2320 South Lawndale, Chicago, IL 60623 · Cook County · (773) 522-0400
106 certified beds, about 95 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 146018 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 18, 2025, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Illinois average is 12.6, the national average 9.2).
Of 58 health citations since September 2023, 10 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $96,359 in the last three years; the largest was $54,464, and the latest is dated June 5, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.37 hours per resident per day, against 3.45 across Illinois and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.
33.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Illinois average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 58 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) remained free from sexual abuse by another resident in a sample of five reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plan was revised to address ongoing medication refusal and escalating aggressive behaviors; and failed to implement effective, individualized interventions, resulting in the need for psychiatric transfer for one resident (R6). This failure affects 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care planning.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R4) was free from physical abuse and verbal abuse. These failures caused R4 to suffer humiliation and emotional distress due to derogatory language used by staff, and staff forcefully pulling multiple braided strands of hair from R4's scalp, resulting in removal of approximately six braids from the crown of R4's head causing pain and injury. R4 has a diagnosis which include but are not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideations, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, viral hepatitis c, schizoaffective disorder, alcohol abuse. R4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 2/3/26 shows a score of 15 which indicated that R4 is cognitively intact. The facility's initial reportable incident dated 2/13/26 documents in part: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed a resident's assessed transfer status, which required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers. This failure affected one out of three residents reviewed for falls and caused R3 to be sent to the local hospital due to R3 sustaining a fracture of the distal femoral shaft, which requires R3 to use a left leg brace.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, facility failed their policy and did not protect a resident from physical resident to resident abuse when a resident (R2) punched in the face another resident (R1) and that resulted in a brief red mark on R1's face. This failure affected one resident (R1) in the sample of three residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy and provide an adequate number of staff to meet resident needs based on their facility assessment. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a RN (Registered Nurse) that worked eight consecutive hours daily. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents that reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food storage practices as evidenced by a.) Food not properly labeled, and b.) staff personal items in the food preparation area. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all 99 residents receiving food prepared for the nursing skilled facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure medications had the proper label, b.) ensure medications were labeled and dated after opening, c.) ensure medications requiring refrigeration were refrigerated, d.) ensure insulin pens were stored in a bag to prevent cross contamination and e.) discard discontinued medications in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication labeling and storage. Findings Include: On [DATE] at 11:01 AM medication cart B was reviewed with V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R40's Albuterol Sulfate 90 mcg aerosol inhaler was observed in the medication cart with no open date. Surveyor asked V14 if the inhaler should be labeled with an open date. V14 responded, for these I am not sure. An Albuterol inhaler was observed in a bag with no name or label. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy to a.) ensure medications was handled in a sanitary manner for 1 (R11) resident, b.) ensure reusable medical equipment was cleaned and disinfected between resident use for 4 (R11, R58, R94, R98) residents, c.) perform hand hygiene between 2 (R2, R58) residents contact, d.) store insulin pens to prevent cross contamination for 4 (R14, R27, R28, R102) residents and e.) ensure infection control protocols related to linen handling were followed for 1 (R5) out of 4 residents reviewed for linen handling out of a sample of 21.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure call light is within reach for 1 (R73) out of 3 residents reviewed for call lights in a sample of 24. Findings Include:On 12/15/2025 at 10:12 AM, surveyor observed R73 in his bed in his room. R73's call light is not within reach. R73 stated that he doesn't get out of bed on his own. R73 stated that he doesn't know where his call light is. On 12/15/2025 at 10:14 AM, surveyor asked V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant) to come into the room. When V9 came into R73's room, surveyor asked V9 where is R73's call light. V9 stated that R73's call light is by the wall. V9 stated that R73's call light should be clipped to his bed. Surveyor observed V9 clip R73's call light to his bed. V9 stated that R73 cannot get out of bed by himself. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a Physician's order with the code status for three (R8, R71, R111) residents reviewed for Advance Directives in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed. Findings Include: R8's Facesheet documents that R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8's Facesheet documents that there are no advanced directives selected for this resident. R8's Physician Orders Sheet/POS does not document a physician order for an advanced directive. R71's Facesheet documents that R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R71's Facesheet documents that there are no advanced directives selected for this resident. R71's Physician Orders Sheet/POS does not document a physician order for an advanced directive. R111's Facesheet documents that R111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a home like environment for one (R17) in a total sample of 21 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse for two (R51, R92) in a sample of 21 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for one (R109) resident reviewed for baseline care plans in a sample of 21. Findings Include:R109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to Fracture of Unspecified Part of Neck of Left Femur, Asthma, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, Schizoaffective Disorder, Presence of other Bone and Tendon Implants. Progress note dated 12/10/25 12:57 PM document in part: Progress Note R109 arrived at 12:03 pm. R109 was admitted to the hospital for a fall where he (R109) sustained a left hip