Home / Pennsylvania / Philadelphia
650 Edison Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19116 · Philadelphia County · (215) 673-5700
225 certified beds, about 211 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395084 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 13, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since June 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.05 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.16 of those hours.
50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Accela Healthcare, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation regarding an allegation of fraud for one of one investigation reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to report a resident's self-injurious behavior resulting in injury requiring hospital transfer and sutures to the Department of Health for one of three residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility polices and documents, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to properly supervise a cognitively impaired resident who was able to exit the facility and board a train, for one of five residents reviewed for elopement risk (Resident R1). This failure placed the resident in an Immediate Jeopardy situation.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview with resident and staff, review of facility policy and documentation as well as review of clinical record, it was determined that facility failed to provide respiratory care to one resident according to professional standards of practice for Resident R3.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and sanitary environment in resident-use and service areas for one of two nursing units. (Second floor)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free of significant medication error related to the administration of antihypertensive medication outside of parameters ordered by the physician for one of 5 residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policy, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of four residents reviewed (Resident R1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, clinical record review and interview with staff/residents/family, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that privacy and confidentiality of person medical information was maintained for six of six residents reviewed (Residents R4, R122, R128, R131, R171, and R199).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents were free of misappropriation of resident property related to diversion of a narcotic medication for one of three residents reviewed who were prescribed narcotic medications. (Resident R416)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards when the facility failed to ensure vital signs were obtained and hypoglycemic protocols were implemented in accordance with physcian orders for three of 35 resident records reviewed (Residents R28, R65, and R123).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care related to oxygen therapy for two of three residents reviewed receiving oxygen therapy. (Resident R85, R99)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documents and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records were accurate and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R141 and Resident R416)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews with resident and staff, review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain physician orders to allow a resident to store a medication at bedside and further failed to ensure the medication was stored in a safe, secured location for one of 35 resident records reviewed (Resident R26).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to proper disposal and storage of used and potentially contaminated suctioning devices and the use of a urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag in accordance with professional standards for one of two residents reviewed. (Residents R99 and R128).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment for 2 of 10 residents. (R130 and R160)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for one of five nursing units (2nd floor).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that facility failed to timely provide notices of Medicare non coverage (payment) for three out of three residents and failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for two out of three residents reviewed (Resident R76, R161, and R117). Findings Include: A review of the form Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123, (a notice that informs the recipient when care received from the skilled nursing facility is ending; and how to contact a Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to appeal) revealed instructions that a Medicare provider must ensure that the notice is delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers as required for three of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident R171, R136, and R123). Findings Include: Review of Resident R123's clinical record revealed the resident was sent to the hospital on December 2, 2024 and December 26, 2024. Review of facility documentation revealed the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This was confirmed with the Nursing Home administrator on March 13, 2025 at 12:33 p.m. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of facility assessment, facility staffing schedule, clinical records, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population for three of four units reviewed. (Second floor, A unit and D unit). Findings Include: Review of facility assessment dated [DATE], revealed that Staffing plan: 3.2. Accela Rehab and Care at Somerton provides adequate daily staffing based on census, acuity and diagnosis of our resident population to ensure individualized patient-centered care needs are met. Individual staff assignment 3.3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, review of clinical records and facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to administer diabetic medications in accordance with professional standards of for five of five clinical records reviewed of residents who were order antidiabetic medication (Resident R1, R6, R9, R13 and R17). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Administering Medications, dated April 2019, revealed that Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Review of physician orders and medication administration record for Resident R1 for November 2024 revealed orders for the following medications: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on the review of clinical records and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not maintain accurate clinical records for two of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1 and Resident R5) Findings Include: Review of an undated facility document Medication Administration Policy revealed that Medications should be administered at the times that are order and signed out immediately when given. Observation of the facility second floor revealed that Licensed Nurse, Employee E3 was administering medications on November 5, 2024, at 10:57 a.m. She stated she was administering morning medications which mostly scheduled for 9:00 a.m. Licensed nurse, Employee E3, stated she had four more residents to finish. Licensed nurse, Employee E3 stated she had to finish 9 a.m. med pass for Resident R1, R2, R3 and R4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately post information regarding daily nurse staffing data as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility documentation, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe, functional, and comfortable environment was maintained for two of ten residents observed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of resident records, and interviews with staff it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of nine residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings Include: Review of resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed an admission date of August 18, 2022. The resident was admitted with a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, seizures, tachycardia, chronic viral hepatitis, respiratory failure, hypocalcemia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, alcohol dependence with withdrawal, insomnia, bilateral primary osteoarthritis, adjustment disorder, and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a complete drug regimen review process for three of 36 residents reviewed (Resident R54, R26, R61) Findings Include: Review of the Pharmacy Services - Role of the Consultant Pharmacist Policy dated April 2019, revealed, the consultant pharmacist will provide specific activities related to medication regimen review including a documented review of the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly, appropriate communication of information to prescribers and facility leadership about potential or actual problems related to any aspect of medications and pharmacy services, including medication irregularities and pertinent resident-specific documentation in the medical record. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean, comfortable, and homelike condition for 2 of 5 nursing units (1st and 2nd floor).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation related to missing narcotics for three residents reviewed (Residents R163, R500, R501)
