Home / North Carolina / Pittsboro
The Laurels of Chatham
72 Chatham Business Park, Pittsboro, NC 27312 · Chatham County · (919) 542-6677
140 certified beds, about 123 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 345421 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 8, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the North Carolina average is 4.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 31 health citations since February 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,527 in the last three years; the largest was $10,527, and the latest is dated April 17, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across North Carolina and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
37.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Carolina average 49.0%).
CMS links it to Ciena Healthcare/Laurel Health Care, an affiliated group of 81 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.
July 8, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interviews with staff and the Medical Director the facility failed to provide care safely to a dependent resident (Resident #117). On 02/14/25 Resident #117 was sitting on a bath bench in the shower room while Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 was washing her hair when Resident #117's body suddenly went limp, and she went unresponsive. NA #1 laid Resident #117 onto the shower bench, ran approximately 10 feet away from her to yell for help, leaving Resident #117 with no staff support resulting in the resident falling off the shower bench. Resident #117 sustained a laceration to her right eyebrow with significant bleeding and bruising and a skin tear to her right elbow. Resident #117 was prescribed an anticoagulant (blood thinner) daily for blood clot prevention. This deficient practice affected 1 of 5 residents reviewed for supervision to prevent falls.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and Paramedic and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a resident's (Resident #117) dignity when her nude body was left uncovered until after Emergency Medical Services (EMS) arrived following a fall on the shower room floor. EMS covered the residents' body upon their arrival. A reasonable person would not want to be left with their nude body fully exposed and would have experienced feelings such as embarrassment or humiliation. This deficient practice affected 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dignity.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level II referral was made after a resident was given new mental health diagnoses for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for PASRR.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interviews with staff and Medical Director, the facility failed to thoroughly assess Resident #117, who had a do not resuscitate order and was prescribed an anticoagulant (blood thinner) daily for blood clot prevention, after she went unresponsive during a shower and after a fall that resulted in injury. On [DATE] Resident #117 was sitting on a bath bench in the shower room while Nursing Aide (NA) #1 was washing her hair. Resident #117 took a deep breath, her body suddenly went limp, and she went unresponsive. NA #1 laid Resident #117 onto the shower bench, ran approximately 13 feet away from her to yell for help, leaving Resident #117 with no staff support resulting in the resident falling off the shower bench. [...]
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer water flushes via a feeding tube at the physician ordered flow rate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with tube feedings (Resident #101).
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow sterile technique when Nurse #5 failed to apply sterile gloves for suctioning while providing tracheostomy care for 1 of 2 residents observed for tracheostomy care (Resident #38).
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, Nurse Practitioner and staff interviews, the facility failed to hold a blood pressure medication as ordered by the physician for 1 of 6 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #32).
April 17, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations and interviews with the Orthopedic Physician Assistant, Orthopedic Nurse, Wound Physician Assistant, Medical Director, Hospice Aide, and staff, the facility failed to assess Resident #102's skin under an immobilizer used following a fractured distal femur (the area of the leg just above the knee joint). This resulted in the development of an unstageable (full thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by eschar (dry, dark scab of dead skin), slough (yellow tissue that is stringy and thick) and granulation tissue (part of the healing process in which lumpy, pink tissue containing new connective tissue and capillaries form around the edges of the wound) pressure ulcer to the right inner ankle. [...]
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to resolve resident council concerns regarding call bell responses on night shift. (Resident #s 23, 41, 77), and failed to provide the residents a private resident council meeting without staff interference for 2 of 4 months reviewed (March 2024 and April 2024).
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide stool incontinence care on night shift for a dependent resident which caused him to feel angry (Resident #59) and failed to communicate with a resident. A reasonable person expects to be provided communication during care and understand what to expect (Resident #15). This deficient practice affected 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dignity.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to refuse care when Nursing Assistant (NA) #5 attempted to dress the resident in a gown despite the resident's (Resident #15) physical and verbal behaviors resisting this care. This deficient practice affected 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, and interviews with the Orthopedic nurse, Orthopedic Physician Assistant, Responsible Party (RP) , and staff, the facility failed to notify the orthopedic provider of a newly acquired pressure ulcer caused by a knee immobilizer and that the knee immobilizer was not being worn as ordered for Resident #102's fractured distal femur (the area of the leg just above the knee joint). The facility also failed to notify the RP of the addition and increase of medication prescribed for Resident #173. This was for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for notification.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide dependent residents nail care (Resident #s 59 and 92) and failed to provide hair care and facial hair shaving (Resident #59) for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations and interviews with the Medical Director, Orthopedic nurse, Orthopedic Physician Assistant and staff, the facility failed to apply a right knee immobilizer for a resident with a fractured distal femur (the area of the leg just above the knee joint) as ordered (Resident #102). In addition, the facility transferred a resident with an obvious deformity and pain to the right hip/leg after a fall. (Resident #30). This was for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for well-being.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have complete and accurate medical records in the areas of wound care (Residents #273 and #274). This was for 2 of 7 closed records reviewed.
- D Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility's quality assurance (QA) process failed to implement, monitor, and revise as needed the action plan developed for the recertification survey dated 2/9/23 in order to achieve and sustain compliance. This was for recited deficiencies on a recertification survey on 4/14/24. The deficiencies were in the areas of dignity (550), activities of daily living, pressure ulcer, and accurate medical records. The continued failure during two federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective quality assurance program.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff, Physician and Consultant Pharmacist interviews and record review, the Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify the lack of documentation for the monitoring of side effects for a resident prescribed antipsychotic medications. This was for 1 (Resident #173) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and Physician interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify the lack of documentation for the monitoring of side effects for a resident prescribed antipsychotic medications. This was for 1 (Resident #173) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
February 9, 2023Standard inspection · 13 citations
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, family member, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to trim and clean dependent residents' nails (Residents #66, #28, #114, #40, #116 and #58) and failed to assist with shaving (Resident #84). In addition, the facility failed to assist a resident with bathing (Resident #33). This was for 8 of 12 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).
- E Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the alternating pressure reducing air mattress was set according to the resident's weight for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #58, #87, and #14).
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience by providing residents with disposable food containers and plastic utensils during three observed meals (Resident #89 and Resident #31) and referring to a resident who needed assistance with meals as a feeder (Resident #75). This was for 3 of 9 residents reviewed for dignity. Based on the reasonable person concept residents would expect to utilize regular plates and utensils regardless of how fast they eat and would not expect to be identified as a feeder. Requiring a resident to utilize disposable food containers and plastic utensils while other residents were not or being labeled a feeder has the potential for a reasonable person to experience a negative psychosocial outcome.
- D Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, interviews with staff, Responsible party, the facility failed to transfer a resident to the hospital when the Responsible Party's (RP) made the request for 1 of 1 (Resident #119) reviewed for choices.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice related to showers (Resident #66) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for choices.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately in the areas of cognition (Residents #89, #87 & #19), pressure ulcer (Resident #114) and diagnoses (Resident #28) for 5 of 31 residents whose MDS were reviewed.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to transcribe the correct medication administration route for 1 (Resident #87) of 4 residents reviewed for gastric feeding tube and with orders for nothing by mouth (NPO).
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to apply the right-hand palm guard (Resident #87) and bilateral elbow extension splints (Residents #58) as ordered for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, Medical Director and staff interviews, the facility failed to transcribe vital sign parameters for a blood pressure medication as ordered for 1 of 6 residents whose medications were reviewed (Resident #223).
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview with resident and staff, the facility failed to secure medication patches for 1 of 4 (Resident #16) residents observed for medication administration.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for wound care (Resident #123), and respiratory care (Resident #123). This was for 1 of 7 closed records reviewed.
- D Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observations, resident, and staff interviews, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor interventions the committee put into place following the annual recertification and complaint survey completed on 1/24/20. This was for 3 deficiencies that were cited in the areas of Accuracy of Assessments, Services Provided Meet Professional Standards, and Increase/Prevent Decrease in Range of Motion/Mobility. In addition, one further deficiency was cited during the annual recertification and complaint survey on 3/17/22 in the areas of Resident Records. The duplicate citations during three federal surveys of record shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI program.
- B Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to display accurate Posted Nurse Staffing Information as compared to the Staff Schedule/Assignment Sheets for 31 out of 31 days reviewed.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 17, 2024, 3 on February 9, 2023, 1 on March 17, 2022.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 17, 2024 | Fine | $10,527 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.72 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.23 | 3.42 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.37 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.04 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 37.5% | 49.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 45.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.81 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.92 on weekdays and 3.23 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.83 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.72 | 0.30 | 3.92 | 3.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 123 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.89 | 0.26 | 4.06 | 3.46 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 121 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.87 | 0.31 | 4.08 | 3.33 | 0.1% | 2 of 92 | 122 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.83 | 0.39 | 4.05 | 3.28 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 120 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| North Carolina, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.82 | 3.25 | 8.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for North Carolina
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.49 | $17.28 to $21.08 | 64,010 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.42 | $28.50 to $33.51 | 18,010 |
| Registered nurses | $40.56 | $37.87 to $49.06 | 111,120 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | North Carolina | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 15.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 18.3 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.9 | 14.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.5 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.8 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available. CMS links this home to Ciena Healthcare/Laurel Health Care, a group of 81 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on July 8, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on July 8, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 8, 2025: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 8, 2025: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.23 hours per resident per day, below the North Carolina average of 3.42.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Arbor Pittsboro, 6.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Sanford Health & Rehabilitation Co Sanford, 10.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- The Cedars of Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, 15.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 3 citations
- Signature Healthcare of Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, 16.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Siler City Center Siler City, 17.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Unc Rex Rehab & Nursing Care Center of Apex Apex, 17.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Parkview Health and Rehabilitation Center Chapel Hill, 17.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 4 citations
- Carol Woods Chapel Hill, 18.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
North Carolina contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in North Carolina. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: NC Division of Health Service Regulation, Nursing Home Licensure and Certification Section, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: North Carolina Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: NC DHSR Regulated Facilities search (Statements of Deficiencies), where North Carolina publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is The Laurels of Chatham's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Laurels of Chatham 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Laurels of Chatham get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 8, 2025. The North Carolina average is 4.7.
- Has The Laurels of Chatham been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,527 in the last three years.
- Does The Laurels of Chatham accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns The Laurels of Chatham?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager, and links the home to Ciena Healthcare/Laurel Health Care. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.