475 Washington Street, Metter, GA 30439 · Candler County · (912) 685-2168
120 certified beds, about 97 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115411 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 26 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.04 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.22 of those hours.
60.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
CMS links it to Beacon Health Management, an affiliated group of 11 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Abuse Prevention: Fast Alerts, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough abuse investigation was conducted for six of nine Residents (R) (R2, R3, R4, R6, R5, and R9) reviewed for abuse investigations out of a total sample of 22 residents. This failure had the potential to result in additional residents to be abused by the same perpetrator.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation; Abuse Prevention: Fast Alerts, the facility failed to notify the State Survey Agency (SSA) of an allegation of physical abuse for one of seven Residents (R) (R9) reviewed for abuse out of 22 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documentation that the SSA was notified of an allegation of physical abuse when the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of bruising to R9's body by the hospital's Social Worker. This failure had the potential to contribute to further abuse or injury, which could result in mental anguish, physical harm, or fear.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure three of three garbage dumpsters were maintained in sanitary conditions, free from trash and debris on the ground, and with secure fitting lids. The deficient practice had the potential to promote the harboring of pests, rodents, insects, and other organisms. The facility census was 101 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, F-689 Accidents -Water Temperatures, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures at the hand washing sink in 12 of 28 resident bathrooms and two of three resident shower rooms. In addition, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from chemical and environmental hazards in one of three shower rooms. This deficient practice placed the residents residing in the affected rooms and using the affected shower rooms at risk of avoidable injuries and a diminished quality of life. The census was 101 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that one of two medication carts was locked and secured when unattended by the nurse. The deficient practice had the potential to allow unauthorized persons, including residents and visitors, to access medications. The census was 101 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Laundry Linen: Handling of, and Biohazardous/Infectious Waste, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices to prevent cross-contamination during a glucometer check for one resident, during the storage of linen in one linen storage room, during the storage of soiled linen in two shower rooms, and during the storage of washbasins and urinals in three resident restrooms. These deficient practices had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination and spread infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to place a privacy bag over the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag of one of two residents (R) (R251) reviewed with a urinary catheter. This failure had the potential to diminish R251's quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 54 residents (R) (R49 and R1) reviewed did not have unsecured, unauthorized medications and over-the-counter medication products stored at the bedside. This failure placed R49 and R1 at risk for inappropriate and unsafe medication use and had the potential to allow unauthorized access to medications to other residents and visitors in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, New Hire Checklist, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment screenings, specifically reference checks and fingerprinting, were conducted prior to employment for four of 10 employees reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents residing in the facility at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation from staff. The census was 101 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument)/Care Planning Management, the facility failed to implement the person-centered comprehensive care plan for one of 12 residents (R) (R78) with a care plan for fall mats and two of two R (R49 and R68) with a care plan for oxygen (O2). This failure had the potential for R78, R49, and R68 to not receive treatment and/or care according to their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for two residents (R) (R43 and R78). Specifically for an evaluation for Physical Therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT), and Speech Therapy (ST) for R43 and for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) water flushes for R78. This failure had the potential for R43 and R78 to not receive medical treatment according to their needs and placed them at risk for adverse consequences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to increase or prevent a decrease in range of motion (ROM) for one of 52 sampled residents (R) (R43). The deficient practice had the potential to place R43 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Respiratory System Management Standard, the facility failed to ensure two residents (R) (R49 and R68) receiving oxygen (O2) therapy were administered O2 in accordance with the physician order. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of respiratory complications for R49 and R68. The sample size was 52 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, and record review the facility failed to serve food that was hot and/or well-seasoned to four of five sampled residents (R) (#48, #82, #57, and #75) reviewed for food palatability. This failure had the potential to affect all 99 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Food storage, the facility failed to cover stored food, keep scoops and cups out of stored dried foods, store meat, vegetables, nutritional supplements, and bread products in a kitchen reach-in freezer at zero degrees Fahrenheit (F) or lower, and date nutritional supplements when removed from freezer storage. This failure had the potential to affect all 99 residents who consumed food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Pest Control, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of rodents. This failure had the potential for all the residents of the facility to be at risk for diseases caused by rodent infestations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, the facility failed to ensure the secure unit was in good repair, and free from odors. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that dressers were kept in good repair in the secure unit for four residents (R) (#2, #15, #48, and #82). This failure had the potential to affect all 51 residents who resided in the secure unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to provide routine care and adequate supervision for the 51 residents on the secure unit out of a total of 99 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Mobility Aids: Conduct wheelchair Inspection, the facility failed to provide wheelchairs and geri-chairs that were functional, clean, and in good repair for 10 of 49 sampled Residents (R) (#3, #22, #42, #61, #63, #9, #27, #87, #5, and #11) who used wheelchairs or geri-chairs. This failure had the potential to affect residents' mobility and have a negative impact on their quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience at meals by serving residents food and beverages on disposable Styrofoam plates, disposable Styrofoam cups, small disposable plastic cups, and disposable plastic eating utensils for three of four sampled residents (R) (#48, #76, and #82) reviewed for dignity while dining. This failure had the potential to affect all 51 residents who resided in the facility on hallways A, B, and C.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R) (#22) reviewed for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process, who was admitted with a mental health diagnosis, was referred for a Level II screening. This failure had the potential to increase the risk for a resident with a mental illness diagnosis from not receiving specialized services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Hygiene-Bath and Shower Standards, the facility failed to ensure baths/showers and consistent Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were provided to a resident who was dependent on staff for personal hygiene needs. This affected one of six residents (R) (#83) reviewed for ADLs on the secure unit. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care by residents not receiving bathes/showers according to the facility policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled, Behavior Monitoring, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for monitoring of effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for three of five residents (R) (#22, #42 and #72) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure had the potential to contribute to unnecessary antipsychotic medication use for residents who used the medication to treat the behavioral symptoms of dementia.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an angled rocker knife and evaluate a resident's need for other special eating utensils for one of one sampled residents (R) (#2) reviewed for assistive eating devices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an adequately furnished dining room for resident dining by utilizing two overbed tables and two folding tables in the dining room. This affected two of 28 residents (R) (#2 and #48) who ate their meals in the facility's main dining room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Clinical Staffing Standard dated August 2021 revealed, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This failure had the potential to affect all residents and visitors to the facility.
13 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 15, 2026, 6 on August 21, 2024, 3 on February 23, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.04 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.22 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.67 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.84 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.98 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 60.0% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 77.8% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.19 on weekdays and 2.67 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.06 in April to June 2025 to 3.04 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.04 | 0.22 | 3.19 | 2.67 | 0.2% | 0 of 90 | 97 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.12 | 0.21 | 3.23 | 2.83 | 2.5% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.97 | 0.23 | 3.06 | 2.74 | 5.3% | 0 of 92 | 93 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.06 | 0.19 | 3.18 | 2.78 | 8.2% | 4 of 91 | 97 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Georgia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.12 | $17.06 to $20.66 | 43,440 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.82 | $25.43 to $33.99 | 21,060 |
| Registered nurses | $44.98 | $38.02 to $51.12 | 100,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 39.0 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.1 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.4 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.4 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Pleasant View Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Georgia: 49 better, 27 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 15 eligible stays.
11.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Georgia: 2 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
7.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Georgia: 0 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 38 eligible stays.
48.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia46.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia0.4% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Georgia2.2% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Georgia97.4% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PW SNF LLC. CMS links this home to Beacon Health Management, a group of 11 nursing homes averaging 1.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rwc Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2016 |
| Pww Healthcare, LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/01/2016 |
| Williams, Berry | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/15/2022 | |
| Wertheim, Bruce | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Beacon Health Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/2016 | |
| Wertheim, Bruce | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Williams, Berry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/15/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.