Home / New York / Croton on Hudson
67 Springvale Road, Croton on Hudson, NY 10520 · Westchester County · (914) 739-6700
200 certified beds, about 195 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335806 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 15, 2025, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 38 health citations since October 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.56 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.
26.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 38 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, conducted during the recertification survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure proper storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, 1) undated cheese and juice was stored in the refrigerator; 2) ground meat and vegetables were not dated; and 3) Food Service Workers did not wear hairnets and beard guard to prevent hair from contacting food.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00359686) survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure the resident's representative was notified when there was a need to alter the resident's treatment and transfer the resident from the facility. This was evident for 1 (Resident #194) of 4 residents reviewed for notification of change. Specifically, Resident #194's representative was not notified when the resident received intravenous hydration and was transferred to the hospital.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00359686) survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure a safe environment with protection of a resident's property from loss or theft. This was evident for 1 (Resident #194) of 6 residents reviewed for personal property. Specifically, Resident #194's personal cell phone went missing and was unable to be found during their stay at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2564017) from 08/11/2025-08/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse or mistreatment, were reported to the Administrator of the facility immediately or within two (2) hours after the allegation was made for one of five (1 of 5) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #200's daughter made an allegation of verbal mistreatment/abuse by a staff member, but staff did not report the allegation to the Administrator or State Agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during the recertification survey on 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that the resident, resident's representative(s), or representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an official patient advocate not hired by the facility) was notified of the transfer or discharge, and the reasons for the move, in writing and in a language and manner they understand for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #189 and Resident #191) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. Specifically, 1) the facility did not complete a discharge notice or notification of bed hold for Resident #189 when they were hospitalized . The ombudsman was not notified of Resident #189's transfer/discharge to the hospital; 2) The Ombudsman was not notified of Resident # 191's discharge to the community.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey 8/11/25 to 8/15/25, the facility did not ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (resident assessment tool) for one of three residents (Resident #16) reviewed for urinary catheter. Specifically, the Minimum Data Sets with reference dates of 6/22/25 (quarterly), 3/24/25 (annual) and 12/24/24 (quarterly) were coded incorrectly, indicating the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plan was revised to reflect preventative interventions for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #64's Comprehensive Care Plan was not updated to reflect new risk reduction fall interventions implemented after a fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (2564017 and 781248/NY00353892) from 08/11/2025-08/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two of seven (2 of 7) residents (Resident #199 and Resident #200) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, 1) Resident #199 required assistance with activities of daily living and the certified nurse aide documentation was inconsistent; 2) Resident #200 required assistance with activities of daily living and the certified nurse aide documentation was inconsistent. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 08/11/2025 through 08/15/2025, the facility did not ensure that emergency equipment was readily available for one of two residents (Resident #125) reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #125, who had a tracheostomy, did not have an Ambu bag (a handheld device that provides positive pressure to residents who are not breathing) at the bedside.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], revealed that the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored according to current professional standards for 2 out of 7 residents (Resident #60 and Resident #115) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Specifically, 1) Resident #60 was observed three times with Carboxy-methylcellulose 0.5% eye drops, Deep Sea Nasal Spray 0.65%, and a Budesonide-Formoterol 80-4.5 micrograms/actuation metered-dose inhaler on their bedside table. 2) Resident #115's Humalog 100 units/milliliter insulin pen was observed on a medication cart on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 8/11/2024 to 8/15/2024, the facility did not ensure that special eating equipment and utensils were provided for residents who need them. This was observed during dining observation for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #17). Specifically, Resident #17 was observed on three occasions eating without the use of the proper assistive devices as indicated in the meal tray ticket, recommended by occupation therapy and ordered by the medical doctor.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from August 11, 2025, through August 15, 2025, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. Specifically,1) Licensed Practical Nurse #13, did not don a gown while providing wound care to Resident #165, who was on enhanced barrier precautions; 2) Home Health Aide #4 did not perform proper hand hygiene during meal service and assistance with feeding Resident #183; and 3) Home Health Aide #8 did not perform hand hygiene after feeding Resident #157 and then fed another resident during a breakfast meal.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification survey on 8/11/2025 to 8/15/2025 the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of flies. Specifically, Resident #8's room was observed with several flies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey 8/11/25-8/15/25, the facility did not ensure individuals working in the facility under the title Home Health Aides, had successfully completed a State-approved training program for feeding residents for 12 of 12 employees reviewed (Home Health Aides #4, #8, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40 and #41.) Specifically, there was no documentation the Home Health Aides received the required training to feed residents and Home Health Aide # 4 was observed feeding Residents on more than one occasion and Home Health Aide#38 and #36 were observed feeding residents on the Dementia Unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00382686) from 8/11/2025-8/15/2025, the facility did not ensure residents were adequately equipped to call for assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 1 (Unit 2 East) of 5 residential units. Specifically, on Unit 2 East, the call bell system was not functioning correctly on 8/13/2025, 8/07/2025, 8/01/2025, 5/07/2025, 3/16/2025, 1/11/2025, 1/08/2025, 10/16/2024, 6/19/2024, and 2/22/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00355663) the facility did not ensure the resident representative was immediately informed of a significant change in the resident's physical status or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. Specifically, Resident #1's representative was not notified when the resident had a Midline Catheter (Intravenous Catheter) inserted.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview conducted during the abbreviated survey (NY00352849) the facility did not ensure that residents remained free from abuse for one of three (Resident #7) reviewed for Abuse. Specifically, for Resident #7 with documented ongoing aggressive behaviors and refusal of medication/s, there was no documented evidence that care plan interventions were evaluated to determine effectiveness to ensure resident safety. Subsequently, on 8/28/2024 Resident #7 propelled their wheelchair hitting another resident as staff assisted the other resident up off the floor and on 9/4/2024 Resident #7 struck Resident #10 in the stomach which caused a fall and resulted in Resident #10 sustaining a left side hematoma of the head, right wrist fracture, left femoral intertrochanteric (hip) fracture.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00331614) the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours to the state survey agency for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Abuse (Resident #5). Specifically, Resident #5 made an accusation of abuse on 1/15/2024 and that was not reported to the state agency until 1/17/2024. In addition, there was no documented evidence of the 5-day investigation report submission to the Department of Health either.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review during an abbreviated survey (NY00332451), the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) investigated for abuse received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and resident preferences to promote mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, on 1/29/24, Resident #4 made an allegation of abuse. The Accident and Incident report, nursing notes and care plans documented a referral to psychiatry was made. There was no documented evidence that the referral was completed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00355610, NY00353621, NY00356241) the facility did not ensure residents' right to be free from abuse for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1,#2, #3, #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 9/7/2024 Resident #1 who was assessed as having aggressive behavior walked up to Resident #2 in the dining room and pushed them from behind. Resident #2 complained of back pain, was given Tylenol, and sent to the emergency room for evaluation. On 9/26/2024 Resident #1 struck Resident #2 on the right ear, and they sustained an abrasion. First aid was administered to Resident #2, and Resident #2 was transferred to the emergency room for further evaluation. The corrective action for both incidents with Resident #1 and Resident #2 documented to keep the residents separated. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00355610, NY00353621, NY00356241), the facility did not ensure submission of the report of the results of an investigation to the New York State Department of Health within 5 working days of the incident. This was evident for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, (1) on 9/7/2024 Resident #2 reported that they were pushed by Resident #1. The 5-day investigative conclusion report was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 10/3/2024; (2) On 9/26/2024 Resident #2 reported they were struck on the right ear by Resident #1 and sustained an abrasion to their right ear. The 5-day investigative conclusion report was not submitted to the New York State Department of Health until 10/25/2024; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY003355610, NY00353621), the facility did not ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed, updated, and revised for 2 out of 4 residents (Resident #1, #2) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, (1) on 9/7/2024 Resident #2 reported Resident #1 pushed them from behind. Review of Resident #1's abuse care plan revealed it was not updated to reflect the incident; (2) On 9/7/2024 Resident #2 was reportedly pushed from behind by Resident #1. Review of Resident #2's risk for abuse care plan revealed no documented evidence of updating from the 9/7/2024 incident. Review of Resident #2's psychosocial care plan last revised 10/28/2024 revealed it was not updated with the incident that occurred on 9/26/2024.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated survey (NY00339167 & NY00345633) completed on 12/30/24, the facility did not ensure that their facility assessment included an evaluation of the overall number of facility staff that are needed to ensure that each resident's needs are met.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00340395, NY00339018) the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment or discharge plans for 2 out of 3 (Resident #2, Resident #4) residents reviewed for discharge planning. Specifically, Resident #2 had no discharge care plan initiated for the resident on admission and they were discharged from the facility on 4/1/2024. Resident #4 was discharged from the facility on 4/15/2024 and there was no documented evidence of a discharge care plan initiated on admission for the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00340395, NY00339018) the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5) out of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #3 who had a history of falls had a total of 3 falls in a month (3/3/2024, 3/19/2024, 3/24/2024) and a 4th fall on 4/3/2024. Resident #3 sustained acute left femoral neck fracture with slight varus angulation. There was no documented evidence of timely updates/interventions after each fall to prevent reoccurrence. The resident's fall risk care plan was not updated after each fall and no new interventions were put in place.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Abbreviated Survey, ( NY00333646) it was determined for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Quality of Care, the facility did not ensure a Baseline Care Plan was developed and implemented for each newly admitted resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective care within 48 hours of a resident's admission and that a summary of the Baseline Care Plan was provided to the resident and/or their representative. Specifically Resident #1's baseline care plan was not developed by nursing to provide direction for diabetic care and there was no documented evidence the plan was provided to the resident's representative.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during an Abbreviated survey (#NY00333646) the facility did not ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, Resident #1's hospital discharge orders for blood glucose monitoring and insulin were not reviewed or clarified.
