Home / Pennsylvania / Tyrone
951 Washington Avenue, Tyrone, PA 16686 · Blair County · (814) 684-0320
102 certified beds, about 96 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 395393 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 5, 2026, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).
Of 72 health citations since September 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $29,909 in the last three years; the largest was $19,551, and the latest is dated April 17, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.03 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.
36.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).
CMS links it to Century Healthcare, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 72 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, clinical records, and facility reports, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation after a fall to rule out abuse or neglect for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident 4).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that recommendations from a wound consultant were reviewed with the attending physician for one of 5 residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 43).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate, ongoing activities designed to meet the needs of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pain management for two of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 7 & 48).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items that were palatable.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare and store ice under sanitary conditions for one of four ice machines (third floor pantry).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policy, clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 92).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) use and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for three of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 4, 9, 11, ). Findings Include:The facility's policy regarding the use of psychotropic medications, dated January 27, 2026, indicated that the staff and physician will review with the resident/representative the risks related to not taking the medication as well as appropriate alternatives. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident representative regarding a fall (change in condition) for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 29).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set assessments were completed in the required time frame for four of 32 residents reviewed (Residents 6, 39, 43, 97).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 88, 114).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly date medications after they were opened in one of three medication carts reviewed (second floor cart), failed to discard expired medical supplies, and failed to permanently affix a narcotic storage box to the refrigerator.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct and/or maintain compliance with quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of established infection control guidelines, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 103).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of personnel files as well as interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required In-Service Training was completed for one of four nurse aides reviewed (Nurse Aide 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policy and observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a safe and comfortable environment was maintained for three of nine residents reviewed (Residents 7, 8, 9) who were in the day room with temperatures above 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was in safe operating condition in the residents' rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a dental appointment was scheduled for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, investigation reports, clinical records, and staff education records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2), resulting in harm due to a fall with fractures. This deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of investigation reports and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 2) who required two staff for bed mobility, resulting in a fall with fractures. This deficiency is being cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for three of three resident refrigerators.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 99).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for enteral feedings were followed for three of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 16, 54, 67).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food that was palatable.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, investigative reports, and clinical records, as well as staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from neglect for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 95).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the resident, responsible party, and Ombudsman, in writing, regarding the reason for hospitalization for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 67).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that appropriate parties were notified about the facility's bed-hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 19, 67).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized care regarding the use of an anti-coagulant (blood thinner) for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 99).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 91).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for one of 46 residents reviewed (Resident 59).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for two of 46 residents reviewed (Residents 79, 95).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of manufacturer's instructions, facility policies, and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to discard expired insulin pens in two of three medication carts reviewed (second and third floor long hall medication carts).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and written menus, as well as observations and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficiencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide comfortable temperatures for one of three dining rooms in the facility (fourth floor Dining Room).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's representative was notified about the need to alter treatment/new physician's orders for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 6).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their abilities to ambulate and perform activities of daily living for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's investigation documents and residents' clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that safe transfer techniques were used in accordance with their care plans for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 5) resulting in a fall. This deficiency was cited as past non-compliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that weekly weights were obtained as recommended by the dietician for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2) who had a weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory specimens were obtained as ordered for one of nine residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, written menus, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow their planned menu.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety by ensuring the food was served at the appropriate temperatures.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to ensure that dietary staff wore appropriate hair coverings.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Pennsylvania's Nursing Practice Act and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to clarify physician's orders for one of six residents reviewed (Resident 5).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that admission orders were followed for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory specimens were obtained as ordered for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that insulin was administered timely for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 1, 4), and failed to provide medications as ordered by the physician for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, residents' clinical records, and the facility's investigative documents, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a professional (licensed) nurse completed a timely assessment when changes in condition occurred for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). This deficiency was cited as past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that advance directives decisions were documented in the clinical record for 10 of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 28, 37, 47, 55, 62, 64, 73, 78, 82).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans that included specific and individualized interventions to address specific care needs for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 45, 73).
Inspectors wroteBased on review clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician that a medication was ineffective for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 62).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide confidentiality of residents' personal health information during medication administration for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 242).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated to reflect changes in care needs for three of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 23, 62, 78).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 48).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nutritional supplements were provided as ordered for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 29) who were at risk for weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that oxygen therapy was provided as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 78).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were assessed and received trauma-informed care to eliminate or mitigate triggers for residents with the diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (a mental and behavioral disorder that develops related to a terrifying event) for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 45).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain labs timely for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 62).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain laboratory studies as ordered by the physician for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 37).
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and failed to ensure that food items were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in three of three nursing unit pantry refrigerators (first, third, fourth floor pantries).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for two of 37 residents reviewed (Residents 53, 62).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of hospice contracts and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the designated interdisciplinary team member obtained the required information from the contracted hospice provider for two of two hospice residents reviewed (Residents 32, 48).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure that corrective plans to improve and/or correct quality deficiencies effectively addressed recurring deficiencies and ensured that the facility maintained compliance with nursing home regulations.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC - the national health protection agency) and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow CDC guidelines to reduce the spread of infections and prevent cross-contamination related to Clostridioides difficile infection for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident 38).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified timely of a change in condition, resulting in hospitalization and death for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 1).
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the Pennsylvania Nurse Practice Act, facility policies, residents' clinical records, and a resident's hospital records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was assessed after a change in condition for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 1), resulting in a delay in sending the resident to the hospital for a serious medical condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documents and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate the residents' needs by failing to provide a communication board for one of 11 residents reviewed (Resident 2).
Inspectors wroteBased on a review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a therapeutic diet was provided as ordered by the physician for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 4).
14 fire safety citations on file: 1 on February 5, 2026, 3 on January 10, 2025, 10 on February 8, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 17, 2025 | Fine | $10,358 |
| December 1, 2023 | Fine | $19,551 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.03 | 3.89 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.55 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.83 | 3.53 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.78 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.70 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.1% | 44.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 39.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.11 on weekdays and 2.83 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.21 in April to June 2025 to 3.03 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.03 | 0.55 | 3.11 | 2.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 96 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.25 | 0.51 | 3.34 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 95 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.58 | 3.50 | 3.23 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 91 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.21 | 0.66 | 3.25 | 3.11 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 92 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.82 | 3.34 | 11.3% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennsylvania, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.44 | $18.88 to $22.52 | 67,740 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.74 | $29.02 to $35.01 | 38,260 |
| Registered nurses | $46.36 | $38.75 to $50.35 | 146,520 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Pennsylvania | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.0 | 16.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.0 | 17.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.6 | 17.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.8 | 22.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.1 | 9.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Cedarwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 72 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 77 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
59.1% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
3.5% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
4.9% this home
Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 57 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: EPWORTH REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to Century Healthcare, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 1.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Century Pennsylvania Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2023 |
| Century I Tbd Holdco LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2023 | |
| Kulanu Oc Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/01/2023 | |
| Dobkin, Ari | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Klein, Efraim | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Strimbu, Tina | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Berdugo, Shai | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Klein, Efraim | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Berdugo, Shai | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/04/2025 | |
| Lightner, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/31/2025 | |
| Scharf, Brett | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Berdugo, Shai | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/04/2025 | |
| Lightner, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2025 | |
| Scharf, Brett | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/25/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.