Home / West Virginia / Wheeling
20 Homestead Avenue, Wheeling, WV 26003 · Ohio County · (304) 234-0500
150 certified beds, about 140 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 515002 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 1, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the West Virginia average is 11.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 54 health citations since June 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $144,089 in the last three years; the largest was $127,823, and the latest is dated February 13, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.12 hours per resident per day, against 3.67 across West Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
43.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (West Virginia average 44.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 54 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possible. This was a random opportunity for discovery of a medication left at bedside unattended Resident Identifier #11. Facility census 131. a) Resident #11An observation, on 06/22/26 at 12:23 PM, found two (2) pills in a 30 ml medication cup at Resident #11's bedside, unsecured and unattended and allowing access to this medication by wandering residents, unauthorized staff, or visitors. During an interview on 06/22/26 PM at 12:29 PM , Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #120 verified the two (2) Renvela pills (a prescription phosphate binder used to lower high blood phosphorus levels in adults with chronic kidney disease) should not be left out in the room. LPN #120 removed the 30ml medication cup at this time. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. This was found during the Long-Term Care Annual Survey Process and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident Identifiers, #2, #11, #13, #17, #18 ,#44 and #84. Facility census: 131.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility did not ensure all equipment used for meal deliveries was clean, that hotel pans were not air dried prior to storage, and that proper hair restraints were being utilized. The facility also failed to ensure any plastic items with large chips were removed from service. This was found during the annual Long-Term Care Survey Process and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census 131.
Inspectors wroteBased upon record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper documentation of medical procedures. Blood pressures were documented for the wrong locations of dialysis patients. This was true for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed under the Dialysis Pathway throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident Identifiers: #8 and #11. Census 131.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections with regards to resident hand washing, and unsanitary practices with trash storage. These were random opportunities for discovery. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that reside in the facility. Facility census: 131.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PASSAR) reflected pre-admission diagnoses for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR, during the long-term care survey. Resident identifier #26. Facility Census 131. Findings Included:a) Resident #26A record review of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR), the resident's most recent PAS, dated 02/06/26, indicated no level II not required. Section lll, Question #30 MI/MR Assessment indicated Anxiety and history of seizure diagnosis. The record also revealed indicated the resident had a diagnosis of schizophrenia on admission, 02/09/26, but did not receive a new PAS to address whether or not specialized services were needed. On 06/24/26 at 10: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was in place for a resident with a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), for a resident receiving comfort care, and a resent ordered to use plastic utensils. This deficient practice was true for three (3) out of 33 sampled residents throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #12, #17, and #23. Facility census: 131.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a person-centered comprehensive care plan. The facility failed to revise care plans for behaviors. This practice affected one (1) of (33) resident's care plans reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). The failure to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised for the resident's highest practicable well-being placed the residents at risk of not receiving services that would meet their desires or wants and a decreased quality of life. Resident Identifier #110. Facility census: 131.