1415 Yellowstone River Rd, Billings, MT 59105 · Yellowstone County · (406) 245-9330
129 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 275123 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Montana average is 11.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 63 health citations since October 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $80,893 in the last three years; the largest was $58,728, and the latest is dated August 1, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 4.05 across Montana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.
50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Montana average 54.8%).
CMS links it to The Charly Bello Family, the Maze Family, the Swain Family, & Walter Myers, an affiliated group of 20 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 63 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food labeling and storage in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and failed to maintain sanitary and clean conditions including employee hygiene. These deficient practices affected all residents receiving food services from the facility kitchen and dietary staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of staff COVID-19 vaccine status and ensure staff were provided information on obtaining the COVID-19 vaccine.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective social services were provided to a resident needing assistance in accessing social security disability benefits for 1 (#79) of 29 sampled residents. The failure resulted in prolonged financial stress for the resident in excess of one year's time, and multiple staff were aware of the resident's need for assistance, but failed to intervene, showing a pattern of not addressing the resident's need for help.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive investigations of facility reported incidents were completed for 2 (#s 67 and 99) and failed to ensure post-incident interventions were implemented to prevent additional similar incidents for 1 (#67) of 29 sampled residents. These deficient practices increased the risk of an adverse outcomes for the residents involved in the facility reported incidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the written transfer notice for a resident sent to the hospital showing the need for the transfer, for 1 (#44) of 29 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the MDS assessments for 2 (#s 6 and 67) of 29 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to reflect a resident's current care needs after an elopement for 1 (#67) of 29 sampled residents. The failure placed the resident at elevated risk for additional elopements.
Inspectors wroteBased on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff responded to resident needs timely for a resident requiring assistance with activities of daily living for 1 (#99) of 29 sampled residents. The deficient practice increased the risk for skin integrity issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize a documented weight severe weight loss and address the weight change, for 1 (#6) of 29 sampled residents, which placed the resident at risk for adverse health consequences. The MDS was not correctly completed to reflect the weight, and the weight loss was suspected to be due to an error, not an actual loss of weight, as reflected in the medical record.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the staff member administering medications failed to follow proper processes, and this contributed to the facility's failure to prevent a total medication error rate of five percent or less during medication administration observations for 2 (#s 25 and 74) of 4 sampled residents for medications. This deficient practice increased the risk of residents #25 and #74 experiencing negative physical and psychosocial outcomes related to medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and provide rehabilitation therapy ordered by a physician for 1 (#34) of 29 sampled residents, which increased the risk of a decline for the resident related to the areas therapy should have been treating.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed safe and sanitary conditions by donning hair coverings and beard nets while preparing resident meals in the facility kitchen. This failure put all residents receiving meals at risk for sanitation issues related to the uncovered hair if it were to get into food.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure an interdisciplinary team was involved in determining if a resident was safe to self-administer medication and failed to implement a system to ensure an as needed medication was secured in a resident's room for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents. This deficient practiced caused resident #6 a temporary burning sensation under her right arm.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility nursing staff failed to meet professional standards of practice by not providing safe administration of a scheduled topical medication for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #6 a temporary burning sensation under her right arm.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff members followed appropriate protocols for the safe transfer of residents while using a Hoyer lift for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure safe administration of a scheduled topical medication for 1 (#6) of 9 sampled residents. This deficient practice caused resident #6 a temporary burning sensation under her right arm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precaution practices were utilized by staff while performing high-contact resident care during a transfer, for 1 (#5) of 9 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards by failing to label and date food stored in the facility's walk-in cooler and nutrition room refrigerators; failed to prevent or clean dirty surfaces in the walk-in cooler; and failed to maintain or complete routine monitoring of refrigerators and freezers on the Rosebud Hall, which could negatively affect any resident receiving services related to, or foods from, the equipment or areas of concern identified.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices which included: proper hand hygiene for 4 (#s 3, 11, 17, and 20); proper use of isolation masks; disinfecting equipment after use; environmental cleanliness for 1 (#14); enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (#20); and dietary infection control of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the reason for a facility-initiated transfer to a resident or the resident's representative, for 3 (#s 18, 64, and 78) of 36 sampled residents, and staff were not aware of the process or need for completion of the transfer notices.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required bed hold notice to the resident or the resident's representatives prior to, or timely after, a transfer, for 3 (#s 18, 64, and 78) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a qualified activity professional to direct the activity program, which may affect all residents receiving or participating in activities at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to sufficiently and accurately document pressure ulcers for 3 (#s 11, 57, and 76) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders, for 2 (#s 3 and 20); failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (#20); and failed to measure and record the total fluid volume administered for 2 (#s 3 and 20) of 2 sampled residents with a PEG tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored; failed to properly dispose of expired medications; failed to ensure medication carts were locked when staff was not by them; and failed to monitor medication refrigerator and freezer temperatures. These failures could negatively affect a resident receiving improperly stored or expired medications, or from the refrigerator or freezer if temperatures were not maintained in a safe manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely fix items in resident's rooms for 2 (#s 17, and 44) of 36 sampled residents; and failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff in the Rosebud nursing unit area of the building.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 1 (#14) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences within 14 days of admission for 1 (#233) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for the resident's oral status, for 1 (#8) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, resident-centered care plan which identified the resident's physical and psychosocial needs to help the resident reach their highest practicable level, for 1 (#8) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise an individualized comprehensive care plan to reflect a mental health diagnosis, for 1 (#233) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a trauma-informed assessment to identify, manage, avoid potential triggers, and maintain the highest practicable well-being, for 1 (#8) of 1 resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure the Director of Nursing did not work as a charge nurse when the average daily census was more than 60 residents, which may negatively affect any resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 (#17) of 36 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the dietary department failed to have sufficient staffing to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutritional services department, by serving meals cold and late. This failure may negatively affect any resident receiving services from the dietary department.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had the necessary certification for oversight of the infection control program. This failure would affect any resident who had an infection, was at risk of an infection, or for how the facility upheld and monitored infection prevention strategies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a pneumococcal and Covid-19 vaccine for 1 (#74) of 7 sampled residents for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage of chemicals in an unlocked closet on the Rosebud unit hallway, and this increased the risk of resident misuse of the chemical due to the closet being unlocked.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from neglect for 2 (#s 1 and 15) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice of neglect contributed to skin breakdown and psychosocial harm and pain for 1 (#15) and psychosocial harm to 1 (#1) of the 17 sampled.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act promptly to resolve grievances brought forth by residents; provide access to allow residents to file grievances anonymously; take immediate action to protect and prevent further potential violations of any resident rights or potential abuse; and ensure a thorough investigation into the grievances were completed and documented for 6 (#s 1, 6, 9, 10, 15, and 16) of 17 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents who voiced concerns related to alleged abuse or neglect of care; failed to report neglect allegations to the State Survey Agency within the required 24 hours for 3 (#s 1, 14, 15); and failed to report the investigative findings of their reported incidents to the State Survey Agency within five days for 3 (#s 5, 8, 16) of 17 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refund a resident representative within 30 days of the resident's date of discharge for 1 (#1) of 3 reviewed for timely refunds at discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately assessed to be outside independently, and failed to ensure residents were inside the facility at night for 1(#13) of 17 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm to a resident driving their wheelchair down a dark road.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion or mobility received the restorative services necessary to maintain their highest level of functioning for 4 (#s 1, 3, 8, and 13) of 4 residents sampled for restorative services and mobility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staffing available to allow for the consistent provision of restorative nursing services for 4 (#s 1, 3, 8, and 13) of 16 sampled residents receiving restorative services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident identified as needing restorative nursing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, a staff member failed to provide necessary care and services for a dependent resident, for 1 (#19) of 19 sampled residents. The deficient practice caused the resident to initially be upset and tearful.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to post the required staffing each day as required, and failed to ensure any changes in staffing or census were included on the required staff posting. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident wishing to view the information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an Unstageable pressure injury for 1 (#38) of 2 sampled residents with wounds
