801 North 6th Street, Purcell, OK 73080 · McClain County · (405) 527-7798
105 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375286 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 5, 2024, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 11 health citations since May 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.40 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.
65.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
CMS links it to IHS Management Consultants, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The ADON identified eight residents at risk for elopement.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for 1 (#1) of 6 residents sampled for timely administration of medications. The administrator identified 67 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure discontinued medications were discarded in a timely manner from the refrigerator for three (#25, 27, and #36) of three sampled residents reviewed for medication labeling and storage. The administrator identified 60 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within two hours for two (#1 and #2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The DON identified 54 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal blood pressures for two (#3 and #5) of five sampled residents reviewed for changes in condition. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician order for two (#3 and #5) of five sampled residents reviewed for changes in condition. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer insulin according to physician orders for two (#10 and #26) and failed to notify the physician for FSBS outside of ordered parameters for one (#26) of six residents sampled for medications. The ADON identified seven residents who received insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during insulin administration. The ADON identified seven residents in the facility received insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately documented the status of residents for one (#26) of 16 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 09/14/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a weekend RN for eight hours a day. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 30 residents lived in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to include the recommendations from the PASRR Level II evaluation report into a resident's assessment and care planning for one (#22) of five residents reviewed for PASRR screening. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 26 residents receiving psychoactive medications.
4 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 5, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.40 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.22 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.20 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.2% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.0% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 2.93 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.48 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.19 in April to June 2025 to 3.40 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.40 | 0.28 | 3.48 | 3.22 | 6.6% | 1 of 90 | 52 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.71 | 0.31 | 3.83 | 3.43 | 9.9% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.33 | 3.54 | 3.15 | 17.7% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.19 | 0.24 | 3.24 | 3.07 | 19.3% | 1 of 91 | 66 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.2 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.6 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 29.2 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.4 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Purcell Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 11 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 14 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PURCELL CARE CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to IHS Management Consultants, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forvis Mazars LLP | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 07/16/2019 |
| Reed, Bart | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 07/16/2019 |
| Livingston, Jeff | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/16/2019 | |
| Reed, Bart | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/16/2019 | |
| IHS Management Consultants Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/16/2019 | |
| Reed, Bart | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/16/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.