4602 Northgate Court, Sarasota, FL 34234 · Sarasota County · (941) 355-2913
120 certified beds, about 90 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1982
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105407 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 1, 2024, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since August 2023, 8 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (7 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
57.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, an affiliated group of 79 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician of a resident change in condition for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for nutritional concerns.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, residents representatives and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Residents funds were conveyed to the appropriate party within the required 30-day timeframe after death or discharge from the facility, for 3 (Residents #15, #26, #27) of 3 Residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, residents and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 (Residents #25, #68 and #12) of 4 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #63) of 7 residents reviewed by failing to follow physician's orders parameters for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication regimen review identified medications administered without adequate monitoring for 1 (Resident #63) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to issue in writing the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and/or the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN) for 3 (Residents #17, #463, and #464) of 3 residents reviewed for advanced beneficiary notices. This had the potential for residents to not be aware of the right to appeal the facility decision to terminate Medicare services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 (Residents #7, #12 and #461) of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical records, review of facility policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility the facility failed to implement meaningful resident centered activities to meet the interest and wellbeing of 2 (Resident #7 and #12) of 2 residents reviewed for activities. The lack of an individualized activity program has the potential to cause social isolation, boredom, agitation, and frustration.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement processes to ensure the residents' right to a safe and clean environment in that they failed to ensure an environment free of disease-causing pests. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of rodent infestation in the building, including the kitchen. The facility consistently failed to implement the recommendations from the contracted pest control company to trim back over hanging trees next to the building to prevent wildlife from getting easier access to the building. The facility failed to identify and repair all rodent entry points. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from neglect in that they failed to adequately address ongoing presence of rats in the facility, including the kitchen. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of the rodent infestation in the building, including the kitchen, and neglected to implement appropriate immediate actions to eradicate the rodent infestation. Certain diseases can spread from rodents to people from direct or indirect contact with infected rodents which could result in serious illness, or death. Rodents can also damage building structures and start fires by gnawing electrical wiring. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to mitigate rodent infestation in the foodservice establishment and failed to take effective measures to protect packaged food, clean equipment, single service, and single use items from contamination from rodents. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of rodent infestation in the kitchen and failed to take effective immediate actions to eradicate rodent infestation, store and prepare food in a manner to prevent contamination from disease causing rodents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility's Administration failed to utilize resources effectively to protect the residents right to be free from neglect in that the Administration failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment free from disease causing pests. On 12/19/22 the facility administration became aware of a rodent infestation. The facility Administration failed to take appropriate actions to eradicate the rodent infestation. Certain diseases can spread from rodents to people through direct or indirect contact with infected rodents which could result in serious illness, or death of residents. Rodents can also damage building structures and start fires by gnawing electrical wiring, the extent to which is not known at this time. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to show effective communication and coordination to develop and implement adequate corrective actions related to pest control and rodent infestation to ensure a safe and sanitary environment free from disease causing pests, which could lead to the spread of diseases from direct and indirect contact with infected rodents. On 12/19/22 the facility administration became aware of a rodent infestation. On 7/31/23 through 8/3/23 multiple observations of rodent feces on the kitchen floor, and on the shelves of the dry storage food area used to store ready to eat food. Observation of single service packets of mayonnaise with visible rodent bite marks stored in a basket in the kitchen. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment, and to help prevent the developement and transmission of zoonotic (animals) and vector-borne (e.g., mosquitoes, ticks, and fleas) disease and infections by rodent infestation. The facility failed to follow infection control practices and failed maintain urinary catheter drainage in a sanitary manner for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #5) of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pest control measures to eradicate an ongoing rodent infestation. On 12/19/22 the facility became aware of rodent infestation in the building, including the kitchen. The facility failed to consistently implement the recommendations from the contracted pest control company to trim back over hanging trees next to the building to prevent wildlife from getting easier access to the building. The facility failed to identify and repair all rodent entry points. The failure to implement adequate measures to eradicate and contain a rodent infestation created a serious threat to residents health and safety due to the spread of certain diseases from direct or indirect contact with rodents and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) starting on 12/19/22. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident #29 and Resident #88) of 2 residents reviewed experiencing mouth pain, received dental services to meet their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 7 (Residents #35, #40, #55, #67, #73, #194, #88) of 7 residents received medications in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to order medications on a timely manner or failure to administer medications in accordance with the physician's orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and staff record review the facility failed to ensure 4 (Staff O, CC, DD, and FF) of 5 staff employee records had a performance review completed at least once every 12 months with in-service education based on the outcome of the performance reviews.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, resident records review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, resident records review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Two nurses and 25 opportunities were observed. Six medication errors were identified, resulting in a 24% medication error rate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with chewing or swallowing problems were served diets in a form to meet their individualized needs as prescribed by their physician for 2 (Resident #58 and #61) of 9 residents reviewed. This failure could potentially cause inadequate nutritional intake or swallowing concerns.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, review of facility policy, record review and staff interview the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances expressed by the resident group. The facility failed to have documentation of their response and rationale. Five residents participated in the Resident Council interview.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure they had discussed formulating an advance directive which would include the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment with the resident or their representative for 1 (Resident #86) of 3 residents reviewed for advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene and nutrition for 4 (Resident #2, #52, #55 and #65)) of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff and resident interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with lost glasses received the proper treatment to maintain vision and assist with arrangements to have the glasses replaced in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #88) of 1 resident reviewed for vision impairment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of the clinical records and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate restorative services and physician ordered interventions for the management of contractures (fixed deformity of joints) for 1 (Resident #31) of 1 resident reviewed with positioning devices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, records review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications left at the bedside were appropriately stored for 1 (Resident #73) of 1 resident observed with unsecured medications at the bedside and 1 (North Hall) of 2 medication carts observed.
9 fire safety citations on file: 9 on August 6, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.42 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.32 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.13 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.72 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.0% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.5% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.04 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.47 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 4% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.73 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.42 | 0.58 | 3.47 | 3.32 | 1.7% | 0 of 90 | 90 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.64 | 0.67 | 3.70 | 3.47 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 78 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.52 | 0.47 | 3.65 | 3.22 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 83 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.73 | 0.43 | 3.87 | 3.40 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.4 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 42.1 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Siesta Key Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 20 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 47 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
71.4% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
2.6% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 64 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 3 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SARASOTA FL OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper, a group of 79 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beard, Laura | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/20/2020 | |
| Gorelick, Batya | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/20/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.