688 Kingsborough Square, Chesapeake, VA 23320 · Chesapeake City County · (757) 547-9111
180 certified beds, about 176 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1978
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 495108 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 14, 2021, inspectors cited 17 health deficiencies (the Virginia average is 14.3, the national average 9.2).
Of 53 health citations since September 2017, 5 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $58,043 in the last three years; the largest was $33,466, and the latest is dated May 21, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.92 hours per resident per day, against 3.76 across Virginia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.34 of those hours.
63.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Virginia average 48.1%).
CMS links it to Lifeworks Rehab, an affiliated group of 64 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 53 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident/staff and RP (responsible party) interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents for seven of 70 residents, Residents #17, #195, #66, #145, #190, #88 and #134.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain dignity by not providing appropriate grooming or clothing before a scheduled outside appointment for 1 of 70 residents (Resident #88), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide care and services for an indwelling catheter for one of 70 residents in the survey sample, Residents #136.
Inspectors wroteBased on family interviews, staff interviews, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents received two person assistance during care and bed mobility per care plan and the bed mobility assessment binder to prevent accidents for one (1) of six (6) residents in the survey sample, Resident #1 which resulted in a fall with major injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on a family interview, staff interviews, a clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to ensure the Power-of-attorney (POA) and/or a designated representative was notified of the identification of a sacral pressure ulcer on [DATE] and of the deterioration of the same sacral pressure on [DATE] for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #1), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on a family interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of documents provided by the family, the facility's staff failed to ensure Resident #2 received total assistance of two or more people during care/bed mobility and the needed assistive device (a 47-inch wide bariatric bed) was in use to prevent a fall on [DATE] which resulted in multiple blunt force injuries which contributed to the resident's death resulting in immediate jeopardy.
Inspectors wrote3. The facility staff failed to ensure the necessary treatment, care and services were provided to prevent development of a pressure ulcer that was initially identified at an advanced stage, resulting in harm. Resident #90 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has been discharged multiple times from the facility to the community. The admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/04/2021 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #90 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility's documentation, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary care and services to 1 of 58 residents (Resident #170) for the prevention and complication of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and sepsis. The facility staff failed to notify the physician or Physician Assistant (PA) when orders were given for a UA with C&S, and that they were never obtained, over five days. The resident became unresponsive, with oxygen saturation levels of 83% (normal=95-100%), and was transferred via 911 (emergent) to the local hospital and admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of severe sepsis, hypothermia at 88 degrees, complicated UTI and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI); which constitutes harm.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to one resident (Resident #28) during wound care treatment to promote dignity and respect and failed to remind and assist 3 Residents (#146, #132 and #103) to vote in the November 2021 general election in the survey sample of 58 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were afforded the opportunity to formulate advance directives, and the advance directive was maintained in the clinical record, readily accessible to the direct care staff to convey upon transfer to the emergency medical personnel and/or the hospital for 5 of 58 residents (123, 55, 77, 146 and 170), in the survey sample
Inspectors wroteBased on complaint investigation, staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician and resident's representative of missed laboratory services for 3 residents (Resident #13, Resident #17 and Resident #170), and they failed to notify one representative of a change in condition for one resident (Resident #167), a closed record resident in the survey sample of 58 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview and staff interviews the facility staff failed to provide reasonable care for the protection of residents' property from loss and to return laundry in a timely manner for 3 of 58 residents (Resident #50, Resident #90 and Resident #138) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility record review, the facility staff failed to recognize, assess and intervene (to follow physician orders for obtaining daily weights and act upon the spouse's concerns regarding edema to the resident's legs) on behalf of a resident presenting with an acute change in condition for 1 of 58 residents in the survey sample (Resident #123).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to treat, monitor and manage pain for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #138), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, resident interview and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to procure narcotics timely for one resident (Resident #138) in a survey sample of 58 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was free from significant medication error (the staff failed to administer the intravenous (IV) antibiotic (Cefazolin 2 grams IV every 8 hours) as ordered from 11/16/21 through 12/2/21 for 1 of 58 residents (#55), in the survey sample
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and the facility's policy, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders for laboratory services for 3 out of 58 residents (Resident #13, Resident #17 and Resident #170) in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accommodate the resident's foods preferences to meet nutritional needs for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #123), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide documentation in the resident's clinical record of the influenza vaccine administration or the refusal of or medical contraindications to vaccines for 2 of 58 residents (Resident #129 and 112), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of the facility's COVID-19 recommended frequency of twice a week staff testing to include agency employees based on the level of community transmission.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to promptly provide 1 out of 58 resident's (Resident #27) the services needed to meet their dental needs after knowing about broken dentures.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, review of facility documents and during the course of a complaint investigation, the facility's staff failed to accurately document in one residents medical record for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #167), a closed record, in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide documentation in the resident's clinical record of the COVID-19 vaccine administration or the refusal of or medical contraindications to vaccines for 1 of 58 residents (Resident #129), in the survey sample.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure 2 residents (Residents #99 & Resident #122) of 63 residents in the survey sample received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to identify a pressure ulcer prior to an advanced stage constituting harm for Resident #99; and inaccurately assessed and documented a pressure ulcer to the shin for Resident #122. 1. The facility staff failed to identify Resident #99's left heel pressure ulcer prior to it being found at an advanced stage resulting in harm. The pressure ulcer was first identified found as an unstageable with 100% eschar (hard black dead tissue). 2. For Resident #122, the facility staff failed to accurately assess and document an area of cellulitis at a surgical incision wound on the right shin. [...]
Inspectors wrote4. Resident #139 was a [AGE] year old admitted originally to the facility on 4/30/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. resident #139's diagnoses included but were not limited to, Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 5/27/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was an 11 out of a possible 15 indicating Resident #139 was cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #139's MDS transmit history was reviewed and is documented as follows: 5/9/2019 Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated, Unplanned. 5/20/19 Re-Entry from Acute Hospital. Resident #139's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: 5/9/2019 at 12:43 P.M.: Change of Condition: [...]
Inspectors wrote5. Resident #139 was a [AGE] year old admitted originally to the facility on 4/30/19 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #139's diagnoses included but were not limited to, Congestive Heart Failure and Chronic Kidney Disease. The most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was a admission 5 Day with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 5/27/19. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was an 11 out of a possible 15 indicating Resident #139 was cognitively intact and capable of daily decision making. Resident #139's MDS transmit history was reviewed and is documented as follows: 5/9/2019 Discharge Assessment-Return Anticipated, Unplanned. 5/20/19 Re-Entry from Acute Hospital. Resident #139's Progress Notes were reviewed and are documented in part, as follows: 5/9/2019 at 12:43 P.M.: Change of Condition: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, Resident interview, staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of nursing practices for 3 out of 63 residents (Residents #99, 421 and 47). 1. The facility staff failed to follow the physician orders for the administration of [NAME] hose for Resident #99. 2. The facility staff failed to obtain daily weights per physician orders starting on 06/06/19 for Resident #421. 3a. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to notify the physician for weight gain greater than 2 pounds on 5/29/19 per physician's order. 3b. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to accurately assess blisters to her right foot and implement a physician ordered treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on information during a complaint investigation, clinical record review, staff interviews the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents (Resident #174) in the survey sample maintained a normal bowel elimination pattern. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #174 maintained a normal bowel elimination at least every 3 days. Resident #174 went 6 days without having a bowel movement.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure pain management was provided to 2 of 63 residents in the survey sample (Residents #30 and #47) consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. 1a. For Resident #30, facility staff failed to document the location of pain; and attempt non-pharmacological pain interventions prior to the administration of PRN (as needed) pain medication on several occasions in May and June 2019. 1b. For Resident #30, facility staff failed to clarify two different orders for as needed (PRN) pain medications. 2. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to document the location of pain; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary pain medications for two of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #30 and #47. 1. For Resident #30, facility staff failed to attempt and/or offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication on several occasions in May and June of 2019. 2. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to attempt and/or offer non-pharmacological interventions prior to the administration of pain medication on several occasions in May of 2019.
Inspectors wroteThe facility staff failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility staff failed to store and label food in a safe, sanitary manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to enhance and promote dignity for 7 residents during the dining experience in the Day Room on Unit 2 in the following ways: 1. Meals were served in an institutional manner to Residents on trays. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant #2 (CNA) was standing with her hands on her hips while feeding a resident. 3. CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3 stood while feeding Residents. 4. CNAs placed clothing protectors on Residents without asking their permission. 5. CNA #2 turned off the TV because she felt a resident wasn't eating due to the TV being on. 6. CNA #2 was putting too much food on a spoon to feed a resident and not waiting for the resident to chew and swallow her food before giving her something to drink or eat.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide a homelike environment during the dining observation on 06/07/19 in the Day room on unit two. Facility staff served resident meals on trays during the dining observation in the Day Room on unit one for lunch.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 resident (Resident #148) of 63 residents in the survey sample, had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 resident (Resident #148) of 63 residents in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include Diabetes Mellitus for Resident #148.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for three of 63 residents in the survey sample, Residents #47, 35 and 78. 1. For Resident #47, facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan when she acquired two blisters to her right medial and dorsum foot on 5/17/19, when the blisters had opened with a new treatment order, and when the blisters had resolved. 2. For Resident #35, facility staff failed to revise his care plan with a new diagnosis of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and his new order for oxygen. 3. The facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan to to include how often to release a wheel chair seat belt used for Resident #78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to ensure that activities of daily living necessary to maintain personal grooming was provided for 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, Resident #48. The facility staff failed to ensure that fingernail and facial hair care was provided to Resident #48 who was unable to carry out these activity of daily grooming tasks independently.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #122) of 63 residents in the survey sample received care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility staff failed to obtain an order for a stabilization/fracture boot which resulted in cellulitis to a surgical incision wound; and the facility staff inaccurately assessed and documented the cellulitis as a Stage 3 pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents (Resident #164) in the survey sample who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain toenail care. The facility staff failed to ensure that podiatry services/nail care was provided to Resident #164.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 63 residents in the survey sample, (Resident #78) was transferred according to the comprehensive care plan to prevent potential accidents. The facility staff failed to transfer Resident #78 with a mechanical lift per the resident's plan of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure one Resident (Resident #78) of 63 resident's in the survey sample, received appropriate treatment to prevent complications from enteral feeding. The facility staff failed to ensure safety precautions were followed to prevent potential complications from enteral feeding for Resident #78 during ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to communicate an ongoing assessment for one (Resident #421) of 63 residents in the survey sample, for monitoring of complications before after dialysis treatment. The facility staff failed to communicate an ongoing assessment with the dialysis center where Resident #421 attended outpatient dialysis three days per week every Monday, Wednesday and Friday.
