Home / New Jersey / Salem
438 Salem-Woodstown Road, Salem, NJ 08079 · Salem County · (856) 935-6677
116 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315058 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2025, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 36 health citations since December 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.13 of those hours.
66.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).
CMS links it to Autumn Lake Healthcare, an affiliated group of 59 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteCOMPLAINT# 3043799, 3045753 Based on interviews, review of medical records and other pertinent facility documentation on 6/22/26, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice when they: a) failed to implement Provider's verbal wound treatment order for Nystatin and b) transcribe the verbal order for Nystatin onto the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1), and was evidenced by the following: Resident #1 was not at the facility at the time of the survey. A closed record review was conducted. According to the admission Record, Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to: encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), cachexia (a condition that causes significant weight loss and muscle loss), and hyperlipidemia. [...]
Inspectors wroteIntake ID: 2636901Based on interviews, review of closed medical records and other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to perform an initial full body skin assessment and implement timely interventions for a resident upon admission to the facility in accordance with the facility Skin Assessment Policy to prevent altered skin integrity. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injury prevention and was evidenced by the following:On 10/23/25 at 10:28 AM, the surveyor reviewed the closed electronic medical record for Resident #1. A review of the admission Record, an admission summary, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included but were not limited to; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and staff performed handwashing between glove use and task changes. These failures had the potential to affect 103 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility's kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters' lids were closed, the plugs were in place, and used gloves and debris was picked up off the ground. This failed practice had the potential to allow trash and animals to enter and leave the dumpster and cause sanitary issues.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess one resident (Resident (R) 7) of 33 sampled residents to self-administer medications prior to leaving medications at the bedside. This had the potential for the resident not to receive their ordered medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained when he laid in bed with his backside exposed to anyone walking in the hallway outside of his room for one resident (Resident (R) 102) out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause distress to the resident and other residents and visitors who might witness the exposure.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse for two residents of three residents (Resident (R8 and R55) reviewed for abuse out of a sample of 33 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor target behaviors for the use of Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) for one of five residents (Resident (R)5) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 33. This had the potential for R5 to receive medication without being assessed if behaviors had improved or declined.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse for two of three residents (Resident (R) 8 and R55) reviewed for abuse out of 33 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to allow for continued abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure written notice of the transfer to the hospital and the bed hold policy were provided to the resident and the resident's representative upon transfer for three (Resident (R)25, R88, and R4) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization out of a sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause confusion or distress upon transfer and a lack of understanding of appeal rights or bed hold should the resident not be permitted to return or disagree with the reason for transfer.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I assessment was completed after admission for one resident (Resident (R)8) out of 33 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk for the resident not receiving specialized services as determined by a Level II prompted by a Level I that indicated mental illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical staff documented the correct indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication and instead documented a diagnosis of Schizophrenia in the medical record for one resident (Resident (R) 6) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause psychological distress and impact treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician for one (Resident (R) 80) of 33 sampled residentsFindings include: Review of R80's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admission tab revealed R80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis of other sites and type 2 diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications. During an observation and interview on 08/04/25 at 11:15 AM, revealed R80 had an ace bandage on his lower right leg. R80 stated the bandage had not been changed since 08/01/25 and it was supposed to be changed daily. During an observation and interview on 08/04/25 at 11:23 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN1) revealed R80 had a white bandage under an ace bandage dated 08/01 with LPN1's initials. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident utilizing supplemental oxygen (Resident (R) 65) had orders and a plan of care for its use and a resident (R31) had clean oxygen concentrator filters out of two residents reviewed for oxygen use out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure had the potential to cause impaired respiratory function.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of assessment prior to, and upon return from, dialysis and failed to ensure communication forms were used between the facility and the dialysis center for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident (R) 2) out of 33 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect the health of residents receiving dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to the installation of side rails and that assessments were completed for the risk of entrapment for one of four residents (Resident (R)59) reviewed for side rails out of 33 sampled residents. The lack of alternate side rail measures and proper assessment/consent could lead to potential restraint or side rail entrapment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was ordered upon admission from the hospital for one resident (Resident (R) 113) out of a total sample of 33 residents. This failure increased the risk that the resident would have unrelieved pain.
