Find a nursing home

Home / Florida / Naples

Bentley Care Center

875 Retreat Drive, Naples, FL 34110 · Collier County · (239) 431-2100

84 certified beds, about 75 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2004

Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 106062 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 21, 2024, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 17 health citations since July 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 6.45 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.90 of those hours.

31.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).

CMS links it to VI Living, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
1E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 21, 2024Standard inspection · 15 citations
  1. F
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    F802 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical nutritional assessments were completed within the scope of practice and failed to ensure appropriate competencies in accordance with standards of practice for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents #55, #6, #14, #43, and #26). This had the potential to affect 67 residents on the facility's current census.
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to store prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the skilled nursing home kitchen, satellite serving kitchen, and the main campus kitchen, which potentially effected all of the 66 facility residents.
  3. F
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  4. F
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    F835 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the Administrator failed to administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain each resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility's Administrator failed to ensure that the Consultant Clinical Dietitian provided dietary services, supervision, and oversight in accordance with State and Federal Guidelines. The facility's Administrator failed to ensure that the current Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) was providing dietary services within her scope of practice for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents #17, #43, #14, #55, #6, and #26). This had the potential to affect 67 residents who were on the census at the facility.
  5. E
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident privacy by posting signs with private medical information on the entrance doors to their rooms. This affected 12 residents in the final sample (Residents #4, #9, #14, #16, #17, #22, #26, #38, #43, #53, #55, and #211) with the potential to affect 27 additional residents in the facility with signs on their doors.
  6. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Residents #26 and #18)
  7. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure services provided (Administration of Intravenous [IV] medication) meet professional standard of quality for 1 of 12 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) employed by the facility for 1 of 1 resident with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter affecting Resident #264.
  8. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to assess and provide adaptive eating utensils and drinking cups to maintain independence in eating ability for 1 (Resident #43) of six residents reviewed for nutrition.
  9. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure nutritional assessments were completed accurately with appropriate interventions in place for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for nutrition (Residents #55, #6 and #26).
  10. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe the physician's order agreeing to pharmacy recommendation for psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents for unnecessary medication affecting Resident #22.
  11. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days for 2 of 5 sampled residents for unnecessary medication (Residents #22 and #53).
  12. D
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    F808 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the correct fluid restriction was provided as per physician's order for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Dialysis (Resident #55).
  13. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records for each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 1 resident sampled for transmission based precautions with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) affecting Resident #264.
  14. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices during medication administration for 1 of 5 residents observed for medication administration affecting Resident #265.
  15. D
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    F919 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, and interview it was determined that 6 of 13 resident room bathrooms located on the East Wing of the second floor were disabled, inoperable, and out of reach in a resident emergency. The six identified rooms were noted to effect Resident's #2, #7, #17, #24, #31, and #41.
March 2, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal grooming and hygiene for 1 (Resident #13) of 2 sampled residents requiring assistance with activities of daily living.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of the facility's protocol, Resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement preventive measures to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 resident at risk for pressure ulcer.
July 29, 2021Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 5 on March 2, 2023, 1 on July 29, 2021.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · March 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · March 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · March 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Have exits that are accessible at all times.
    K 271 · March 2, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 29, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeFloridaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)6.453.823.86
Registered nurses1.900.730.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.843.493.42
Nurse aides3.85
Licensed practical nurses0.70
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)31.1%41.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover43.9%46.0%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.75 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.70 on weekdays and 5.84 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.36 in April to June 2025 to 6.45 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20266.451.906.705.84 5.3%0 of 9075
Oct to Dec 20256.351.856.585.77 1.5%0 of 9264
Jul to Sep 20256.581.866.835.92 1.2%0 of 9262
Apr to Jun 20256.361.886.625.71 0.3%0 of 9165
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Florida, Jan to Mar 20263.760.703.903.441.1%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Florida

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Florida, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$17.33 to $20.3496,960
LPNs and LVNs$29.70$28.14 to $31.1138,620
Registered nurses$40.48$37.82 to $48.64229,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Bentley Care Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeFloridaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.58.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.50.71.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.22.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.21.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.39.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.04.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.48.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.626.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.29.112.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.82.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Bentley Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (58.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

58.8% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 162 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 175 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 136 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

55.3% this home

Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 179 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.2% this home

Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 244 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

4.3% this home

Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 244 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

97.9% this home

Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 143 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CC-NAPLES INC. CMS links this home to VI Living, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 4.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Cc Development Group LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%12/11/1990
Margot and Tom Pritzker Foundation5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization10%05/22/2025
P. G. - Daniel Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Don #3 Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Jim Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Johnny Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Karen Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization9%01/01/2012
P. G. - Linda Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization5%01/01/2012
P. G. - Nicholas Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization6%01/01/2012
P. G. - Tony Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization5%01/01/2012
Pritzker Pucker Family Foundation No. 25% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization9%05/22/2025
Muszynski, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2022
Poorman, JohnCorporate directorIndividual07/29/2004
Smith, GaryCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2012
Cope, TaraCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2018
Muszynski, ThomasCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2022
Poorman, JohnCorporate officerIndividual07/29/2004
Smith, GaryCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2022
Classic Residence Management Limited PartnershipOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/11/1990
Allison, PamelaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/21/2025
Conzelman, TinaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/09/2025
Elterman, FrankOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2023
Evraets, MelissaOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/31/2020
Koszylko, TomekOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/15/2018
Maslow, CaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/2019
Smith, PennyOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/2016
Williams, BridgetOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/01/2022
Classic Residence Management Limited PartnershipAdp of the SNFOrganization10/18/2025
Allison, PamelaAdp of the SNFIndividual07/21/2025
Conzelman, TinaAdp of the SNFIndividual06/09/2025
Cope, TaraAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2018
Elterman, FrankAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2023
Evraets, MelissaAdp of the SNFIndividual08/31/2020
Koszylko, TomekAdp of the SNFIndividual10/15/2018
Maslow, CaryAdp of the SNFIndividual08/01/2019
Muszynski, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2022
Smith, PennyAdp of the SNFIndividual08/01/2016
Williams, BridgetAdp of the SNFIndividual12/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2024: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Florida contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Bentley Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Bentley Care Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Bentley Care Center get at its last inspection?
15 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 21, 2024. The Florida average is 7.1.
Has Bentley Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Bentley Care Center accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Bentley Care Center?
CMS lists 38 owners and managers, and links the home to VI Living. Legal business name: CC-NAPLES INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection