Home / Pennsylvania / Haverford
3300 Darby Road, Haverford, PA 19041 · Delaware County · (610) 642-3000
78 certified beds, about 63 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395801 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 27, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since May 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated January 16, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.34 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.05 of those hours.
65.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Healthpeak Properties, Inc., an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of professional literature, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a PICC (Peripheral inserted central catheter) in accordance with professional practice standards for two of two residents with IV (intravenous lines). (Resident R9 and Resident R46).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care/oxygen services consistent with professional standards of practice of two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R53, and R72).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and a review of employee credentials, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and an interview with staff it was determined that the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to Transmission Based Precautions for two of two residents reviewed (Residents R1and R2) and an Infection Preventionist.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents and/or their representatives could file a grievance/concern anonymously by failing to ensure that grievance boxes were in place for residents or their representatives to anonymously drop their grievances/complaints for two of two units reviewed. (First floor and Second floor)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, it was determined that the facility failed to properly dispose of garbage and refuse. Findings Include: Observations on April 2, 2026 with the Culinary Director (Employee E23), the Director of Maintenance (Employee E24), and the Nursing Home Administrator on April 2, 2025 at 11:35 a.m. near the trash compactors (areas on the sides of , front of, back of, and underneath of the trash compactors) located near the loading dock receiving area revealed the following: Various trash items such as tops to jars, cans, sugar packets bottles and cardboard boxes were seen in the above referenced areas. The presence of fall leaves and 1 dinner plate was even also among the trash/debris. Various other trash items had been present for so long that they turned black, appeared moist, and the type of trash/debris it once was could not be determined due to its diminished appearance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of facility-initiated transfers and discharges, and failed to ensure that a 30-day discharge notice included required information, for four of four residents reviewed for discharge notices (Residents R57, R16, R59 and R58).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was informed of charges for services not covered under Medicare, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R61).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse and neglect for two of 25 residents reviewed (Residents R16 and R57).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete an MDS assessment for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident R55).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, facility documents, clinical records, and interview with staff, it was determined the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and interventions related to pain management, foot care and compression stocking for two of 17 resident clinical record reviewed (Resident R42 and Resident R47).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to follow a physician's order related to the application of compression stockings, and failed to clarify/notify the physician of the expected time of the completion of an ultrasound study for 2 out of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R47 and Resident R35).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that podiatrist services were provided for 1 out of 17 residents reviewed (Resident R47).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain orders for urinary catheter for one of two clinical records of residents with urinary catheters reviewed (Resident R46).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that intravenous (IV) devices were maintained in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one residents reviewed for intravenous therapy (Resident R106).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain orders for oxygen for one of 17 clinical records reviewed (Resident R21).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care of residents with intravenous (IV) devices for two of five employees reviewed for IV skills competencies (Employees E15 and E16).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for two of three medication carts reviewed (Second floor nursing unit A and C medication carts).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, staff interview and review of clinical record, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to contact precaution and maintenance of urinary catheter/urine bag for two of 17 residents observed. (Resident R46 and Resident R159)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to check the temperature of the hot water provided to Resident R1 which resulted in actual harm to Resident R1, of spillage of hot water on the left upper and outer thigh, and developing a blister on the left thigh for one of six residents. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, review of select manufacture's guidelines, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed. (Resident R3).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with staff, and a review of facility policies and documentation, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that garbage was dispose of properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policies and procedures, interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation of one alleged violation of unknown source of injury for one of 16 residents reviewed. (Resident R165).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer to the hospital and the reasons for the transfer to the hospital in a timely manner, in writing and in a language and manner they understoodfor one of 16 residents reviewed. (Resident R52) Findings Include: Review of nursing note for Resident R52, dated May 8, 2024, revealed that the resident was febrile (having or showing symptoms of a fever), and was discharged to the hospital. Further review revealed a nursing note for Resident R52, dated April 26, 2024, revealed that the resident was discharged to the hospital for systemic anemia. Another nursing note for Resident R52, dated March 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was admitted to the hospital with acute kidney injury. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative receive written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of a facility-initiated transfer to a hospital for one of 16 residents reviewed. (Resident R52)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and modify interventions consistent with the resident's needs to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of three residents reviewed for nutritional status (Resident R44 and R55). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Nutritional Intervention Pathways for Weight Loss undated, revealed that oral supplements must be obtained from the physician and documented. Review of facility policy titled, Fortified Foods revised June 7, 2016, revealed that fortified foods will meet the increased nutritional needs of residents who are underweight, have significant weight loss, pressure ulcers or poor intake. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records, facility documentation, observations, interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the appropriate competencies and skill sets related to the care of residents with intravenous line and medication administration for two of two employee records reviewed. (Employee E14 and E15). Findings Include: Review of facility reported incident dated December 14, 2024, revealed that Resident R164 was involved in a medication error. Nurse accidentally administered Sertraline (Antidepressant) 100 milligrams (mg) tablet and Lisinopril (Blood Pressure medication) 10 mg. Resident's family requested evaluation from nurse practitioner in-house. They were not available and therefore resident was sent to the hospital for further evaluation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical records, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication error for two of five residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident R164 and Resident R167).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documents and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director or designee was in attendance at monthly Quality Assurance Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee meetings for three of three months reviewed. (January 2024 through April 2024)
25 fire safety citations on file: 5 on February 27, 2026, 7 on April 3, 2025, 13 on May 22, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 16, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.34 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.05 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.83 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.16 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 65.7% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 67.7% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.69 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.55 on weekdays and 4.83 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.81 in April to June 2025 to 5.34 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.34 | 1.05 | 5.55 | 4.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 63 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.44 | 1.09 | 5.67 | 4.86 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.49 | 1.23 | 5.66 | 5.06 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 60 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.81 | 1.08 | 4.89 | 4.59 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 59 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.9 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.0 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.2 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.6 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Quadrangle's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
65.0% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 542 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 512 eligible stays.
6.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 334 eligible stays.
45.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 240 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 350 residents counted.
2.2% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 350 residents counted.
99.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 114 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SH OPCO THE QUADRANGLE LLC. CMS links this home to Healthpeak Properties, Inc., a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hcp S-H Sunrise Opco Holdco LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 10/01/2020 | |
| Hcp S-H 2014 Member LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/02/2024 | |
| Hcp S-H Opco Trs LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/16/2020 | |
| Healthpeak Op LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/16/2020 | |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/16/2020 | |
| S-H 2014 Opco Trs Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/02/2024 | |
| Sunrise Senior Living Management Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/16/2020 | |
| Bown, Keith | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Coelho, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Desai, Mehir | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Eccles, Susan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/28/2024 | |
| Falco, Denise | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Frantz, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Kessler, Thomas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| O'Riordan, Damien | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Painter, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Royal, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/02/2024 | |
| Sekel, Wendy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Thompson, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Verger, Pierre | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Wells, Anja | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Cheng, Patrick | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/28/2025 | |
| Johnston, Shawn | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/28/2025 | |
| Russo, Frank | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/28/2025 | |
| Hcp S-H 2014 Member LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/02/2024 | |
| Hcp S-H Opco Trs LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2020 | |
| Hcp S-H Sunrise Opco Holdco LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/01/2020 | |
| Healthpeak Op LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2020 | |
| Healthpeak Properties Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/16/2020 | |
| S-H 2014 Opco Trs Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/02/2024 | |
| Sunrise Senior Living Management Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/20/2025 | |
| Bown, Keith | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Coelho, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Desai, Mehir | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Eccles, Susan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/28/2024 | |
| Falco, Denise | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Frantz, Edward | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Harris, Tony | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Kessler, Thomas | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| O'Riordan, Damien | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Painter, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Royal, Patricia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2024 | |
| Sekel, Wendy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Thompson, Lisa | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Verger, Pierre | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 | |
| Wells, Anja | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/16/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.