Find a nursing home

Home / Vermont / Ludlow

Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont

8 Gill Terrace, Ludlow, VT 05149 · Windsor County · (802) 228-4571

46 certified beds, about 42 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1995

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 475052 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Vermont average is 7.9, the national average 9.2).

None of its 25 health citations since January 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.51 hours per resident per day, against 4.22 across Vermont and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.99 of those hours.

20.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Vermont average 55.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
18D
5E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a staff member for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1).
February 25, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide a system that enables residents to file an anonymous grievance.
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices during medication administration by not practicing appropriate hand hygiene during preparation and administration of medications and the presence of a staff member's personal drink on 1 of 2 medication carts. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous three re-certification surveys dated 1/11/23, 1/24/24, and 3/19/25.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a plan of care to reflect an identified concern of a decline in mobility for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #27).
  5. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were less than 5% or greater. There were 31 medication administration opportunities, 29 were observed to be given and 2 were omitted, resulting in errors for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #14 and Resident #16). The total error rate for all observations was calculated at 6.45%.
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 2 medication carts.
August 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 resident [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents.
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated regarding 1 resident [Resident #1] of 3 sampled residents.
March 19, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 9, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed [PRN] orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days for 3 of 19 sampled residents [Resident #37, #21, and #22] unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days and documents their rationale.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 9, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain facility-wide systems for the prevention, identification, and control of infection and communicable diseases of residents, staff, and visitors through surveillance, staff training, and following established policies and procedures related to proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) specifically Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 4 of 4 of the applicable sample (Residents #7, #11, #10, and #38).
  3. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of 1 resident [Resident #28] of 19 sampled residents regarding physician orders not followed related to medications not administered as ordered.
  4. D
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 25, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 [Resident #43] of 4 sampled residents who are trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experience and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident.
November 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality regarding proper actions following a fall which resulted in harm for one resident [Res.#1].
  2. D
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed and implemented the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety for one resident [Res.#1].
January 24, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 10 citations
  1. F
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff were assessed for skills competency upon hire and annually, based on the care needs of the residents who reside in the facility.
  2. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed for 3 of 26 residents in the sample. (Resident #36) related to assessment and monitoring after a choking episode, and (Resident # 188 and Resident #7 ) related to safe administration and monitoring of diabetic medications and blood glucose monitoring.
  3. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of needs and preferences related to a mattress for 1 of 26 residents sampled. (Resident #7).
  4. D
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    F626 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accept a resident back after being transferred to an acute care facility for evaluation for 1 of 26 residents sampled. (Resident #33).
  5. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident's physical needs related to requiring a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Machine (CPAP) for 1 of 26 residents sampled. (Resident #188).
  6. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 of 26 residents in the sample (Residents #188 and #237) related to a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) device (Resident #188), and a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective care related to a pressure ulcer (Resident # 237).
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all residents have adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 26 residents sampled (Resident #33 and Resident #12).
  8. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with Professional standards of practice for 1 of 26 residents sampled. (Resident #188). During an interview with Resident #188 on 1/22/23 5:12 P.M. a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Machine (CPAP) was noted on the resident's bedside table. (This is a machine that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep. The air pressure delivered is determined by the pressure setting on the device.) The resident turned the machine on and there were specific settings programmed into the machine. The resident stated his/her spouse brought the machine in from home. Resident #188 said that he/she wears his/her CPAP at night, and the nursing staff does not assist him/her with the CPAP. He/she stated he/she puts it on, turns it on, and removes it him/herself. [...]
  9. D
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    F710 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the physician evaluated and assessed a pressure ulcer for 1 of 26 residents sampled. (Resident #33).
  10. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 22, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure proper infection control processes were followed for 2 of 26 residents sampled. (Resident #33) during a pressure wound dressing change and cleaning of a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Machine (CPAP) for (Resident #188)

