5301 W Duval Rd, Austin, TX 78727 · Travis County · (512) 345-1805
206 certified beds, about 200 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675956 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 22, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $23,341 in the last three years; the largest was $17,605, and the latest is dated September 9, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.93 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.46 of those hours.
40.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Wellsential Health, an affiliated group of 67 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from unnecessary drugs used in excessive dose including duplicated drug therapy, excessive duration, without adequate monitoring, and without adequate indications for it for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for pharmacy services and unnecessary drugs. The facility did not prevent Resident #14 from receiving 13 doses of unnecessary psychotropic drug, Ativan 1ml/mg, discontinued on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for overdosing, delayed healing, and other adverse consequences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order, and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 3 of 11 medication carts (Medication Cart #1, Medication Cart #2, and Medication Cart #3) in the facility effecting 5 of 11 residents (Resident #91, Resident #201, Resident #122, Resident #14, and Resident #73) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure:1. RN A accurately reconciled Resident #91's narcotic medication log on medication cart #1 when he administered Resident #91's Lorazepam 0.5 mg (controlled medication used for anxiety). 2. MA E accurately reconciled Resident #122's narcotic medication log on Medication Cart #2 when she administered one tablet of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg.3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors and failed to report drug errors to the resident's physician in a timely manner and record them in the resident's record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #91) reviewed for drug administration. The facility failed to ensure that RN A administered a correct dose of Lorazepam 0.5 mg (controlled medication used for anxiety) to Resident #91 for a week without obtaining a correct dose of medication according to the physician order. This failure could place residents at risk for overdosing, delayed healing, and other adverse consequences.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services.1)The facility failed to effectively reseal all food items in the walk-in refrigerator and dry pantry to prevent contamination or spoilage on 05/19/2026.2)The facility failed to label and date all food items located in the reach-in refrigerator, walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, and kitchen shelves on 05/19/2026 and 05/20/2026.3)The facility failed to dispose of expired foods items located in the walk-in refrigerator and dry pantry.4)The facility failed to ensure proper hair restraints were worn by kitchen staff and individuals entering the kitchen. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #179) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #179's call light had been placed within reach. This failure had the potential to place dependent residents at risk for injuries and unmet needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure confidential and personal medical records for 1 (Resident #40) of 9 residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality of records. The facility failed to protect Resident #40's PII on 03/27/2026 when the AMD emailed a PEME request form to an RP of another facility resident. This failure placed residents' PII at risk of exposure to unauthorized parties through electronic communication.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #29) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29 did not keep smoking materials in his room. This failure could place residents at risk of a fire, burning themselves, or ingesting unknown substances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 14 residents (Resident #162 and Resident #179) reviewed for infection control.1. CNA C failed to wash or sanitize her hands when going from a dirty surface to a clean surface while performing incontinent care for Resident #179.2. The facility failed on 05/19/2026 to use the CDC recommendations regarding contact isolation for chicken pox for Resident #162. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one of one (Resident #1) resident reviewed, or the resident representative to obtain a copy of the resident's medical records upon verbal or written request to the facility. The facility failed to provide medical records for Resident #1 to his RP / family representative within two working days of a request on 03/31/2026. This failure placed residents in the facility at risk by causing a negative health impact due to not having continuity of care. and the right to review their health care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for two of eight residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #61, Resident #84, and Resident #131) reviewed for rights. The facility failed to ensure CNA A and LVN B knocked on Resident #61's, Resident #84's, and Resident #131's door when going into the residents' rooms. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of feeling like their privacy was being invaded or the facility was not their home.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served reflected the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines for all residents when the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for all residents for 2 of 2 meals observed. The facility failed to follow the posted menus for two meal services served at the facility on Monday, 03/31/25 and Tuesday 04/01/25. These failures could place residents that eat food from the kitchen at risk of poor intake, chemical imbalance, and/or weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. The meal test tray's on 03/31/2025, 04/01/2025, and 04/02/2025 were not at appropriate homelike meal temperature, had an unappetizing off-putting appearance (no seasoning observed, and food colliding together), not cooked well (overcooked), and lacked palatable seasoning including flavor. The facility failed to provide palatable food that was attractive or appetizing to residents' who complained the food did not look or taste good. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure DA I ate food outside of the kitchen production area. 2. The facility failed to ensure the dishwasher's hot water was at the appropriate temperature. 3. The facility failed to ensure areas behind the oven and stove were clean. 