516 13th Street, Wellman, IA 52356 · Washington County · (319) 646-2911
62 certified beds, about 51 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 165234 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 14, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Iowa average is 6.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 46 health citations since May 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $93,473 in the last three years; the largest was $93,473, and the latest is dated October 30, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.80 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Iowa and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.
CMS links it to Campbell Street Services, an affiliated group of 24 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 46 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal and physical abuse were reported to the State Agency within two hours of staff knowledge for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Resident's Rights. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to update a care plan to reflect a resident's risk for exploitation for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for inadequate nursing supervision (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 52 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent a resident-to-resident incident that resulted in an injury. Resident #1 hit Resident #2 with a walker which resulted in a nasal fracture. The facility reported a census of 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to carry out provider orders for 10 of 24 residents reviewed (R#1, R#8, R#13, R#17, R#26, R#29, R#30, R#40 R#43, R#45). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, resident interview and facility assessment review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect for 2 of 21 reviewed (Resident #29 and Resident #41) reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interview and resident interview the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were within reach for 2 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident #30,Resident# 36). The facility reported the census is 50.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to accurately document resident's cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) status for 1 of 24 (Resident #34) residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and the facility housekeeping assistant job description, the facility failed to thoroughly mop the dining room floor after each meal service and clean the ceiling fans in the dining room on a routine basis. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to store medications that required refrigeration at an appropriate temperature. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect while providing incontinence cares for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for dignity(Residents #2 and #7). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents #2 and #7). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and failed to ensure separation between the alleged perpetrator of abuse and residents for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse(Residents #2 and #7). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 1 discharges reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative(s) a notice of bed-hold policy for 1 of 1 discharges reviewed (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of proper notices and documentation after they did not allow a resident to return to the facility after a hospitalization for 1 of 1 discharged residents reviewed(Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide emergency services in a timely manner (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, provider and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop interventions to meet the resident's discharge goals and needs to ensure a smooth and safe transition from the facility to a post-discharge setting. (Resident #3) The facility reported census was 47.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, call light logs, facility policy and resident council minutes the facility staff failed to respond to call lights within a reasonable amount of time. Residents reported having to wait from 30 minutes to over an hour for the call light to be answered numerous times (Resident #10, #22, #34, & #50). The facility reported a census of 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to carry out a treatment as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed(Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to elevate the head of bed during administration of enteral feeding and failed to label supplemental formula bag with the date and time that enteral feeding had started for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for enteral/tube feeding. The facility reported a census of 53 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection control measures with the laundry, during the passing of ice water, provide environmental cleaning and disinfecting of areas between laundry and dietary and were low on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) gloves, not readily accessible in all resident areas. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. During an observation on 8/05/24 at 11:40 AM, Staff L, Hospitality Aide passed water, filled the ice cup for resident's residing in the 200 hall and dropped the scoop back into the ice and closed the lid at each resident room. During an observation on 8/06/24 at 11:02 AM, Staff E, Laundry Aide delivered towels and washcloths to the large laundry carts in the halls. The wire basket containing the clean laundry brought up from the basement laundry room was not covered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility's failure resulted in Resident #1's increased agitation and escalation of physical behaviors that resulted in aggressive physical contact between Resident #1 and another resident (Resident #2). In addition, a staff member, Staff A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), got injured from an encounter with Resident #1. The facility reported a census of 55 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents are treated with dignity while being provided care for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. (Residents #14, #21) The facility reported census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility remains free of persistent odors. (Resident #21) The facility reported census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, the facility failed to complete treatment of wounds in accordance with physician orders for 2 of 2 resident reviewed. (Resident #12, #15) The facility reported census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, bathing records and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents are provided adequate personal hygiene services to include at least two bathing opportunities per week for 3 of 4 residents reviewed and failed to provide catheter care in accordance with professional standards of practice. (Residents #12, #14, #18) The facility reported census was 46.