Home / Mississippi / Philadelphia
1001 Holland Avenue, Philadelphia, MS 39350 · Neshoba County · (601) 663-1200
160 certified beds, about 129 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255137 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 18, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since August 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,364 in the last three years; the largest was $10,364, and the latest is dated February 3, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.48 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.90 of those hours.
45.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, facility policy reviews, and the facility's investigation, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent residents who were identified as an elopement and wandering risk, from exiting the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for two (2) of 19 residents residing on the secured Alzheimer's unit. Resident #1 and Resident #2. On 1/20/26 at approximately 1:32 PM to 1:35 PM Resident #1 entered the door alarm code and Resident #1 and Resident #2 exited the facility undetected by staff. Resident #1 was unattended and unsupervised until located by law enforcement 29 miles from the facility and returned to the facility at 3:50 PM. Resident #2 was identified by staff to be outside on facility property and was assisted back into the facility at 1:48 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and surrounding areas were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition for two (2) of three (3) kitchen tours. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled, General Sanitation of the Kitchen undated, revealed The staff shall maintain the sanitation of the kitchen through compliance with a written comprehensive cleaning schedule.4. A cleaning schedule will be posted. Employees will be trained on the cleaning schedule and how to perform duties. Employees will initial and date tasks when completed . During the initial kitchen tour on 9/29/25 at 12:20 PM, observation of the deep fryer revealed a thick yellow and black substance with food particles built up down the entire right side of the fryer. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the use of a bed alarm did not constitute a physical restraint for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for restraints (Resident #62). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Restraint Free Environment with an approval date of 6/27/2025 revealed, Each resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience, and limits restraint use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraints. An observation and interview on 9/29/25 at 1:15 PM with Resident #62, revealed the resident lying in bed with her hands clenched, body appearing stiff and her bed alarm was sounding despite only slight movement. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) (Resident #5, #64, #105), wandering (Resident #57), gastrostomy (Resident #64), and therapeutic diet (Resident #134) for five (5) of 26 resident care plans reviewed. Resident #5, #57, #64, #105, and #134 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan undated revealed under Policy. It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care related to nail care (Resident #64, Resident #105) and shaving (Resident #5) for 3 (three) of 50 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #5 On 9/29/25 at 3:38 PM and again on 9/29/25 at 3:58 PM Resident #5 was observed with multiple scattered gray chin hairs that measured approximately one-half (1/2) inch. She was pleasantly confused and unable to answer simple questions. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident identified as an elopement risk had the physician prescribed wander alert bracelet applied for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for accident hazards. Resident #57 Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Code Alert Policy, unrevised, revealed under Policy: To prevent wandering residents from leaving the facility or attempting to leave the facility by alerting the nursing staff of their exit through the doors . Procedure: Wandering residents who are deemed to be a Flight Risk will have a code alert bracelet placed on their wrist or ankle. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper placement of a gastrostomy tube prior to medication administration for one (1) of two (2) enteral tubes reviewed. Resident #64 Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Tube Medication, unrevised, revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 8. Enteral tube placement must be checked via auscultation and/or aspiration before any fluids or medication are administered. During an observation on 9/30/25 at 12:10 PM with Resident #64, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 flushed the resident's enteral tube with water and administered medications without first verifying placement of the tube. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage and security of medications for one (1) of 128 residents reviewed during initial tour. Resident #101 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled General Rules for Residents and Sponsors (undated) revealed under section .5: Residents are not permitted to keep any medications in their room unless the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is safe and ordered by the physician. An observation and interview with Resident #101 on 9/29/25 at 12:42 PM revealed she was lying in bed with a Symbicort inhaler and a Spiriva inhaler lying on a table in the room. Resident #101 stated the nurse had forgotten to come back and get them after she took them that morning. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a prescribed therapeutic diet for one (1) of 50 sampled residents. Resident #134. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Thickened Liquids revealed, It is the policy of the (proper name) facility that residents receive liquids as they are ordered and recommended by their physician and or speech language pathologist. An observation and interview on 09/30/25 at 11:32 AM of Resident #134's lunch meal revealed that he had nectar thickened water, nectar thickened sweet tea, and a carton of regular consistency creamy strawberry Glucerna on his tray. An observation also revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2, open his Glucerna and insert a straw into the container for him to drink. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the possibility of the spread of infection by respiratory equipment not being stored properly for one (1) of two (2) residents observed receiving nebulizer treatments (Resident # 53). Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled Nebulizer Therapy with an approval date of 8/06/25 revealed, It is the policy of this facility for nebulizer treatments, once ordered, to be administered by nursing staff as directed using proper technique and standard precautions. An observation on 9/29/25 at 4:30 PM and again on 9/30/25 at 1:45 PM revealed Resident #53's nebulizer was sitting on top of the resident's oxygen concentrator with the mouthpiece uncovered and not stored in a clean or protected manner. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse to Resident #1 for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings Include: The facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated approved 03/04/2025 read: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, contractors, volunteers, or staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members, legal guardians, friends, or other individuals. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items in the kitchen refrigerators were dated and labeled and failed to ensure kitchen equipment was clean for two (2) of three (3) kitchen tours. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage undated, revealed Food is stored, prepared and transported at appropriate temperatures and by methods designed to prevent contamination or cross contamination .13. Leftover food is stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item is clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Leftover food is used within 3 days or discarded. f .Meat, fish, and poultry should be stored on lower shelves . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to address a grievance discussed in resident council for the use of bed rails for five (5) of 12 residents that attended resident council. Resident #15, Resident #27, Resident #37, Resident #61, and Resident #66. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Resident and Family Grievances undated revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 8. Grievances may be voiced in the following forums: . d. Verbal complaint during resident or family council meetings . An interview with the Resident Council President (Res #27) on 12/12/23 at 12:25 PM, revealed that the residents had discussed the facility's removal of the bed rails during a previous meeting. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide dignity to residents as evidenced by leaving urinary catheter bags uncovered for two (2) of five (5) residents with a catheter. Resident #24 and Resident #89. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revealed, The resident has the right to a dignified existence .8. Privacy and confidentiality: The resident has a right to personal privacy . Review of a statement on facility letterhead dated 12/14/23 and signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed, We do not currently have included in our policy that catheter bags have to be covered in dignity bag. Resident #24 An observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 12:01 PM, revealed Resident #24 sitting in her wheelchair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to accommodate a resident's mobility needs for (2) two of (3) three sampled residents reviewed for mobility needs. (Resident #82, and #83)
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for a trapeze bar for (Resident #81), a side rail use care plan for (Resident #1), and a care plan for two handle adaptive cups for (Resident #41 and Resident #60) for four (4) of 29 resident care plans reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to follow physician orders for a resident with side rails for one (1) of 27 sampled residents (Resident # 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to accommodate a residents mobility needs for (1) one of (3) three sampled residents reviewed for mobility needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to accommodate hydration needs for a resident when a water pitcher was not in accessible reach of the resident for (1) one of 109 residents with water pitchers. (Resident # 50)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide a PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube feeding as ordered for one (1) of five (5) residents with PEG tubes observed during survey. Resident #54.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a resident with a handled cup for drinking during mealtime for two (2) of eight (8) residents observed with adaptive equipment for dining. Resident #41 and Resident #60 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Adaptive Eating Devices undated revealed, Policy: Adaptive eating equipment devices are available for those residents needing them . Adaptive devices in use are sanitized and provided for each meal. Adaptive devices are noted on each resident Tray Ticket and in the medical record . Resident #60 Record review of Resident #60's lunch meal ticket provided with the meal dated 12/12/23 revealed, Handled cup with lid. An observation of Resident # 60 during a lunch meal on 12/12/23 at 11:52 AM, revealed the resident feeding herself ice cream. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide written notification to the resident/representative regarding bed hold when the resident was sent to the hospital for four (4) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #24, Resident #54, Resident #87, and Resident #94
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interviews and record review the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representative with a written notice of transfer/discharge to the hospital for four (4) of (4) residents reviewed. Resident's #66, #67, #78 and #84. Findings Include Resident # 67 Record review of a typed statement on facility letterhead, signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed, On August 24th, 2022, our Facility did not have a Written Transfer/discharge notice policy and/or form for resident being transferred/discharged from our facility. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/23/22 at 2:55 PM revealed Resident #67 was taken to the hospital on [DATE]. An interview with the DON on 8/24/22 at 10:25 AM, revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital. [...]
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on May 9, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 3, 2026 | Fine | $10,364 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.48 | 4.18 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.77 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.45 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.14 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.5% | 45.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 28.6% | 38.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.16 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.77 on weekdays and 3.77 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 25.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.01 in April to June 2025 to 4.48 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.48 | 0.90 | 4.77 | 3.77 | 25.2% | 0 of 90 | 129 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.14 | 0.87 | 4.40 | 3.49 | 21.6% | 0 of 92 | 129 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.18 | 0.98 | 4.48 | 3.41 | 22.6% | 0 of 92 | 122 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.01 | 0.97 | 4.30 | 3.29 | 18.4% | 0 of 91 | 120 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Mississippi, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.60 | 4.35 | 3.44 | 6.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $15.15 | $14.19 to $16.92 | 14,200 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $24.14 | $22.50 to $27.90 | 9,850 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $31.22 to $40.62 | 29,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 20.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 19.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 45.5 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.4 | 27.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.8 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Neshoba County Nursing Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (63.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
63.1% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 192 eligible stays.
9.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 227 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 119 eligible stays.
24.2% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 91 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
2.5% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.
92.9% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NESHOBA COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neshoba County General Hospital | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/22/2009 | |
| Ward, Glenda | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| McNair, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Neshoba County General Hospital | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/22/2009 | |
| Posey, Marshall | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/20/2016 | |
| Brazzle, Ruby | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/05/2011 | |
| Daly, Jo Helen | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 12/15/2011 | |
| Jolly, Oliver | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 09/16/2009 | |
| Joyner, Dale | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/15/2020 | |
| Posey, Marshall | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 04/20/2016 | |
| Neshoba County General Hospital | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/22/2009 | |
| Beale, Stefani | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2025 | |
| Ward, Glenda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.