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify potential incidents of abuse, report the alleged violations, and implement interventions to prevent further abuse and mistreatment from occurring Resident Identifiers: Residents #161 and #46. Facility Census: 137. Findings Include a) Resident #161 Record review on 10/06/24 at approximately 4:25 PM revealed that Resident #161 was no longer at the facility. Further record review revealed the following: A note on 05/14/25 at 6:30 AM by Director of Nursing (DON), which stated: Resident continuing to go into Female Residents rooms while they are sleeping. Redirected with effect Another note on 05/14/25 at 3:44 PM by the DON, which stated: social services notified about resident going into other residents rooms On 05/15/25 at 9:01 AM SW #304 documented a progress note which stated: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate potential verbal and sexual abuse, failed to implement interventions to prevent further abuse and mistreatment from occurring while the investigation was in progress; and failed to take appropriate corrective action to ensure that the abuse or mistreatment would not recur. Resident Identifiers: Residents #5, #27, #46, #51, #75, #76, and #119. Facility Census: 137. Findings IncludeRecord review revealed that Resident #161 was no longer at the facility. a) Resident #5Record review on 10/06/24 at approximately 4:25 PM revealed the following: A note on 05/10/25 at 7:19 AM by LPN #131Resident repeatedly going into a female Residents room while they where sleeping. This nurse redirected resident to leave and go back to his floor. Explained that he can not be in female residents room. Supervisor made aware. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the resident's grievance, and failed to make prompt efforts to resolve those grievances. Resident Identifiers: Resident #76. Facility Census: 137. Findings Include a) Resident #76During an interview on 10/07/25, at approximately 1:15 PM, the resident indicated that she had requested a room change due to difficulties sleeping at night. When asked about the reasons for her sleeplessness, Resident #76 mentioned that her roommate often makes a lot of noise during the night. When asked if she had informed the facility about her issues, the resident replied that she had notified both the nurse and the Director of Nursing (DON) about her complaint and had requested a room change in late August. While she could not recall the name of the nurse she had spoken to, she was confident that she had communicated with the DON. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise and update the resident's care plan, and implement interventions to ensure that residents at the facility were free from abuse. Resident Identifier: #161. Facility Census: 137. Findings Include a) Resident #161Record review on 10/06/24 at approximately 4:25 PM revealed that Resident #161 was no longer at the facility. Record review on 10/07/25 revealed multiple reports by staff and the Social Worker, over a period of over six (6) months, stating that Resident #161 was indulging in sexually inappropriate behaviors with female residents, as evidenced by the following progress notes:[Typed as Written]A note on 11/27/24 by Registered Nurse (RN) #94, which stated:This patient (Resident #161) along with 706-2 (Resident #53) sat outside the doorway of 704. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse completed a timely assessment and intervention in response to an acute change in condition for a resident identified as high risk for bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy. This verifies a complaint that the facility failed to provide care in noncompliance with 42 CFR S483.25 (Quality of Care - F0684). Entry: 10/06/2025 at 12:00 PMFacility Census: 137RE: FRI #2561221Status: Verified- The facility failed to ensure that a licensed nurse completed a timely assessment and intervention in response to an acute change in condition for a resident identified as high risk for bleeding due to anticoagulant therapy. Date Complaint Received: 07/12/2025 at 8:38 AMAllegation Date (per complainant): [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and Interviews, the facility failed to ensure that PRN(as needed) pain management was provided timely for a resident who required such services, consistent with Physician Orders, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Resident Identifier:
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and observation the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Facility Census: 137. Findings Include a) room [ROOM NUMBER]During an interview with Resident #27 in room [ROOM NUMBER], on 10/07/25 at approximately 10:20 AM, the bathroom door was open and a 'pool noodle' was observed taped with orange tape, to the entire length of the water pipe leading to the commode. The flush handle too was covered with foam and tape. When asked about it, Resident #27 stated, It was there when I came to this room! During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 10/07/25 at approximately 11:00 AM, she stated that it had been installed when another resident occupied the room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on results of State inspection, The facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were located in prominent areas and readily accessible to residents and public. This deficient practice had the potential to effect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the grievance forms were within reach for each resident to enable to file grievance anonymously if they so choose. This was a random opportunity for discovery and was true for Resident #40. Facility Census: 132. Findings Include: a) Resident #40 Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] an observation found the grievance forms were up too high for residents who could not stand up. If a resident is confined to the wheelchair they are unable to obtain a grievance form without asking staff or others to hand them the form. On 02/11/25 at 11:45 am Resident #40 indicated they were not able to reach the grievance forms nor the box provided to place the grievance forms without standing up from the wheelchair. [...]
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards over which it had control. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Water temperatures were found to be above 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively effect more than a limited number of residents. Facility census: 132.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and food tray temperatures the facility failed to serve food to residents that was at an appetizing temperature. This failed practice was true for one (1) of two (2) wings tested for food tray temperatures throughout the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Facility census: 132.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and equipment manual review the facility failed to keep the ice machine in safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect all Residents who get their nutrition from the kitchen, and residents who attend food related activities. Facility Census: 132. Findings Included: a) Ice Machines On 02/13/25 at 12:40 PM a tour with the Maintenance Director found the ice machines located in the Kitchen area had a drainpipe running on the floor to a drain. Nutrition rooms on units one (1) and three (3) had no required air gap on the ice machine drains. The drainpipes were touching the drains. Continued tour found unit one (1), five (5) and six (6) had no required filter on the ice machines. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete medical record for seven (7) of 32 residents. Resident identifiers: #3, #17, #280, #128, #123, #71 and #75. Facility Census: 132. Findings Include: a) Resident #3 On [DATE] at 9:18 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #3. The review found the [NAME] Virginia (WV) Physicians Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) was incomplete. The resident's signature under section E was not dated. On [DATE] at 2:21 PM, the Director of Nursing was notified and confirmed the resident's signature was not dated. b) Resident #17 On [DATE] at 9:30 AM, a record review was completed for Resident #17. The review found the WV POST form under section B had both selective treatments and comfort-focused treatments selected. The directions under section B specify pick one (1). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the Facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs of Resident #86 by ensuring the call light was in reach. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility census: 132.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have residents Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASSAR) reflect a new diagnosis after admission. This is true for one of (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for the care area of PAS-R during the long term care survey process. Resident Identifier: Resident #13. Facility Census 132.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Pre-admission Screening (PAS) reflected pre-admission diagnoses. This was true for two (2) out of six (6) residents reviewed for the category of PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Record Review, during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #125 and #67. Facility census: 132.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his or her preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial need regarding schizoaffective disorder. This practice affected one (1) of (28) resident's care plans reviewed. Resident identifier: #27. Facility census: 132.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan regarding an appropriate diagnosis for Resident #128's urinary catheter, antipsychotic medication and behavior monitoring for Resident #90; and the discontinuation of a feeding tube for Resident #86. This was true for three (3) of 32 sampled residents reviewed during the survey process. Resident Identifier: #128, #90 and #86. Facility Census: 132. Findings Include: a) Resident #128 On 02/11/25 at 3:21 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #128. The review found the care plan listed the resident's need for a urinary catheter was personal preference. However, further review of the record found urinary retention as the correct diagnosis for the urinary catheter. On 02/12/25 at 2:22 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the diagnosis for the urinary catheter on the care plan was incorrect. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders regarding medication administration, behavior monitoring, pain score, side effects of a antipsychotic, and supplement. This was true of two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed under the care area of unnecessary medications. Resident Identifiers: #13 and #58. Facility Census: 132. Findings Include: a) Resident #13 On 02/13/25 at 12:24 PM, a record review was completed for Resident #13. The review found blanks on the 02/2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR). The following is the list of the missed behavior and side effect monitoring: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to date insulin upon opening for Resident #3 and dispose of expired insulin for Resident #18. These were random opportunities for discovery. Resident Identifiers: #3 and #18. Facility Census: 132. Findings Include: a) Medication Cart 800 wing On [DATE] at 1:00 PM, a tour of the medication cart on the 800 wing was completed. The tour found Resident #3's insulin glargine not dated upon opening and Resident #18's Novolog insulin expired on [DATE] after 28 days from opening. Registered Nurse (RN) #119 confirmed the insulin glargine was not dated upon opening and the Novolog insulin was expired. b) Facility policy On [DATE] at 2:30 PM, a review of the facility policy was completed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an appropriate infection control program for foley catheter care. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Resident Identifier: 85. Facility Census: 132. Findings Include: a) Resident #85 On 02/10/25 at 12:46 PM, an observation of Resident #85's urinary catheter drainage bag touched the floor. On 02/10/25 at 12:48 PM, Nurse Aide (NA) #163 confirmed the drainage bag was touching the floor. NA #163 stated, let me raise the bed .it shouldn't be touching the floor. On 02/10/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified. The DON confirmed the urinary catheter drainage bag should not be touching the floor.