Inspectors wroteBased on the facility's medication storage review/inspection of 4 medication carts and 2 medication rooms, the facility staff failed to dispose of Resident #471's medications after the resident was discharged , and failed to ensure accountability for controlled medications awaiting final disposition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for two of 17 residents in the survey sample, Residents #102 and #107.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews the facility staff failed to follow infection control practices therefore, increasing the chance of spreading infections, illnesses and diseases for 3 of 63 residents in the survey sample (Residents #39, 113, &104) and 7 dining room residents. 1. The Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene before assisting 7 Residents during mealtime. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #39's indwelling catheter was managed in a manner to minimize the risk of cross-contamination and infections. 3. For Resident #113, facility staff failed to maintain his Foley catheter in a sanitary manner. 4. For Resident #104, facility staff failed to maintain respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner. The Findings Included; 1. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to prepare, store, distribute and serve food in a safe, sanitary manner. The facility staff failed to ensure that the kitchen was free from pests to include roaches and drain flies, maintain a clean stove and oven that were free from copious amounts of grease and burnt debris, and ensure that an air gap was in place from the two food steamer units drain pipe to the floor drain.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility document review and staff interviews the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility is free of pests. 1. The facility staff failed to ensure that the kitchen was free from pests to include roaches and drain flies. 2. The facility staff failed to ensure the facility was free from ants.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and the facility staff failed to assess one of 26 Residents in the survey sample (Resident #15) ability to self administer Voltaren Gel.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review, and review of the facility's policy the facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 26 residents (Resident #17), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to code Resident #17's MDS assessment correctly at section A1500 through A1550.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to update a comprehensive person centered care plan after a fall for one of 26 residents (Resident #10) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to revise Resident #10's comprehensive care plan to include a fall on 02/12/17.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to date two open multidose vials of insulin for 2 out of 26 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #20) in the survey sample. 1. The facility staff failed to date an opened multidose vial of Novolog (1) insulin (Resident #19). 2. The facility staff failed to date an opened multidose vial of Humalog (2) insulin (Resident #20).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered for one out of 26 residents (Resident #1) in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered for the following: Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) (1) and Hemoglobin A1C (2) for the month of August 2017.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to accurately document medical record information for one of 26 residents (Resident #17), in the survey sample. The facility staff failed to accurately document information on Resident #17's Screening for Mental Illness, Mental Retardation/Intellectual Disability, or Related Conditions assessments.
27 fire safety citations on file: 12 on December 14, 2021, 4 on June 10, 2019, 11 on September 8, 2017.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | Fine | $33,466 |
| January 4, 2024 | Fine | $11,180 |
| October 30, 2023 | Fine | $13,397 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.92 | 3.76 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.34 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.37 | 3.29 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.51 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.07 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 63.3% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 52.4% | 48.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.14 on weekdays and 2.37 on weekends, 25% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 2.92 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.92 | 0.34 | 3.14 | 2.37 | 3.5% | 0 of 90 | 176 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.02 | 0.35 | 3.22 | 2.51 | 4.9% | 0 of 92 | 176 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.09 | 0.37 | 3.27 | 2.61 | 5.5% | 0 of 92 | 171 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.45 | 3.52 | 2.81 | 14.3% | 0 of 91 | 172 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Virginia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.58 | 0.56 | 3.76 | 3.12 | 5.7% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.77 | $17.80 to $22.56 | 40,580 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.21 | $28.66 to $35.84 | 15,550 |
| Registered nurses | $45.00 | $38.51 to $49.53 | 77,490 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Virginia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.2 | 14.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 15.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.0 | 14.2 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.2 | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.1 | 11.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chesapeake Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
65.1% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Virginia: 101 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 648 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Virginia: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 575 eligible stays.
7.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Virginia: 2 better, 8 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 395 eligible stays.
56.3% this home
Median of homes: Virginia60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 261 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Virginia0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 378 residents counted.
4.5% this home
Median of homes: Virginia2.1% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 378 residents counted.
96.6% this home
Median of homes: Virginia97.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 146 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHESAPEAKE SNF LLC. CMS links this home to Lifeworks Rehab, a group of 64 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Holdings I LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/28/2021 |
| Charles 1994 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Chesapeake East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Edward 1998 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ek 2005 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Fay 2014 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Fay 2014 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Ll 2013 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mms 2008 Family Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Mzr East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Saul 2012 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Silverstone East LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sol 2000 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Sol 2000 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 & Family LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 Family Grantor Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Stevens 3920 LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/28/2021 | |
| Land, Irvin | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/26/2024 | |
| Land, Irvin | Corporate director | Individual | 01/26/2024 | |
| Rylbss East Manager LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/28/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Virginia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.