Inspectors wroteBased interview and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (NY 00333646), the facility did not ensure sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing related services for the residents on 1 of 6 units (Unit 1 West) reviewed for staffing. Specifically, on 2/04/24 the facility did not have a licensed nurse on Unit 1 [NAME] from 3 PM to 6 PM when Resident #1 suffered a medical emergency requiring the resident's family to call 911 for assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure that residents were adequately equipped to call for assistance through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area. Specifically, resident bathrooms were observed to have call bells without pull strings, making the call bell inaccessible if resident was on the floor. This was evident for 2 of 2 residential floors.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (#NY00304291) from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure all alleged incidents involving injuries of unknown origin were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) immediately, but no later than two hours after the time of the incident occurrence. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #94) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #94 sustained an injury of unknown origin resulting in a fracture to their left humorous (upper arm) bone, and there was no evidence the incident was reported to the NYSDOH in the required time frame.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure that a resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #84) reviewed for Nutrition. Specifically, Resident #84's care plan documented the need for a weighted mug, and on three observations the weighted mug was not provided on Resident #84's meal tray.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, it was determined for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 76) reviewed for Nutrition, the facility did not ensure the resident was provided the necessary care to maintain, to the extent possible, acceptable body weight. Specifically, Resident #75 had a weight loss of 8.5% in 3 months, the physician was not notified and new interventions were not initiated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review during the recertification survey from 6/26/23-6/30/23, the facility did not ensure that Infection Control practices and procedures were maintained. Specifically, Resident #90's Foley (indwelling) catheter bag was observed on the floor without the use of a barrier, and was observed on a soiled floor mat covered with a towel.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 6/26/23 - 6/30/23, the facility did not provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. This was evident for one resident (Resident #90) on the 1 [NAME] unit. Specifically, Resident #90 was not provided a long enough bed and the control unit for the resident's alternating mattress was soiled and on the floor. An undated policy and procedure titled Resident Room Cleaning documented Daily cleaning will ensure optimum levels of cleanliness and sanitation, prohibit the spread of infection and bacteria, and maintain the outward appearance of the facility. Steps in the daily cleaning included to clean and dust all vertical and horizontal surfaces using a clean cloth soaked in or sprayed with disinfectant cleaner.
Inspectors wroteF550 Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during a recertification survey, it could not be ensured that the facility residents were treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #41, #72 and #108) reviewed for dignity, 1) Resident #41 was interviewed in a common area in proximity of other residents and staff, 2) staff did not respond in a timely manner to a meal request for Resident #72, and 3) staff did not assist Resident #108 with her meal at the same time as her tablemates.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey it could not be ensured that the facility properly stored perishable foods and maintain food storage equipment in accordance with standards for food service safety. Specifically, several items of perishable foods were not properly dated and 3 of 3 refrigerators used to store items brought in by residents' families were not maintained in sanitary condition.
Inspectors wroteF880 Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, it cannot be ensured that the facility practiced proper infection control. Specifically, an observation of 5 of 5 residents (# 6, #20, #35, #103 and #108) revealed did not clean the pulse oximeter before and after each use, did not place a barrier between the pulse oximeter and table and staff did not perform hand hygiene after each use of the pulse oximeter. Furthermore, one staff did not perform hand hygiene after each resident contact for 3 of 3 residents (#4, #6, and #103) observed during dining .
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review conducted during the Recertification survey, it cannot be ensured that the facility provided Advanced Directives services. Specifically, no evidence was available to verify that staff periodically reassessed residents' desires regarding Advanced Directives or that facility staff communicated residents' wishes to the physician. This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility Policy and Procedure titled, Advance Directives/Advance Care Planning dated 11/5/2005 and revised 5/2015 revealed the facility's Social Work Department leads ongoing education to all residents regarding their right to execute advance directives during care planning. Furthermore, on an individual basis, advance directives include a Health Care Proxy. [...]
26 fire safety citations on file: 7 on August 15, 2025, 13 on June 30, 2023, 6 on October 9, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.56 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.62 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.10 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.17 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.77 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 26.9% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.86 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.10 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 26.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.56 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.56 | 0.62 | 3.75 | 3.10 | 26.4% | 0 of 90 | 195 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.60 | 0.63 | 3.77 | 3.15 | 28.4% | 0 of 92 | 198 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.92 | 0.71 | 4.15 | 3.36 | 31.6% | 0 of 92 | 187 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.69 | 3.93 | 2.93 | 32.1% | 0 of 91 | 189 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: NYS DOH Nurse Aide Training Programs (nursing homes), as of October 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Springvale Nursing and Rehabilitation Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.1 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.1 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Springvale Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (41.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
41.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 113 eligible stays.
7.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 96 eligible stays.
75.3% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 89 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE PREMIER CENTER FOR REHABILITATION OF WESTCHESTER LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bethel Op Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 43% | 05/05/2023 |
| Jsb Bethel Holdings LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 43% | 05/05/2023 |
| Schwartz, Joel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 05/05/2023 |
| Bleier, Aharon | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 9% | 05/05/2023 |
| Bleier, Sorah | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 34% | 05/05/2023 |
| Sod, Leah | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 42% | 05/05/2023 |
| Sofia, Lisa | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 05/01/2023 |
| Diamond, Gilad | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/05/2023 | |
| Bleier, Sorah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/05/2023 | |
| Sod, Leah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/05/2023 | |
| Sofia, Lisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/05/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.