What is The Springs Batesville's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates The Springs Batesville 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did The Springs Batesville get at its last inspection?

2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 28, 2025. The Arkansas average is 2.7.

Has The Springs Batesville been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does The Springs Batesville accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns The Springs Batesville?

CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to The Springs Arkansas. Legal business name: BATESVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC.

The Springs Batesville: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 28, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Arkansas average is 2.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 19 health citations since April 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.16 hours per resident per day, against 4.02 across Arkansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.29 of those hours.

57.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arkansas average 49.5%).

CMS links it to The Springs Arkansas, an affiliated group of 26 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

504/23

1005/24

110/24

102/25

208/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

13E

Potential for minimal harm

August 28, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations

E

Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for one of one meal observed.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was maintained in a sanitary manner; expired food items were promptly removed or discarded on or before the expiration or use by date, that dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean equipment, and hot food items were maintained at required temperature for one of one meal observed.

February 5, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the Care Plan of a resident who was at risk for falls, as evidenced by intervention of a fall mat not being on the floor beside resident's bed to prevent injury for 1 (Resident # 1) of 3 sampled residents.

October 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 31, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly transfer a resident using a mechanical lift and failed to investigate and educate to prevent possible injury for one (Resident #2) sampled resident who was transferred via mechanical lift.

May 23, 2024Standard inspection · 10 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were discarded by their use by date; food items were stored and served in a manner to prevent cross contamination; and hair covering for the face and head were worn at all times in 1 of 1 kitchen.
E

Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents individualize plan of care was revised to reflect the current needs of the resident and updated to include falls for 02 (Resident #06, #31) of 02 sample mix resident, and to include half side rail use for 01 (Resident #06) of 01 sample mix residents.
E

Provide appropriate foot care.

F687 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with foot care were regularly provided with the necessary assistance to maintain good hygiene and grooming, as evidenced by failure to ensure toenails were kept clean and trimmed for 1 (Resident #68) of 1 sampled resident.
E

Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.

F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were utilized to prevent worsening of contractures in one of one sampled resident (Resident #8).
E

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from potential accidents from half side rail use for 1 (Resident #06) and failed to ensure bed side rails were properly padded for a resident with a seizure disorder for 1 (Resident #06) of 1 sampled resident, and failed to ensure a wheelchair was left unlocked to prevent an injury for 1 (Resident #294) of 1 sample mix resident.
E

Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.

F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rail assessments were performed before the use of bed rails for 1 (Resident #06) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for accidents.
E

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were stored in a permanently affixed container in the medication room.
E

Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.

F805 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 5 sampled residents who have a physician's order for a pureed diet received food which was smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the threat of choking or other complications.
E

Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.

F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preferences or allergies for a diet was implemented for 1 (Resident #79) of 1 sampled resident.
D

Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 21, 2024

Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, accurate assessment of the resident's side rail use was completed quarterly for 01 (Resident #06) of 01 sample mix residents.

April 7, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations

F

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen floor was maintained in clean, sanitary condition for food preparation to prevent the potential for food borne illnesses for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; the refrigerator temperature and dairy products stored in the refrigerator were maintained at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below; food items stored in the freezer were sealed or covered to prevent the potential for cross contamination or freezer burn, employees washed their hands and changed gloves when contaminated to decrease the potential for food borne illness for residents receiving food from 1 of 1 kitchen and the ice machine was maintained in clean condition to prevent the potential contamination of residents' beverages. These failed practices had the potential to affect 79 residents (total census: [...]
E

Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents feet were kept clean for 1 (Resident #28) of 8 (Residents #16, #17, #21, #28, #40, #57, #66 and #130) sampled residents who required assistance or were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) and/or bathing.
E

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation of the 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM medication passes on [DATE], record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% to prevent potential complications for 2 (Residents #1 and #18) of 3 (Residents #1, #3 and #18) residents observed during the medication pass, resulting in medication errors. Medication errors were made by 2 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN #1 and LPN #2) who were observed administering medications in the facility. The medication error rate was 5.88% based on the observation of 34 medication opportunities and 2 errors detected.
E

Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents who received pureed diets and 17 residents who received mechanical soft diets from 1 of 1 kitchen according to a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 04/06/23.
D

Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 28, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #40) of 1 sampled resident received a trapeze bar to assist with positioning as ordered by the Physician.

