Find a nursing home

Home / Louisiana / Bossier City

Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation

1524 Doctors Drive, Bossier City, LA 71111 · Bossier County · (318) 742-1623

155 certified beds, about 121 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
1 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 195594 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Louisiana average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 22 health citations since January 2024, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (5 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 3 fines totaling $186,253 in the last three years; the largest was $120,973, and the latest is dated September 3, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.40 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Louisiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.22 of those hours.

69.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Louisiana average 47.6%).

CMS links it to Priority Management, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
1K
2L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
10E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 25, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 (Resident #47) resident reviewed for UTI.
  2. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on medication administration observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. The facility had a 14.29% medication error rate with 4 medication errors out of 28 opportunities.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interview the facility failed to inform and provide written information to residents or resident's representative concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 2 (#38, #96) of the 48 sampled residents.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect changes of a resident refusing medication/treatment for 1 (#31) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for care planning.
  5. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to provide nutritional and hydration care and services for 1(#57) of 5 (#4, #7, #13, #14 and 57) resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to provide care and services for resident #7 consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment resulting in weight loss.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use infection control standards of practice for 1(#7) of 5 (#4, #7, #13, #14 and 57) residents reviewed for nutrition by not providing proper placement of a resident's gastrostomy tubing to prevent an increased risk of contamination and infection. Resident #7's gastrostomy tubing with the cap or cover was attached to the feeding pump tubing laying on the floor. Observation on 02/23/2026 at 12:50 p.m. with S4 LPN revealed Resident #7's PEG tube was disconnected. The gastrostomy tubing extended from Resident #7's abdomen did not have a cap or cover; it was opened. The cap or cover attached to the feeding pump tubing laying on the floor. S4 LPN removed the cap or cover from the floor and attached it to Resident #7's gastrostomy tube. During an interview on 02/23/2026 at 12:50 p.m. [...]
September 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to use a Hoyer lift, as determined necessary by the resident's comprehensive care plan, during a transfer from the resident's bed to wheelchair for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents which resulted in a right humeral neck fracture. The deficient practice resulted in harm for Resident #1 on 07/14/2025 at approximately 10:30 a.m. when S6 agency CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred Resident #1 from the bed to a wheelchair with a stand and pivot method without utilization of a Hoyer lift. Resident #1 had an onset of acute pain to her right arm/shoulder and reported her right arm hit the wheelchair armrest during transfer. Resident #1 was care planned for activities of daily living self-care deficit with intervention of dependent in transferring with the use of Hoyer lift. [...]
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from neglect when nursing staff failed to use a Hoyer lift to transfer 1 (Resident #F3) of 4 (Residents #F1, #F2, #F3, and #F4) sampled residents who required a mechanical lift for transfers.
December 17, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards for 2 (#102, #105) of 26 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure safe oral medication administration practices by leaving medication at the bedside.
  2. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (#27, #224) out of 2 (#27, #224) residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility failed to: 1. Change the humidification bottle and nasal cannula weekly as ordered for Resident #27, and 2. Ensure oxygen tubing was dated, and humidification was administered with oxygen for Resident #224.
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure dietary services were provided in a safe, sanitary environment to prevent contamination and food borne illness for the 121 residents served a meal tray from the kitchen per the Dietary Manager. The facility failed to ensure frozen meat was thawed following accepted practices.
  4. E
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to electronically submit accurate payroll information for direct care staffing as required.
December 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, video footage review, and interviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from deprivation of goods and services by staff for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) sampled residents when staff failed to utilize a Hoyer lift during a transfer. The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on 11/17/2024 when Resident #1 was transferred from a Geri chair to the bed without utilization of a Hoyer lift. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital related to a left lower leg wound which had adipose tissue and bone exposed. Review of Resident #1's hospital record revealed, Resident #1 was admitted with the primary diagnosis type I or II open non-displaced spiral fracture of shaft of left fibula with a laceration to distal LLE (left lower extremity) above the ankle mortis with exposed fibula. [...]
  2. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, video footage review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate assistance to prevent accidents for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1, #2, #3) residents reviewed for transfers by failing to follow Resident #1's plan of care. The deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 on 11/17/2024 when Resident #1 was transferred from a Geri chair to the bed without utilization of a Hoyer lift. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital related to a left lower leg wound which had adipose tissue and bone exposed. Review of Resident #1's hospital record revealed, Resident #1 was admitted with the primary diagnosis type I or II open non-displaced spiral fracture of shaft of left fibula with a laceration to distal LLE (left lower extremity) above the ankle mortis with exposed fibula. [...]
August 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. L
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, video review, and interviews the facility failed to supervise a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 ( #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 07/23/2024 at 5:55 p.m. when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who was ambulatory, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. Resident #1 walked out of the front entrance of the facility after S5Evening Receptionist remotely released the front sliding doors to an open position for Resident #1 to exit. Staff had not realized Resident #1 eloped from the facility until 07/23/2024 at approximately 7:30 p.m., when the search began and local police and Resident #1's RP (Responsible Party) were notified. [...]
  2. L
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    F835 · Administration · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, video review, an interviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled its resources to be used effectively and efficiently by failing to implement a system to provide quality care to meet the needs of each resident by failing to: 1. Ensure a process was in place to prevent a cognitively impaired resident from exiting the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. and 2. Ensure the nursing staff possessed the competency to accurately assess a resident for an elopement risk. The lack of administrative oversight resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 07/23/2024 at 5:55 p.m. when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who was ambulatory, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. [...]
  3. K
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff possessed the competency to accurately assess a resident for elopement risk for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 ( #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) sampled residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy on 07/23/2024 at 5:55 p.m. when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident who was ambulatory, was unsupervised and eloped from the facility. Resident #1 walked out of the front entrance of the facility after S5Evening Receptionist remotely released the front sliding doors to an open position for Resident #1 to exit. Staff had not realized Resident #1 eloped from the facility until 07/23/2024 at approximately 7:30 p.m. [...]
April 24, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure grievances/complaints had been documented and investigated. The facility failed to follow their policy for reporting and investigating grievances for 1 (#1) of 4 (#1, #2, #3, #4) sampled residents.
January 31, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the resident's representative were provided with written information concerning advance directives and/or the option to formulate an advanced directive for 14 (#1, #3, #20, #21, #22, #24, #28, #40, #45, #50, #58, #65, #67, #74) of 15 (#1, #3, #20, #21, #22, #24, #28, #33, #40, #45, #50, #58, #65, #67, #74) residents reviewed for Advanced Directives.
  2. E
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were transmitted within the required timeframe for 3 (#88, #60, #49) of 19 residents reviewed for assessments out of a total of 28 sampled residents.
  3. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure oral care was provided for 2(#30, #109) of 4(#1, #30, #109, #111) residents reviewed for ADLs.
  4. E
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 16, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed as ordered by a physician for 2 (#20, #106) of 4 (#20, #30, #74, #106) residents reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
September 3, 2025Fine $12,425
September 3, 2025Payment Denial 13 days from October 16, 2025
December 4, 2024Fine $52,855
August 1, 2024Fine $120,973