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to protect Resident #39's right to be free from sexual abuse. This was true for one (1) out of five (5) resident-to-resident altercations reviewed during the complaint process. Facility census: 135. Resident identifiers: #39 and #137. The facility's failure to follow their abuse policy and recognize the incident as an occurrence of resident-to-resident sexual abuse placed an unlimited number of residents currently residing in the facility at risk for possible abuse. The state agency determined this was an immediate jeopardy (IJ) situation. a) An electronic medical review, completed on 05/21/24 at 9:45 AM, revealed the following details: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to keep Resident #38 free from a chemical restraint imposed for purposes of discipline when an antipsychotic medication was given without a physician order. The deficient practice put all one (1) resident that exhibit behaviors currently residing in the facility at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. Resident identifier: #38. Facility Census: 135.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the residents environment over which it had control was free from accident hazards related to Resident # 27 received a burn after spilling reheated hot coffee on herself. The deficient practice put all residents that drink coffee currently residing in the facility at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. Resident identifiers: #27. Facility census: 135.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of three (3) residents had a person-centered comprehensive care plan implemented to meet his/her other preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. Failure to implement Resident #72's care plan resulted in her sustaining a burn to her abdomen which required physician intervention. Resident #72 sustained actual harm due to the facility's failure to implement her care plan. Resident identifiers: #27. Facility census: 135.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported in a timely fashion to all appropriate state agencies. This was true for one (1) out of five (5) resident-to-resident altercations reviewed during the complaint process. Facility census: 135. Resident identifiers: #39 and #137.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise residents care plans after an occurrence of resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This was a random opportunity for discovery throughout the complaint survey process. Resident identifiers: #137 and #39. Facility census:
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure hallway temperatures were set at least 71 degrees Fahrenheit (F). This was a random observation. Facility census: 133.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records. Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) forms were incomplete and/or inaccurate for 17 of 18 records reviewed for accurate POST forms. Additionally, one (1) of 18 records reviewed had a missing POST form that was not part of the electronic medical record or the chart. Resident identifiers: #4, #19, #27, #29, #44, #87, #115, #119, #132, #28, #39, #71, #131, #90, #118, #246, #74, and #65. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for the administration of an antibiotic. This was true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for antibiotics. The facility failed to notify the physician when blood sugar levels were above 400 or when a blood sugar level was below 70. This was true for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for insulin. The facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders and the Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (POST) form matched. This was true for two (2) of 18 residents reviewed for advance directives. Resident identifiers: #19, #44, #29, #95, #107. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing was posted in a prominent place and readily accessible to residents on the second floor. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a safe and sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards of practice. During the kitchen tour it was discovered a stove drip pan was heavily soiled with grease, eight (8) storage racks had a heavy dust build-up, the threshold to walk-in freezer was damaged. The floors to the walk-in freezer and reach-in coolers needed to be cleaned. Also, the ice machines located on each of the 8 hallways were not draining properly. These deficient practices had the potential to affect any resident receiving nourishment from the kitchen and ice from the eight (8) ice machines located in the Medical Storage Rooms. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure meal trays were delivered in a manner to protect and promote resident dignity by failing to serve roommates a meal tray at the same time. This was based on two (2) random opportunities for discovery and had the potential to affect a limited number of residents. Resident identifiers: #115 and #55. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on family interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA) regarding a change in condition. This was true for one (1) of 35 sample residents reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident #39 had testing ordered on 06/02/23 and the MPOA was not informed of the appointment. Resident identifier: #39. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a resident with a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN). This is true for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. Resident identifier: #4. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with a resident's Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA), staff interview and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve a grievance and to keep the resident notified of progress toward resolution. This was true for one (1) of three (3) reviewed during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP). Resident identifier: #17. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the care plan and ensure emergency equipment was at the bedside and readily available for a resident with a tracheostomy. In addition, care plans were not developed for a resident admitted with a urinary catheter and a resident diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This was true for three (3) of 35 residents reviewed for care plans. Resident identifiers: #107, #123, #131. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect a change in code status. This is true for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed for code status. Resident identifier: #95. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment related to vision impairment for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed in the care area of communication/sensory. Resident identifier: #17. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident admitted with a urinary catheter had a written physician order with an appropriate indication for use and guidelines for monitoring and maintaining. This was true for one (1) of five (5) reviewed for urinary catheters. Resident identifier: #123. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency equipment was at the bedside and readily available for a resident with a tracheostomy. This is true for 1 of 2 reviewed for tracheostomy. Resident identifier: 107. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of dialysis during the Long-Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP), received such services consistent with physician's orders for care. Resident #103 did not have a dialysis emergency kit maintained at the bedside in accordance with physician's orders. Resident identifier: Resident #103. Census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to follow a monthly medication regimen review (MRR) recommendation and attempt a gradual dose reduction of a psychotropic medication. This is true for one of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident identifier: 95. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored and administered to residents past the manufacturer's date of use. This failed practice was identified through a random opportunity for discovery and was found to be true during one (1) of four (4) medication cart reviews. An insulin vial, containing Humalog insulin, currently stored in the medication cart and being administered to a resident, was being administered past the manufacturer's guidelines for safe usage. Resident identifiers: Resident #79. Facility census: 138.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident Council meeting interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature. During the last breakfast test tray on the 800 hallway, it was discovered Resident #55's food was not being served at an appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Resident identifier: #55. Facility census: 135.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated resident preferences. This was true for two (2) of 35 residents sampled in the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Resident identifiers: #1 and #46. Facility Census: 138.
25 fire safety citations on file: 5 on July 1, 2026, 13 on February 13, 2025, 7 on June 7, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 13, 2025 | Fine | $14,518 |
| May 28, 2024 | Fine | $127,823 |
| October 2, 2023 | Fine | $1,748 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.12 | 3.67 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.94 | 3.17 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.96 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.4% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 36.4% | 42.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.19 on weekdays and 2.94 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.44 in April to June 2025 to 3.12 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.12 | 0.52 | 3.19 | 2.94 | 2.4% | 0 of 90 | 140 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.72 | 0.71 | 3.86 | 3.37 | 1.6% | 0 of 92 | 135 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.49 | 0.82 | 3.64 | 3.13 | 1.5% | 0 of 92 | 138 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.44 | 0.67 | 3.56 | 3.12 | 6.8% | 0 of 91 | 134 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| West Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.67 | 3.75 | 3.08 | 3.9% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| West Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.66 | $17.05 to $18.47 | 9,390 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $26.61 | $23.71 to $29.47 | 6,050 |
| Registered nurses | $38.52 | $32.77 to $47.97 | 23,430 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | West Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.4 | 14.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 4.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 15.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.4 | 13.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.8 | 22.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.7 | 11.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Peterson Rehabilitation and Healthcare's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · West Virginia: 9 better, 28 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 120 eligible stays.
9.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · West Virginia: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 136 eligible stays.
5.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · West Virginia: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 79 eligible stays.
61.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia50.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 59 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia1.2% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 83 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 83 residents counted.
96.2% this home
Median of homes: West Virginia97.6% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: WHEELING REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stallion Wv Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/09/2024 |
| Lrans Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/09/2024 | |
| Stallion Wv Tbd Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/09/2024 | |
| Bharti, Sanjay | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 04/09/2024 | |
| Borkoski, Heather | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/09/2024 | |
| Gottlieb, Refoel | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/09/2024 | |
| Gotts Consulting Wv LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/09/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in West Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.