fracture and has 3 sutures intact and open to air. R109 is alert to name, place and time. R109 has a hx (history) of Asthma, Chronic lower back pain and Schizophrenia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide scheduled showers for a resident that requires partial/moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living/ADL care. This failure affects one (R71) resident in a total sample of 21 residents reviewed for ADL care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure the narcotic count was completed at the beginning and end of each shift and failed to sign the controlled drug count record at the beginning and end of each shift for 1 of 2 medication cart narcotic logs reviewed. Findings Include:On 12/15/25 at 11:01 AM medication cart B was reviewed with V14 (Licensed Practical Nurse). During review of the Controlled Substances, November 2025 and December 2025 Controlled Substance Check Form there were observed with multiple blank boxes. V14 stated, there were no narcotics before 2 days ago and we did not have any narcotics before that because the doctor does not prescribe narcotics. On 12/15/25 at 01:18 PM the medication cart A was reviewed with V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%, by making 2 errors out of 31 attempts with an error rate of 6.45%. This deficient practice was identified for 2 (R11, R58) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Findings Include:R11 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis not limited to Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Biventricular Heart Failure, Congestive Heart Failure, Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with Moo Disturbance, Bradycardia and Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker. R11's Care Plan document in part: Problem: Category: Cognitive Loss/Dementia. R11 has memory/recall problems, forgetting vital information towards her plan of care. BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score 3, indicating cognitively impaired. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the rights of the resident and allow one (R2) resident to go out on a community pass after a ninety-day restriction without performing a reassessment. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R2 is cognitively intact. R2's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to other bipolar, major depressive disorder recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, generalized anxiety disorder, and other psychoactive substance abuse. On 8/19/25 at 10:58 AM, R2 received in room, stated he has been in the facility since October 2023. He went out to the community on independent pass on 2/28/25, he came back to the facility intoxicated with drug-marijuana, and he was given a ninety-day community pass restriction on 3/3/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of mental abuse (bullying) to the state survey agency. This failure affects 1 resident (R1) sampled for abuse reporting.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of verbal/mental abuse after an allegation of bullying was made. This failure affects 1 resident (R1) sampled for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 4 residents (R1, R2, R5, and R6) were free from physical abuse. This failure affected R1, R2, R5, and R6 who had verbal altercation that resulted in R1 injury and bleeding to mouth and R6 injuries resulting in stitches to eyebrow and injury to forehead. This has the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate measures to ensure adequate supervision is afforded to two residents R1 and R2 reviewed for physical abuse. This failure affected R1 and R2 who had an altercation that resulted into physical abuse and R1 injury to mouth and has the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review facility failed to document in the medical records the reason for one residents' (R1) transfer and discharge to the hospital out of three residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility failed to check the correct box that they could not meet R1's needs on the Involuntary Discharge form, instead they checked the box that the safety of individuals in the facility were endangered. Finding Include: R1 progress note dated 12/25/2024 08:43 PM reads Ambulance arrived to facility. Resident became aggressive yelling and screaming that she does not have to leave because she got drunk while on pass. Resident stated she will call state and that she has the right to drink when she is not at facility. Resident left facility on stretcher to Hospital. R1's emergency room note dated 12/25/24 reads: patient arrived by ambulance from nursing home with petition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review facility failed to give a resident an involuntary discharge notice 30 days prior to the resident's discharge. This applies to one resident (R1) out of three residents reviewed for transfers and discharges. Finding Include: R1 progress note dated 12/25/2024 08:43 PM reads: Ambulance arrived to facility. Resident became aggressive yelling and screaming that she does not have to leave because she got drunk while on pass. Resident stated she will call state and that she has the right to drink when she is not at facility. Resident left facility on stretcher to Hospital. R1's emergency room note dated 12/25/24 reads: patient arrived by ambulance from nursing home with petition. Per Emergency Medical Support staff said she was aggressive earlier. On arrival patient is cooperative and calm. She is upset admission to psych unit. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review facility failed to follow their bed hold policy for one resident (R3) out of three residents reviewed for discharges/transfer. This failure resulted in the facility not holding R1's bed for 10 days and subsequently R1 was discharged to the community instead of being allowed to return to the facility Findings Include: Facility's bed hold and readmission policy denotes it is the policy of this facility to readmit residents after hospitalization or temporary therapeutic leave when the resident requires services which can be provided by the facility. Residents, or their designated representative, shall be informed of this policy at the time of admission and at the time of transfer to a hospital, or for therapeutic leave which extends beyond 24 hours. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to let one resident (R1) return out of three residents reviewed transfers and discharges. This failure resulted in R1 not returning to the facility after hospitalization and was subsequently discharged to the community. Finding Include: R1 progress note dated 12/25/2024 08:43 PM reads: Ambulance arrived to facility. Resident became aggressive yelling and screaming that she does not have to leave because she got drunk while on pass. Resident stated she will call state and that she has the right to drink when she is not at facility. Resident left facility on stretcher to Hospital. R1's emergency room note dated 12/25/24 reads: patient arrived by ambulance from nursing home with petition. Per Emergency Medical Support staff said she was aggressive earlier. On arrival patient is cooperative and calm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for 8 consecutive hours in a 24-hour period on Mondays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and every other Saturday and Sunday during 3 of 3 months reviewed. This failure has the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to follow handling of clothes inside a net-like bag by leaving on the floor exposed to unclean surfaces per their policy. These failures have the potential to affect 5 residents (R17, R10, R73, R22, and R100). Facility also failed to follow Water Management Program that have the potential to affect all 105 residents living in the facility in ensuring water supply in the facility are free from water borne diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to discard medications not in their original packaging, label and date a used insulin pen, store unused insulin in the refrigerator, check medication fridge temperatures daily, store mediations in a clean fridge, and store refrigerated medications away from food. This has the potential to affect all 48 residents receiving medications from Medication Cart A and those residents on insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interviews the facility failed to educate 2 residents (R73 and R250) on influenza vaccination and 4 residents (R45, R73, R90 and R250) on pneumococcal immunization per their policy on documentation of influenza and pneumococcal immunization. These failures have the potential to affect 4 residents (R45, R73, R90 and R250) on informed decision on the risk and benefits of influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations in a sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interviews the facility failed to provide the right of every resident to formulate advance directives for 2 out of 22 residents (R90 and R250) per their policy. Failures includes providing written information on advance directives and addressing advance directives as part of planning of care. These failures have the potential to affect 2 residents (R90 and R250) out of 46 residents in the sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to include urinary catheter use in R85's comprehensive care plan, have urinary catheter care orders, and maintain R85's dignity by not failing to provide a urinary catheter privacy bag for one (R85) out of a total sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to transcribe hospital orders upon initial admission for one (R96) out of a total sample of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to a.) ensure the portable oxygen tank was on the correct setting, b.) ensure the oxygen tubing was stored to prevent contamination, and c.) ensure the oxygen tubing was labeled and dated when changed. This failure has the potential to affect 1 (R37) of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings Include: R37 has diagnosis not limited to Respiratory Failure, Unspecified with Hypoxia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 4, Permanent Atrial Fibrillation, Pleural Effusion, Shortness of Breath, Unilateral Primary Osteoarthritis, Left Knee, and Hypertensive Heart Disease. R37 MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 12 indicating moderately impaired. Physician Order Report dated 11/03/24 - 12/03/24 document in part: Oxygen: Change tubing and mask weekly and prn (as needed) (Label). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have resident's medications readily available for administration, administer medications on time, and ensure accurate reconciliation of a resident's controlled medication for three residents (R43, R74, R78) observed during medication administration and during medication storage and labeling task.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to obtain written informed consent prior to prescribing and administering psychotropic medications for 3 residents (R15, R90 and R96) out of a total sample of 46 residents per facility's policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of records and interviews the facility failed to educate 2 residents (R73 and R250) on Covid- 19 vaccination per their policy on documentation of Covid-19 immunization. These failures have the potential to affect 2 residents (R73, and R250) on informed decision on the risk and benefits of Covid-19 vaccinations in a sample of 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and review of records the facility failed to ensure that resident room environment was in a safe condition for 1 (R73) out of 46 residents . Failure includes detached vinyl flooring and tiles located at entry door from the bed going to the restroom.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of physical and verbal abuse from staff. This failure affected one of three residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents have privacy curtains which extend around the bed. This failure affected Four residents (R8, R9, R10, and R14) reviewed for residents' privacy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' call lights are functional and in good working order. This failure has the potential to affect 5 residents, R2, R7, R11, R12, and R13, reviewed for functioning call lights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the large community shower room on the A-Wing is maintained in a sanitary manner free of patches black substance. This failure has the potential to affect all 13 residents on the A-Wing and other residents who use this shower room.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility failed to affirm the right of the resident to be free from verbal abuse. This deficient practice affects one (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: On 08/25/2024 at 9:34AM, R1 was not observed inside of his room. On 08/25/2024 at 9:36AM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) states she is the nurse responsible for caring for R1 but R1 is not currently in the facility. V7 states R1 was petitioned to be sent out to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation on 08/22/2024 due to verbal aggression and resistance to redirection. On 08/25/2024 at 2:18PM, V6 (Maintenance Director) states he has been working at the facility for 6.5 years. V6 states V4 (Former Floor Technician) is a former floor technician who was responsible for mopping the facility floors. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from physical abuse. These failures affected R2, R3, R5, R7 and R9 as a result of R2 who was physically hit in the head with a chair by R1, causing R2 harm of pain and a facial laceration by the right eye; R7 who was physically hit in the face by R8, causing R7 psychosocial harm by feeling unsafe as a legally blind and wheelchair dependent resident in the facility; R5 who was physically pushed by R6, causing a right hand scratch; R9 who was physically hit in the face by R2; and R3 who was physically hit by R4 in the sample of 14 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise residents on the smoking patio. This failure affected R1 and R2 resulting in R1 physically hitting R2 in the head with a chair, causing R2 harm of pain and a facial laceration by the right eye, in the sample of 14 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy to protect resident's right to be free from resident-to-resident abuse for two of five residents (R2, R4) these failures resulted in 1) R2 sustaining facial fractures after R2 was struck by a peer and 2) R4 experiencing back stiffness after R4 was struck by a peer.