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeLouisianaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.403.763.86
Registered nurses0.220.310.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.993.213.42
Nurse aides2.21
Licensed practical nurses0.98
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)69.3%47.6%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported41.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 4.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.57 on weekdays and 2.99 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 31.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.81 in April to June 2025 to 3.40 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.400.223.572.99 31.2%0 of 90121
Oct to Dec 20253.310.203.462.92 34.2%0 of 92123
Jul to Sep 20253.050.143.152.79 32.8%0 of 92125
Apr to Jun 20252.810.132.942.49 27.5%0 of 91126
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Louisiana, Jan to Mar 20263.640.263.863.103.6%0.9% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Louisiana

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Louisiana, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$14.67$13.97 to $16.8720,690
LPNs and LVNs$27.63$23.87 to $29.4317,600
Registered nurses$38.57$33.19 to $45.0048,970
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeLouisianaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.617.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.63.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.63.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.017.914.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.65.64.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.722.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.928.023.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
13.414.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.92.61.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.71.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

42.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Louisiana: 16 better, 33 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Louisiana: 0 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

11.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Louisiana: 1 better, 7 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 81 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

62.7% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana50.0% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 59 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.9% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana1.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 102 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.8% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana2.8% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 102 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Louisiana100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PMG OPCO-PILGRIM LLC. CMS links this home to Priority Management, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sdb Holdings5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%04/01/2019
Bauder, WilliamIndirect ownership interestIndividual04/01/2019
Boulware, DouglasIndirect ownership interestIndividual04/01/2019
Boulware, StevenIndirect ownership interestIndividual04/01/2019
Priority Management Group, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2019
Bauder, WilliamOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2019
Boulware, StevenOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2019
Priority Management Group, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/16/2025
Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2023
Adams, AngelaAdp of the SNFIndividual09/19/2018
Almond, JamesAdp of the SNFIndividual04/18/2025
Angelo, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual04/17/2025
Colvin, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual04/17/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 3, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.99 hours per resident per day, below the Louisiana average of 3.21.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Louisiana contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Louisiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Louisiana average is 6.4.
Has Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 3 fines totaling $186,253 in the last three years.
Does Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Pilgrim Manor Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation?
CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to Priority Management. Legal business name: PMG OPCO-PILGRIM LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection