Find a nursing home

Home / Wisconsin / La Crosse

Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse

2902 East Avenue South, La Crosse, WI 54601 · La Crosse County · (608) 788-9870

80 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
1 of 5
Health inspections
1 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525438 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 18, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 23 health citations since October 2023, 7 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 5 fines totaling $90,784 in the last three years; the largest was $30,275, and the latest is dated January 21, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.56 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.04 of those hours.

49.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

CMS links it to Benedictine Health System, an affiliated group of 23 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
5G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
4E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 18, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
  1. J
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 3 residents (R5 and R40) reviewed for pressure injuries out of a total sample of 21, received care to prevent the development of pressure injuries and/or promote the healing of existing pressure injuries. R5 had a chronic left heel ulcer and was at risk for the development of additional pressure injuries. The facility implemented a Rooke Boot but did not include interventions for staff to follow related to removal of the boot. Staff interviews found that staff did not consistently remove the boot and/or did not complete a thorough skin inspection with cares. R5 developed a stage 4 pressure injury to the left calf. When the pressure injury showed signs of worsening, the physician was not consulted to determine if there was a need to change treatments. [...]
  2. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (R21) reviewed for accidents. R21 self-transferred and fell backwards while grabbing for her walker, hitting her head. Subsequently, R21 sustained a laceration to the back of her head that required staples. CNA K (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated to Surveyor that R21 ambulates independently 3-4 times each shift. There is no evidence that risks and benefits associated with self-ambulating have been discussed with R21's APOAHC (Activated Power of Attorney for Health Care.) There is no evidence of increased monitoring to prevent further self-ambulation and potential injuries. Evidenced by:The facility policy and procedure, Integrated Fall Management, undated, documents in part, as follows: Purpose: [...]
  3. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents who reside in the facility. Surveyor observed dust covering the sprinkler heads and suspended from the light fixtures in the facility's stove hood. Surveyor observed staff with facial hair and not wearing hair restraints. Surveyor observed [NAME] J use a dirty alcohol swab to sanitize a thermometer and intervened before the thermometer touched resident food. Surveyor also observed [NAME] J use a dry paper towel to manually dry the thermometer after sanitizing it and before probing food. Surveyor observed 3 mixers to be stored under a plastic covering and unclean. [...]
  4. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that every resident was treated with dignity and respect when providing activities of daily living for 3 of 18 residents (R24, R40, R42) reviewed and 3 supplemental residents (R53, R62, R61). Surveyor observed 2 staff assisting 6 residents with their meal. 4 residents were made to wait until their turn to receive dining assistance while their plate of food sat on the table in front of them. CNA/Restorative Aide E kept getting up to assist at two different tables and reported that she is not able to converse with residents and sit alongside them while she assists them with dining, because of how many she is trying to assist. R42 was not assisted with her meal in a dignified and home-like manner. R53 was not assisted with his meal in a dignified and home-like manner. Evidenced by: [...]
  5. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 5 residents (R50) reviewed for unnecessary medications. R50 is receiving Melatonin for insomnia and did not have a sleep assessment/tracking completed. Findings Include:R50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following diagnoses: Insomnia, Chronic congestive heart failure, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. R50's physician orders include, in part: Melatonin 3 mg at bedtime. Take one tablet by mouth at bedtime for sleep. On 6/3/2026 at 3:17 PM, DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated she was not able to find a completed sleep assessment for R50. [...]
  6. D
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    F711 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility did not ensure the Physician or Provider, reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments or sign and date all orders for 1 of 1 Residents Physician orders reviewed (R5). R5 was missing a provider review of R5's total program of care, including medications and treatments due to not having signed monthly orders for January, February, April and May of 2026 Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Physician Services, indicates the following: Procedure: .11. The physician will: a. review the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments, at each visit; b. Write, sign and date progress notes at each visit; and c. [...]
  7. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and medical record review, the facility did not ensure to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 21 sampled residents (R50). R50 was noted to drop a pill while she was taking oral medications. The pill was never recovered, the other pills were swallowed, and it was unknown which medication was omitted. The facility failed to monitor R50 following the omission and failed to contact R50's Medical Doctor. Evidenced by:Facility policy, titled Medication Error/Occurrences, includes: 8/31/23, includes: When an error is made in the preparation or administration of a medication or a mediation error is discovered the licensed nurse is notified. [...]
  8. D
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    F849 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure hospice collaboration and communication processes were established to ensure continuity of care between hospice and the facility for 1 of 1 resident (R40) reviewed for hospice. R40's hospice notes are not available to facility staff. The facility did not designate a staff member to coordinate the plan of care with the hospice provider. As evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Hospice, dated June 2021, states, in part: .Policy: The community will provide collaborative care with Hospice providers to ensure the resident's end of life preferences and choices are honored . Procedure 1. There is agreement for the provision of hospice services with one or more Medicare-certified hospices. 2. This signed agreement will include. i. [...]
  9. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 21 residents (R65 and R1) reviewed for infection control. R65 was not tested for COVID-19 after he was showing signs and symptoms of COVID-19. RN M (Registered Nurse) did not complete hand hygiene during R1's wound care. This is evidenced by: The facility's COVID-19 manual, dated 9/29/22, includes Symptom-and Contact-Based Testing: Test vaccinated and unvaccinated residents and associates (1) who develop COVID-19 symptoms. [...]
January 21, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure staff provided adequate supervision to prevent an accident for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls (R1). R1 sustained a fall from bed on 1/6/26, resulting in a closed right clavicle (collarbone) fracture after a certified nursing assistant (CNA) failed to follow R1's care plan, which required the assistance of two staff members for cares. CNA C performed R1's morning cares on her own. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Integrated Fall Management, effective 8/24/17, states in part, .Policy: Residents are assessed for their risk of falls upon admission, significant change and quarterly thereafter. Residents with risk for falling will have interventions implemented through the resident centered care plan. R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include, in part: [...]
March 5, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement professional standards of practice to ensure that a resident does not develop pressure injuries (PIs), receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent infection of PIs, or prevent new PIs from developing for 3 of 6 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (R52, R49, R2). R52 was admitted to the facility with a stage II PI and determined to be at high risk for PI. Weekly assessments were not completed consistently, implementing interventions to prevent/improve PIs was not timely, turning and repositioning program was not monitored/reviewed, R52 was not educated on risk vs benefits of repositioning and offloading to prevent/improve PI, and physician was not notified when PI worsened. R52 developed a second stage II PI on 3/4/25. This example is being cited at actual harm. [...]
  2. E
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure call lights were in reach for 2 of 15 sampled residents (R) (R18 and R2) and 2 of 2 supplemented residents (R9 and R29). R18, R2, and R9 were observed to not have their call lights within reach On 2/26/25, a grievance was filed regarding R29's call light not being within reach. Evidenced by: The facility's call lights - Call System Activation and Response Policy dated 2024, includes, in part, Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to residents' requests and needs. Residents are provided with a means to call for staff assistance through a communication system that directly notifies a staff member or a centralized workstation. Procedure: 1. Each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance. [...]
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 5 care observations (R209, R49 and R210). Staff did not perform hand hygiene before putting on gloves when passing medications for R210 and R49. R209's catheter bag was hanging from the garbage can and lying on the floor.
June 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. J
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    F678 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure the code status of residents (R), as indicated in the advance directives, is followed. This affected 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R1) whose Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) wishes were not followed. R1's Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) indicated R1 wanted CPR. The facility failed to initiate CPR upon finding R1 with no respirations and pulseless. The facility's failure to follow the code status identified in the advance directives and failure to begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on [DATE]. The Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A and Director of Nursing (DON) B were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 1:55 p.m. [...]
January 11, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. G
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased upon interview, policy review and record review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated or prevent further potential abuse from occurring while the investigation was in progress for 1 of 1 (R270) resident reviewed. R270 alleged CNA N put her fingers up R270's rectum. R270 experienced recurring fear and anxiety, expressed by feeling tense, nervous and fearful of CNA N when CNA N came to her room after this incident. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy and procedure for Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 07/21/22, includes, in part: The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment. This will be done by: * All allegations of abuse will be thoroughly investigated by the Director of Social Services, Director of Nursing. [...]
  2. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents. The facility did not have a clear water management process or plan in effect to prevent transmission of Legionella infection. The facility staff did not use appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering COVID-positive isolation rooms on contact/droplet precautions residents (R) (R272, R49, and R41); and did not ensure shared medical equipment is properly sanitized. Staff did not keep clean linens stored in the linen rooms on all halls free from contamination of possible infections. [...]
  3. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure all drugs and biologicals were securely stored for 5 of 5 residents (R) (R56, R25, R41, R30, and R9) and did not ensure controlled drugs were stored in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments. The facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled with an expiration date in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 resident (R) (R272).
  4. E
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure they were monitoring the effectiveness of psychotropic drugs. Behavioral monitoring was not completed as outlined in the comprehensive care plan to determine effectiveness of the medication for 4 of 5 residents (R) reviewed. (R29, R46, R30, and R47)
  5. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when an allegation of abuse was not reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse. (Resident (R) 270)
  6. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not refer a resident with serious mental disorders for a Level II Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASRR), after the resident's stay was extended past 30 days; this occurred for 1 of 1 resident (R46). Findings Include: R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. R46 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which means they are cognitively intact. On 01/09/24 at 7:23 AM, record review of R46's current PASRR one indicated that no level two was required due to the exemption of being in the facility for 30 days or less. R46 has been a resident since 4/25/23 and is currently a resident in the facility. [...]
  7. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure resident (R270) needing care and treatment of constipation received the services to ensure an adequate bowel regimen for 1 of 12 residents reviewed.
  8. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure they maintained medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and have them readily accessible for Surveyors to review for 1 of 3 residents (R61) reviewed for closed records. This is evidenced by: On 01/10/24, Surveyor requested 3 closed records from Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A. On 01/11/24, Surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record for R61. R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from [Name] Health System. R61 had Do Not Resuscitate orders. R61 was found to be unresponsive at the facility on 12/15/23. [...]
October 25, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of significant medication errors for 6 of 8 residents (R1, R9, R11, R12, R13, and R10) reviewed for medication errors. R1's medication error resulted in actual harm. R1's prophylactic antibiotic was discontinued when a nurse entered new orders for Spirolactone on 7/13/23. Per interview and record review it is unclear why the nurse discontinued the antibiotic. R1 was then hospitalized on [DATE] for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP; a serious infection of the fluid that fills the abdomen) due to not receiving her prescribed prophylactic antibiotic resulting in significant medication error. R9's dosing of Lorazepam was decreased from 0.5 mg to 0.25 mg. Pharmacy sent a card of the 0.5 mg Lorazepam and staff continued to give that dose without noting the dose difference. [...]

