Home / Pennsylvania / Darby
1412 Lansdowne Avenue, Darby, PA 19023 · Delaware County · (610) 461-6510
273 certified beds, about 252 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395282 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 5, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
None of its 26 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.37 of those hours.
58.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Center Management Group, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, review of clinical record, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents/resident's next of kin/legal guardian/power of attorney are notified of changes in resident's care related to ankle monitoring bracelet for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R175). Review of facility policy on notification and change of condition, revised May 2025, revealed that the facility shall utilize a notification process when there is change in the resident's medical condition and or status. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of a room change for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R105). Findings Include:Review of Resident R105's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident R105 on June 2, 2026, revealed on May 28, 2026, his/her room was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident R105 further reported being unhappy with the room move and was not informed why he/she needed to move. Review of Resident R105's entire clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the resident or resident representative were notified of the room change and subsequent response from the resident or resident representative. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper notification to the physician in a timely manner for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R26). Findings Include:Review of Resident R26's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 14, 2026, revealed the resident has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - cognitive assessment) Score of 7 (severe cognitive impairment) and diagnoses of anemia (lack of healthy red blood tissues), osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) , and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body). Resident R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete, accurate, and thorough investigation of alleged abuse and neglect for two of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R37 and R26). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Abuse Prevention/Reporting revised February 25, 2025, revealed the facility will investigate of all suspected cases of abuse. Further review of the facility policy revealed the facility will collect written documentation such as signed witness statements, statements of accused personnel, medical records, incident reports and other pertinent information. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, observation, interviews with resident and staff it was determined that the facility failed to provide quality of care in accordance with physician orders for two of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R287 and R78). Findings Include: Review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the tongue (tongue cancer) and protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories, leading to loss of fat and muscle). Continued review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed a physician order dated May 24, 2026, to use Infuvite Adult Intravenous (IV) Solution (multiple vitamin) at 80 milliliter/hour (ml/hr) intravenously one time per day. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order for tracheostomy size for one of one resident reviewed with tracheostomy (Resident R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 37 residents observed (Resident R287). Findings Include:Review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the tongue (tongue cancer) and protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories, leading to loss of fat and muscle). Continued review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed a physician order dated May 24, 2026, to use Infuvite Adult Intravenous (IV) Solution (multiple vitamin) at 80 milliliter/hour (ml/hr) intravenously one time per day. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related personal protective equipment for one of 37 residents observed (Resident R2). Findings Include: Review of facility policy on personal protective equipment revealed that personal protective equipment appropriate to specific task requirements is available at all times. Further review of facility policy revealed employees required to perform tasks that may involve exposure to blood/body fluids will be provided appropriate protective clothing and equipment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to include active input from residents, their representative(s), family members, and representatives of direct care staff in the facility assessment process. Findings Include: Review of facility documentation titled, Facility Assessment dated April 22, 2026, states the people involved in the process are the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Governing Body Rep, and the Medical Director. [...]
Inspectors wroteFacility failed residents with food preferences. Based on interviews with residents, observations of the food service and a test tray evaluation, interviews with dietary staff, reviews of policies and procedures and reviews of resident council and food committee meeting minutes, it was determined that each resident was not receiving foods and drinks to accommodate their individualized preferences. Appealing food and drink options of similar nutritive value were not being planned and provided on facility menus. (Residents R58, R47, R164, R145, R 207, R208, R220, R77, R117, R196, R64, R194, R144, R219, R86, R50, R234 and R115).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a safe manner during medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews with staff, and review of clinical records it was determined the facility failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of one of 38 resident records reviewed (Resident R105).
Inspectors wroteBased on the observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of four nursing units reviewed (Fourth Floor Main).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, interview with staff, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect when staff attempted to provide care for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R322).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission relating to oxygen administration for one of thirty-five residents reviewed. (Resident R99) Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Plan of Care with a revision date of June 2024 states, Policy Statement- Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of a plan of care for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation states, The care plan is based on the resident's assessment and is developed by a Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team. [...]