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: 2569972Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 7/28/2025, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of a low blood sugar result, and to follow facility policy titled Notification of Changes. This deficient practice was identified for (Resident #7), 1 of 3 residents reviewed and was evidenced by the following:A review of the closed Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was as follows:According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Diabetes, Hypertension, and Chronic Pain Syndrome. The resident was discharged from the facility on 12/30/2024. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, medical record reviews, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 7/28/2025, it was determined that the facility staff failed to consistently document in the Documentation Survey Report (DSR) the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) status and care provided to the residents. Also, the facility failed to follow its policy titled ADL Documentation Policy. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for ADL documentation. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1. According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to Quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), Acute Respiratory Failure, and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ00179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a Care Plan (CP) for a resident that had a diagnosis of Diabetes (high blood sugar levels) and was admitted to the facility with elongated(long) toenails. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of clinical practice regarding a.) ensuring a resident was seen by the Podiatrist in a timely manner, b.)ensuring a resident care plan (CP) was developed for a resident that had a diagnosis of Diabetes and was admitted to the facility with elongated (long) toenails, and c.) immediate notification to the Physician of abnormal urine culture results. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed and evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ00179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foot care and services for a resident that had a diagnosis of Diabetes (high blood sugar levels) and was admitted to the facility with elongated (long) toenails on 01/18/2024 and was not seen by a Podiatrist until 10/07/2024. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Podiatry Services. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for foot care. This deficient practice was evidence by the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint #: NJ00179130 Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 11/07/2024 and 11/08/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to promptly notify the Physician of an abnormal urine culture result. The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Laboratory Services and Reporting. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for laboratory results. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, Diabetes (high blood sugar levels), Major Depressive Disorder, and Unspecified Dementia (general decline in cognitive abilities that affects a person's ability to perform everyday activities). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for 3 resident rooms (room numbers 211, 212, and 213) on the C/D unit of the facility. The evidence of this deficient practice includes: 1. During the initial tour of the unit on 03/04/24 at 11:32 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], the surveyor observed the side table missing the middle drawer handle, the walls behind and next to the bed with gouges, the opposite wall with scratches and missing paint, the closets with scratches and missing laminate on the edges exposing the raw edge, and the closet drawer handle hanging perpendicular to the drawer. In the bathroom, the surveyor observed a brown discolored ceiling tile, a black bucket under the bathroom sink with water in it, and water on the floor under the sink. 2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner that is intended to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses and b.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 03/04/24 from 09:54 to 11:03 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD) and observed the following: 1. On a metal rack in the walk-in refrigerator, there were two boxes marked raw chicken drumsticks that were resting on a parchment paper lined metal tray and the paper was marked pull with no date. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of electronic medical records and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of clinical practice with respect to obtaining a diagnosis for the use of an antibiotic intravenous medication for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #184) reviewed for antibiotics. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint # 155679, 165123, and 168629 Based on interviews, review of electronic medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain a physician order for the treatment of a skin tear that was obtained during a fall and b.) update a resident's Care Plan (CP) with fall prevention interventions after the resident fell on [DATE]. This was deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #334) reviewed for accidents and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #334 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), sepsis (occurs when your immune system has a dangerous reaction to an infection), and malignant neoplasm of the brain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag did not touch the floor and b.) ensure the urinary catheter drainage bag was kept below the level of the bladder for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for urinary catheter. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/04/24 at 9:58 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #67 lying in bed. The resident had a urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to empty urine) with a drainage bag secured to the bed. The bottom of the urinary catheter drainage bag was touching the floor. According to the admission Record, Resident #67 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, retention of urine. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to label and dispose of medications in accordance with accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #184) reviewed for antibiotic therapy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record, Resident #184 was admitted to the facility in March of 2024. The resident did not have a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed at this time. The admission assessment (AA) indicated that Resident #184 was admitted to the facility with intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy and rehabilitation. The AA indicated that the resident had the diagnoses of cellulitis and that the resident had a single lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) located in the right upper arm. [...]
