Home / Pennsylvania / Lebanon
900 Tuck Street, Lebanon, PA 17042 · Lebanon County · (717) 273-8595
159 certified beds, about 137 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395472 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 48 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.76 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
58.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Genesis Healthcare, an affiliated group of 184 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 48 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative(s) of transfer(s), and failed to notify a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, including the reasons for the moves, in writing upon transfer for six of six residents who were transferred out of the facility. (Residents 2, 7, 14, 42, 149, and 151)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, resident group interview, a review of facility resident council meeting minutes and grievances, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to address grievances voiced by residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment on two of five nursing units. ([NAME] and [NAME] units)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed to accurately reflect the current status of one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 139)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed the individual resident's needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 13)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain activities of daily living (showering) for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were implemented for three of 31 sampled residents. (Residents 4, 8, and 139)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review and clinical record review it was determined that the facility failed to attempt and document non-pharmacological interventions to alleviate pain prior to the administration of pain medication prescribed on an as needed basis for two of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 6, 96)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate dialysis treatment for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 10).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess residents with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to render trauma informed care for one of 31 sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician acknowledged the pharmacist's recommendations for two of 31 sampled residents. (Residents 6 and 12)
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of employee personnel and education records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each nurse aide received 12 hours of in-service training annually, including training for dementia management, resident abuse prevention, and identified performance weaknesses for two of two nurse aides reviewed (NA 1 and NA 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to report an alleged violation of potential neglect for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, review of facility documentation, and results of a test tray audit, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food and beverages that were at an appetizing temperature on one of five nursing units. ([NAME] unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner in the dietary department.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to perform infection surveillance in accordance with facility policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary services manager in the absence of a full-time qualified dietitian.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a call bell was answered in a timely manner for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 16) In addition, the facility failed to provide services to enhance each resident's quality of life by offering showers as scheduled to one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 47)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care from staff as she preferred in order to attend activities of her choice for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 51 and 141)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a restorative ambulation program as recommended by physical therapy for one of one sampled resident who was recommended for a restorative ambulation program. (Resident 94)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement physician's orders for five of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 37, 51, 119, 141, 355) In addition, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for a compression stocking and a compression wrap for one of one sampled resident. (Resident 355)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline and/or improve range of motion for one of five sampled residents at risk for limited range of motion. (Resident 101)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that adequate catheter care was provided for one of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter. (Resident 44) In addition, the facility failed to assess bladder incontinence and provide services to restore bladder function as much as possible for one of two sampled residents at risk for bladder function loss. (Resident 144)
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications/biologicals were securely stored in a medication or treatment cart on one of six nursing units. ([NAME] nursing unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were served preferred food items on their meal trays for three of 29 residents. (Residents 94, 96 and 118)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently implement an antibiotic stewardship program and maintain a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for one of two residents receiving antibiotics. (Resident 355)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to offer pneumococcal disease vaccines in accordance with facility policy to five of 29 residents whose vaccines were reviewed. (Residents 41, 51, 56, 80, 137)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation, resident interview, results of a test tray audit, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and at an appetizing temperature on one of five nursing units. ([NAME] unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the baseline care plan summary was provided to the resident or representative for three of six sampled residents. (Residents 2, 3, 4)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to review the care plan within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment for three of six sampled residents. (Residents 1, 5, 6)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's order were implemented for one of six sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner respectful of each resident's dignity and preferences to promote the quality of life for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for seven of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 5, 27, 46, 90, 105, 115, and 135)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for five of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 27, 34, 44, 63, 76)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner on two of three resident nourishment rooms. ([NAME] and [NAME])
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for three of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 28, 63, 90)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan and interventions to meet each residents' needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 1)
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy observation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nursing services consistent with professional standards of quality as defined by the PA Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 145)
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to assess and document the status of wounds for three of seven sampled residents with wounds. (Residents 17, 46, 145)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered plan to render trauma-informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for one of 29 sampled residents. (Resident 145)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician acknowledged the pharmacist's recommendations for two of 29 sampled residents. (Residents 63, 115)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident's representative(s) of transfer and the reasons for the move in writing for seven of seven sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 1, 15, 17, 44, 46, 87, 115 )
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident, responsible party, or legal representative at the time of transfer for six of seven sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital. (Residents 1, 15, 17, 46, 87, 115)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was offered medication as prescribed by the physician for three of six sampled residents. (Residents 1, 2, 4)
11 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 26, 2025, 6 on April 12, 2024, 3 on May 19, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.76 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.33 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.35 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.06 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.7% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 68.8% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.33 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.93 on weekdays and 3.33 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 19.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.76 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.35 | 3.93 | 3.33 | 19.0% | 0 of 90 | 137 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.67 | 0.39 | 3.84 | 3.22 | 19.0% | 0 of 92 | 132 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.57 | 0.45 | 3.67 | 3.34 | 23.8% | 0 of 92 | 134 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.29 | 0.38 | 3.40 | 3.02 | 44.0% | 0 of 91 | 137 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.9 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 27.1 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.7 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.4 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.9 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lebanon Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 225 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 218 eligible stays.
8.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 129 eligible stays.
53.3% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 120 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 156 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 156 residents counted.
79.7% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 59 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 900 TUCK STREET OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Genesis Healthcare, a group of 184 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genesis Pm Pa Operations LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/15/2020 |
| Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Gen Operations I LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Gen Operations II LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Genesis Healthcare Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Genesis Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Genesis Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Ghc Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Sun Healthcare Group Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 11/15/2022 | |
| Whitman, Arnold | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 11/15/2022 | |
| Berg, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/15/2022 | |
| Bridgeford, Laura | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Mendelson, Avi | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Morris, Diane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Ross, Tara | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/13/2023 | |
| Ross, Tara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/13/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.