Inspectors wroteReview of facility policies, observations, review of clinical records, and interviews with residents and staffed revealed that the facility failed to ensure resident care plan were revised related to bed rails, beds against the wall, oxygen therapy, and diet for five of thirty-five residents reviwed. (Residents R106, R42, R96, R125, and R574). Findings Include: Review of Resident R106's clinical record revealed the diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), need for assistance with personal care, pressure ulcer of sacral region- stage IV (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer), and osteomyelitis (infection in the bone) of vertebra. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a resident's interview, clinical record review and review of the facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities of daily living was maintained and did not diminish for one of 35 resident records reviewed (Resident R141).
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical record, interview with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer the medication in a timely manner as ordered by the physician and according to the professional standards of practice for two of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R179 and Resident R147) Findings Include: Review of facility policy Administering Medication dated June 2024, revealed Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications must be administered one hour before and after the prescribed times. Standard prescribed times will include but not limited to a. Morning Medication b. Afternoon meds c. Early evening meds d. Late evening meds e. Night meds f. Specific prescribed medication times Interview with Resident R147 on September 23, 2024, at 10:24 a.m. stated he received the medication often late; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed in relation to oxygen administration for one of thirty-five residents reviewed. (Resident R98) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration- Resident with a revision date on December 2022 states, Purpose- The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Steps in the procedure state, . 4. Turn on the oxygen. Unless otherwise ordered, start the flow of oxygen at the rate ordered. 5. Place appropriate oxygen device on the resident. 6. Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident. 7. Securely anchor the tubing so that it does not rub or irritate the resident's nose, behind the resident's ears, etc. 8. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the timely availability of medication for one of 35 residents reviewed (Resident R12).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during dining services for one of four nursing units reviewed (Fourth Floor Main). Findings Include: Observation of fourth floor main dining room on September 25,2024, from 12:32 p.m. revealed that there were 14 residents in the dining room. Five employees were serving lunch to residents in the dining room. It was observed that Employee E8, Nurse Aide, passed tray to a resident sitting at the table, set up the tray, opened the utensils, touched residents clothing protector and table and proceeded to pass and set up the lunch tray for the next residents. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility documentation, facility policies and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program that includes a system that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to effectively monitor antibiotic usage for four of four months of antibiotic stewardship program data reviewed. (May 2024, June 2024, July 2024 and August 2024). Findings Include: A review of CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines, The core element of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, revealed that Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national priority. 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to equip corridors with safe handrails on each side, for one of four nursing floors observed (Fourth Floor Main).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not maintain complete and accurate medical records for eight of 10 records reviewed (Resident R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R10).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and a review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility was not maintaining an effective pest control program.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.39 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.37 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.12 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.91 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.11 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.4% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 32.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.51 on weekdays and 3.12 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 31.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.82 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.39 | 0.37 | 3.51 | 3.12 | 31.0% | 0 of 90 | 252 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.35 | 3.56 | 3.21 | 25.5% | 0 of 92 | 235 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.64 | 0.40 | 3.78 | 3.27 | 21.8% | 0 of 92 | 228 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.82 | 0.41 | 3.94 | 3.50 | 25.4% | 0 of 91 | 227 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.6 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.4 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for St. Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 121 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 162 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 122 eligible stays.
58.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 135 residents counted.
0.3% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 326 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 326 residents counted.
98.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 128 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: 1412 LANSDOWNE OPERATING LLC. CMS links this home to Center Management Group, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehm, Caroline | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 11/28/2023 | |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 11/28/2023 | |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 07/30/2024 | |
| Allen, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/03/2014 | |
| Bauer, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/15/2019 | |
| Petroski, Edward | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/08/2018 | |
| Allen, Daniel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2014 | |
| Bauer, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2019 | |
| Klein, Baruch | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/03/2014 | |
| Levi, Shlomo | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Marasco-Kennedy, Elizabeth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/18/2019 | |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/18/2016 | |
| Petroski, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/08/2018 | |
| Allen, Daniel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2014 | |
| Bauer, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2019 | |
| Boehm, Caroline | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/28/2023 | |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/28/2023 | |
| Klein, Baruch | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/03/2014 | |
| Levi, Shlomo | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Marasco-Kennedy, Elizabeth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/18/2019 | |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/18/2016 | |
| Petroski, Edward | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/08/2018 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.