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 28, 2025, 4 on May 23, 2024, 2 on April 7, 2023.

Every fire safety citation9 citations

F
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · August 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · August 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.

K 344 · August 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.

K 341 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.

K 344 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · May 23, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.

K 347 · April 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have exits that are accessible at all times.

K 271 · April 7, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Arkansas	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	4.16	4.02	3.86
Registered nurses	0.29	0.41	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.61	3.45	3.42
Nurse aides	2.82
Licensed practical nurses	1.05
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	57.3%	49.5%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	55.6%	44.8%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.01 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.39 on weekdays and 3.61 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.01 in April to June 2025 to 4.16 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	4.16	0.29	4.39	3.61	0.0%	0 of 90	88
Oct to Dec 2025	4.41	0.28	4.68	3.72	0.0%	0 of 92	91
Jul to Sep 2025	4.19	0.28	4.42	3.60	0.0%	0 of 92	98
Apr to Jun 2025	4.01	0.34	4.31	3.26	0.0%	0 of 91	94
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Arkansas, Jan to Mar 2026	4.05	0.40	4.28	3.47	2.0%	0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Arkansas

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Arkansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$16.55	$14.52 to $17.34	17,260
LPNs and LVNs	$27.22	$23.82 to $29.43	10,010
Registered nurses	$37.95	$32.04 to $43.40	29,400
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Arkansas	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.5	9.5	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.6	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	1.2	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.8	3.9	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.7	1.3	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.6	10.1	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.1	4.2	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	18.4	10.9	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	29.0	24.1	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	7.7	12.5	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.6	2.0	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.7	2.1	1.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Springs Batesville's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

53.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Arkansas: 7 better, 25 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Arkansas: 0 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Arkansas: 0 better, 7 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 58 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

64.3% this home

Median of homes: Arkansas64.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.9% this home

Median of homes: Arkansas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

6.4% this home

Median of homes: Arkansas2.7% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Arkansas98.8% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BATESVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to The Springs Arkansas, a group of 26 nursing homes averaging 3.3 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
White River Healthcare LLC	Operational/managerial control	Organization	01/01/2020
Sherwood, Chad	Operational/managerial control	Individual	12/31/2019
Thomas, Mincie	Operational/managerial control	Individual	03/10/2023
Hoffman, Helen	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	08/22/2025
Kurz, Chaim	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	08/22/2025
Kurz, Solomon	Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF	Individual	08/22/2025
Batesville Realty Holdings LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization	01/01/2020
White River Healthcare LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization	07/24/2025
Sherwood, Chad	Adp of the SNF	Individual	12/31/2019
Thomas, Mincie	Adp of the SNF	Individual	03/10/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on August 28, 2025: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on October 1, 2024: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 5, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 23, 2024: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Wood-Lawn Heights
Batesville, 1.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Mountain Meadows Health and Rehabilitation
Batesville, 5.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Cave City Nursing Home Inc
Cave City, 11.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
The Blossoms at White River Rehab & Nursing Center
Newport, 23.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Pioneer Therapy and Living
Melbourne, 23.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
The Blossoms at Newport Rehab & Nursing Center
Newport, 24.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 27 citations

Arkansas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Arkansas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Arkansas Department of Human Services, Office of Long Term Care, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Arkansas Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Licensed home lookup: Arkansas Long Term Care Facilities Map.

Common questions

What is The Springs Batesville's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates The Springs Batesville 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Springs Batesville get at its last inspection?: 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 28, 2025. The Arkansas average is 2.7.
Has The Springs Batesville been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does The Springs Batesville accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns The Springs Batesville?: CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to The Springs Arkansas. Legal business name: BATESVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.