3210 West Fork Road, Cincinnati, OH 45211 · Hamilton County · (513) 605-3000
107 certified beds, about 99 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366399 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 11, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since February 2020, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.65 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
51.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents consuming food prepared in the kitchen. No residents in the facility were nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity when staff stood over residents as they fed them lunch. This affected two residents (#26 and #48) of twenty four reviewed for dining observation. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were locked in a medication cart. This had the potential to affect one resident (#84) of two residents who were independently mobile and cognitively impaired that resided on the100 hall. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and review of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices as suggested by the CDC when wound care supplies of calcium alginate were being stored on the floor in a plastic bag. This had the potential affect one resident (#5) of three reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge. This affected one Resident #111 of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to have a baseline care plan that included pain management and hearing loss. This affected one, (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for the baseline care plan. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, policy review and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' activity needs were assessed regularly and addressed in the care plans. This affected two Residents #40 and Resident #54 of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available for a resident. This affected one, (Resident #2) of six residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment. This affected one, (Resident #54) of three residents reviewed for a sanitary environment. The facility census was 104.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, interview with staff at oral surgeon's office, review of the weather history for Cincinnati, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. This affected one (#12) of two residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 102.
Inspectors wroteBased on closed medical record review, staff interviews, interview with Wound Nurse Practitioner (WNP) #175, review of facility policy, and review of guidelines from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), the facility failed to adequately assess and monitor residents' skin and failed to timely identify pressure ulcers (a pressure ulcer is a localized injury of the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #104 who was admitted without pressure ulcers but was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers, subsequently developed an avoidable facility acquired pressure ulcer which was not identified until it had reached an advanced stage. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record reviews, observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in working order on the facility's 200-hall. This affected 12 residents (#12, #14, #19, #23, #32, #42, #54, #57, #59, #74, #91, and #94) of 27 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, review of resident council meeting notes, and record review, the facility failed to address resident concerns timely and ensure staff only attend the meetings if the residents invited them to attend. This affected three (#47, #78, and #88) of four residents who attended the resident council meeting. The facility census was 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interviews, review of the facility's policy, and observations, the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety devices for the prevention of falls were functioning and failed to complete a thorough fall investigation into a resident's fall. This affected two (Residents #27 and #95) of seven residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed, labeled, and dated per the physician's order, plan of care, and facility policy and the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered in a safe manner. This affected one (#49) of one resident reviewed for oxygen use. The facility identified 15 residents who used oxygen. The facility census was 95.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to post daily staffing data at the beginning of each shift. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to appropriately document the number the shift to shift counting of controlled substances in the 100 Hall cart. This had the potential to affect 16 sixteen (#18, #36, #52, #53, #71, #73, #75, #138, #139, #140, #144, #149, #150, #151, #240, #290) residents with controlled substances stored in the 100 hall cart. Facility census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's recommendations the facility failed to discard expired medications and failed to date injectable medication upon opening to ensure it was discarded in a timely manner in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. This had the potential to affect the six (#24, #71, #142, #288, #289, #290) residents. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a safe and appetizing temperature. This had the potential to affect 33 residents residing on the 100 halls, except Resident #20 who does not receive dietary services. Facility census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to store food properly and maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen to prepare food. This had the potential to affect 92 out of 93 residents residing in the facility, except one (#20) resident who did not receive food from the kitchen. Facility census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to accommodate a residents need by providing a resident with an alternate mobility device while her motorized wheelchair was being repaired. This affected one (#40) of 19 residents sampled during the survey. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident representative and staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was afforded with the choice of food preferences with each meal. This affected one (#11) of one reviewed for choices. The facility census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident code status was communicated consistently and accurately to the staff. This affected two (#24 and #18) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected resident psychiatric diagnoses. This affected one (#18) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, resident, resident representative and staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide dental care for dependent residents. This affected one (#11) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure as needed anti-anxiety medication had a stop date and failed to thoroughly document target behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions offered prior to administration of an as needed anti-anxiety medication. This affected one (#18) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 93.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file review, staff interview and review of a job description, the facility failed to ensure a qualified Activity Director was on staff to oversee the facility's overall activity services. This had the potential to affect every resident residing in the facility. The census was 93.
7 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 11, 2026, 2 on February 8, 2024, 2 on February 13, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.65 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.38 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.83 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.34 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.0% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.92 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.76 on weekdays and 3.38 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.79 in April to June 2025 to 3.65 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.65 | 0.48 | 3.76 | 3.38 | 3.3% | 0 of 90 | 99 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.67 | 0.56 | 3.79 | 3.37 | 2.3% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.64 | 0.62 | 3.72 | 3.44 | 2.9% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.85 | 3.62 | 3.8% | 0 of 91 | 99 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.9 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.4 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Covenant Village Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
65.1% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 175 eligible stays.
10.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 178 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 110 eligible stays.
41.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 105 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
2.1% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.