2027 College Avenue, Elk Horn, IA 51531 · Shelby County · (712) 764-4201
64 certified beds, about 48 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 165155 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 26, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Iowa average is 6.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 46 health citations since June 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $15,260 in the last three years; the largest was $15,260, and the latest is dated May 22, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.86 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Iowa and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.64 of those hours.
63.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Iowa average 44.0%).
CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 46 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility document review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication errors for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #1). On 4/1/26, staff failed to remove the plastic backing off of a Fentanyl (a powerful synthetic opioid) patch for which resulted in Resident #1 not receiving any medication through the patch and experiencing more pain and required an increase in the use of liquid morphine (a powerful, naturally occurring opioid analgesic derived from the opium poppy, primarily used to treat moderate to severe acute or chronic pain) medication until 4/3/26 when a new Fentanyl patch was replaced. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy and procedure review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident #4). The facility identified a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a pain patch that was not activated for 48 hours for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Residents #1). The facility reported a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and review of policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse involving mistreatment, neglect, and injuries of unknown source were reported to the Department of Inspection and Appeals and Licensing (DIAL) within 2 hours for 2 of 3 resident reviewed. (Resident #2 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate injuries of unknown injury for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #9). Resident #2 had a bruise on the right wrist and Resident #9 had a bruise underneath the left eye. The facility reported a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, call light logs and the facility policy/procedure, the facility staff failed to answer resident call lights in a timely manner (no longer than 15 minutes) for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #5 and Resident #11). The facility identified a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility investigation review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly destroy Resident #1's narcotic (pain) medication per facility policy/procedure. The facility identified a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete resident clinical records for residents that had injuries of unknown origin for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 46 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, resident interviews, family interviews, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to provide dignity and respect when a nurse yelled at a resident about being outside of the facility and smoking on the sidewalk to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 52 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, family interview, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to assist residents with activities of daily living by not offering an opportunity to bathe for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1,and #3). The facility reported a census of 56 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, family interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents personal property was protected from loss or theft (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on document review, staff interviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the abuse and neglect policy by not completing background checks prior to staff employment for 1 out of 5 staff reviewed. The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on electronic health record review, resident interview, personnel file review, facility policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to investigate and report alleged violations related to mistreatment to officials including the State Survey Agency in an appropriate time frame for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 2 residents with a negative Level I result for the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who were later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements (Resident #16, #20). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide quality of nursing care by leaving a resident on a bed pan for an extensive period of time without a call light and not documenting the event for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of Resident #8's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #8 utilizes oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #8's EHR page titled, Physician's orders revealed an order for oxygen 1 Liters Per Minute (LPM) per nasal cannula at night while sleeping. Interview 6/23/25 at 1:02 PM with Resident #8 revealed that she just puts the oxygen on, and is unsure how often the tubing is changed. Observation 6/23/25 at 1:02 PM oxygen tubing was noted to be dated 4/16/25, and humidification bottle was noted to be dated 4/23/25. Interview 6/24/25 at 10:37 AM with Staff A RN (Registered Nurse) revealed she works here every other weekend with an agency, and oxygen tubing is to be changed weekly on Wednesdays. Staff A then revealed that there is a book that shows oxygen tubing is to be changed weekly on Wednesday nights. [...]
Inspectors wrote2. Review of Resident #9's MDS dated [DATE] revealed an admission date to the facility from a short-term general hospital stay 5/13/24. The MDS further revealed Resident #9 utilizes an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #9's EHR page titled, Clinical Physician ' s Orders revealed an order for coudé (a type of urinary catheter with a curved or bent tip) catheter for infection control with a date of 4/22/25. Observation 6/25/25 at 11:06 AM Staff D Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) brought Resident #9 into the bedroom to empty Resident #9's catheter drainage bag. Staff D then donned a gown and gloves with no hand hygiene. Staff D then obtained a urine graduate and placed it on a barrier on the floor. Staff D then drained the drainage bag without cleaning the drainage port of the drainage bag. After the drainage bag was emptied Staff D cleansed the drainage port with an alcohol wipe. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility investigative file, staff interviews, resident interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards while administering medications for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #3, #4, #5, and #6). The facility reported a census of 45 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, facility camera footage review, staff interviews, resident interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) was free from financial exploitation. The facility reported a census of 45 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary practices by failing to prevent cross-contamination while serving food. The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, menu review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly prepare and serve the appropriate portions of pureed diets for 3 of 3 residents and minced and moist diets for 7 of 7 residents. The facility reported a census of 49.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly protect resident information from unauthorized access. The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene during toileting and urinary catheter care for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1, Resident #35) observed. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene between feeding two (2) residents. The facility reported a total census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a bed hold notice with the resident or resident's responsible person when residents transferred out of the facility for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #12). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to complete a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #20), who was diagnosed with new mental disorder diagnoses since admission to the facility. The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #5, #18, and #39). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident interview, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to revise and update a care plan to include current transfer needs for 3 out of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #24, Resident #42, and Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 49 residents. Findings Included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated 611/24 for Resident #24 documented diagnoses of pain in the left knee, muscle weakness and heart failure. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The Progress Notes for Resident #24 showed the following: a. On 8/6/24 at 3:08 PM Resident #24 returned back to the facility after a procedure. Resident #24 reported having pain down her left leg. b. On 8/7/24 at 6:47 PM Resident #24 required a total lift to transfer to the wheelchair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #46) reviewed. The facility identified a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to identify target behaviors for psychotropic mediation use for 2 of 3 residents reviewed ( Resident #18 & #39). The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, electronic health record (EHR) review, document review, resident interviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 2 of 5 resident reviewed (Resident #9 and #10). The facility reported a census of 52 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to provide appropriate infection prevention practices when completing blood sugar monitoring for 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #4, #5, and #6). The facility reported a census of 52 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, hospital record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate a change in condition for three of three residents reviewed (Residents #22, #25, and #42). Two of the residents had a sudden increase of pain (Residents #22 and #25). Resident #22 walked independently in the facility and experienced a bout of dizziness causing her to fall on 5/13/23. At the time of the fall, Resident #22 denied pain but started to report pain later that evening and requested pain medication. Resident #22 did not use any as needed medication until after her fall on 5/13/23. Resident #22 received no evaluation by a provider until 5/17/23. During the hospital stay, the staff determined Resident #22 had multiple compression fractures in her back. Resident #22 received treatment to one of the compression fractures involving an invasive procedure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, emergency room, hospital and facility record review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent injuries for 3 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #22, #25, and #33) for falls. In addition, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for falls. Despite the facility documenting that Resident #25 had difficulties with standing with her transfers using the mechanical standing lift, no one adjusted the transfer technique to ensure her safety with transfers. Due to the staff continuing to transfer Resident #25 with an unsafe technique, she fell out of the standing lift resulting in a compression fracture in her back. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility schedule and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty for 8 hours a day, 7 days per week. The facility reported a census of 49 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations interviews and record review the facility failed to destroy and have an accurate account for discontinued narcotic medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #25 and #101). Resident #25 and Resident #101 had their narcotic medications discontinued but the pills remained in the medication storage room and the medication cart.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to serve hot food to residents in their rooms. The facility reported a census of 48 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's current code status was available for 1 out of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #201).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify the family for a significant change in condition for 1 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #42) for pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and chart review the facility failed to prevent the mishandling of a resident's narcotic medications for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #38).
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, hospital record review, resident, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate the sudden increase of pain for a resident who received scheduled pain medication for chronic pain who used a standing lift for transfers for one of one resident reveiwed (Resident #25). Despite reports that Resident #25 had difficulty standing with the standing mechanical lift, the facility did not investigate the concern. Without investigation of the concern, the staff continued to transfer Resident #25 with the standing mechanical lift. After a change in condition, the facility sent Resident #25 to the hospital who discovered a compression fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility record review, facility policy review, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to revise and update the Care Plan to address the increased needs of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #25).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #45 and #33). The facility failed to obtain weights as ordered by the physician for Resident #45. In addition, the facility failed to document the administration of medications, blood sugars, and bed time (HS) snacks for a diabetic resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, facility record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary interventions and care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent deterioration of a wound, heal a stage 2 pressure ulcer, and prevent the development of new ulcers for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #251 and #24). The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to complete dialysis assessments before and after outpatient hemodialysis treatments for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #42).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate medical record for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Residents #45 and #251). After Resident #45 fell, their clinical record lacked a progress note related to the incident. During incontinence cares, the facility staff observed open areas to Resident #251. After reporting the concerns to the nurse, the clinical record lacked documentation of his open areas.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to follow hand hygiene and gloving practices consistent with accepted standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #45) while providing catheter care.
17 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 26, 2025, 9 on August 11, 2024, 7 on June 6, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | Fine | $15,260 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.86 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.17 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.58 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.0% | 44.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.0% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 2.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.14 on weekdays and 3.17 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.29 in April to June 2025 to 3.86 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.86 | 0.64 | 4.14 | 3.17 | 8.0% | 1 of 90 | 48 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.56 | 0.54 | 3.90 | 2.70 | 13.6% | 1 of 92 | 55 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.95 | 0.58 | 3.18 | 2.34 | 28.6% | 2 of 92 | 57 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.29 | 0.71 | 3.60 | 2.53 | 29.5% | 2 of 91 | 50 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Iowa, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.80 | 0.71 | 3.98 | 3.36 | 4.7% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.92 | $17.96 to $21.95 | 22,670 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.11 | $27.12 to $34.06 | 5,510 |
| Registered nurses | $37.80 | $32.83 to $41.32 | 34,420 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.3 | 17.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 16.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.1 | 19.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.7 | 20.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.6 | 13.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Salem Lutheran Home's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (38.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
38.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Iowa: 28 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Iowa: 1 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 63 eligible stays.
9.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Iowa: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
45.2% this home
Median of homes: Iowa56.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
5.6% this home
Median of homes: Iowa0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Iowa1.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Iowa100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Lutheran Church | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/14/2003 |
| Blakestad, Alan | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2020 | |
| Gude, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2021 | |
| Nielsen, Phil | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/06/2016 | |
| Schechinger, Tami | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2021 | |
| American Lutheran Church | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/14/2003 | |
| The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/20/2007 | |
| Norby, Nicklos | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/14/2020 | |
| Shell, Stephen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2025 | |
| American Lutheran Church | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/14/2003 | |
| Shell, Stephen | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Iowa. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.