820 3rd Ave, Laurel, MT 59044 · Yellowstone County · (406) 628-8251
79 certified beds, about 62 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 275111 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 29, 2026, inspectors cited 23 health deficiencies (the Montana average is 11.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 49 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $7,163 in the last three years; the largest was $7,163, and the latest is dated October 12, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.24 hours per resident per day, against 4.05 across Montana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
67.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Montana average 54.8%).
CMS links it to Evergreen Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 49 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were free from unnecessary use by administering Narcan (naloxone) without a physician order or documented clinical indication for 1 (#4) of 1 resident reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure resulted in precipitated opioid withdrawal symptoms, increased resident distress, and hospitalization, and the resident received additional medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Facility-Reported Incidents were reported to the State Survey Agency within the required timeframe for 2 (#s 10 and 14), and failed to submit the results of investigations to the State Survey Agency within the required five-working-day timeframe for 9 (#s 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16) of 19 residents reviewed for Facility-Reported Incidents. The failures delayed the State Survey Agency's receipt of information necessary to evaluate the facility's response to allegations involving resident safety, placing residents at increased risk due to delayed regulatory oversight.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely toileting and activities of daily living (ADL) assistance for 3 (#s 2, 5, and 6) of 6 sampled residents who required staff assistance with toileting and personal care. The failure resulted in resident #2 remaining on the toilet for a prolonged period and residents #5 and #6 not receiving required toileting and ADL assistance, placing the residents at risk for discomfort, loss of dignity, unmet care needs, pain, skin impairment, and injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective system for timely reporting of allegations of abuse and neglect following a previous F609 deficiency for the same concern. The facility's continued failure to timely report allegations after implementing corrective measures demonstrated ineffective administrative oversight and failure to implement, monitor, and sustain the reporting process for 9 (#s 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16) of 19 residents. The failure placed residents at risk for delays in notification, investigation, protection, and response following allegations of abuse or neglect. Review of the facility's previous F609 deficiency dated 1/29/26 showed the facility was cited for late reporting for allegations of neglect and abuse for three residents. The facility submitted a plan of correction for the deficient practices identified. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure a resident's current Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form was immediately available to staff during a medical emergency for 1 (#12) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The failure resulted in CPR being initiated despite the resident's documented wishes to forgo resuscitation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and neglect for 1 (#3) of 9 sampled residents reviewed for abuse or neglect. The failure resulted in an incomplete investigation that did not demonstrate the facility adequately evaluated the allegation, determined the facts, or documented findings and corrective actions, placing residents at risk for unaddressed abuse and inadequate protection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance during bathing and transfers consistent with the resident's assessed needs and care plan for 1 (#14) of 3 residents sampled for falls. The failure resulted in resident #14 falling forward from a shower chair, placing the resident at risk for injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services that ensured stock emergency medications were obtained, available, and administered only as authorized by physician orders for 1 (#4) of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services. The failure increased the risk residents could receive emergency medications without appropriate authorization or clinical indication.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize and maintain a QAPI system to identify performance improvement issues related to grievances, abuse and neglect allegations, Bowel and Bladder care for dependent residents, and infection control; and failed to show how the QAPI committee was involved in addressing these quality of care issues and the lack of policies and procedures which could negatively affect many, or all, of the residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an annual improvement project that focuses on high risk or problem-prone areas identified through the data collection and analysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed when providing incontinence care for 1 (#21); hand hygiene practices were followed for 1 (#7); posted PPE requirements were followed for 1 (#21); transporting of dirty linens; storage of clean linens; and maintained cleanable surfaces for 34 sampled residents. These deficient practices place all residents at increased risk of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an antibiotic stewardship program in order to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics. This deficient practice increased the risk for residents to develop drug-resistant organisms and/or complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence to show the facility took action to acknowledge and resolve, or attempt to resolve, all concerns brought forth by the resident council. The failure affected any resident who had concerns that remained unresolved, or who had an interest in the council's activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances either voiced or provided to the facility were followed up on and resolved, and this was a system failure, to include: not assisting with verbal grievances, not identifying concerns and resolving them, not notifying the party filing the grievance of the resolution, not documenting steps taken to resolve the grievance, and not maintaining the grievance for 3 years from the date the grievance decision was issued for 1 (#21) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice affected all residents with grievances related to concerns or quality-of-care issues, which could negatively affect many or all of the residents residing at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and/or neglect for 5 (#s 7, 11, 18, 21, and 62) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial distress for resident #7 feeling intimidated and scared to return to her room; on-going psychosocial distress with resident #11 feeling scared due to the physical and verbal abuse (with fear of a repeat event occurring with a fellow resident); resident #21 having her head hit the wall during peri care (with fear of a repeat event occurring); and neglecting to provide resident #s 7, 18 and 21 proper toileting care, which may have contributed to a urinary tract infection for resident #21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of neglect and abuse to the State Survey Agency for 3 (#s 7, 18, and 21) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #7 having fear of going to her room, resident #21 had fear of having her head hit the wall during care sessions, and for resident #21 voiced fear of having her head hit the wall during care (recurrent), and neglect of care related to care and services not being provided as needed for #s 7, 18, and 21. Refer to F600 for more information on failure to prevent abuse/neglect.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper ADL (Activities of Daily Living) cares were completed, specifically for 1 (#28) who was not receiving toenail care while her roommate #5 received toenail care biweekly; and for 3 (#s 11, 59, and 77) were not receiving showers from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in a resident feeling unclean and unkept.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of a resident's property from loss or theft for 1 (#6) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice placed resident #6 at risk for continued loss of personal property and lack of resolution for reported concerns.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate an abuse allegation for 2 (#s 11 and 62) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in psychosocial distress for resident #11 who was feeling scared due to the physical and verbal abuse (with fear of a repeat event occurring with a fellow resident).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit each resident to remain in the facility and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility without written notice and a safe discharge plan for 1 (#72) of 3 discharged residents subsampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and or the resident's representative, in writing, of the reason for transfer when transferring a resident to the hospital, for 1 (#35) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's PTSD triggers were noted on the resident's Care Plan for 1 (#61) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with hearing and vision limitations were provided group and individual activities to meet their needs and preferences for 1 (#1) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice resulted in resident #1 self-isolating.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and ensure hearing aids were properly working for 1 (#63) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinent residents received treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections, avoid skin breakdown, and maintain continence to the degree possible for 3 (#s 7, 18, and 21) of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice may have contributed to resident #21 developing a urinary tract infection and resident #7 developing a red, inflamed rash in two areas above and below her pannus.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer fluids and nutrition to a dependent resident for 1 (#59) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feed bags were changed every 24 hours for 1 (#11) of 2 sampled residents receiving tube feedings.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with post-traumatic stress disorder received trauma-informed care, accounting for resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 (#61) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than 5% during 2 (#s 25 and 74) of 26 observed medication administrations. There was an observed medication error rate of 7.41%.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were offered in a timely manner for 2 (#'s 4 and 57) of 34 sampled residents. The failure placed residents at elevated risk for oral pain, infection, impaired nutrition, and decline in oral health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident preference for Jello to 1 (#11) of 34 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify or correct deficient practice(s) through the utilization of their QAPI process related to facility-reported events and personal belongings inventory management for 1 (#57) of 6 sampled residents. The deficient practice placed all residents at elevated risk for theft or loss of personal belongings.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of a cognitively impaired resident's property from loss or theft, when the resident admitted with a very large sum of money, which was in his possession, but was not returned or found upon the resident's death, for 1 (#57) of 6 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility staff failed to report investigative findings for a reportable event, within the required timeframe, for 1 (#4) of 6 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the mandatory staffing information for the fourth quarter of federal fiscal year 2024, as required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all controlled substance medications were accurately administered, accounted, and documented for 4 (#s 24, 27, 38, and 109) of 4 sampled and supplemental residents receiving physician ordered controlled substances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene and appropriate use of personal protective equipment, during care of residents on enhanced barrier precautions, for 1 (#43) of 18 sampled residents. During an observation on 12/18/24 at 9:04 a.m., staff member F was training a new staff nurse, staff member G, on medication pass for residents. Staff member F went into resident #43's room to set up an area to administer scheduled medications by enteral (tube) feeding. Staff member F put on a pair of gloves before entering resident #43's room to administer the medications. Staff member F left resident #43's room to go to a supply room to obtain supplies for the tube feeding with the same pair of gloves on. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the reason for a facility-initiated transfer to the resident or the resident's representative, for 3 (#s 7, 37, and 111) of 18 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required bed hold notice to the resident or the resident's representatives prior to, or timely after, a transfer, for 3 (#s 7, 37 and 111) of 18 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to meet professional standards of quality by not ensuring all controlled substance medications were accurately accounted for and documented in a resident's EHR, for 3 (#s 1, 4, and 7) of 3 sampled residents for medications. This deficient practice affected the accuracy of medication administration records, had the potential to result in administration errors, and to allow unidentified controlled substance diversion to occur.