Home / Pennsylvania / Philadelphia
6300 Greene Street, Philadelphia, PA 19144 · Philadelphia County · (215) 844-0700
120 certified beds, about 109 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395715 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since April 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,824 in the last three years; the largest was $8,824, and the latest is dated November 4, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.84 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
42.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policies, facility documents, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the safety and adequate supervision and ensure that safety devices were in place for five of six residents reviewed for risk of wandering and elopement. (Residents 122, R21, and R39).
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective and comprehensive water management program necessary to identify, monitor, control, and reduce hazardous conditions supporting the growth and spread of Legionella within the facility water system and failed to ensure proper infection control practices during the administration of eye drops for one of one resident observed. (Resident R101)Findings inlcude: Review of the CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention- a major public health agency in the United States that works to: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure an appropriate, safe, and properly documented discharge process for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for discharge practices (Resident R 118).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews with residents and staff, reviews of policies and procedures, nursing staffing assignments, pertinent human resource documents and the report form for investigation of alleged abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property (PB-22), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident was free from physical and mental abuse. (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observation, interviews with residents and staff, it was determined the facility failed to promote care for residents that maintains or enhances dignity and respect related to privacy during treatment administration and ensuring residents' care and comfort is maintained by providing necessary necessities of bedding for two of eight residents reviewed. (Resident 4 and Resident 370)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers to the hospital for one of two hospitalizations reviewed (Resident R117). Findings Include: Review of Resident R117's clinical record revealed a nursing progress note dated March 18, 2025, that indicated the resident was transferred to the local hospital for evaluation. Review of documentation provided by the Nursing Home Administrator on May 23, 2025, at 10:35 a.m. revealed the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman was not made aware of Resident R117's facility-initiated emergency transfers to the hospital as required until May 21, 2025. Interview on May 23, 2025, at 10:54 a.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for one of two new admissions reviewed (Resident R319). Findings Include: Review of facility policy, Care Plan-Baseline dated 2001 revealed, A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admissions. Review of Resident 319's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive degenerative disease of the brain). A comprehensive care plan which was initiated on May 12, 2025 did not indicate a baseline care plan for dementia. On May 21, 2025, at 1:48 p.m. an interview with the Director of Nursing, Employee E2 confirmed that Resident R319 did not have a baseline care plan. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, and interviews with residents, family members, and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain proper grooming for 3 of the six residents reviewed (Residents R319, R62 and R45).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that medically related social services were provided as required for four of eight residents reviewed related to routine care plan meetings. (Residents R60, R61, R68, R97) Finds include: Review of facility policy titled Care Plans - Baseline dated March 2022 revealed the baseline plan includes instructions needed to provide effective person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care and must include minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including but not limited to initial goals, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, PASARR recommendations. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, staff interview, and pharmacy review recommendations, it was determined that the facility failed to act on the pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R78).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policies and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications carts were kept locked and refrigerated medications kept dry and at proper temperatures on one of two nursing floors. (2nd Floor)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the operations of the food and nutrition services department, reviews of policies and procedures and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided foods and drinks that were palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Residents (R14,R3, R86, R115, R55, R85, R94, R94, R79).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews with staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage and handling of personal food products brought in from outside sources for three of 21 residents. (R80, R15). Findings Include: Review of Facility Policy: Foods Brought by Family/Visitors undated, states Food brought to the community by visitors and family is permitted. Community staff will strive to balance resident choice and a homelike environment with the nutritional and safety needs of residents. Safe food handling practices will be explained to family/visitors in a language and format they understand. Perishable foods must be stored in re-sealable containers with tightly fitting lids in a refrigerator. Contains will be labeled with the resident's name, the items and the use by date. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate tracking and surveillance of infection for two of 3 months reviewed April 2025 and May 2025. (Resident R97)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the physical environment of the food and nutrition services department and interviews with staff, it was determined that essential equipment used to operate the main kitchen where foods and beverages were prepared for the residents was not in safe functional condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on environmental observations of the food and nutrition services department, reviews of the consulting pest control operator's reports and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for the building.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that grievance regarding abuse/neglect was filed, tracked and promptly resolved for one of six residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Grievances/Complaints, Filing dated April 2017 states, 8. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint. 9. The grievance officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that all allegations of abuse and neglect were reported immediately to the Pennsylvania Department of Health for one of six residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program revised December 2016 states, Policy Statement-Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Review of facility records revealed Resident R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had the following diagnoses: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide evidence that an allegation of abuse/neglect was thoroughly investigated for one of six residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program revised December 2016 states, Policy Statement-Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. Review of facility grievance form titled, Resident/Family Concerns dated April 21, 2025 states, Concern-Nursing Received complaint by section is not checked off. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record, review of facility documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of six residents reviewed receive the required assistance via mechanical lift during a bed to chair transfer. This failure resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 whose left leg got twisted during transfer and sustained a fracture of the left femur (thigh bone). (Resident R1)
Inspectors wroteBased on environmental observations of the food and nutrition department, interviews with staff and reviews of policies and procedures, it was determined that foods were not being stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on environmental observations of two of thirty-six resident rooms, reviews of policies and procedures, interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure reasonable care for the protection of resident's property from loss or theft for two of 22 residents reviewed. (Resident R88 and Resident R27)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan related to edema for one of 22 resident records reviewed (Resident R42).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a neurological assessments were completed and to obtain orders for the use of a hand splint for two of 22 residents records reviewed (Resident R85 and Resident R42).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent a resident from falling out of the bed during personal care for one of 22 records reviewed (Resident R38).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, interviews with resident and staff, and facility policy. it was determined that the facility failed to obtain services in a timely manner when the facility could not obtain these services on site to meet the needs of one of 22 resident records reviewed (Resident R62).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of 22 residents reviewed (Resident R8 and R42 )
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interviews with staff and review of policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered according to professional standards of practice before and during dialysis treatment for one of two residents on hemodialysis.(Resident R1)
27 fire safety citations on file: 6 on May 7, 2026, 19 on May 23, 2025, 2 on August 9, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 4, 2024 | Fine | $8,824 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.84 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.48 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.11 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.2% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 26.7% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.99 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.63 in April to June 2025 to 3.84 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.84 | 0.68 | 3.99 | 3.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 109 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.74 | 0.63 | 3.86 | 3.45 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 108 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.61 | 0.57 | 3.73 | 3.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 112 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.63 | 0.63 | 3.75 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 111 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.7 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.8 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.2 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.7 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Wesley Enhanced Living at Stapeley's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 87 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 99 eligible stays.
5.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
75.4% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 61 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 76 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 76 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: STAPELEY HALL.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stapeley Hall | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2010 |
| Beiler, Kenneth | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Conner, Ronnie | Corporate director | Individual | 06/10/2024 | |
| Beiler, Kenneth | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/23/2015 | |
| Conner, Ronnie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/10/2024 | |
| Stapeley Hall | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2010 | |
| Beiler, Kenneth | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/23/2015 | |
| Conner, Ronnie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/10/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.