Home / California / Vacaville
Vacaville Ranch Post Acute
101 S Orchard Ave, Vacaville, CA 95688 · Solano County · (707) 448-6458
87 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055412 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 8, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 19 health citations since May 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 7 fines totaling $127,689 in the last three years; the largest was $94,169, and the latest is dated February 20, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.51 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.78 of those hours.
57.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
August 8, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when:1. Several metal sheet pans in clean and ready-to-use storage areas:a. Were stacked wet while stored awayb. Had food debris and brown substance on outside surface; 2. There were opened bags of food items in dry storage, refrigerator, and freezer with issues:a. 12 opened bottles of spices did not have a use by dateb. One opened bin of chicken soup base did not have a use by date c .One opened loaf of bread did not have a use by dated. Four pallets of bread did not have a receive date e. One package of thawed country fried steak did not have a pull datef. One opened box of frozen beef patties did not have an open or use by dateg .One opened package of frozen cookie dough had an illegible open and use by date 3. [...]
- F Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper disposal of garbage for a census of 47, when garbage dumpsters were left uncovered. This failure had the potential to expose the facility to pests, disease, and odors.
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 14 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 16, Resident 30, Resident 32, Resident 37, Resident 43, Resident 60, Resident 4, Resident 57, Resident 58, Resident 59, Resident 2, Resident 6, Resident 9, and Resident 29) were offered an advance directive (a legal document where a competent adult specifies their future medical care wishes in the event they cannot communicate them themselves, often due to illness or injury). This failure had the potential to result in the residents' medical wishes not being honored.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed for the therapeutic diet for lunch on 8/6/25 when:1. 12 residents (Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 9, Resident 15, Resident 18, Resident 21, Resident 29, Resident 31, Resident 35, Resident 39, Resident 41, and Resident 48) who were on a Mechanical Soft/Soft and Bite sized diet (a diet for people with mild to moderate chewing and/or swallowing difficulty) received whole green beans instead of soft and chopped green beans and hard bread instead of soft and buttered bread as indicated on the menu; and,2. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow guidelines for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, an infection prevention and control intervention and guidance on what and how to properly wear the PPE, [personal protective equipment]) to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms) that utilize the use of gowns and gloves during direct care activities for three of 17 sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 43 and Resident 29) when:1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 and Infection Preventionist (IP) did not wear gowns and gloves when they turned Resident 4 to her side;2. Physical Therapy (PT) staff did not wear a gown and gloves when he brought Resident 43 to the gym and back to her room; and,3. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 and Physical Therapy staff did not wear gowns and gloves with Resident 29. [...]
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of bed-hold at the time of transfer was provided for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 54 and Resident 6). This failure resulted in Resident 6 and Resident 54 not being fully informed about bed-hold options and rights.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care received for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident 58 and Resident 29) met professional standards, when:1) Nursing staff did not notify the physician of Resident 58's fluid imbalance; and2) Nursing staff did not document Resident 29's left heel wound accurately and completely. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 58 having fluid overload, electrolyte imbalance, or urinary retention and Resident 29's left heel to worsen.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure discharged /discontinued controlled medications (substances that have the potential for abuse and addiction and are therefore regulated by law) were jointly counted by the outgoing nurse and an oncoming nurse. This failure had the potential for diversion (obtain or use of prescription medicines such as controlled medications illegally), medication errors, and/or misuse of controlled medications in the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/5/25 at 10:45 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 of medication carts for A hall and part of B hall, LN 2 unlocked the narcotic box that contained active (active means, in-patient narcotic medications) and discharged /discontinued narcotic medications. [...]
December 13, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Food items inside the refrigerator in the facility kitchen were labeled, open dated and had a use by date. These failures could lead to misidentification of food item and a potential for food borne illness (food poisoning) from consuming expired or spoiled items. 2. The utensils were stored in a sanitary condition when the drawers where utensils were stored were dirty with food crumbs and other residue from preparing food. This failure could result to cross contamination and the spread of bacteria. 3. A contaminated food item was not discarded properly. This failure could lead to consumption of unsafe food, diseases, and food borne illnesses.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove two expired multi-dose vials of Tuberculin skin test solution (used to test for tuberculosis (TB), which is an airborne bacterial infection that primarily affects the lungs) with expired dates from use. Failure to remove the opened, expired vials of Tuberculin skin test solution decreased the facility's potential to safely administer medication and ensure residents benefitted from the full effects of the medications.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was appetizing and palatable for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 42, 33, and 208). This failure put the residents at risk for decreased food intake and decline in their nutritional status.
July 12, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide prescribed medications, as ordered, for two of two sampled residents (Residents 153 and Resident 208), when: 1. Resident 153's Spiriva (an inhaled medication used to treat Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) was unavailable in the facility for four days; and, 2. Nine of nine scheduled medications (medications to be administered at a specific time) for Resident 208 were administered one hour and forty-five minutes past the scheduled administration time. These failures resulted in: 1. Resident 153 feeling anxious and increased the potential for an exacerbation of her chronic respiratory disease, which may have led to breathing difficulties, increased coughing, fatigue, and trouble sleeping or doing daily activities. 2. [...]