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 11, 2023.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · January 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. C
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · January 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. B
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · January 11, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeVermontUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.514.223.86
Registered nurses0.990.800.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.113.663.42
Nurse aides2.34
Licensed practical nurses0.17
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)20.5%55.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%39.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.67 on weekdays and 3.11 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.14 in April to June 2025 to 3.51 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.510.993.673.11 1.4%0 of 9042
Oct to Dec 20253.761.004.013.13 0.0%0 of 9242
Jul to Sep 20254.090.964.413.29 0.0%0 of 9242
Apr to Jun 20254.141.004.443.36 0.0%0 of 9142
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Vermont, Jan to Mar 20264.250.794.473.7123.2%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Vermont

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Vermont, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.66$19.64 to $23.533,030
LPNs and LVNs$33.62$29.56 to $37.611,130
Registered nurses$46.86$39.53 to $50.587,410
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeVermontUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.619.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.90.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.72.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.65.93.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.317.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.15.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
42.019.915.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.81.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

56.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Vermont: 8 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Vermont: 1 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 57 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Vermont: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

25.0% this home

Median of homes: Vermont57.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 20 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Vermont0.4% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Vermont2.7% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Vermont97.6% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 1 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE TRUSTEES OF THE GILL ODD FELLOWS HOME OF VERMONT.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Allen, EverettCorporate directorIndividual05/01/2000
Benoit, MarthaCorporate directorIndividual05/01/2022
Devereux, DennisCorporate directorIndividual10/12/2023
George, SandraCorporate directorIndividual05/01/2013
Jones, BrandinCorporate directorIndividual10/12/2023
Merrifox, DylanCorporate directorIndividual04/17/2025
Thomson, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2022
York, ZacharyCorporate directorIndividual08/14/2025
Benoit, MarthaCorporate officerIndividual08/14/2025
Devereux, DennisCorporate officerIndividual10/10/2023
Jones, BrandinCorporate officerIndividual08/14/2025
Thomson, GeorgeCorporate officerIndividual08/14/2025
Caloras, DanielOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/2019
Conway, AshleyOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/02/2024
Copley, TonyaOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/19/2025
Farnsworth, RalphOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/17/2014
Ferland, LindseyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2026
Green, NicoleOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2023
Kiniry, WandaOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2023
Little, MorganOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/29/2024
McElwain, MaeganOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2026
Moore, JenniferOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/21/2025
Olivo, JenniferOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/17/2026
Reichert, JanuaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/17/2016
Allen, EverettTrustee of the SNFIndividual05/01/2000
Benoit, MarthaTrustee of the SNFIndividual05/01/2022
Devereux, DennisTrustee of the SNFIndividual05/01/2015
George, SandraTrustee of the SNFIndividual05/01/2013
Jones, BrandinTrustee of the SNFIndividual10/12/2023
Merrifox, DylanTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/17/2025
Thomson, GeorgeTrustee of the SNFIndividual06/01/2022
York, ZacharyTrustee of the SNFIndividual08/14/2025
Allen, EverettAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2000
Benoit, MarthaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2022
Caloras, DanielAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2019
Devereux, DennisAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2015
Ferland, LindseyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2026
George, SandraAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2013
Jones, BrandinAdp of the SNFIndividual10/12/2023
Merrifox, DylanAdp of the SNFIndividual04/17/2025
Moore, JenniferAdp of the SNFIndividual02/01/2024
Olivo, JenniferAdp of the SNFIndividual02/17/2026
Reichert, JanuaryAdp of the SNFIndividual10/17/2016
Thomson, GeorgeAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2022
York, ZacharyAdp of the SNFIndividual08/14/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 20, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 25, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.11 hours per resident per day, below the Vermont average of 3.66.

Other nursing homes nearby

Vermont contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Vermont. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 25, 2026. The Vermont average is 7.9.
Has Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Gill Odd Fellows Home of Vermont?
CMS lists 45 owners and managers. Legal business name: THE TRUSTEES OF THE GILL ODD FELLOWS HOME OF VERMONT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection