601 West 1st Street, Chandler, OK 74834 · Lincoln County · (405) 785-7486
76 certified beds, about 39 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375470 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 15, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 52 health citations since July 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 10 fines totaling $95,240 in the last three years; the largest was $53,957, and the latest is dated August 10, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.22 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
81.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 52 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure prepared food items were labelled with preparation and use-by dates and food items were discarded after use-by date during 1 of 2 kitchen observations. The administrator identified 36 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (#31) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility filed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the OSDH for 1 (#21) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was investigated for 1 (#21) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised for 1 (#30) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 (#6) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. menus were prepared in advanced for serving sizes and nutritional adequacy; and b. menus were reviewed by the dietitian for nutritional adequacy. The DON identified 32 residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a licensed administrator for the management of the facility. The DON identified 32 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents rights to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care for 3 (#1, 2 and #4) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for care plan meetings in the last six months. The DON identified 32 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a system was maintained to assure generally accepted accounting principles for each resident's personal funds account, and b. individual financial records were available to the residents through quarterly statements and upon request for 3 (#1, 2, and #4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for personal funds accounts. The business office manager identified 18 residents with trust fund accounts.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was permitted to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for 1 (#5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospitalization. The DON identified 32 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PASSAR level I assessment was completed before or on admission for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PASSAR. The DON identified 32 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN order for an antianxiety medication had a 14 day stop date for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an annual comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days of the ARD for one (#11) of 14 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were transmitted within seven days of completion for two (#11 and #92) of 14 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed for three (#22, 27, and #92) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for four (#3, 27, and #92) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the urinary drainage bag was positioned in a manner to maintain infection control for two (#92 and # 6) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for urinary catheters. The Resident Matrix documented two residents who had urinary catheters.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for dialysis and pre/post dialysis assessments were completed for three (#3, 22, and #27) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for dialysis. The DON identified three residents who received dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured one (Southwest treatment cart) and failed to ensure medications were dated when opened for two (Southwest treatment cart and North medication cart) of two medication/treatment carts and one of one medication rooms observed for medication storage. The DON identified four medication/treatment carts and one medication room in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was qualified dietary staff to meet the needs of the residents. The DON identified 38 residents who received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient dietary staff to meet the needs of the residents. The DON identified 38 residents received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures for one (evening meal) of one meal observed for palatability. The DON identified 38 residents received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meat was thawed in a sanitary manner and that residents plates were delivered in a sanitary manner. The DON identified 38 residents received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice of dining location for one (#1) of one resident sampled for choices. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed within 14 days of the ARD for one (#27) of 14 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a level two PASARR was requested for one (#27) of one sampled residents who were reviewed for PASARR. The DON identified seven residents who had a diagnoses of a serious mental illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was reviewed for one (#141) of one sampled resident reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the residents stay was completed for one (#39) of one sampled resident who was discharged . The DON identified 13 residents who had been discharged in the past three months.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an enteral tube feeding bag was properly labeled for one (#33) of two sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding management. The Facility Matrix, identified two residents who received enteral tube feeding via continuous pump.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of an anticoagulant medication and obtain hemoglobin A1C monitoring as ordered by the physician for one (#27) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified eight residents who received anticoagulant medications and 13 residents who were diabetic.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for one (evening meal) of two meal services observed. The DON identified 38 residents who received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized for one (#6) of one sampled residents observed for infection control and failed to ensure the glucometer was disinfected between uses for three (#3, 93, and #25) of three sampled residents who were observed during glucose monitoring. The administrator identified one resident with a tracheostomy, two residents with urinary catheters, and 13 residents who required glucose monitoring.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement, which resulted in hospitalization for rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, and UTI. The administrator identified seven residents who were high risk for elopement.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and substitutions to the menu were reviewed and/or approved by the registered dietitian. The ADON identified 35 of 37 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature and was palatable. The ADON identified 35 of 37 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteOn 07/13/23 at 3:09 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related to the facility failed to provide goods and services by ensuring adequate portions, options for extra food, and/or an alternative of equal nutritive value was offered to the residents in order to maintain optimal physical and psychosocial well being. On 07/13/23 at 3:09 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the existence of the immediate jeopardy. On 07/14/23 at 4:45 p.m., the facility provided an acceptable plan of removal for the immediacy. The plan documented the following: Plan of Removal 07/14/23 Menus will be reviewed by a dietitian and adjusted to meet dietary standards, as needed. RDO or Dietary Manager will place all food orders to ensure there is an adequate supply. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were conducted for six (#31, 32, 81, 82, 131, and #182) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, identified 45 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed and submitted for five (#6, 9, 14, 29, and #30) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a base line care plan within the required 48 hour time frame for three (#82, 92, and #96) of three sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error for one (#32) of five residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents received medication.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure lab tests were completed as ordered by the physician for two (#14 and #21) of five sampled residents whose labs were reviewed. The Regional Director of Operations identified 45 residents who had physician orders for lab services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to be administered effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The administration failed to ensure: a. residents were free from physical abuse and neglect. b. a safe, functional, sanitary, comfortable environment was provided. c. comprehensive assessments were completed within 14 days of admission. d. quarterly assessments were completed every three months. e. base line care plans were completed on admission. f. prepared meals were of adequate portion size, palatable, and met resident preference. g. sufficient nutritional intake to maintain health and weights. h. infection were tracked and analyzed for trend routinely. i. the facility assessment was updated with changes in resident care needs. j. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was updated yearly and reflected the resources necessary to meet the needs for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility, one resident received dialysis, and one resident had a tracheostomy.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement plans to correct or improve identified concerns with resident care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the QA committee met at least quarterly. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, identified 45 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infections were tracked and data was analyzed to determine trends for ten (August 2022 through June 2023) of 12 months reviewed for infection monitoring. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, identified 45 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary environment for three (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of three resident rooms observed on the [NAME] hall, one (the [NAME] hall) of four halls observed, one (the MDS office) of one office observed, and one (West hall lobby) of three common areas/lobbies observed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure conveyance of personal funds within 30 days of discharge/death for two (#95 and #99) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for personal funds. The Regional Director of Operations identified eight residents who had been discharged /expired in the past three months who were in the trust account.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to OSDH for one (#31) of three sampled residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure transportation to dialysis for one (#6) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis services. The Resident Census and Condition form, dated 07/03/23, documented one resident for dialysis treatment.
14 fire safety citations on file: 9 on December 15, 2025, 5 on August 14, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 10, 2024 | Fine | $53,957 |
| August 10, 2024 | Payment Denial | 9 days from September 21, 2024 |
| November 13, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| November 6, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 30, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 23, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 17, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 10, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 2, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| September 25, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| September 18, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.22 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.90 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.93 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 81.4% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 2.94 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.35 on weekdays and 3.90 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.16 in April to June 2025 to 4.22 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.22 | 0.36 | 4.35 | 3.90 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 39 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.41 | 0.39 | 4.61 | 3.89 | 8.0% | 0 of 92 | 39 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.32 | 0.39 | 4.54 | 3.78 | 9.1% | 0 of 92 | 36 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.16 | 0.45 | 4.46 | 3.40 | 3.7% | 1 of 91 | 31 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.1 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.4 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chandler Therapy & Living Center LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
10.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 12 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHANDLER THERAPY & LIVING CENTER LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kilgore, Joshua | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 01/26/2024 |
| 601ch, LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 08/01/2016 | |
| Dwuma, Alex | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2016 | |
| Jones, Nola | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/17/2025 | |
| Kilgore, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/26/2024 | |
| 601ch, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2016 | |
| Kilgore Family Trust-2012 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2016 | |
| Ktfw-Ok, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2016 | |
| Dwuma, Alex | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2016 | |
| Jones, Nola | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/17/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.