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system that accounted for all Schedule II controlled substance medications, from receipt to administration or destruction, for 3 (#s 1, 4, and 7) of 3 sampled residents for medications. The deficient practice resulted in a discrepancy between the number of doses removed from secure storage, and the number of doses administered to a resident, which allowed for an increased risk for diversion of controlled substance medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse by a staff member for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were accurately coded on the resident's MDS for 1 (#21) of 5 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan after completion of a course of antibiotics for tooth pain, for 1 (#22) of 1 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (#3) of 14 sampled residents was free from a significant medication error requiring hospitalization. Resident #3 was given 22.5 mls of Methadone instead of the ordered 10 mls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the bathing and dining needs were completed for those residents requiring assistance for 5 (#s 6, 8, 10, 13, and 14) of 14 sampled residents. This failure resulted in a delay of residents receiving showers, and a delay in residents receiving meals and assistance, in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate number of staff were available for necessary care and services for bathing and dining needs for 5 (#s 6, 8, 10, 13, and 14) of 14 sampled residents. This failure resulted in residents not receiving showers and a delay in residents receiving meals and assistance in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from neglect by a staff member by not providing care when answering a call light for 1 (#8) of 5 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wheel chair was evaluated as a possible restraint for 1 (#10) of 14 sampled residents. Resident #10 was not able to use the wheel chair for mobility and relied on staff to get her from her room to activities and meals.
21 fire safety citations on file: 7 on January 29, 2026, 8 on December 19, 2024, 6 on December 7, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 12, 2023 | Fine | $7,163 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Montana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.24 | 4.05 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.98 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.76 | 3.59 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.78 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 67.6% | 54.8% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 69.2% | 48.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.43 on weekdays and 2.76 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 26.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.23 in April to June 2025 to 3.24 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.24 | 0.56 | 3.43 | 2.76 | 26.8% | 0 of 90 | 62 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.14 | 0.48 | 3.35 | 2.60 | 11.6% | 1 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.17 | 0.64 | 3.39 | 2.59 | 9.4% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.23 | 0.61 | 3.48 | 2.62 | 15.7% | 1 of 91 | 51 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Montana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.91 | 0.89 | 4.10 | 3.46 | 11.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.67 | $18.29 to $22.86 | 4,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.91 | $27.95 to $32.14 | 1,620 |
| Registered nurses | $41.00 | $38.56 to $48.46 | 10,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Montana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.1 | 18.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.8 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 20.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.2 | 19.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.2 | 14.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Laurel Health & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
45.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Montana: 7 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 64 eligible stays.
10.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Montana: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 78 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Montana: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
52.6% this home
Median of homes: Montana58.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Montana0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Montana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 51 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Montana97.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LAUREL SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Evergreen Healthcare Group, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacific Northwest SNF Operations Holdings (mt) LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Ch Pacific Northwest Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Pacific Northwest SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Witzcorp Global LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Yenowitz, Yitzchok | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Johnson, Rebecca | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Lowe, Leonor | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Couve Financial Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Couve Healthcare Consulting LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Laurel SNF Operations LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Montana SNF Consulting LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Pacific Northwest Opco Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Mansfield, Jame | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Rodenberger, Monica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Severa, Larry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Spielman, Shimon | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Yenowitz, Yitzchok | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Ch Pacific Northwest Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Couve Financial Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/12/2026 | |
| Couve Healthcare Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2025 | |
| Laurel SNF Operations LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/29/2025 | |
| Montana SNF Consulting LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2025 | |
| Pacific Northwest Opco Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/19/2025 | |
| Witzcorp Global LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/31/2023 | |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Johnson, Rebecca | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Lowe, Leonor | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Mansfield, Jame | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Rodenberger, Monica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Severa, Larry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Spielman, Shimon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 | |
| Yenowitz, Yitzchok | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/31/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Montana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.