident with significant weight loss for one of 15 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, resident council meeting minutes, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the needs, interests, and preferences of residents as expressed by three out of four residents interviewed during a resident group interview. (Residents 4, 6, and 8).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to monitor the nutritional parameters of two residents (Resident 36 and Resident 20) with an identified significant weight loss and failed to implement a planned nutrition intervention in response to weight loss for one resident (Resident 20) out of 13 residents sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined the physician failed to act upon pharmacist identified irregularities in the medication regimen of three of 13 residents sampled (Resident 11, 24, and 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, select facility policy, documentation provided by the facility, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from physical restraints that are not required to treat a resident's medical symptoms for one resident out of three closed records reviewed (Resident 196).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and the Resident Assessment Instrument and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS - a federally mandated standardized assessment conducted at specific intervals to plan resident care) accurately reflected the status of one resident out of 13 sampled. (Residents 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide person-centered care as prescribed to meet the current clinical needs, and failed to follow physician orders for management of a PICC line for one of 13 residents sampled (Resident 94).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of select facility policy, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a manner to promote optimal functioning for one resident out of 13 sampled residents. (Resident 24).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, select facility policy, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate accounting of controlled drugs when acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and or administering to identify possible diversion for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 43).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the presence of physician documentation of the clinical rationale for the increase of an antipsychotic medication for one resident out of five sampled residents for unnecessary medication use. (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, select incident reports and clinical records, and interviews with staff and a resident's family, it was determined that the facility neglected to provide the care and services necessary to avoid physical harm and maintain the physical health of one resident out of 14 residents sampled (Resident 33), resulting in an sprained ankle, which caused the resident pain and a decline in abilities to perform activities of daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and a review of employee time sheets and qualifications, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified director of food and nutrition services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain acceptable practices for the storage and service of food to prevent the potential for contamination and microbial growth in food, which increased the risk of food-borne illness in the food and nutrition services department and resident pantry.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, a review of clinical records, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to facilitate a resident's participation in activities for one of the 14 residents sampled (Resident 41).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility's abuse policy and employee personnel files and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their established abuse prohibition procedures for fully screening and training one employee out of five reviewed to ensure that they were eligible for employment in a long-term care nursing facility (Employee 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of the facility's abuse prohibition policy, clinical records, select facility investigations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to timely report an instance of resident neglect to the State Survey Agency for one out of the 14 residents reviewed (Resident 33).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was revealed that the facility failed to provide therapeutic social services to promote the mental and psychosocial well-being of one resident out of 14 sampled (Resident 8)
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records consistent with professional standards of practice by failing to timely and accurately document the facility's response to a change in a resident's condition for one resident out of 14 sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, select facility policy and grievances lodged with the facility, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in an environment, which promotes each resident's quality of life by failing to respond timely to residents' request for assistance as reported by five residents out of nine interviewed (Residents 2, 7, 1, 6, and 8 ).
7 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 18, 2025, 2 on February 28, 2025, 2 on March 28, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 28, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.69 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.33 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.10 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.0% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 3 |
CMS expects 3.96 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.83 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.73 in April to June 2025 to 3.69 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.71 | 3.83 | 3.33 | 5.8% | 0 of 90 | 44 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.80 | 0.79 | 3.92 | 3.48 | 4.0% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.83 | 0.89 | 3.91 | 3.64 | 18.5% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.73 | 0.81 | 3.86 | 3.41 | 17.9% | 0 of 91 | 41 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.8 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 33.3 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.2 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.1 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.2 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Green Valley Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ce's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (40.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
40.9% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 270 eligible stays.
12.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 253 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 148 eligible stays.
61.7% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 94 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 128 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 128 residents counted.
96.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 77 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: K & K HEALTH CARE LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isle Pa Tenant Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/26/2026 |
| Isle Healthcare Group LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/26/2026 |
| Oxford Finance LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 03/28/2023 | |
| Oxford Finance LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 03/28/2023 | |
| Repchick, George | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Bekisz, Louise | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Ferrera, Erica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Lazur, Diana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Martin, Bonita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Purcell, Timothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Repchick, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Repchick, George | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/05/2026 | |
| Oxford Finance LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/10/2025 | |
| Senior Health Care Solutions | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/13/2025 | |
| Bekisz, Louise | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Ferrera, Erica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Lazur, Diana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Martin, Bonita | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Purcell, Timothy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Repchick, George | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/26/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.