Home / Utah / West Valley City
4090 West Pioneer Parkway, West Valley City, UT 84120 · Salt Lake County · (801) 397-4400
124 certified beds, about 110 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 465075 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Utah average is 8.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since May 2022, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $20,318 in the last three years; the largest was $20,318, and the latest is dated October 26, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 4.09 across Utah and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.06 of those hours.
48.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Utah average 50.7%).
CMS links it to Rocky Mountain Care, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly ordered hospice comfort medications were promptly implemented and administered as ordered by the physician. Specifically, for 1 out of 11 sampled residents, staff failed to enter and administer newly ordered end-of-life pain and anxiety medications, resulting in multiple missed doses over a two-day period. The facility developed and implemented a correction action plan before the survey start date. The facility's correction action plan, which was developed and implemented by [DATE], included the following measures: individual education for Nurse 1, facility wide education on end-of-life care and entering physician orders, resident interview and record review to identify any other medication error concerns, daily medication error audits, and implementation of a triple-check process for entering in physician orders. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that each resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and received adequate supervision and assistance with devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident who had significant dysphagia was coughing while eating with no staff supervision or assistance. Resident identifier: 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 30 residents receiving a tube feeding received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications. Specifically, observations revealed the tube feeding was not infusing at the rate prescribed by the provider. Resident identifier:
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident who received medication for diabetes mellitus did not have those medications available from the pharmacy for administration. Resident identifier: 97.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide the required specialized rehabilitation services, speech-language pathology. Specifically, one resident experienced a change in his eating abilities and speech therapy was not notified. Resident identifier: 122.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized. Specifically, blood sugar results were not recorded in the medical record for a resident who was given unprescribed insulin. Resident identifiers: 126.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not establish and implement written policies and procedures for feedback, data collections systems, and monitoring, including adverse event monitoring. Specifically, the facility did not implement policies to address the underlying cause of the problems or identify how corrective actions were taken and monitored in regard to feeding tubes. Resident identifier:
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an emergency call system was available and accessible in 5 out of 5 public and staff-accessible restrooms located in common areas used by residents. This failure created a risk that residents who utilized these restrooms would be unable to summon staff assistance in the event of an emergency or fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 11 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide each resident adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was not provided two person assistance during a brief change, which led to a fall and subsequent fractures. This resulted in a finding of harm for resident 5. Resident identifiers: 5.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to adhere to its established infection prevention and control program. Specifically, a staff member was observed not to wash or sanitize their hands between resident rooms. On June 26, 2025 at 10:50 AM, the surveyor observed certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 exited a resident's room designated by posted signage for enhanced barrier precautions. The displayed signage required hand hygiene upon entry and exit, as well as the use of gowns and gloves for high-contact resident care, including tasks such as dressing, bathing, transferring, linen changes, hygiene, and toileting assistance. CNA 1 was observed to be carrying a bag of garbage, which appeared to be soiled briefs or linens, and a water mug. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to assess 1 (Resident #74) of 10 sampled residents to ensure the resident was safe to self-administer inhaled medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to develop a care plan for 1 (Resident #80) of 7 sampled residents who were dependent on respiratory ventilators.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care for 2 (Resident #76 and Resident #98) of 10 residents who were dependent on staff for personal hygiene.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #91) of 10 residents receiving tube feeding received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications. Specifically, observations revealed the tube feeding formula bottle for Resident #91 was not dated or timed when it was initiated to ensure the formula was not administered beyond 24 hours.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for 1 (Resident #30) of 3 sampled residents receiving supplemental oxygen administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 3 sampled residents, a resident that was a quadriplegic received second degree burns on his body after being served hot water by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and the resident was not supervised while drinking the hot water. Resident identifier: 1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 9 sampled residents, that the facility failed to protect residents form abuse. Specifically, a resident was sexually abused without ongoing interventions to prevent further abuse. Additionally, the facility had prior knowledge of the alleged perpetrators behaviors and the facility failed to provide protection for the resident thereby allowing ongoing access and abuse of the resident by the alleged perpetrator. This requirement was determine to be out of compliance at the severity level of immediate jeopardy. Due to the ongoing access to resident 1, by the alleged perpetrator, the scope of the noncompliance is determined to be a pattern. Resident identifier: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 9 sampled residents, that the facility failed to protect residents form abuse. Specifically, a staff member had an allegation of sexual abuse toward resident 1 that was not thoroughly investigated in July 2022. An additional allegation of sexual abuse of resident 1 was made against the same staff member in September 2023 that substantiated abuse. Additionally, the facility had prior knowledge of the alleged perpetrators behaviors and the facility failed to provide protection for the resident thereby allowing ongoing access to the resident by the alleged perpetrator. This was found to have occurred at an immediate jeopardy (IJ) level. Resident identifier: 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on confidential and non-confidential interviews with administrative staff, therapy staff, licensed and unlicensed nursing staff, and record review, it was determined, for 1 of 9 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure that all suspected or alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the administrator and other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures. Specifically, when interviewed by surveyors, multiple staff reported observing Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) 1 interacting with resident 1 in a suspicious manner and did not report their concerns, thereby, allowing COTA 1 ongoing access to resident 1. The facility's noncompliance relative to identifing and reporting abuse was determined to be at the severity level of immediate jeopardy. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and services to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, one resident sustained a skin tear to his face after falling off the bed during wound care. Resident identifier: 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, it was determined, the facility did not ensure each resident received and the facility provided, food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, several residents complained of cold meals, and on two separate meal observations the temperature of the food meant to be hot was served cold. Resident identifiers: 46, 85, and 252.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Specifically, for 2 out of 34 sampled residents, residents were not provided assistance with showers. Resident identifiers: 58 and 152.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record the review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, a resident that had chronic pain was admitted to the facility with half the dose of a fentanyl patch than had been received at home. The same resident complained of pain and was unable to get a change in pain relief . Resident identifier: 152.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined, that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, a residents medications were not administered as ordered by the physician due to the medications not being available by the pharmacy. Resident identifier: 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure any irregularities reported by a pharmacist to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director (MD), and Director of Nursing (DON), were acted upon. Specifically, for 2 out of 34 sampled residents, the facility did not implement recommendations, which were made on the Pharmacist Consultation Report and approved by the resident's physician. Resident identifiers: 49 and 92.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that a resident who used psychotropic drugs was not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Specifically, for 1 out of 34 sampled residents, a resident did not receive a GDR on a benzodiazepine medication for anxiety that was initiated on 12/13/20. Resident identifier: 81.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined, that the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility was found to be in non-compliance with F689 which were cited within the facility's 2018 and 2019 recertification survey.
29 fire safety citations on file: 11 on February 12, 2026, 11 on January 11, 2024, 7 on May 23, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 26, 2023 | Fine | $20,318 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Utah | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.71 | 4.09 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.06 | 1.25 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.30 | 3.58 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.24 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.41 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 48.9% | 50.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 52.2% | 40.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.87 on weekdays and 3.30 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 18.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.70 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.71 | 1.06 | 3.87 | 3.30 | 18.8% | 0 of 90 | 110 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.54 | 0.99 | 3.69 | 3.15 | 15.2% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.86 | 1.06 | 4.00 | 3.53 | 15.0% | 0 of 92 | 101 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.70 | 1.08 | 3.84 | 3.35 | 11.3% | 0 of 91 | 103 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Utah, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.91 | 1.11 | 4.10 | 3.44 | 2.8% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utah, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.15 | $17.81 to $21.32 | 12,260 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.40 | $25.71 to $35.86 | 1,680 |
| Registered nurses | $40.67 | $38.49 to $50.54 | 27,420 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Utah | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 11.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 15.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.4 | 16.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.6 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.3% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Utah: 40 better, 0 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 105 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Utah: 3 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Utah: 2 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
79.0% this home
Median of homes: Utah63.5% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Utah0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
4.2% this home
Median of homes: Utah1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Utah100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL. CMS links this home to Rocky Mountain Care, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaver City Corporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 11/01/2015 |
| Bangerte, Nathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Bangerter, Edward | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Bangerter, Johnathan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Barney, Janett | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Beeman, Raymond | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Boardman, Laura | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Brown, Gary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2011 | |
| Darby, Megan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Gatherum, Jason | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Hale, Fredrick | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Hansen, Kent | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Mikesell, Bradley | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Neves, Courtney | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Oakden, Richard | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/10/2010 | |
| Owens, Jon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Robinson, Matt | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Samuelson, Lance | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Schena, Tyler | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Smith, Val | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Snowball, Kelly | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Widdison, Alan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/22/2022 | |
| Wright, Craig | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Langford, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2018 | |
| Moss, Tyler | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2018 | |
| Bcvv, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2015 | |
| Martinez, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Spencer, Zachary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/08/2026 | |
| Bcvv, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/15/2025 | |
| Rocky Mountain Care LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/03/2025 | |
| Bangerter, Edward | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2019 | |
| Bangerter, Johnathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/05/2020 | |
| Martinez, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Spencer, Zachary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/08/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Utah. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.