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and follow interventions for a severe weight loss for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare food in sanitary conditions, putting residents at risk for foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine bathing for dependent residents for 4 (#s 2, 6, 27, and 44) of 23 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to formulate an advanced directive for 1 (#205) of 23 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of a significant weight loss for 1 (#303) of 23 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to provide privacy by leaving the window blinds open while providing perineal care for 1 (#14) of 23 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report and investigate a bruise alleged by the resident to be caused by another individual for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS within 14 days of a resident's change in condition for 1 (#47) of 1 sampled resident who received hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 (#205 and #304) of 23 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow care plan interventions to protect a resident's room from being entered by other residents for 1 (#6) of 1 sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality by failing to follow a physician's order to hold insulin for a blood glucose value less than 100 mg/dL for 1 (#2) of 23 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to follow a physician's order for a resident's continuous tube feeding administration; failed to label the enteral and free water bags used during the continuous tube feeding; and failed to consistently and accurately document the resident's enteral and free water intake for 1 (#19) of 23 sampled residents. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for inadequate caloric and free water intake.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an RN scheduled for eight hours per day. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents in the facility receiving nursing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to post daily staffing numbers. This deficient practice had the potential to leave family and visitors uninformed of the facility's daily census and number of licensed staff members working.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep a foley catheter and tubing from dragging on the floor, increasing the risk for infection for 1 (#24) of 4 sampled residents; and nursing staff failed to follow infection control standards by placing urine-soaked bed linens on the floor during a bed linen change for 1 (#14) of 23 sampled residents. This deficient practice has the potential to increase the risk of infection to residents and staff.
47 fire safety citations on file: 18 on January 15, 2026, 18 on November 7, 2024, 11 on October 26, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 1, 2024 | Fine | $58,728 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $1,899 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $3,418 |
| October 26, 2023 | Fine | $16,848 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Montana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.23 | 4.05 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.49 | 0.98 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.76 | 3.59 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.93 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.80 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.0% | 54.8% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.5% | 48.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.29 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.42 on weekdays and 2.76 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.16 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.23 | 0.49 | 3.42 | 2.76 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 85 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.28 | 0.50 | 3.43 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.25 | 0.45 | 3.43 | 2.78 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.16 | 0.55 | 3.32 | 2.76 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 82 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Montana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.91 | 0.89 | 4.10 | 3.46 | 11.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Montana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.67 | $18.29 to $22.86 | 4,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.91 | $27.95 to $32.14 | 1,620 |
| Registered nurses | $41.00 | $38.56 to $48.46 | 10,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Montana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 18.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.9 | 20.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.1 | 19.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.3 | 14.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for River Ridge Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (43.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
43.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Montana: 7 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
11.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Montana: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 87 eligible stays.
6.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Montana: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 80 eligible stays.
72.0% this home
Median of homes: Montana58.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Montana0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
4.8% this home
Median of homes: Montana2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Montana97.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: RIVER RIDGE REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC. CMS links this home to The Charly Bello Family, the Maze Family, the Swain Family, & Walter Myers, a group of 20 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amin Family Limited Partnership | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 10% | 10/01/2023 |
| Myers Living Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 10/01/2023 |
| Cashmer LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2023 | |
| Dover Ruxpin Family Limited Partnership | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2023 | |
| Fey, Kristin | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 9% | 10/01/2023 |
| Myers, Cindy | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Myers, Daniel | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Myers, Sheri | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Myers, Walter | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Myers, Walter | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Myers, Walter | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Swain, Jared | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Cottonwood Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2023 | |
| Professional Business Advisors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2023 | |
| Wipfli LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2023 | |
| Anderson, Wendy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Williamson, Zack | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Cottonwood Healthcare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/04/2025 | |
| Professional Business Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/04/2025 | |
| Wipfli LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/04/2025 | |
| Myers, Walter | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Williamson, Zack | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Montana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.