Inspectors wroteComplaint NJ# 168629 Based on interview and review of medical records and other facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an accurately documented and complete medical record for 1 of 22 reviewed (Resident #334). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR), Resident #334 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), sepsis (occurs when your immune system has a dangerous reaction to an infection), and malignant neoplasm of the brain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care, dated 09/07/23, reflected that the resident was cognitively impaired and had a history of falls prior to admission to the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to act on or respond to, comments made by the Pharmacist Consultant in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for unnecessary medications and was evidenced by the following: According to the Pharmacist Consultant's Therapeutic Suggestions dated 07/26/21, the Pharmacist Consultant (PC) made a recommendation for Resident #31 As per CMS guidelines, is a taper of Zoloft [an antidepressant medication] indicated? If a taper of this medication is contraindicated, include the rationale in your response to this request. A review of the Order Summary Report for Active Orders as of 07/01/2021 revealed that Resident #31 had an order dated 01/12/21 for Sertraline HCL (Zoloft) 100 mg daily, an anti-depressant. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe, consistent manner designed to prevent foodborne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/29/21 at 9:52 AM, the surveyor, in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following during the kitchen tour: 1. In the dessert refrigerator, an undated turkey and cheese sandwich wrapped in clear plastic was stored on a shelf. 2. In the dessert refrigerator, an undated styrofoam cup containing dessert and an undated styrofoam cup containing lemonade was stored on a shelf. 3. In the dessert refrigerator, an opened bottle of ginger ale was stored on a shelf. 4. In the dessert refrigerator, an opened and undated bottle of water was stored on a shelf. 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) consistently monitor fluid restriction instructions in accordance with the physician's order and professional standards of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #56) reviewed for dementia care and b.) clarify conflicting physician orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to follow an active physician's order to apply bilateral heel protectors (a cushioned pressure relieving device for heels) (heel protectors) while in bed. This deficient practice was identified for Resident #56, 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and Resident #24, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for positioning and mobility and was evidenced by the following: On 12/01/21 at 10:58 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #56 asleep with the head of bed elevated. Surveyor #1 observed that the resident had a heel protector applied to the left foot and no heel protector on the right foot. Surveyor #1 further observed a heel protector on the resident's wheelchair which was positioned near the resident's closet. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) the Resident Care Staffing Report was posted on 1 of 2 nursing units (C/D unit) and b.) the posted Resident Care Staffing Report was completed for each shift on 1 of 2 nursing units (A/B unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/30/2021 at 12:33 PM, the surveyor observed the Resident Care Staffing Report for the A/B unit on a bulletin board near the nurses' station. The 7a-3p shift section of the form was not completed. On 12/01/2021 at 9:30 AM, the surveyor was unable to locate the Resident Care Staffing Report at the front entrance. The Receptionist was unaware of where the Resident Care Staffing Report was located. [...]
9 fire safety citations on file: 6 on August 7, 2025, 3 on December 8, 2021.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.92 | 3.85 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.13 | 0.68 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.69 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.57 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.21 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 66.7% | 39.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 77.8% | 37.7% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.01 on weekdays and 3.69 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 31.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.80 in April to June 2025 to 3.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.92 | 0.13 | 4.01 | 3.69 | 31.7% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.88 | 0.13 | 3.95 | 3.70 | 38.3% | 0 of 92 | 106 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.50 | 0.13 | 3.59 | 3.28 | 28.9% | 0 of 92 | 105 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.80 | 0.12 | 3.88 | 3.62 | 41.6% | 0 of 91 | 101 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New Jersey, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.59 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.6% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Jersey, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.52 | $21.13 to $23.44 | 32,400 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $36.13 | $32.16 to $38.45 | 17,410 |
| Registered nurses | $51.20 | $47.94 to $61.41 | 92,680 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New Jersey | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 8.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.8 | 5.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.7 | 12.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.9 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.1 | 8.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Autumn Lake Healthcare at Salem County's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (52.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
52.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New Jersey: 130 better, 19 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 156 eligible stays.
12.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New Jersey: 2 better, 8 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 165 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New Jersey: 3 better, 13 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 111 eligible stays.
74.1% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey68.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 85 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 137 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey1.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 137 residents counted.
95.5% this home
Median of homes: New Jersey99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 66 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GOLDEN REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER, LLC. CMS links this home to Autumn Lake Healthcare, a group of 59 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bsd Entities LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2011 |
| Goldberg, Simchah | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 11% | 06/01/2011 |
| Kerman, Neil | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 45% | 06/01/2011 |
| Engelson, Daniel | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/30/2014 | |
| Stern, Samuel | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.