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, family and staff interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment free from resident abuse for 8 of 9 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #11, #15). Clinical record review revealed on 9/26/23 at 4:00 p.m., Resident #6 fell and sustained a hematoma to her head. After the initial hour of assessments, the facility staff neglected to conduct follow up assessments and neurological assessments (as per ordered by the provider) throughout the evening, night and next morning. On 9/27/23 the day shift Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) requested for a nurse to assess Resident #6 who was unconscious, (16 hours after last assessment). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to conduct assessments and provide timely interventions for 6 out of 6 residents with a change of condition (Resident #13, #6, #1, #14, #8 & #10). The facility failed to assess Resident #13 after the Speech Therapist conducted a swallowing evaluation that revealed moderately severe dysphagia, and clinical signs of aspiration during the study on 10/11/23, and subsequently the resident was hospitalized [DATE] with Hypoxia (lack of oxygen), fever, acute aspiration pneumonia, Rhinovirus (common cold), Methicillan-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA, a contagious antibiotic-resistant staph infection) positive in both nares, acute kidney injury and a leaking PEG feeding tube that required replacement. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy to ensure MRSA (a contagious staph bacteria infection) was contained. Hospital record review revealed Resident #13 was hospitalized for hypoxia, aspiration pneumonia and was found to be positive for MRSA in the nares (nose). Due to the nursing staff that re-admitted Resident #13 not reviewing the hospital discharge records, lab results were not reported and the facility did not provide personal protective equipment for staff use for 10 days. The facility also failed to follow infection control practices during a meal service for Resident #19 & #20. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of November 27, 2023 on December 7, 2023 at 12:25 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, family and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for 1 out of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #6). Clinical record review revealed on 9/26/23 at 4:00 p.m., Resident #6 fell and sustained a hematoma to her head. The facility staff failed to conduct a dementia pain assessment for 16 hours, or treat the resident's pain. The facility sent the resident to the emergency room (ER) where the resident was assessed to have a subdural hematoma (brain bleed), fracture of the right clavicle, and a urinary tract infection. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of September 26, 2023 on December 19, 2023 at 12:15 p.m. The facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on December 19, 2023 by implementing the following actions: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out treatments and assessments to prevent the worsening of a pressure ulcer for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Residents #1 and #9). Resident #1 had a wound to the left buttock and during the period of 11/3/23 until 11/21/23 the facility failed to complete regular assessments, treatments, and preventative interventions in order to promote healing of the area. The resident was also at risk for heel breakdown and the facility failed to document measures to prevent heel breakdown. Resident #9 had a history of a pressure ulcer to the buttock. The facility failed to document the completion of ordered treatments. Resident #9's ulcer reopened. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff written statements, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to immediately protect a resident after an allegation of abuse(Resident #2) for 1 of 2 resident's reviewed for an allegation of staff to resident abuse, failed to protect residents from resident-to-resident abuse for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse(Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #8, #11, and #15), and failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin(a buttock bruise) for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for abuse(Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for medications(Residents #1, #6, #9, #14). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 10/25/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and dementia. The MDS stated the resident was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, showering, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and chair to bed transfers. The MDS listed the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain sufficient staffing in order to carryout treatment orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers(Resident #1 and #9) and medication orders for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for medications(Residents #1, #6, #9, #14). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Quality Assurance (QA) meeting documentation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out quality assurance activities to obtain feedback, use data, and take action to conduct structured, systematic investigations and analysis of underlying causes or contributing factors of problems affecting facility-wide processes that impact quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: The facility policy Quality Assurance and Process Improvement (QAPI), reviewed 8/20/20, stated the QA Committee would meet monthly and discuss quality measures and concerns and implement action items for improvement. Review of QA meeting documentation from May 2023 until the start of the current survey on 11/28/23 revealed the facility held a QA meeting on 6/29/23. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, written staff statements, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity by posting a picture of a resident on social media(Resident #15) and speaking to/handling a resident in a rough manner(Resident#2) for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify a family member of a finger injury for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a change in condition(Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 8/6/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #10 which included Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety disorder. The MDS stated the resident was independent with bed mobility, transfers, walking, and eating, required limited assistance of 1 staff for dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of 1 staff for bathing. The MDS documented the resident's cognition was severely impaired. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency for 1 of 9 resident's reviewed for abuse(Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 8/6/23, listed diagnoses for Resident #10 which included Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and anxiety disorder. The MDS stated the resident was independent with bed mobility, transfers, walking, and eating, required limited assistance of 1 staff for dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance of 1 staff for bathing. The MDS stated the resident's cognition was severely impaired. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent cares for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for personal cares(Resident #17) and failed to complete oral cares for 1 of 3 (Resident #13)residents reviewed for oral cares. The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide proper care for a gastric tube and failed to provide nutritional feeding as per physician orders for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #13 & #14). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident # 14 revealed a diagnosis of cerebral palsy, aphasia (inability to communicate), dysphagia (swallowing disorder) and profound intellectual disabilities, identified a tube feeding and listed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 0 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that the portion total calories the resident received through tube feeding was 51% or more, and the average fluid intake per day by feeding tube was 501 milliliters per day or more. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for medications(Resident #1 and #21). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccine education was provided and the vaccine was offered to 4 (Residents #24, #40, #41, and #43) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred for a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) when the resident experienced a change and had a newly diagnosed mental illnesses for 1 (Resident #25) of 2 residents reviewed for the PASRR assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled for 1 (Resident #32) of 3 resident medications observed on the South Hall medication cart.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES RELATE TO THE IOWA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (IAC) CHAPTER 58. 58.12(135C) Admission, transfer, and discharge. 58.12(1) General admission policies. l. For all residents residing in a health care facility receiving reimbursement through the medical assistance program under Iowa Code chapter 249A on July 1, 2003, and all others subsequently admitted , the facility shall collect and report information regarding the resident's eligibility or potential eligibility for benefits through the Federal Department of Veterans Affairs as requested by the Iowa commission on Veterans Affairs. The facility shall collect and report the information on forms and by the procedures prescribed by the Iowa commissions on veteran's affairs. Where appropriate, the facility may also report such information to the Iowa department of human services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to document the record of death for 1 (Resident #45) of 2 sampled residents that expired in the facility. The facility further failed to properly transcribe orders for 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents observed for medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to transcribe an order to discontinue Resident #6's Lotensin (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) when a new order was received on [DATE].
20 fire safety citations on file: 4 on August 14, 2025, 12 on August 8, 2024, 4 on May 11, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 30, 2025 | Payment Denial | 29 days from December 2, 2025 |
| January 3, 2024 | Fine | $93,473 |
| January 3, 2024 | Payment Denial | 20 days from February 21, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.80 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.38 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.58 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.06 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.37 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 44.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.89 on weekdays and 2.58 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.77 in April to June 2025 to 2.80 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.80 | 0.38 | 2.89 | 2.58 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 51 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.81 | 0.37 | 2.88 | 2.61 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.53 | 0.44 | 3.75 | 2.97 | 8.0% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.77 | 0.55 | 4.04 | 3.08 | 6.2% | 0 of 91 | 49 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Iowa, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.80 | 0.71 | 3.98 | 3.36 | 4.7% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.92 | $17.96 to $21.95 | 22,670 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.11 | $27.12 to $34.06 | 5,510 |
| Registered nurses | $37.80 | $32.83 to $41.32 | 34,420 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.4 | 17.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 16.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.8 | 19.4 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Parkview Manor's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (37.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
37.1% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Iowa: 28 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Iowa: 1 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.
7.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Iowa: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.
57.1% this home
Median of homes: Iowa56.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Iowa0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Iowa1.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 27 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Iowa100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: OPCO WELLMAN IA LLC. CMS links this home to Campbell Street Services, a group of 24 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dole, Isaac | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Birchwood Healthcare Partners LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/03/2025 | |
| Campbell Street Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/03/2025 | |
| Holdco, Ia 5, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/03/2025 | |
| Dole, Isaac | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Martin, Kayleen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Nacos, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Pacha, Rebecca | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Satterfield, Brenda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Campbell Street Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/05/2025 | |
| Cyclone Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/03/2025 | |
| Holdco, Ia 5, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/05/2025 | |
| Wellman Property, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/03/2025 | |
| Dole, Isaac | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Martin, Kayleen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Nacos, George | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Pacha, Rebecca | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2025 | |
| Satterfield, Brenda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Iowa. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.