Fire safety inspections

17 fire safety citations on file: 4 on June 18, 2026, 11 on March 5, 2025, 2 on January 11, 2024.

Every fire safety citation17 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · June 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · June 18, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Meet requirements for the use of electrical equipment.
    K 919 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · March 5, 2025 · Waiver
  9. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · March 5, 2025 · Waiver
  13. D
    Construct fire resistant interior walls.
    K 331 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. D
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · March 5, 2025 · Waiver
  15. D
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. F
    Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
    K 232 · January 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · January 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
January 21, 2026Fine $12,438
March 5, 2025Fine $24,382
June 11, 2024Fine $10,036
January 11, 2024Fine $30,275
October 25, 2023Fine $13,653

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.564.213.86
Registered nurses1.040.990.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.283.773.42
Nurse aides2.22
Licensed practical nurses0.31
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)49.4%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover47.4%39.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.51 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.68 on weekdays and 3.28 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.49 in April to June 2025 to 3.56 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.561.043.683.28 0.1%0 of 9060
Oct to Dec 20253.621.003.723.36 0.0%0 of 9262
Jul to Sep 20253.681.133.863.22 0.0%0 of 9260
Apr to Jun 20253.491.093.653.09 0.0%0 of 9161
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 20264.190.954.363.748.8%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Wisconsin

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Wisconsin, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.70$19.03 to $22.7528,370
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.67 to $36.067,390
Registered nurses$45.93$39.39 to $49.3368,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.816.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.92.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.53.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.318.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.35.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.215.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.123.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.515.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.71.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.72.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

46.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Wisconsin: 52 better, 26 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 69 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 6 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 81 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

63.3% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin54.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

7.8% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin2.2% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ST JOSEPHS REHABILITATION CENTER. CMS links this home to Benedictine Health System, a group of 23 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Catholic Residential Services Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/1966
Benedictine Health System5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%10/01/2012
Thompson, LeslieContracted managing employeeIndividual12/30/2019
Bowe, TiaCorporate directorIndividual10/31/2019
Bruhn, JenniferCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2022
Carley, GeraldCorporate directorIndividual01/23/2018
Nykiel, ChristineCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2012
Rymanowski, KevinCorporate directorIndividual01/23/2014
Bergien, TriciaCorporate officerIndividual10/27/2016
Benedictine Health SystemOperational/managerial controlOrganization10/01/2012

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.28 hours per resident per day, below the Wisconsin average of 3.77.

Other nursing homes nearby

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse get at its last inspection?
9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 18, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 5 fines totaling $90,784 in the last three years.
Does Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Benedictine Manor of Lacrosse?
CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Benedictine Health System. Legal business name: ST JOSEPHS REHABILITATION CENTER.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection