5500 Fort St., Trenton, MI 48183 · Wayne County · (734) 671-3500
120 certified beds, about 47 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235052 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
None of its 36 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.42 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
68.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to 2794609. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper transfer assistance for one resident (R106) out of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Properly date-label food in the walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer; 2. Adequately clean surfaces in the kitchen; 3. Consistently ensure the dish machine was operating properly; and 4. Maintain cleanable wall surfaces near the dish machine. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all the residents who consumed from the kitchen resulting in the potential for food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper use of the legally protected professional designation of Registered Dietitian.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent proper working order of the walk-in freezer and that the drain line from the commercial ice machine was protected against contamination from sewage or other sources of contamination. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents that eat from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three (R15, R17, and R29) of six residents reviewed for resident assessments in a timely manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the standard of practice for transcribing physician's orders for one (R47) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in R47 missing nine doses of a multivitamin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have a medication error rate below 5%.During the medication administration task three errors were observed from 28 opportunities and subsequently a 10.4% medication error rate. #1. On 9/10/25 at 9:19 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) C was observed to administer R28 medications at the bedside. RN C proceeded to sign out all the medications that were administered. R28 did not receive Ozempic 2 milligram (mg)/3 milliliter (ml)give 0.5 ml subcutaneous injection. Upon inquiry RN C confirmed all the resident's medications were given. R28's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed with RN C, and they were asked about the Ozempic prescription. RN C said, Oh, was that supposed to be given today? Yes, I should have given that. Its every Wednesday. Today is Wednesday. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to MI001221903. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call button was within reach for one resident (R110) out of four residents reviewed for call light access.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to MI1221903. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Unit 300 shower room was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, resulting in the residents' environment not being homelike and the potential for spread harmful pathogens.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain and address Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations timely for two residents (R3 and R12) of five residents reviewed for medication regimen review, resulting in the potential for the continuance of unnecessary medications and lack of communication of recommended medication changes between pharmacist and physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for two (R3 and R12) of 15 residents reviewed for medical records, resulting in resident's pharmacy recommendations being unclear and not maintained in the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) with the potential for miscommunication of pharmacy recommendations, physician's orders, and an unclear picture of the resident's health care status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to practice proper infection control techniques for one (R4) of one resident reviewed with enhanced barrier precautions, resulting in the potential for widespread infection.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake MI00138801. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to seek timely medical evaluation of an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R102), out of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the potential for delay in the provision of resident care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to promptly make good faith attempts to resolve grievances for members of the Resident Council resulting in the potential for frustration and unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteResident #16 (R16) According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident 16 (R16) was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included heart peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. Review of MDS reflected R16 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Further review of the medical record including the monthly Physician orders reflected R16 was started on an anti-anxiety medication on as as needed basis on April 28, 2023 with no stop date. Review of R16's care plan dated 7/13/23 reflected R16's problem for the care plan was a diagnosis of anxiety with a goal of stabilize/improve mood and approaches were 1. appropriate referrals 2. encourage activities of interest. 3 explain all procedures of care calmly. 4. identify possible stressors to resident that need to be eliminated . 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intakes MI00132462 and MI00135054. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed maintain sufficient staff for one (Resident #2) and Resident Council, resulting in extended call light response times and the potential for unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician received, reviewed and acted upon identified medication regimen irregularities for four residents (Resident #9, 16, 17, and 35) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and adverse reactions. Resident #16 (R16) According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident 16 (R16) was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included heart peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. Review of MDS reflected R16 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Further review of the medical record including the Pharmacy reviews and revealed the Pharmacist had found irregularities and had made recommendations for the Physician on 5/07/23, 06/01/23 and 07/05/23 . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications in one of two medication carts and two of two medication rooms reviewed, resulting in the potential for decreased medication efficacy and adverse side effects in a current facility census of 34 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate completion of advance directive information for 3 (Resident #23, #27, and #35) of 4 residents reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains To Intake #MI00135054 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and operationalize an abuse policy consistent with regulations for three (Resident #'s 1, 9 and 23) of five reviewed, resulting in allegations of abuse to go unreported to the State Agency, not thoroughly investigated and the potential for further abuse allegations not be reported.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains To Intake #MI00135054 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse for three (Resident #1, #9 and #23) of 5 reviewed, resulting in allegations of abuse that were not reported to the State Agency and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains To Intake #MI000135054 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of residents and thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for one (Resident #9) of 5 reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for further abuse to occur and allegations of abuse not being thoroughly investigated. Resident #9 According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident 9 (R9) was a [AGE] year old male admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included Parkinson's disease and depression. Further review of the MDS reflected R9 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. On 08/09/23 at 09:00 AM, R9 was interviewed in his room, R9 was observed sitting in his recliner. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident's representative a written reason of transfer to a hospital for 2 (Resident #9 and #23) of 2 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge, resulting in the potential of residents and/or family being un-informed of the reason for transfer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative of the facility's policy for bed hold for two (Resident #9 and Resident #26) of two reviewed resulting in the potential of residents and/or representatives to be uninformed of the bed hold policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed complete a comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #139) of 12 reviewed, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan for one residents (#23) of 12 residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision resulting in the potential for residents that use language other than English to have unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide interpretive services for one resident (#23) of one resident reviewed for language resulting in the potential for resident that use language other than English to have unmet care needs. Findings Included: Resident #23 (R23) Review of the medical record revealed R23 was admitted to the facility 08/21/2016 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, dementia, psychotic disturbances, mood disturbance, anxiety, disc degeneration of the lumbar region, pain, spondylosis (wear and tear of spinal disk) of cervical region, insomnia, hyperkalemia (high potassium), osteoarthritis, and constipation. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intakes MI00134426 and MI00136854. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for three (Resident #139, #188, #238) of four reviewed, resulting in unmet care needs and the potential for a decline in emotional and physical health.
Inspectors wroteResident #11 According to the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] , Resident 11 (R11) was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility with multiple medical issues including a diagnoses of traumatic brain injury. Review of the MDS reflected R11 scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental (BIMS). Section G of the MDS reflected R11 required extensive assistance from two staff persons for bed mobility and transfers, for dressing and eating R11 coded as requiring extensive assistance from one staff person. Section G 0400 of the MDS reflected upper extremity impairment and bilateral impairment for lower extremity. Review of R11's Physician order dated 04/05/23 reflected Restorative (3x/wk ) [3 times a week] AROM (active range of motion) exes (exercises) of BUE/BLE (bilateral upper and lower extremities) 10 reps x 1 set. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet that considers the residents clinical conditional condition for one resident (#189) of three residents reviewed for proper diet requirements resulting in the potential of clinical complications for those residents with a clinical condition. Findings Included: Resident #189 (R189) Review of the medical record revealed R189 was admitted to the facility 07/13/2023 with diagnoses that included diabetes, hypertension, end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle weakness, epistaxis, diarrhea, kidney transplant, asthma, constipation, arthritis, angina pectoris, atherosclerotic heart disease, breast cancer, hypothyroidism, hypertension, bipolar disorder, and kidney failure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assure safe and appropriate use of bed rail assist bars for one resident (#23) of one resident reviewed for bed safety resulting in the potential for entrapment, injury, or death. Findings Included: Resident #23 (R23) Review of the medical record revealed R23 was admitted to the facility 08/21/2016 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, dementia, psychotic disturbances, mood disturbance, anxiety, disc degeneration of the lumbar region, pain, spondylosis (wear and tear of spinal disk) of cervical region, insomnia, hyperkalemia (high potassium), osteoarthritis, and constipation. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/16/2023, revealed R23 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) was dashed out because resident cognition could not be assessed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review , the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotopic medication was not prescribed for longer than 14 days for one resident (#16) of 5 reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unnecessary psychotropic medications and adverse reactions. According to the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident 16 (R16) was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included heart peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. Review of MDS reflected R16 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Review of monthly Physician orders reflected an anti-anxiety medication was ordered on 4/28/23 on an as needed basis, the Physician order did not have a stop date. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when two medication errors were observed from a total of twenty-eight opportunities for two residents (Resident #16 and #17) of five reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.14% and the potential for reduced efficacy of medications and increased risk of adverse reactions/side effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer pneumococcal immunizations in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for two residents (#1, #23) of five residents reviewed resulting in the potential for server illness and complications from pneumococcal disease Findings Included: Resident #1 (R1) Review of the medical record revealed R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteoarthritis, insomnia, anxiety, and pseudobulbar affect. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 7/9/23 revealed R1 scored 6 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of R1's medical record demonstrated that she had received pneumococcal vaccination, PCV13, on 10/11/2017. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure monitoring and inspection of resident bed frames and mattress for one resident (#23) of one resident reviewed for bed safety resulting in the potential for entrapment, injury, or death. Findings Included: Resident #23 (R23) Review of the medical record revealed R23 was admitted to the facility 08/21/2016 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, dementia, psychotic disturbances, mood disturbance, anxiety, disc degeneration of the lumbar region, pain, spondylosis (wear and tear of spinal disk) of cervical region, insomnia, hyperkalemia (high potassium), osteoarthritis, and constipation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure information within the Survey Book was up to date and maintained to include reports of retrospective surveys and facility plan of correction for identified deficiencies and failed to inform/educate six of six resident who attended the Confidential Group Meeting resulting in the potential for residents, visitors, and families to be uninformed of the facilities deficient practices in a current facility census of 34 residents. Findings Included: During facility tour on 08/09/2023 at 07:11 a.m. the facility Survey Book was located steal hanger by the first nurses' station when entering the facility. Review of the Survey Book demonstrated surveys with exit dates of 7/31/2022, 8/8/2022, 2/5/2021, 9/17/2019, and 9/23/2019. The facility had received an abbreviated survey with and exit date of 11/16/2022. [...]
26 fire safety citations on file: 7 on September 11, 2025, 2 on August 29, 2024, 17 on August 9, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.42 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.17 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.08 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.04 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.2% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.51 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.53 on weekdays and 3.17 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.61 in April to June 2025 to 3.42 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.42 | 0.30 | 3.53 | 3.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 47 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.55 | 0.42 | 3.68 | 3.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.62 | 0.53 | 3.84 | 3.03 | 7.0% | 0 of 92 | 41 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.61 | 0.40 | 3.81 | 3.12 | 20.9% | 1 of 91 | 38 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.7 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.7 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.4 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.0 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Aberdeen Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 9 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 18 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 12 eligible stays.
15.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.
8.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
2.9% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 25 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 9 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SANA HEALTH INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasir, Shahida | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 07/01/2008 |
| Nasir, Iqbal | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Nasir, Iqbal | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Nasir, Shahida | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Duggan, Dennis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Sudhakara, Avikshitha | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Terry, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/10/2011 | |
| Duggan, Dennis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Nasir, Iqbal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/01/2008 | |
| Sudhakara, Avikshitha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.