Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Cushing

Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts

530 South Linwood Avenue, Cushing, OK 74023 · Payne County · (918) 225-2220

67 certified beds, about 49 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2005

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375471 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 23, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since January 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.51 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.23 of those hours.

58.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

CMS links it to Skyblue Healthcare, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 23, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed within 48 hours of admission for 3 (#47, 54, and #161) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.
  2. E
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the direct care staffing hours on the Quality of Care report were accurately reported. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's DNR was valid for 1 (#212) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for 1 (#162) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.
  5. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for an allegation of abuse for 1(#162) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.
  6. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dented cans, and opened bottles were removed from circulation in the dry storage. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility and ate from the kitchen.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a water management plan to prevent waterborne pathogens had been implemented. The administrator reported 55 residents resided at the facility.
  8. D
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure abuse training on hire was conducted for 1 (CNA #2) of 3 staff members files who's employee files reviewed. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility.
February 23, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon grievances presented during resident council meetings or provide rationale as to why concerns could not be met. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility.
  2. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for three (#34, 40, and #32) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility.
  3. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. fall interventions were care planned after falls and have a process for notifying staff of interventions for one (#34), b. fall interventions were implemented and care planned after falls for one (#40), and c. a fall assessment was completed for one (#32) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff investigated reports of misappropriation of resident items for one (#1) of one sampled resident for misappropriation of property. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility.
  5. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a new mental health diagnosis to OHCA for a PASRR level II evaluation for one (#40) of one sampled resident reviewed for PASRR. The Administrator reported 49 residents resided in the facility.
  6. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for psychotic disorder with delusions for one (#40) of 13 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Administrator reported 49 residents resided in the facility.
  7. D
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed for one (#51) of two sampled residents reviewed for discharge. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility.
  8. D
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    F745 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's specialist appointment was completed timely for one (#34) of one sampled resident reviewed for social services. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility.
  9. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations were offered for one (#104) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The Administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility.
February 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure two trash dumpster's were covered. The Daily Census, dated 02/09/24, documented 52 residents resided in the facility.
January 26, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 23, 2025, 1 on February 23, 2024, 3 on January 26, 2023.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · May 23, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · May 23, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · February 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · January 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · January 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · January 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.513.793.86
Registered nurses0.230.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.163.443.42
Nurse aides2.67
Licensed practical nurses0.61
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)58.6%55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover66.7%53.6%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 3.12 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.65 on weekdays and 3.16 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.55 in April to June 2025 to 3.51 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.510.233.653.16 0.0%0 of 9049
Oct to Dec 20253.580.293.763.14 0.2%0 of 9249
Jul to Sep 20253.450.273.583.12 0.0%0 of 9252
Apr to Jun 20253.550.303.782.97 0.0%0 of 9154
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$17.27$15.82 to $18.3919,410
LPNs and LVNs$28.04$24.06 to $29.8411,540
Registered nurses$39.87$37.19 to $47.5538,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.213.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.22.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.34.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.51.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.413.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.74.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.917.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.627.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
7.916.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.72.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.43.01.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

49.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

14.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 67 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

36.8% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LINWOOD VILLAGE OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Skyblue Healthcare, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Rivers Edge Operations LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/06/2023
Rivers Edge Partners LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization50%10/01/2023
Oelbaum, Yitzchok5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual15%01/06/2023
Bradley, SamanthaW-2 managing employeeIndividual02/22/2023
Ganz, DavidCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2023
Ganz, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2023
Oelbaum, YitzchokOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/06/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
  2. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.16 hours per resident per day, below the Oklahoma average of 3.44.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 23, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Linwood Village Nursing & Retirement Apts?
CMS lists 7 owners and managers, and links the home to Skyblue Healthcare. Legal business name: LINWOOD VILLAGE OPERATIONS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection