52225 B Avenue, Hubbell, MI 49934 · Houghton County · (906) 296-3301
55 certified beds, about 48 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235551 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 3, 2026, inspectors cited 23 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 66 health citations since November 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $38,961 in the last three years; the largest was $38,961, and the latest is dated February 2, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
43.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 66 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer covid vaccinations for six Residents (#49, #7, #14, #28, #43, and #45) of nine residents reviewed for covid vaccinations. This deficient practice resulted in death for Resident #49 (R49) from Covid-19 after the facility failed to administer the Covid-19 vaccine as requested.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to promote the highest practicable level of physical, mental and psychosocial well-being with the potential to affect all 44 residents that reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review for five out of five Certified Nurse's Aides (CNA's) at least every 12 months. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for inadequate care and unmet resident care needs for all 44 residents residing in the facility. Review of facility personnel records demonstrated the following:CNA E was hired on 11/10/21with no performance reviewCNA K was hired on 11/10/23 with no performance reviewCNA L was hired on 1/15/24 with no performance reviewCNA M was hired on 7/13/23 with no performance reviewCNA N was hired on 2/24/23 with no performance reviewDuring an interview on 3/3/26 at 8:34 a.m., Business Office Manager (BOM) reported I do not have any evaluations of any of the five staff members they are supposed to be done annually. The staff are supposed to have annual performance reviews. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake# 2631101. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to fully implement its policy for delivery and storage of controlled medications for one Resident (#51) of three residents reviewed for medication administration, storage and labeling resulting in the misappropriation of 120 narcotic pain medications for R51, the potential for an increase in drug diversion, misappropriation of medications, residents missing pain medication, and the potential for uncontrolled pain and discomfort.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for all 44 residents living in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the outside grounds garbage storage area in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests potentially affecting all 44 residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a comprehensive Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that addressed the full range of services the facility provides. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for quality-of-care concerns for all 44 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish priorities for its improvement activities, develop and implement action plans, and review or analyze data collected under the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for quality-of-care concerns for all 44 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment free from foul odors and soiled environmental surfaces for all residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) training of no less than 12 hours per year was completed for five of five CNAs reviewed for nurse aide training hours.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to Provide notification of transfer information to the hospital for one Resident (#5) of four reviewed for notification of transfer to the hospital Provide written notification of the bed hold policy and notify the local ombudsman upon transfer to the hospital in 4 of 4 Residents (#2, #5, #7, & #21) reviewed for transfer and discharge requirements.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received diets as prescribed by a physician and in accordance with the plan of care for four Residents (#1, #17, #28 and #34) of five residents reviewed for therapeutic diets.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medications for one Resident (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to deliver mail/package unopened for one Resident (#20) of one resident reviewed for privacy related to receiving mail.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information to formulate an advance directive for two Residents (#3 and #49) of twelve residents reviewed for advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely information of a change in coverage and subsequent changes in the amount billed for services for one Resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for receipt of Notice of Medicare Non-coverage.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake# 2631101 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property, by a staff member for one Resident (Resident #51) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of property, resulting in 120 narcotic medication pills missing, increased potential for undetected controlled drug diversion and the potential for uncontrolled pain and discomfort with medication delivery delays from refill too soon notices flagged by the pharmacy provider.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications for one Resident (#20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a PASARR (Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review) prior to admission for one Resident #3 (R3) of one resident reviewed for PASARR screening.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store oxygen equipment in a sanitary manner for two Residents (#18 and #37) of three residents reviewed for oxygen equipment and storage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify triggers or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one Resident #3(R3) of one resident reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress DisorderFindings include:Resident #3 (R3)Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnoses including post traumatic stress disorder [(PTSD) a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing terrifying, life-threatening, or violent events], anxiety disorder, depression, and Non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a psychiatric or mental health consult dated 1/8/26, read I part .Psychiatry Follow up. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Nonpharmacologic: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Certified Nurse Aides (CNA's) [ L and N] of five CNA's reviewed for competencies had the required yearly competency trainings, including demonstration in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to Ensure eligible residents were administered pneumococcal vaccinations after receiving consent for 2 Residents (#7 & #28) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations/vaccinations and;Have a process for tracking and securely documenting the pneumococcal vaccination status of residents.
Inspectors wroteThis deficient practice pertains to Intake 2728102. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and notify a physician of a change of condition for one Resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care.