4. The facility failed to ensure shelves were functional and did not require additional supports for the shelves to stay upright. 5. The facility failed to ensure the items in the walk-in fridge were free from liquid from other food products. 6. The facility failed to ensure the floors in the kitchen, walk-in fridge, and storage room were swept clean and free of trash. 7. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's bedside, toilet and bathing facilities were adequately equipped to allow all residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system that would relay the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #13, Resident #34, and Resident #124 ) reviewed for resident call system . The facility failed to provide a working communication system, which was easily at reach, which would allow Resident #13, Resident #34, and Resident #124 the ability to safely call for staff for assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of not having a means of directly contacting caregivers in an emergency or when they needed support for daily living.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 10 (Resident #92) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update the care plan to reflect the use of bed rails as an assistive aid for Resident #92. This failure placed the resident at risk of losing mobility, becoming entrapped, and receiving improper care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #461) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to respond to and assess Resident #461's malfunctioning beeping oxygen concentrator with a red-light indicating malfunction for approximately 45 minutes. This failure could place residents at risk of an oxygen delivery problem, not receiving necessary medical care, harm, and hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #114, Resident #460, and Resident #461) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure the TN H sanitized her hands and changed gloves prior to applying wound treatment and clean dressing to Resident #114's left heel wound. 2. The facility failed to post Enhanced Barrier Protection signage on Resident #460 and Resident #461's doors when they admitted to the facility with a wound and a suprapubic catheter. 3. The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Protection was worn when providing resident care for Resident #461's suprapubic catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist's drug regimen review irregularity reports for two of (Residents #1 and #2) of seven residents reviewed for medication consents. 1. The facility failed to respond to the pharmacist's notification that Resident #1's Trazodone (an antidepressant and sedative medication used to treat depression and may also be used for other conditions) consent was missing and needed to be obtained and uploaded. The facility had an unsigned written consent from Resident #1's RP before administering Trazodone. 2. The facility failed to respond to the pharmacist's notification that Resident #2's Lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) consent was missing and needed to be obtained and uploaded. The facility had an unsigned written consent from Resident #2's RP before administering Lorazepam. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from abuse for 1 (Resident # 1) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1 was not physically assaulted by Hospitality Aide A. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 08/02/2024 and ended on 08/06/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse, in that: The facility failed to report Resident #1's abuse allegation to the State Agency. On 04/15/24, Resident #1 informed staff that he was hit by Resident #2 in the dining room during meal service. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of abuse and revictimization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for physical environment, in that: The facility failed to ensure no open flames are near oxygen cylinders, store cylinders in the upright position, and secure the cylinders from residents and the public. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/26/24 at 10:25 AM While the IJ was removed on 01/27/24 at 10:27 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of widespread and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to monitor their corrective actions. These failures could place residents at risk of injury or death due to improper or unsafe smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for 3 of 40 residents (Residents #19, #102, #153) reviewed for resident rights, in that: 1. Resident #19 was not served her meal timely with respect to Resident #153 sitting at the same table and was served at least 16 minutes later than him. 2. Resident #102 was not fed his meal timely with respect to his roommate. This failure could place residents needing assistance at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen of 2 out of 40 residents (Resident #37 and Resident #102) were reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist, in that: 1. Resident #37 was missing monthly medication reviews documented for the months of October 2023 and July 2023. 2. Resident #102 was missing monthly medication reviews documented for the months from August 2023 to December 2023. These deficient practices could place residents at risk from harm related to unnecessary medications or dosages, could place them at risk for adverse consequences related to medication therapy, and impact residents' ability to achieve or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program within 1 of 1 facility reviewed for pest control revealed: Live and dead pests were observed in the facility. This deficient practice could lead to contamination and/or infection due to an unsanitary environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #68) of 35 residents reviewed for clinical records, in that: Resident #68's clinical record contained two OOH-DNR forms, both of which were invalid. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 2 of 21 residents (Residents #396 and #190) reviewed for baseline care plan, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #396's baseline care plan included information related to his foley catheter ( tube that helps drain urine from bladder). 