Home / South Carolina / Spartanburg
Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg
375 Serpentine Drive, Spartanburg, SC 29303 · Spartanburg County · (864) 585-0218
95 certified beds, about 92 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 425091 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 20, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the South Carolina average is 3.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 13 health citations since March 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,054 in the last three years; the largest was $12,054, and the latest is dated June 14, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.13 hours per resident per day, against 3.84 across South Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
56.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (South Carolina average 45.9%).
CMS links it to Fundamental Healthcare, an affiliated group of 66 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
July 10, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, document review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated and documented for two of four residents (Resident (R)101 and R46) reviewed for potential incidents of abuse out of 25 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to contribute to further unidentified or staff to resident abuse incidents within the facility.
May 20, 2025Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the provider of a dehisced wound for 2 days, which caused Resident (R)8 to return to the hospital, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ordered fall devices were in place for 1 Resident (R)11, reviewed for accidents.
November 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse, involving Resident (R)2, within the required timeframe, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse.
June 14, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- J Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility policy, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a safe and orderly discharge from the facility, for 1 of 1 resident. Specifically, Resident (R)60 was transported and discharged from the facility on 06/12/24 to the [NAME] Housing Authority, 62 miles from the facility. The [NAME] Housing Authority was not able to receive R60 due to financial issues. Furthermore, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for the discharge. On 06/13/24 at 7:19 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified that the failure to ensure a resident had a safe and orderly discharge from the facility constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F624. On 06/13/24 at 7:30 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 06/12/24. [...]
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a nurse followed physician orders and manufacturer's guidelines for administering an inhaled corticosteroid for 1 out of 29 opportunities of medication administration.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident (R)41.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's Dialysis Contract, the facility failed to ensure communication with the dialysis center for 1 of 1 resident (Resident (R)75) reviewed for dialysis.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)s and Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN)s were provided needed competency training for colostomy care and maintenance. Specifically, a CNA provided skilled nursing care to Resident (R)23's colostomy wafer that was beyond their scope of practice, for 1 of 2 residents observed for colostomy care. This failure had the potential to cause harm to R23's stoma.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff used proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing colostomy care to 1 of 8 residents, Resident (R)17.
April 9, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify the on-call provider regarding a significant change in a resident's (R)1 condition. Specifically, critical lab blood sugar readings were not communicated timely.
March 18, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, policy review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure 1. all staff wore the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) of an N95 mask, eye protection, gown, and gloves prior to entering the rooms of three of three residents (Resident (R) 133, R135, and R136) under quarantine as new admissions who were not up to date with all recommended COVID-19 vaccine doses (including booster doses, if eligible). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a staff member with a vaccination exemption wore appropriate PPE, while in the facility. This placed all residents of the facility at an increased risk for the transmission of COVID-19.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to assess for safe smoking for two of two residents (Residents (R) 133 and R49) reviewed for smoking in a total sample of 19 residents. This failure increases the risk of injury to residents who may have unassessed safety risk factors.
Fire safety inspections
20 fire safety citations on file: 5 on May 20, 2025, 6 on June 14, 2024, 9 on March 18, 2022.
Every fire safety citation20 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- D Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- D Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- D Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 14, 2024 | Fine | $12,054 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.13 | 3.84 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.66 | 3.33 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.85 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 56.4% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.32 on weekdays and 2.66 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.15 in April to June 2025 to 3.13 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.13 | 0.37 | 3.32 | 2.66 | 13.1% | 0 of 90 | 92 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.18 | 0.37 | 3.35 | 2.76 | 20.2% | 0 of 92 | 93 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.10 | 0.38 | 3.25 | 2.71 | 21.8% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.15 | 0.36 | 3.31 | 2.73 | 17.2% | 0 of 91 | 91 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| South Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.81 | 3.13 | 7.2% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | South Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 11.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 12.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.9 | 15.3 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.8 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.0 | 13.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT SPARTANBURG, LLC. CMS links this home to Fundamental Healthcare, a group of 66 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thi of South Carolina, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 08/30/2003 | |
| Forman, Murray | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/28/2006 | |
| Sherbert, Angela | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/24/2019 | |
| Forman, Murray | Corporate director | Individual | 05/11/2006 | |
| Quinn, Kimberly | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/06/2006 | |
| Sherbert, Angela | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/24/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 4, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 14, 2024: "Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 14, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.66 hours per resident per day, below the South Carolina average of 3.33.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Spartanburg Hospital for Restorative Care SNF Spartanburg, 0 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 1 citation
- White Oak Manor - Spartanburg Spartanburg, 0.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- White Oak at North Grove Inc Spartanburg, 1.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Physical Rehabilitation and Wellness Center of Spa Spartanburg, 1.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Summit Hills Skilled Nursing Facility Spartanburg, 2.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Valley Falls Terrace Spartanburg, 3.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- White Oak Estates Spartanburg, 3.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Mountainview Nursing Home Spartanburg, 4.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 29 citations
South Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in South Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: South Carolina Department of Public Health, Healthcare Quality, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: South Carolina Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department on Aging, 1-800-868-9095. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: SC Survey and Certification Public CMS-2567 Search, where South Carolina publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg get at its last inspection?
- 0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 20, 2025. The South Carolina average is 3.7.
- Has Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $12,054 in the last three years.
- Does Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Magnolia Manor - Spartanburg?
- CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to Fundamental Healthcare. Legal business name: THI OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT SPARTANBURG, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.