Inspectors wroteThis deficient practice pertains to Intake 2728102. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor respiratory symptoms per the guidelines set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for one Resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for infection control.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake# 2561427. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision in 2 of 4 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #5), reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in R5 sustaining a 2nd-3rd degree burn when hot liquid hazards were left unattended.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake# 2561427. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet resident needs in 4 of 5 residents (Resident #1, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for sufficient staffing, resulting in a 3rd degree burn for Resident #5, missed grooming and hygiene, a lack of supervision of residents at risk for choking, extended call light wait times and with the potential for all residents to be affected.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #2561427Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity in three residents (Resident #1, #3 and #4) of five residents review for dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 53 residents of the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was safe, sanitary and functional for residents, staff and the public, potentially affecting all 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives related to code status were accurately and timely completed for four Residents (R6, R26, R46, and R50) out of a total sample of 14 residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice resulted in absent or improperly documented resident's code status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary, clean, homelike environment for all 53 facility residents. This deficient practice resulted in unpleasant odors, rooms that were aesthetically unpleasing, and resident dissatisfaction with their environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skills to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. This deficient practice has the potential to result in unsafe practices occurring in the kitchen and dietary services and could affect all 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food in a manner that was a palatable (preferable) in temperature and/or form for 10 Residents (#2, #5, #6, #9, #14, #23, #26, #27, #38, & #46) of 14 sample residents in the facility reviewed for food. This deficient practice resulted in frustration with meals and the potential for weight loss and diminished nutrition.
Inspectors wroteThis deficiency pertains to Intake #MI00147055. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medications prior to initiating them for one Resident (#8) of five residents reviewed for psychoactive medications.
Inspectors wroteThis deficiency pertains to Intake #MI00147055. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were scheduled on a quarterly basis and the responsible party was notified for one Resident (#8) of 14 residents reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice resulted in the failure to include the responsible party in the development of a person-centered plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform a resident assessment for one Resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for self-administration of medication resulting in a resident self-administering medication without appropriate assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence briefs in an appropriate style and size to meet the needs and preferences of two Residents (#23 & #26) out of 14 sample residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident discomfort and dissatisfaction.
Inspectors wroteThis deficiency pertains to Intake #MI00147055. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain authorization prior to the withdrawal of personal funds for one Resident (#8) of 14 residents reviewed for resident rights.
Inspectors wroteThis deficiency pertains to Intake #MI00147055. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly resident trust fund financial statements for one Resident (#8) of 14 residents reviewed for resident rights.
Inspectors wroteResident #204 (R204) On 12/12/24 at 12:43 p.m., a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form for R204 was reviewed which revealed the effective date of coverage for R20 skilled services ended on 11/5/24. The formed was signed on 11/4/24. This deficiency pertains to Intake #MI00147055. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a 48-hour notice of termination of Medicare benefits for three Residents (#8, #204, and #205) of 4 residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications. This deficient practice resulted in the inability for residents to appeal their non-coverage decision in a timely fashion.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident representative in writing with the reason for a transfer out of the facility for one Resident (#49) of four residents reviewed for transfer and/or discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to update or revise care plans after multiple falls for one Residents (#50) of fourteen residents reviewed for care planning. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for further falls, and the potential for injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control per standards of practice and failed to implement interventions for the prevention and treatment of pressure injuries for three Residents (R11, R26, and R54) out of three Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. This deficient practice resulted in the development of facility acquired pressure injuries, and the potential for delayed wound healing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate an accident for one Resident (#46) of four residents reviewed for accidents/hazards which resulted in the potential for further burns, pain, and disfigurement.
Inspectors wroteResident #33 (R33) Review of R33's EMR revealed initial admission to the facility on 6/12/23, with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, Parkinson's disease, dementia with mood disturbance, dementia with anxiety, metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, bipolar disorder, depression, and adjustment disorder. Review of R33's most recent MDS assessment, dated 10/28/24, revealed a BIMS was not able to be completed due to severely impaired cognition. Review of R33's Physician Order Recap, retrieved 12/10/24 at 4:04 p.m., revealed the following pharmacy orders for psychoactive medications without justification for continued use without 14-day PRN (as needed) stop dates: 1. Lorazepam (Ativan) Oral Tablet 0.5 mg (Lorazepam). Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for agitation. Date Initiated: 4/4/23. No End Date. 2. Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 mg. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent for one Resident (#27) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in two medication errors observed, out of 26 opportunities for error and a medication error rate of 7.69 percent, and had the potential for inaccurate dosing and administration of insulin.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake MI00143791. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform pre-employment and pre-admission screenings for tuberculosis (a contagious infection affecting the lungs) based on current professional guidelines. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for exposure and transmission of tuberculosis to susceptible residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to MI00142942. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one visually impaired resident (R16) of three residents reviewed for call light use. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for fear and feelings of helplessness, frustration and anxiety.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes MI00142825 and MI00143791. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignified treatment during the provision of care for two residents (R12 and R15) of three residents reviewed for dignity.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake MI00142941. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike manner for two Residents (R13 and R19) of three residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for feelings of worthlessness, embarrassment and loss of dignity.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake MI00142941 and MI00143791. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safe transfers for two Residents (R13 and R18) of three residents reviewed for safety during transfers. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for falls and injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for two Residents (#22 and #29) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This deficient practice resulted in multiple newly facility acquired pressure injuries which subsequently required debridement, use of antibiotics and the use of a wound vac.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by: A. Failing to properly clean and sanitize dishes and utensils. B. Failing to ensure food preparation surfaces in the dietary department were properly sanitized. C. Failing to ensure that food items were dated, discarded on or before the expiration date, and kept free from contamination due to debris or due to thawing and refreezing. D. Failing to ensure employees practiced effective sanitation practices for food safety. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all 47 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate less than 5%, for 13 of 32 medication administrations. This deficient practice resulted in a medication error rate of 40.63%, with the potential for medical complications related to resident medication treatments for various conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medication storage room free of expired medications, properly dispose of controlled substances, and securely store medications, for one of one medication rooms and two of two medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for administration of medications with reduced intended effect and the potential for drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient competent dietary staff were employed to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. This deficient practice was evidenced by dietary staff who were untrained in maintaining and ensuring a sanitary dietary environment, potentially affecting all 47 residents in the form of a food borne illness outbreak.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for self-administration of medication was clinically assessed, care planned, and had physician orders for the self-administration of medication. This deficient practice resulted in a lack of an assessment for safe medication administration, inaccurate documentation of medication administration, and the potential for medication mismanagement.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately care plan and implement interventions for two (Resident #38 and #47) of 12 residents reviewed for comprehensive care planning. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for unmet nutritional needs and unsafe self-administration of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a recapitulation of stay was completed for one Resident (R13) out of one closed record reviewed for discharge documentation. This deficient practice resulted in lack of key departmental pieces of the recapitulation of the Resident's stay and the potential for unmet care needs after discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 3 of 4 sampled residents (R8, R30, and R34) were free from unnecessary medications resulting in doses of antipsychotic medications without justification.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a serious medication error for one Resident (#20) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for serious diabetic related complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to record or post the nursing staffing information including total number and actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care. This deficient practice resulted in the inability of residents and visitors to determine the number of staff available to provide resident care and had the potential to affect all 47 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete infection control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communication diseases and infections. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the spread of communicable and infectious diseases within all 46 vulnerable residents within the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respectful and dignified care to three Residents (R3, R7, and R11) of 13 sample residents reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice resulted in resident dissatisfaction with care, increased anxiety, frustration, and humiliation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dining assistance for one dependent Resident (R1) of four residents reviewed for provision of activities of daily living (ADL's). This deficient practice resulted in feelings of frustration, anxiety, and dissatisfaction with not being provided required level of meal and fluid intake assistance.
24 fire safety citations on file: 14 on March 3, 2026, 1 on December 12, 2024, 9 on December 19, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 2, 2026 | Payment Denial | 30 days from April 1, 2026 |
| September 16, 2025 | Fine | $38,961 |
| November 2, 2023 | Payment Denial | 17 days from January 23, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.38 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.85 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.24 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.37 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.8% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.5% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.34 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.60 on weekdays and 2.85 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.38 | 0.78 | 3.60 | 2.85 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 48 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.31 | 0.71 | 3.51 | 2.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 49 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.30 | 0.70 | 3.46 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 49 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.29 | 0.77 | 3.46 | 2.86 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 49 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.9 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.9 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 33.9 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.2 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.2 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Greentree of Hubbell Rehabilitation and Health's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 33 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 23 eligible stays.
70.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
4.3% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OUR LADY OF MERCY CONVALESCENT HOME, INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lighthouse at Hubbell Health LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 12/29/2016 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 80% | 06/11/2021 |
| Wiener, Steven | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 19% | 06/11/2021 |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 06/11/2021 | |
| Wiener, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 06/11/2021 | |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/11/2021 | |
| Fletcher, Kelly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/11/2021 | |
| Kallio, Kristen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/10/2024 | |
| Williams, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/03/2024 | |
| Ggm Associates Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2024 | |
| Lighthouse at Hubbell Health LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/11/2021 | |
| Lighthouse at Hubbell Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/11/2021 | |
| Fletcher, Kelly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/30/2026 | |
| Friedman, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/11/2021 | |
| Kallio, Kristen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/30/2026 | |
| Wiener, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/11/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.