10701 Main Street, Fairfax, VA 22030 · Fairfax City County · (703) 273-7705
200 certified beds, about 189 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495099 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 27, 2025, inspectors cited 24 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 60 health citations since October 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $23,112 in the last three years; the largest was $12,599, and the latest is dated February 4, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.55 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.62 of those hours.
44.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Lifeworks Rehab, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 60 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented for resident safety for (1) one of (4) four sampled residents, Resident #1, resulting in harm. Resident #1 sustained a fall during transfer resulting in a subarachnoid hemorrhage and subsequent death.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, environment and help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #7.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure that food was served at a safe and/or appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications in 1 of 1 medication rooms and on 3 of 12 medication carts and failed to properly store medications and biological's for 1 of 41 current residents, Resident #122.
Inspectors wrote5. For Resident #71, the facility staff documented the resident was a full code in a discharge planning note. The resident had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in place. Resident #71's diagnoses included dementia and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #71's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/15/25 was coded 1/1/3 to indicate this resident had problems with long- and short-term memory and was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #71's comprehensive care plan included the focus area has an advance directive DNR order. Resident #71's clinical record included a provider order dated 07/05/24 indicating this resident was a DNR. [...]
Inspectors wrote3. For Resident #167, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of the resident/resident representative being informed of and obtaining consent for the use of the psychotropic medications Quetiapine Fumarate (Seroquel) and Mirtazapine (Remeron). Quetiapine Fumarate is an atypical antipsychotic medication, and Mirtazapine is an antidepressant medication. Resident #167's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Severe Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Psychosis, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Adult Failure to Thrive. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/04/25 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to assess 2 of 41 current residents for self-administration of medications, Residents #22 and #96.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 41 current residents Resident #122 had incontinent supplies.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide all residents with the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 41 current residents, Resident #154.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's personal privacy and confidentiality for 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident #166).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 of 41 sampled residents (Resident #167 and Resident #138).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prepare or orient residents for transfer to the hospital for 1 (one) of 41 current residents in the survey sample, resident #434.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 41 residents, Residents #44 and #85.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 41 sampled residents (Resident #3).
Inspectors wrote2. For Resident #167, the facility staff failed to provide assistance with the removal of facial hair. Resident #167's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Severe Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Aphasia, and Adult Failure to Thrive. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/04/25 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. Resident #167 was coded as requiring substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Resident #167's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating the resident requires assistance with their activities of daily living. The resident's care plan did not address their desire regarding facial hair. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow the provider orders for medication administration for 1 of 41 current residents Resident #33 and failed to follow the providers orders for treatments for 2 of 41 current residents, Residents #99 and #390.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to flush the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line) per the provider orders for 1 of 41 current residents in the survey sample, resident #433.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side/bed rail for (1) one of (41) forty-one sampled residents. (Resident #75).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider reviewed medication regimen reviews in a timely manner and the facility staff failed to ensure a medical provider acted upon and/or provided rationale of pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner for (2) two of (41) forty-one sampled residents, (Resident #88 and Resident #138).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 2 errors in 30 opportunities for a medication error rate of 6.67%. These medication errors affected Resident #59.
Inspectors wrote2. The facility staff failed to follow infection control guidelines during a medication pass and pour observation. The facility staff were observed dropping a medication on top of the medication cart, picking it up with their bare hands, and placing it into a medication cup for administration. On 06/26/25 at 8:18 a.m., during a medication pass and pour observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 this nurse was observed to drop the medication Bupropion on top of the medication cart. LPN #1 picked this medication up with her bare hands and stated you didn't see that and then put the medication in the medication cup with 3 other medications. LPN #1 placed 2 other medications in this cup. The surveyor stopped LPN #1 prior to them entering the residents room and asked the nurse about administering the contaminated medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer a resident a pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with nationally recognized standards for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #3 and Resident #108).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to offer an updated 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine for 2 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #3 and Resident #108.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and resident interview the facility staff failed to provide a way for residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system for one of 41 current residents in the survey sample, resident #433.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to have readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives of residents of the facility, the results of the most recent survey(s) and failed to post a notice of the availability of such reports in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman of transfer or discharge for 2 of 41 residents and failed to provide the receiving entity with proper documentation upon transfer for 1 of 41 residents. (Resident #155, #138, and #434)
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to act with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services to the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to administer medications per the physician's orders for one of _ residents in the survey sample, resident # 2 (R2).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the medical provider orders for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #2).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide enteral feeding as ordered by the medical provider for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #3).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the required individuals related to issues affecting residents' care and/or room assignments for three (3) of 15 sampled residents (Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and/or accurate clinical records for one (1) of 15 sampled residents (Resident #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement an activities care plan which addressed the findings of a resident's activity assessment for one (1) of 15 sampled residents (Resident #7).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide medications per the providers orders for 1 of 15 residents, Resident #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain provider ordered X-rays for 1 of 15 Residents, Resident #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide a clean, homelike dining experience in one of four dining rooms. On 5/3/22, the facility staff provided lunch to residents in the fourth floor dining room without removing meal trays and trash on meal trays before the residents dined.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop and/or implement the comprehensive care plan for 14 of 55 residents in the survey sample; Residents #98, #144, #50, #132, #85, #9, #97, #18, #76 #419, #52, #82, #147 and #4.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to monitor a resident's fluid intake while on a fluid restriction for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to record in April and May 2022, the amount of fluid consumed each shift by R52, who was on a physician ordered fluid restriction .
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and service for a complete dialysis [1] program for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #97 (R97). The facility staff failed to assess R97's dialysis access site for bruit and thrill per physician order.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement bed rail requirements for 6 of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents #368, #144, #50, #132, #4 and #147.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide food at a palatable temperature during dinner service on 05/03/2022 with potential to affect 46 of 46 residents on the fourth floor receiving a meal tray.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain five of five dumpsters in a sanitary manner. Two outside dumpsters were observed with their door open and approximately eight pairs of used plastic gloves and numerous pieces of debris, including several pieces of cardboard and trash were found lying on the ground around and behind the facility's dumpsters.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and in the course of complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to uphold a resident's dignity for two of 55 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 76 and # 419.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide accommodations of resident needs by ensuring the call bell [a device with a button that can be pushed to alert staff when assistance is needed] was within reach for one of 55 current residents in the survey sample, Resident # 76 (R76).
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the provider (physician/nurse practitioner) when medications were not available for administration for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to notify the provider that R52's scheduled medications were not available for administration on 4/14/22, 4/24/22, and 4/26/22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to preserve a resident's privacy during a physical examination by the nurse practitioner for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #419 (R419). R419 was seated in a wheelchair in full public view when the nurse practitioner (NP) performed an examination of the resident on 5/4/22.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete and electronically submit a significant change MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #33 (R33). The facility staff failed to complete a significant change MDS assessment after R33 began receiving hemodialysis for chronic kidney disease stage 4 on 4/6/2022.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately complete an MDS (minimum data set) for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #419 (R419). The facility staff failed to accurately code R419's interview status on the 3/29/22 MDS.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan for 1 of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #369. The facility staff failed to provide a written summary of Resident #369's (R369) baseline care plan to the resident and/or the resident's representative.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to correctly transcribe an order according to professional standards of practice for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to accurately transcribe R52's order for Eliquis (1), which was held on 3/28/22.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide activities per a resident's assessed interest for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #419 (R419). The facility staff failed to provide R419 with preferred activities of watching television or listening to music by leaving the resident seated in a wheelchair at the entrance to the dining room, adjacent to the nurses' station, sleeping and eating in public view, during the day and evening on 5/3/22 and 5/4/22.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have medications available for administration to the resident in a timely manner for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). The facility staff failed to have R52's scheduled medications available for administration on 4/14/22, 4/24/22, and 4/26/22.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure one of 55 residents in the survey sample Resident #52 (R52) was free from a significant medication error. The facility staff failed to administer Eliquis (1) as ordered after the hold period related to a procedure ended.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide food per the dietician's recommendation, and failed to serve food that matched the published menu for one of 55 residents in the survey sample, Resident #52 (R52). At lunch on 5/3/22 and 5/4/22, R52 did not receive double portions per the dietician's recommendation; R52's food items did not match the published menu and meal ticket.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide written information to concerning the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and, at the resident's option, formulate an advance directive by ensuring an accurate durable do not resuscitate (DDNR) form for two of 42 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 11 and Resident # 35.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 42 residents, Resident #87 and Resident #360.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide care and treatment based on the comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 42 residents, Resident #117.
19 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 27, 2025, 3 on November 13, 2024, 1 on December 6, 2023, 3 on May 5, 2022, 7 on October 25, 2019.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 4, 2026 | Fine | $10,513 |
| October 23, 2024 | Fine | $12,599 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.55 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.05 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.13 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 44.8% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 60.0% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.65 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.75 on weekdays and 3.05 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.78 in April to June 2025 to 3.55 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.62 | 3.75 | 3.05 | 0.4% | 0 of 90 | 189 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.84 | 0.59 | 4.03 | 3.35 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 180 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.62 | 0.63 | 3.86 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 187 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.78 | 0.73 | 4.02 | 3.16 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 182 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.2 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.4 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Fairfax Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 429 eligible stays.
9.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 402 eligible stays.
8.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 300 eligible stays.
79.4% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 160 residents counted.
1.0% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 314 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 314 residents counted.
97.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 159 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FAIRFAX OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to Lifeworks Rehab, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia Care Holco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/31/2020 |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/31/2020 | |
| Edward 1998 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/31/2020 | |
| Isva Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/31/2020 | |
| Jkva Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/31/2020 | |
| Mlva Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/31/2020 | |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 10/31/2020 | |
| Rajchenbach, Moshe | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/17/2020 | |
| Innovative Healthcare Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/31/2020 | |
| Rajchenbach, Moshe | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/12/2026 | |
| Vorpahl, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/12/2026 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.