2. The facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan within 48hours of admission date 1/8/2024 for resident #190 to include physical therapy for strengthening. These failures could affect newly admitted residents and place them at risk of not receiving continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to ensure their immediate care needs are met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care for 2 of 26 residents (Residents #2 and #53) reviewed for care consistent with professional standards, in that: 1. The facility failed to post signage for the room of Resident #53 while oxygen was in use. 2. The facility failed to clean the oxygen concentrator filter for Resident #2 while the oxygen was in use. These failures could place residents at risk for improper respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 12%, based on 3 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved (Residents #61 and #165) and 1 of 2 staff (MA J ) reviewed for medication administration, in that: The facility failed to ensure MA J administered medications according to the physician's orders and per professional standards for Residents #61 and #165, which resulted in a 12% medication administration error rate. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to accommodate residents' food preferences for 1 of 8 (Resident #11) residents reviewed for food preferences, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #79's lunch meal on 01/23/24 did not include pepper per her dislike and allergy to pepper. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #37's lunch meal on 01/24/24 included soup as was reflected on her lunch meal tray ticket. These failures could affect residents with food preferences and could result in a decrease in resident choices and diminished interest in meals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure it formulated, adopted, and enforced policies regarding smoking, smoking areas, and smoking safety that also take into account non-smoking residents for 3 of 40 residents (Residents #19 and #102) reviewed so smoking, in that: The facility failed to follow the Smoking/Tobacco Policy to ensure Residents #19 and #102 remained safe while smoking. These failures could place residents at risk of injury or death due to improper or unsafe smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control, as indicated by: MA A and MA B observed not cleaning and disinfecting the wrist blood pressure monitor while using it on Resident #1, #2, #3, and #4. This failure could place the residents at the facility at risk of transmission of disease and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: The food items in the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen were labeled and dated. The food items in the freezer were not stored on the floor. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination.
7 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 22, 2026, 1 on April 2, 2025, 5 on January 27, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 9, 2024 | Fine | $5,736 |
| January 27, 2024 | Fine | $17,605 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.93 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.66 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.47 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 25.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.00 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.04 on weekdays and 2.66 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.69 in April to June 2025 to 2.93 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.93 | 0.46 | 3.04 | 2.66 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 200 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.82 | 0.35 | 2.92 | 2.59 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 203 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.84 | 0.37 | 2.94 | 2.59 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 205 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.69 | 0.40 | 2.80 | 2.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 205 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.1 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Duval's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (32.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
32.5% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 40 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: VAL VERDE COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Wellsential Health, a group of 67 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Val Verde County Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2022 |
| Regency IHS of Windsor Duval LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Dwd Tx Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center Inc | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Reg Hg Opco I, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Reg Hg Opco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Reg Operator Holdco LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Regency Texas Holdings LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Baird, Daniel | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 04/13/2021 | |
| Carvajal, Antonio | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/16/2024 | |
| Clapp, Barbara | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2021 | |
| Cortese, Daren | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Diaz, Cris | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/25/2022 | |
| Gibson, Patricia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/01/2021 | |
| Gonzales, Veronica | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/16/2024 | |
| Jurado, Jorge | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 10/13/2023 | |
| Kaufman, Nicole | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 08/10/2021 | |
| Mandelbaum, Elliot | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Otazo, Julio | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/25/2022 | |
| Palmer, Robin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/18/2020 | |
| Jurado, Jorge | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/13/2023 | |
| Regency IHS of Windsor Duval LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Val Verde County Hospital District | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Helmcamp, Terrell | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/06/2012 | |
| 5301 West Duval Road LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Regency IHS Clinical Consulting, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Regency IHS Master Tenant LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Regency IHS of Windsor Duval LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/05/2024 | |
| Regency IHS Rehab LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Regency Integrated Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2022 | |
| Val Verde County Hospital District | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/28/2025 | |
| Dekowski, Donovan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Faxigue, Blaise | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Grochowalski, Kristin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Helmcamp, Terrell | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/06/2012 | |
| Momin, Zahir | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.