603 Main Street, Mathews, VA 23109 · Mathews County · (804) 725-9443
60 certified beds, about 57 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2021
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495429 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 3, 2023, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 12 health citations since July 2021, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.08 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.80 of those hours.
43.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Riverside Health System, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 Resident (Resident #54) was free from neglect, in a survey sample of 31 Residents. For Resident #54, the facility staff were negligent in their immediate response when he was found unresponsive. The facility staff failed to provide CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) or any other emergency medical treatment, until after Resident #54 had been pronounced deceased and postmortem care had been provided, resulting in harm at past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 31 residents. For Resident #54, the facility staff failed to implement resuscitation interventions as indicated on his comprehensive care plan when he was found unresponsive and not breathing, resulting in harm at past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide resuscitation interventions for 1 resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 31 residents. For Resident #54, who was a full code, the facility staff failed to provide resuscitation interventions when he was found unresponsive and not breathing. This resulted in harm cited at past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to adequately prevent and treat pressure ulcers for 1 Resident (#42) in a survey of 31 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for 7 certified nursing assistants (CNA) (CNA C, CNA D, CNA E, CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, and CNA I) out of a staff sample size of 16 CNA's and for one Resident (Resident #54) out of a sample size of 31 residents. 1. For CNA C, CNA D, CNA E, CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, the facility staff failed to complete license verification upon hire. For CNA I, the facility staff failed to verify CNA I's license renewal which resulted in CNA I working at the facility without verifying license renewal (and having an expired license on file). 2. On 06/11/21, Resident #54, who was a full code was found unresponsive. Four staff members, (CNA A, CNA B, LPN A, RN A), all of which were CPR certified, neglected to provide any type of emergency medical care, to include CPR. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure two Residents were free from significant medication errors (Residents #7, and #23) in a survey sample of 31 Residents. 1. For Resident #7, the facility failed to administer narcotic pain medication timely as ordered by a physician. 2. For Resident #23, the facility failed to administer 5 medications, including a narcotic pain medication timely as ordered by a physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to offer the COVID immunization for 8 Residents (Resident #3, #21, #22, #27, #28, #32, #38, #43) in a survey sample of 31 Residents. The facility staff failed to provide evidence that they offered the COVID vaccination to 8 Residents when they were eligible, despite the facility having vaccines available to administer.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility failed to report an incident of neglect, which was also an unusual occurence for 1 Resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 31 Residents. On 6/11/21, Resident #54, who was a full code was found unresponsive. Four staff members, (CNA A, CNA B, LPN A, RN A), all of which were CPR certified, neglected to provide any type of emergency medical care, to include CPR. The staff response was neglegnt, as well as an unusual occurence; and the facility staff failed to report the event to the OLC (Office of Licensure and Certification), APS (Adult Protective Services), and other authorities as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility failed to investigate an incident of neglect, which was also an unusual occurence, for 1 Resident (Resident #54) in a survey sample of 31 Residents. On 6/11/21, Resident #54, who was a full code was found unresponsive. Four staff members, (CNA A, CNA B, LPN A, RN A), all of which were CPR certified, neglected to provide any type of emergency medical care, to include CPR. The staff response was neglegnt, as well as an unusual occurence; and the facility staff failed to conduct an investigation of the event.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to accurately reflect status of resident on assessments for 1 Resident (#42) in a survey sample of 31 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that is patient centered with measurable goals and objectives for 1 Resident (#42) in a survey sample of 31 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 Residents (Resident #54, Resident #42, Resident #7, Resident #23) in a survey sample of 31 Residents. 1. For Resident #54, who was a full code, the facility staff failed to provide any emergency medical treatment, including CPR, when he was found unresponsive. 2. For Resident #7, the facility failed to administer narcotic pain medication timely as ordered by a physician. 3. For Resident #23, the facility failed to administer 5 medications, including a narcotic pain medication timely as ordered by a physician. 4. [...]
1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on July 9, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.08 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.58 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.63 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.65 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.2% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.27 on weekdays and 2.58 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.99 in April to June 2025 to 3.08 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.08 | 0.80 | 3.27 | 2.58 | 3.2% | 0 of 90 | 57 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.64 | 0.63 | 2.80 | 2.23 | 3.6% | 0 of 92 | 59 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.88 | 0.67 | 3.06 | 2.44 | 4.0% | 0 of 92 | 57 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.99 | 0.81 | 3.19 | 2.49 | 3.9% | 0 of 91 | 56 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.7 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.7 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.5 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.7 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Riverside Lifelong Health and Rehabilitation - M's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 16 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
4.1% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PATRICK HENRY HOSPITAL, INC.. CMS links this home to Riverside Health System, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 3.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Healthcare Association, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/03/2010 |
| Rector & Visitors of the University of Virginia | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 5% | 07/10/2023 |
| Riverside Integrated Services Inc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 95% | 07/10/2023 |
| Nelson, Linwood | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/23/2014 | |
| Alewynse, Joyce | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Bates, Jared | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Haywood, Barbara | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Smith, Conway | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2008 | |
| Smith, Kirby | Corporate director | Individual | 06/01/2008 | |
| Tiller, Brooke | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Verser, Joseph | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Zeidler, Jeanne | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Austin, Walter | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/02/2012 | |
| Dacey, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Downey, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2008 | |
| Heckler, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Houser, Jason | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.