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, review of facility provided documentation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan related to urinary tract infection for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R47)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free from hazards related to cleaning supplies left in the one resident's room in one of five units (A unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper care of a urinary catheter bag and that a physician order was obtained to perform self catherization flushes for one of one residents review with a urinary catheter.(Resident R9)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs between shifts to enable an accurate reconciliation and accountability for one of four medication carts observed (unit Second Floor A).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals are stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards for one of two medication rooms observed. (First floor Unit A)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that that trash and recyclables were properly disposed of in the receiving and dumpster area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documents, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper infection control practices were followed according to professional standards related to enhance barrier precaution during wound care for one of 35 residents reviewed. (Resident R103)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations of the physical environment, review of pest control logs, review of pest control reports, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Findings Include: Review of the facilities pest control policy Titled, Pest Control dated May 2008 states, Policy Statement, Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation states, 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. 2. Pest control services are provided by __(left blank)___. 3. Windows are screened at all times. 4. Only approved FDA and EPA insecticides and rodenticides are permitted in the facility and all such supplies are stored in areas away from food storage areas. 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of clinical record, review of facility policy and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing services met professional standards of quality according to the Pennsylvania Code Title 49, Professional and Vocational Standards, by failing to ensure to ensure that MAR (medication administration record) documentation during medication administration was conducted according to professional standards for six of seven residents observed. (Residents R33, R38, R104, R139, R165 and R180)
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, interviews with staff and reviews of policies, procedures and the respiratory service agreement, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that routine assessments and monitoring by the respiratory care service and licensed respiratory therapist were completed and availavable for review, for two of three residents with tracheostomy care needs. (Residents R1 and R2)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive person centered care plans related to activities of daily living and activities programs for four of six residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3 and R4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living, including shaving and nail care, for 3 of 6 residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2 and R4).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for two of 4 nursing units (A and D nursing units). Findings Include: Review of facility's 'Homelike Environment' policy, revised on February 2021, states the following: The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment, e. clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition, f. pleasant and neutral scents, g. plants and flowers where appropriate, h. comfortable and safe temperatures (71F - 81F). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of clinical records, and staff, resident, and family interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed related to communication needs and transmission based precautions for one of five new admissions reviewed (Resident R309). Findings Include: Review of Resident R309's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility June 22, 2023. Review of Resident R309's nursing admission assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had aphasia (communication deficit disorder) and was difficult to understand. Review of Resident R309's speech therapy evaluation and plan of treatment for certification period June 27, 2023, through July 26, 2023, revealed the speech therapist was unable to determine cognitive status secondary to severe language impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive resident care plan was developed and implemented related to oxygen therapy, Activities of Daily Living, and tracheostomy for three of five residents reviewed (Resident R30, R310 and R362).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record, observation and review of facilty policy, it was determined that the facilty failed to ensure that personal hygiene was timely provided to one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident R7)
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the application of a hand splint for one of one resident reviewed who was ordered for a hand splint (Resident R89).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide enteral feeding in accordance with resident needs and physician orders for one of two residents reviewed with tube-feedings (Resident R309). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Enteral Tube Feeding via Continuous Pump revealed staff should verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure and review the resident's care plan and provide for any special needs of the resident. Review of Resident R309's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of gastrostomy status (surgical procedure for inserting a tube into the stomach through the abdomen used for delivering nutrition formula). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate respiratory care and services for one of 33 residents reviewed (Residents R30).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews with staff and review of facility policies and procedures, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that narcotic medication was disposed of in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations and did not ensure physician ordered medications were obtained from the pharmacy in a timely manner (Resident R309).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure one resident was free from significant medication error for one of five new admissions reviewed (Resident R309). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors revealed a medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs which is not in accordance with physician's orders. Example of medication error includes omission - a drug is ordered but not administered. The attending physician should be notified promptly of any significant error. Further review of facility policy revealed the following information should be documented on in an incident report and in the resident's clinical record: 1. Factual description of the error, 2. Name of physician and time notified, 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory studies were obtained as ordered by the physician for one of 33 residents reviewed (Resident R37).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of seven residents with hospice care reviewed (Resident R259).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a system for the identification of and control measures for Legionella (bacteria that causes disease found in contaminated water) as required.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for one of four nursing units (A Wing). Findings Include: Review of Resident R309's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnosis of tracheostomy status (plastic tube placed through a small surgical opening through the front of the neck into the windpipe allowing air to flow in and out). Observations on June 28, 2023, at 11:50 a.m. confirmed Resident R309 had a tracheostomy. Observations on June 28, 2023, at 11:50 a.m. revealed small gnats in the residents bathroom and a fruit fly hovering around the resident's head. Interview on June 28, 2023, at 11:56 a.m. with nurse aide, Employee E8, confirmed the presence of flies in the room and reported there's flies in every room. [...]
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 13, 2025, 1 on May 3, 2024, 3 on June 30, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.05 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.16 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.80 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.94 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.96 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.0% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.91 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.15 on weekdays and 2.80 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.03 in April to June 2025 to 3.05 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.05 | 0.16 | 3.15 | 2.80 | 14.7% | 0 of 90 | 211 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.04 | 0.18 | 3.14 | 2.77 | 12.5% | 0 of 92 | 211 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.04 | 0.26 | 3.13 | 2.81 | 13.0% | 0 of 92 | 207 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.03 | 0.25 | 3.15 | 2.70 | 15.7% | 1 of 91 | 209 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.6 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.4 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.0 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.3 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.4 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Accela Rehab and Care Center at Somerton's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
48.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 142 eligible stays.
11.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 172 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 85 eligible stays.
55.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.
0.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 224 residents counted.
0.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 223 residents counted.
96.8% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SOMERTON ACQUISITION LLC. CMS links this home to Accela Healthcare, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkowitz, Cheskel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 02/22/2022 |
| Berkowitz, Sam | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 02/22/2022 |
| Leifer, Joel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 02/22/2022 |
| Ornstein, Marton | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 10% | 02/22/2022 |
| Zupnick, Joel | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 02/22/2022 |
| Rosenstock, Yitzchok | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/22/2022 | |
| Stern, Samuel | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/22/2022 | |
| Berkowitz, Sam | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/22/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.