Westminster at Lake Ridge
12185 Clipper Drive, Lake Ridge, VA 22192 · Prince William County · (703) 643-9017
60 certified beds, about 40 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495280 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 22, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since May 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,405 in the last three years; the largest was $8,405, and the latest is dated January 22, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.14 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.12 of those hours.
28.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Ingleside Engaged Living, an affiliated group of 2 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
January 22, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe environment for one of thirty-seven residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). Four oxygen cylinders were observed unsecured constituting the identification of immediate jeopardy (IJ) at Level Four, Isolated scope and severity and substandard quality of care. Upon verification of the removal of the IJ, the scope and severity were lowered to Level Two, Isolated.
- F Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure there was a written transfer agreement with a local hospital which had the potential to affect all residents residing on 3 of 3 units.
June 23, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop a procedure for unvaccinated and vaccinated staff who refuse or are unable to be tested for COVID-19 in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility documentation review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for screening employees for 8 employees (Employee#1, Employee #4, Employee #5, Employee #8, Employee #9, Employee #10, Employee #16, Employee #23) in a sample size of 25 employees.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed within 30 days of admission (prior to admission is being waived due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Public Health Emergency) for 1 resident (Resident #11) in a sample of 19 residents. For Resident #11, facility staff failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed within 30 days of admission.
May 16, 2019Standard inspection · 17 citations
- E Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to accommodate needs and preferences for 7 residents (Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #5, Resident #28, Resident #190, Resident #20, Resident #6) in a sample size of 25 residents. 1. For Resident #12, the facility staff failed to answer the call light in a timely fashion to provide needed care and services for 2 of 14 opportunities the call light was activated. 2. For Resident #15, the facility staff failed to answer the call light in a timely fashion to provide needed care and services for 3 of 15 opportunities the call light was activated. 3. Resident #5 was not provided a hoyer lift sling to get out of bed in the morning on 5-14-19 due to lack of equipment. 4. [...]
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 Residents (Residents # 7, # 190, #5) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. 1a. For Resident #190, the facility staff failed to administer medications per physicians order and; 1b. failed to document that an entry was a late entry. 2. For Resident #7, the facility staff failed to administer 2 consecutive doses of insulin on 05/12/2019 as indicated by sliding scale per physician's orders. 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to ensure insulin was administered on 5-11-19 as ordered by a physician.
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to have sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of seven Residents (Resident #20, Resident #190, Resident #28, Resident #189, Resident #12, Resident #15, Resident #6) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. 1. For Resident #20, the facility staff failed to have adequate staff to respond to the Resident's call bell and request for assistance for three hours. 2. For Resident #190, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate staff available to answer call bell in a timely manner. 3. For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate staff available to answer call bell in a timely manner. 4. For Resident #189, the facility staff failed to provide sufficient staff to safely lift Resident using Hoyer. 5. [...]
- E Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to prevent significant medication errors. The facility failed to administer insulin on 5 separate occasions for 3 of 25 sampled residents. 1. For Resident #7, the facility staff failed to administer 2 consecutive doses of insulin on 05/12/2019 as indicated by sliding scale per physician's orders. 2. For Resident # 190 the facility staff omitted giving insulin at 4:30 PM on two consecutive days. 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to ensure insulin was administered on 5-11-19 as ordered by a physician.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to follow infection prevention protocols. The dietary manager was observed not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in the room of a resident on contact isolation for clostridium difficile. The dietary manager then exited the room without washing hands and entered two other resident rooms without performing hand hygiene.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure one Residents was free from neglect for 1 of 25 sampled Residents (#34). For Resident #34 who had a recent history of falls with fracture, the facility staff left the Resident on the toilet without supervision, neglecting the Resident's known needs, and the Resident fell.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of transfer to the hospital for two Residents (Resident #339, Resident 89) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. 1. For Resident #339, the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of transfer to the hospital on two occasions. 2. For Resident #89, the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of transfer to hospital.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the resident of bed hold policy before transfer to the hospital for one Resident (Resident #339) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. For Resident #339, the facility staff failed to notify the resident of the bed hold policy before transfer to the hospital on two occassions.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed develop a care plan for 2 of 25 sampled residents. 1. For Resident # 91, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for a renal diet. 2. For Resident #34, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for hearing deficits.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a careplan for one Resident (Resident #341) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. For Resident #341, the facility staff failed to review and revise the careplan after the Resident was diagnosed with a superficial vein thrombosis and was started on an anticoagulant.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident representative interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure treatment services to maintain hearing were afforded one Resident, (Resident #34) in a sample of 25 Residents. For Resident #34, who was hard of hearing, and wore hearing aids, the facility staff failed to provide timely cerumen removal as ordered by a physician, to maintain hearing.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide supervision for 2 of 25 sampled Residents (#189 and #34). 1. For Resident #189 the facility staff failed to utilize proper amount of staff while transferring a resident via Mechanical Lift. 2. For Resident #34 who had a recent history of falls with fracture, the facility staff left the Resident on the toilet without supervision, and the Resident fell.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain nutritional status. 1. For Resident #91, the facility staff failed to maintain nutritional status, resulting in an increased potassium level which required pharmacological intervention. 2. For Resident #290, the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet as ordered by the healthcare provider on 05/14/2019.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate record for a controlled medication. Facility staff failed to account for the receipt of a controlled medication from the pharmacy.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure Residents are free from unnecessary medications for 1 Resident (#25) in a survey sample of 25 Residents. For Resident #25 the facility staff administered Tylenol 650 mg on three occasions when Resident has pain rating of 0/10.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident's are free from unnecessary psychotropic medication use for one Resident (Resident #19) in a survey sample of 25 Residents . For Resident #19, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication regime was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide an appropriate alternative to accommodate a food allergy for 1 resident (Resident #290) in a sample size of 25 residents. For Resident #290, the facility staff failed to provide any alternative dessert at the lunch meal on 05/14/2019 to accommodate her food allergies.
Fire safety inspections
11 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 22, 2026, 2 on June 23, 2022, 7 on May 16, 2019.
Every fire safety citation11 citations
- D Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- D Have proper power supply for life support equipment.
- D Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 22, 2026 | Fine | $8,405 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.14 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.12 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.66 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.56 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.46 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 28.8% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 44.4% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.33 on weekdays and 4.66 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.87 in April to June 2025 to 5.14 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.14 | 1.12 | 5.33 | 4.66 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 40 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.12 | 1.22 | 5.29 | 4.70 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 41 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.89 | 1.26 | 5.08 | 4.41 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 45 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.87 | 0.81 | 5.05 | 4.42 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 42 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.9 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.1 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.1 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC.. CMS links this home to Ingleside Engaged Living, a group of 2 nursing homes averaging 5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Westminster Ingleside King Farm Retirement Communities Inc | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 06/01/2011 | |
| Bartels, Bruce | Corporate director | Individual | 03/04/2015 | |
| Cecchine, Margaret | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Cox, Sally | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Gleckman, Howard | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Hauge, Jennifer | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Johnson, Gregg | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Katz, Ruth | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Kearney, Jonathan | Corporate director | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Kreutzer, John | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Kuhn, Nancy | Corporate director | Individual | 10/07/2015 | |
| Magidson, Phillip | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Massetti, Amanda | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2020 | |
| Massey, Nathaniel | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Ortiz, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Wagner, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Alley, Traci | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/02/2021 | |
| Clark, Dale | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2021 | |
| Delovska-Trajkova, Dusanka | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2013 | |
| Mour, Christine | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/24/2015 | |
| O'Connor, Lynn | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2010 | |
| Silverbloom Consulting, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Westminster Ingleside King Farm Retirement Communities Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2011 | |
| Armstrong, Tommy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/17/2025 | |
| Chasm, Alexis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/29/2023 | |
| Green, Lynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/14/2024 | |
| James, Ashley | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/20/2023 | |
| Johnson, Zenobia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/12/2023 | |
| Massetti, Amanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/11/2020 | |
| Wooten, Kera | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/13/2020 | |
| Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Baker Tilly Us LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Flagship Rehabilitation, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Judy Wilhide Mds Consulting, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Marsh & McLennan Companies | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2015 | |
| Richter and Associates | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/10/2015 | |
| Silverbloom Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/15/2025 | |
| Westminster Ingleside King Farm Retirement Communities Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/08/2025 | |
| Armstrong, Tommy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/17/2025 | |
| Green, Lynn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/14/2024 | |
| James, Ashley | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/20/2023 | |
| Johnson, Zenobia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/12/2023 | |
| Massetti, Amanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/11/2020 | |
| Nguyen, Uy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2025 | |
| Tesfay, Akbert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/05/2023 | |
| Wooten, Kera | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/13/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 22, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 23, 2022: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 16, 2019: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 16, 2019: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Belmont Bay Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Woodbridge, 2.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 54 citations
- Belvoir Woods Health Care Center at the Fairfax Fort Belvoir, 4.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Burke Health & Rehabilitation Center Burke, 6.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Greenspring Village Springfield, 6.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- August Healthcare at Leewood Annandale, 9.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Birmingham Green Manassas, 11.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Mount Vernon Healthcare Center Alexandria, 11.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 82 citations
- Fairfax Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Fairfax, 11.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 60 citations
Virginia contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Virginia Department of Health, Office of Licensure and Certification, Division of Long-Term Care Services, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Virginia Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-552-5019. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: VDH Nursing Home and ICF/IID Inspections and Surveys, where Virginia publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Westminster at Lake Ridge's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Westminster at Lake Ridge 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Westminster at Lake Ridge get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 22, 2026. The Virginia average is 14.3.
- Has Westminster at Lake Ridge been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,405 in the last three years.
- Does Westminster at Lake Ridge accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Westminster at Lake Ridge?
- CMS lists 46 owners and managers, and links the home to Ingleside Engaged Living. Legal business name: WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.