Find a nursing home

Home / California / National City

Paradise Valley Health Care

2575 E. Eighth St., National City, CA 91950 · San Diego County · (619) 470-6700

86 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 056388 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 21, 2024, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 21 health citations since May 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,036 in the last three years; the largest was $10,036, and the latest is dated January 24, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.93 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.79 of those hours.

21.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
17D
2E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
January 8, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an appropriate care plan and admission orders to ensure safety interventions were in place, including maintaining non-weightbearing (NWB) status and keeping the immobilizer/splint on at all times, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practiced placed Resident 1 at risk for worsening of the right lower extremity (RLE) fracture, delayed healing, increased pain, falls and additional injury due to not having proper instructions and interventions in place. Cross Reference F684Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Periprosthetic Fracture around Internal Prosthetic Right Knee Joint (a break in the bone surrounding the replaced joint). [...]
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician (MD) orders and failed to put safety measures in place to prevent injury, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice placed one resident (Resident 1) at risk for worsening of a fracture, unsafe movement of the injured limb, potential accidents (falls)and additional injury due to failure to carry out non-weight bearing (NWB) and continuous immobilizer orders. Cross Reference F656Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Periprosthetic Fracture around Internal Prosthetic Right Knee Joint (a break in the bone surrounding the replaced joint). [...]
November 21, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a federal requirement to help ensure individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes) was completed correctly for one of two residents (42). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 42's mental health needs to be unmet.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and services that are resident-centered in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 18 residents (Resident 82) reviewed with congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 82's declining health status with worsening CHF complications.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattresses (LAL - an air flow mattress used to prevent skin breakdown by distributing weight over the mattress to reduce pressure to the skin) were set according to the physician's order, for one of four residents (Resident 47) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure had the potential to increase the risk for skin breakdown and pressure ulcers for residents who used LAL mattresses.
  4. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (the process of cleaning the blood through a machine) access site was properly cared for two of two residents reviewed for dialysis (2 and 78). This deficient practice had a potential for Resident 2 and Resident 78's dialysis access to clot.
  5. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to include the appropriate indication (reason) and monitor the target behaviors for two of five residents (16 and 134) when: 1. Resident 16 did not have appropriate indications for the use of an antipsychotic medication (a medication used to treat symptoms of psychosis such as hallucinations and delusions). 2. Resident 134 did not have appropriate indication for anti-anxiety (medication used for worry and fear) medications and appropriate target behavior for the use of anti- anxiety medications. These failures had the potential for unnecessary psychotropic (mind-altering medications) medication use and a decline for resident's psychological and mental well-being.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were followed when a Licensed Nurse (LN) 14 did not perform hand hygiene (the practice of cleaning hands to remove germs, dirt, or other harmful substances) consistently after removing her gloves while providing wound care to one of four residents (Resident 43), reviewed for pressure ulcer (sore). This failure had the potential for cross contamination, spread of infection, and Resident 43's decline in health.
April 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a care plan for Resident 1 ' s refusal of medications was developed and implemented. This failure had the potential for the care and interventions to not be communicated to all health care providers. Findings. A review of Resident 1 ' s dated admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Orthopedic Aftercare Following Surgical Amputation, Diabetes (abnormal blood sugar) with chronic kidney disease (failure of the kidneys to filter waste from the blood). An interview was conducted on 3/13/24 at 10:47 A.M., with certified nursing assistant (CNA) CNA 1 stated Resident 1 never complained of not having water at his bedside. An interview on 3/13/24 at 10:55 A.M., with licensed nurse (LN) LN 1 was conducted. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff are competent in managing Resident 1 ' s Diabetes (a chronic [long lasting] health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy) when staff did not notify Resident 1 ' s medical doctor on his medication refusals. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1 ' s health condition and possible decline. Findings. A review of Resident 1 ' s dated admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Orthopedic Aftercare Following Surgical Amputation, Diabetes (abnormal blood sugar) with chronic kidney disease (failure of the kidneys to filter waste from the blood). An interview on 3/13/24 at 11:00 A.M., with licensed nurse (LN) LN 1 was conducted. [...]
December 21, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their water management plan was fully implemented to prevent the potential for waterborne illnesses, including Legionella (a bacteria most commonly transmitted through contaminated water sources that could cause Legionnaires' disease). This failure had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was covered to prevent potential contamination during meal delivery to resident rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was covered during meal delivery to resident rooms located on 1 (second floor) of 3 residential floors. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 29 residents who consumed their meals on the second floor of the facility.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards by failing to secure a stairwell that started at the ground floor and extended to the first, second, and third floor residential areas. Specifically, the first, second, and third floors had doors that exited to an exterior stairwell. None of the doors had any type of safety precaution to prevent a resident from exiting into the stairwell unattended. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 8 of 8 residents identified by the facility as at risk for elopement and 5 of 5 residents identified by the facility as ambulatory.
May 7, 2021Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practice when: 1. Two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA 70, 71) entered, and exited the PUI isolation rooms (Person Under Investigation for COVID-19 [a contagious respiratory infection]) without performing hand hygiene, not wearing gloves and gowns while handling and passing meal trays in between residents. 2. The facility placed in the same room, residents that were considered PUI and residents that have been cleared and had completed quarantine days (a period of isolation). These failures had the potential to spread infection amongst the residents, staff, and visitors. In addition, placing PUI residents and cleared residents in the same room had the potential to infect the residents that had already been cleared from COVID-19.
  2. D
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    F552 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Obtain consent prior to administering psychotropic medications, and 2. Failed to utilize practitioner's (physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) to obtain resident consent for vaccines for six residents sampled for consents (228, 9, 28, 48, 62, 233). As a result, the residents may not have been fully informed of the risks and benefits of the psychotropic medications and vaccines.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the environment free of accident hazards for two of 30 sampled residents (9, 279) when: 1. Resident 9 kept her smoking materials at her bedside. 2. Resident 239 was left alone with a chemical disinfectant on her bedside table.
  4. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to correctly label a gastrostomy tube feeding (tube inserted in the abdomen to provide liquid nutrients) bottle and water flush bag for one of one sampled resident investigated for tube feeding (48). This failure had the potential for residents to receive expired feeding formula and contaminated water.
  5. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired medications from the facility. This failure had the potential for the facility to administer expired medications to residents.
  6. D
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the meal preferences for 1 of 2 residents investigated for meal preferences (229). As a result, Resident 229's plate contained food she would not eat.
  7. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired items from the dry storage room and ensure staff covered all facial hair in the kitchen. As a result, there was the risk of: 1. The facility providing expired food to residents 2. Unsecured hair falling onto food.
  8. B
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    F912 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Waiver
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in four resident bedrooms. This failure had the potential to impact resident care and quality of life.

Fire safety inspections

20 fire safety citations on file: 5 on November 21, 2024, 11 on December 21, 2023, 4 on May 7, 2021.

Every fire safety citation20 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. C
    Provide emergency officials' contact information.
    E 31 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. C
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. J
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. D
    Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
    K 511 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. C
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. C
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. C
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · December 21, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · May 7, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · May 7, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · May 7, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · May 7, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
January 24, 2024Fine $10,036

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.934.523.86
Registered nurses0.790.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.454.093.42
Nurse aides2.74
Licensed practical nurses1.40
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)21.3%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover29.4%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 5.83 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.13 on weekdays and 4.45 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.00 in April to June 2025 to 4.93 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.930.795.134.45 0.0%0 of 9081
Oct to Dec 20255.100.795.354.47 0.0%0 of 9280
Jul to Sep 20255.030.785.274.41 0.0%0 of 9281
Apr to Jun 20255.000.795.254.37 0.0%0 of 9191
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Paradise Valley Health Care. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.010.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.01.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.04.34.6
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.922.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.211.212.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Paradise Valley Health Care's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (69.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

69.5% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 785 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 790 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

8.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 515 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

93.0% this home

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 412 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.6% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 630 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.3% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 630 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

91.3% this home

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 240 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PARADISE VALLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Niguidula, TroyContracted managing employeeIndividual04/01/2018
Burrup, PatrickW-2 managing employeeIndividual11/05/2021
Burrup, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual09/03/2020
Burrup, AndrewCorporate officerIndividual09/03/2020
Hancock, MarkCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Burrup, PatrickOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/05/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 21, 2023: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in National City

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its California inspection record.

Assisted living in California

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Paradise Valley Health Care's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Paradise Valley Health Care 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Paradise Valley Health Care get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 21, 2024. The California average is 15.6.
Has Paradise Valley Health Care been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,036 in the last three years.
Does Paradise Valley Health Care accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Paradise Valley Health Care?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: PARADISE VALLEY HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection