74 Mizpah Road, Locust Hill, VA 23092 · Middlesex County · (804) 758-5260
94 certified beds, about 82 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2016
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495422 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 31, 2024, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 39 health citations since February 2020, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,740 in the last three years; the largest was $14,740, and the latest is dated January 31, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.46 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
30.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Saber Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 126 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 39 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to maintain a clean and sanitary food preparation area in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility failed to ensure that a Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) was completed and issued to 1 Resident, (Resident #25) in a survey sample of 3 ABN Residents. For Resident #25, the facility failed to ensure receipt for notification of insurance coverage loss was documented on the ABN prior to the loss of coverage.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure that Residents receive adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 Resident (#18) in a survey sample of 24 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) was provided for one (1) Resident (Resident # 3) in a survey sample of six (6) residents. For Resident# 3, the facility staff failed to continue CPR after starting it before EMS arrival which placed the resident in an immediate jeopardy situation. Without intervention, the likelihood of immediate jeopardy situations existed for all current full-code residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, family interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of a change in condition and death of one (1) resident (Resident # 3) in a survey sample of six (6) residents. For Resident # 3, the facility staff failed to notify the family of the Resident's death prior to the Resident's removal to the funeral home. The Resident expired on [DATE] at 10:09 p.m. and the family was not notified until the next day on [DATE] at 5:30 a.m.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely for one (1) resident (Resident #4) in a survey sample of Six (6) residents. For Resident #4 the facility staff did not provide timely incontinence care.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to ensure Residents were free from significant medication errors for four Residents (Resident #40, #24, #178, and #62) in a survey sample of 41 Residents, which resulted in harm for Resident #40.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to respond to Resident Council grievances for 7 of 41 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide care that meets professional standards of quality for 1 Resident (#178) in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical record review and facility record review the facility staff failed to provide adequate services to maintain good personal hygiene for 4 Residents (#26, #32, # 65, and #76) in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, the gas range top was unclean and contained pasta and rice from previous days according to the menu; there were prepared food items in the walk-in refrigerator which were not dated; and there was milk on the tray line which had a temperature of 54.3 degrees Fahrenheit.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure the Resident was able to self administer medications for 1 Resident (#76) in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plans for 1 Residents (#26) in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide oxygen therapy consistent with infection control measures for 2 Residents, Resident #70 and Resident #6, in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical record review, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure adequate pain management for 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident #178).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure availability of medications for 1 Resident (#24) in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff has failed to ensure routine and emergency dental care for 1 Residents (# 16) in a survey sample of 41 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate clinical record for one Resident (Resident #65) in a sample size of 41 Residents. For Resident #65, there was conflicting information regarding blood glucose values on 10/06/2021.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, facility document review, staff interview, Resident interview, and family interview, the facility staff failed to provide a qualified Activity Professional for 62 days as of the end of survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, facility documentation, clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure the Pharmacy drug regimen review were addressed for 1 Resident (Resident #19) in a survey sample of 29 Residents. This happened on multiple occasions.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to conduct 2 of 4 quarterly meetings that included the Medical Director.
Inspectors wroteBased on Staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to complete a skilled nursing facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Medicare non-coverage (ABN/NOMNC) for one Resident, (Resident #182), in a sample of 3 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 Resident (#54) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and Resident Representative interview, the facility staff interfered and prevented the free communication, as a direct request from a family member, to speak with state surveyors for one family member for a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed, for 3 residents of 29 residents (Resident #36, Resident #332, Resident #25) to implement or develop the comprehensive care plan.
Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a nutritional care plan for one Resident (Resident #60) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 residents (Resident #332) in a sample size of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, facility document review, staff interview, Resident interview, and family interview, the facility staff failed to provide meaningful activities from 12-13-19 until the time of survey for one Resident (Resident #81) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility failed to provide services and care for 1 Resident (Resident # 72) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide podiatry services for 1 Resident (#54) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accident hazard free environment for one resident (Resident #332) in a survey sample of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide sufficient support to maintain ideal body weight and prevent weight loss for 3 Residents (#54 #60 and #9) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide oxygen within the accepted standards of practice for 1 Resident (#78) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure nurse aide competency in skills necessary to care for residents' needs for one resident (Resident #332) in a sample size of 29 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, facility documentation, clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure Residents are free from unnecessary medications for 1 Resident (#19) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility failed to provide dental evaluations and care for 1 Resident (Resident # 72) in a survey sample of 29 Residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, facility documentation review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed, for 2 residents (Resident #9 and Resident # 54) out of 29 sampled residents to provide emergency and routine dental services.
Inspectors wrote2. For Resident # 50 the facility staff failed to ensure she accurate orders for advance directives. Resident # 50 a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, history of stroke, arthritis, and lumbar radiculopathy (pain is often caused by nerve compressing causing pain to radiate from back to the lower extremity). Resident #50's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of [DATE] a quarterly assessment coded the Resident as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On [DATE] during clinical record review it was noted that Resident #50 has current physician orders dated for February 2020 signed by physician on [DATE] that read: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to maintain equipment for one resident (Resident #25) in a sample size of 29 residents.
4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 31, 2024, 2 on October 25, 2021.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 31, 2024 | Fine | $14,740 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.46 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.25 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.03 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.91 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 30.1% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.14 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.55 on weekdays and 3.25 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.46 | 0.52 | 3.55 | 3.25 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 82 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.46 | 3.47 | 3.09 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 86 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.35 | 0.47 | 3.45 | 3.10 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.35 | 3.43 | 3.07 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 83 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.4 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Dockside Health & Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 43 eligible stays.
10.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
65.7% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 47 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MIZPAH HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC. CMS links this home to Saber Healthcare Group, a group of 126 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Weisberg, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Cook, Jaime | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/04/2023 | |
| Hopkins, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Weisberg, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 01/05/2026 | |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2015 | |
| Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2015 | |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2025 | |
| Shg Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2019 | |
| Walker & Associates PC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2015 | |
| Abate, Gerard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/12/2022 | |
| Cook, Jaime | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2023 | |
| Hopkins, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/08/2023 | |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 | |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.