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy to protect the resident's right to be free from [A] verbal abuse by staff members for two (R83 and R242) residents, this failure resulted in R83 and R242 feeling scared when they come across the accused staff members, [B] mental abuse by staff to two residents (R83, R88) in sample of 18 reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R88 feeling humiliated and fearful of retaliation, and R83 feeling depressed, crying, and increase in anxiety. Findings Include: 1. On 11/07/2023 at 1:17 PM, R242 stated that staff members are very rude to residents. R242 stated that there were these receptionists who cursed at residents and did not treat them with respect. This made us feel like we couldn't say anything. It felt like we were in prison. R242's written witness statement (10/20/2023) documents in part: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility social service staff failed to assist one resident[R83] in maintaining their mental and psychosocial health in a sample of 18. This failure resulted in R83 crying, feeling depressed, increase of anxiety and fear of retaliation
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to a.) ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored, b.) air dry the blender after being washed in the three-compartment sink before being used for meal preparation. These failures have the potential to affect all 89 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dumpster was covered to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests, insects, and rodents. This deficient sanitation practice has the potential to affect all 89 residents who reside in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility (a.) failed to properly discard a multi-dose insulin 28 days after opening for 3 residents (R14, R22, R54); (b.) failed to properly date opened multi-dose insulin vials for 3 residents (R1, R6, R75); (c.) failed to properly store multi dose insulin vials that require refrigeration for 3 residents (R6, R19, R54); (d.) failed to ensure that medication cart was locked when not attended; (e.) failed to separate medications from food items from one of one medication storage room and one of two medication carts inspected for medication storage and labeling.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to ensure that resident on hemodialysis was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and failed to ensure that proper use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) including gowns and gloves were implemented and available at the point of care for 1 resident (R12). These failures could potentially affect 17 residents residing on unit D wing for facility's census dated 11/5/23.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately document advanced directives code status for 1 resident (R75) out of 18 residents reviewed for advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that medications were given as ordered by the physician for 2 residents [R57, R83] reviewed for medications in a sample of 18.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below 5% as evidenced by 3 medication errors out of 28 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.71% for 3 (R8, R63, R75) of 10 residents observed during medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve food as planned on the cycle menu, and failed to ensure standardized recipes were followed during food preparation. This failure has the potential to affect all 92 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 5, 2026 | Fine | $41,895 |
| January 19, 2024 | Fine | $54,464 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.37 | 3.45 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.29 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 1.74 | 3.07 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.44 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 33.3% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 14.3% | 41.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 5.74 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.63 on weekdays and 1.74 on weekends, 34% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.30 in April to June 2025 to 2.37 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.37 | 0.29 | 2.63 | 1.74 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 95 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.38 | 0.27 | 2.65 | 1.68 | 0.8% | 1 of 92 | 97 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.39 | 0.29 | 2.65 | 1.71 | 0.0% | 4 of 92 | 98 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.30 | 0.24 | 2.57 | 1.63 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 98 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Illinois, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.26 | 0.65 | 3.40 | 2.92 | 5.4% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.10 | $18.95 to $23.26 | 68,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.06 | $30.57 to $38.25 | 17,440 |
| Registered nurses | $46.15 | $38.47 to $50.94 | 138,910 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Illinois | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 13.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 14.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 80.7 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 39.3 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.7 | 13.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Little Village Nrsg & Rhb Ctr's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Illinois: 106 better, 85 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Illinois: 2 better, 14 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 56 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Illinois: 3 better, 10 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
4.5% this home
Median of homes: Illinois50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Illinois0.3% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
2.8% this home
Median of homes: Illinois1.5% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Illinois100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: LITTLE VILLAGE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemino Healthcare Finance LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 03/31/2023 | |
| Mashiach, Yaacov | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Mashiach, Yechiel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Aliuddin, Khaja | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Mashiach, Yaacov | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Mashiach, Yechiel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| White, Stephanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Aliuddin, Khaja | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Mashiach, Yaacov | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| Mashiach, Yechiel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2017 | |
| White, Stephanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Illinois. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.