- E Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the attending Physician failed to document that he or she reviewed the Pharmacist's findings and/or failed to document the action taken or not taken to address said recommendations for a period of five months (February 2024 to June 2024). This failure has the potential for all 49 vulnerable residents to experience adverse consequences from medication use, such as errors due to drug-drug interactions, omissions, duplication of therapy, or miscommunication between care providers.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for standard precautions (infection prevention practices that apply to all residents. Standard precautions are based on the principal that all blood, body fluids, secretions .may contain transmissible infectious agents. Standard precautions include hand hygiene .), when one licensed staff did not perform hand hygiene (refers to hand washing, antiseptic hand wash, and alcohol-based hand rub) during: 1. the administration of medications for two of five sampled residents (Residents 14 and 209); and, 2. prior to one of one sampled residents (Resident 9) eating her meal. These failures had the potential to expose residents to infectious agents causing illness and potentially death.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility did not ensure one of one sampled (Resident 6) residents had her preferences honored when she wanted to get out of bed to have meals and was not assisted. This failure had the result of not being able to enjoy meals while out of bed, reduced respiratory exercise from not getting out of bed and increased skin breakdown by staying in bed all day.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were immediately removed from stock and disposed of, when six bottles of medication were in the medication storage room two months after their expiration date. This failure had the potential to expose residents to medications that were less effective or risky due to a decrease in strength or a change in chemical composition.
- D Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures on antibiotic stewardship, when two of 18 residents, who acquired Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs), were prescribed antibiotics prior to the results of a culture sensitivity test (Residents 34 and 31). [A culture sensitivity test is a test to find germs, such as bacteria or a fungus, that can cause an infection. A sensitivity test checks to see what kind of medicine, such as an antibiotics, will work best to treat the illness or infection]. This failure resulted in the inappropriate use of antibiotics and increased the risk for Residents 34 and 31 to develop multi-drug-resistant organisms and other antibiotic-related complications.
May 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records review, the facility failed to implement their policy on change of condition/ notification for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's Responsible Party was not notified of Resident 1's new sheared skin (one of the major causes of skin breakdown in sitting and occurs during transfers, reaching, weight shifts or repositioning) to his coccyx (small bone at the bottom of the spine). This failure did not ensure Resident 1's Responsible Party could exercise her right to be informed and to participate with Resident 1's care and treatment.
- D Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and records review, the facility failed to safeguard resident's property for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1's missing clothes upon discharge from the facility.
Fire safety inspections
11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on August 8, 2025, 3 on December 13, 2024, 5 on July 12, 2024.
Every fire safety citation11 citations
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- C Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- C Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Use approved construction type or materials.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
- C Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| February 9, 2024 | Fine | $94,169 |
| January 2, 2024 | Fine | $4,587 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $11,645 |
| October 17, 2023 | Fine | $3,176 |
| October 10, 2023 | Fine | $2,823 |
| September 18, 2023 | Fine | $6,351 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.51 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.78 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.96 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.94 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.1% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 73.7% | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.27 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.74 on weekdays and 3.96 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.98 in April to June 2025 to 4.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.51 | 0.78 | 4.74 | 3.96 | 3.0% | 0 of 90 | 69 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.70 | 0.82 | 4.92 | 4.16 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 57 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.81 | 1.23 | 6.13 | 4.99 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.98 | 1.08 | 6.25 | 5.31 | 3.8% | 0 of 91 | 50 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for California
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| California, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.90 | $22.04 to $26.35 | 110,060 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.34 | $35.98 to $45.06 | 82,850 |
| Registered nurses | $67.44 | $58.87 to $83.25 | 338,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.0 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.1 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.5 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PITAYA HEALTHCARE LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edmonds, Aaron | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 02/01/2023 |
| Niccoli, Joseph | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 02/01/2023 |
| Edmonds, Aaron | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Edmonds, Aaron | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Niccoli, Joseph | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 8, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.96 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Vacaville Convalescent and Rehabilitation Center Vacaville, 2.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Laurel Creek Health Center Fairfield, 3.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Greenfield Care Center of Fairfield Fairfield, 7.3 mi · not rated · 76 citations
- Emmanuel Care Center - Travis Fairfield, 7.3 mi · not rated · 12 citations
- Fairfield Post Acute Rehabilitation Fairfield, 7.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Dept of State Hospitals - Napa D/P SNF Napa, 15.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Napa Post Acute Napa, 15.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Napa Valley Care Center Napa, 15.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 64 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Vacaville Ranch Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Vacaville Ranch Post Acute 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Vacaville Ranch Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 8, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Vacaville Ranch Post Acute been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 7 fines totaling $127,689 in the last three years.
- Does Vacaville Ranch Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Vacaville Ranch Post Acute?
- CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: PITAYA HEALTHCARE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.