3003 Iowa, Chickasha, OK 73023 · Grady County · (405) 224-0909
120 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1999
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375359 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 19, 2024, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since December 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,433 in the last three years; the largest was $14,433, and the latest is dated September 5, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.64 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.12 of those hours.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. The DON identified 52 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a diuretic was included on the care plan for one (#23) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary meds; and b. assist rails were included on the care plan for one (#43) of two sampled residents reviewed for restraints. The administrator in training identified 51 residents resided in the facility and 15 residents received diuretics. MDS Coordinator #1 identified three residents had assist rails.
Inspectors wroteOn 10/07/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure staff followed proper procedure for the use of a mechanical lift to prevent accidents. The failure resulted in a fractured hip for Res #1. An undated facility Hydraulic Lift policy documented to check to be sure hooks are secure. A care plan intervention, dated 11/03/23, documented Res #1 required two staff assistance with a Hoyer (full body mechanical lift) for transfers. On 09/08/24, Res #1 had a fall due to the strap on the transfer sling failing to remain attached to the Hoyer lift. The resident was sent to the hospital and diagnosed with a closed hip fracture. Staff were in-serviced on 09/08/24 regarding lift safety and operation, but no ongoing monitoring was completed to ensure staff compliance with safe utilization of mechanical lifts. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to submit PBJ data to CMS for the third quarter of the fiscal year for 2023. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/10/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility. Findings The PBJ Staffing Data Report documented the facility failed to submit data for the third quarter of 2023 (April 1 - June 30). On 10/10/23 at 9:43 a.m., the BOM was asked how often the facility submitted staffing data to CMS. They stated quarterly. They were asked if they had submitted data for the third quarter of 2023. 10/10/23 at 11:18 a.m., the BOM stated they did not submit the data for the quarter and should have.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessment were accurate and/or completed timely for two (#6 and #44) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/10/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed once every three months and/or no later than 14 days after the ARD for two (#6 and #36) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/10/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to fully develop comprehensive care plans for four (#6, 8, 44, and #47) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/10/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and/or revise the care plan related to: a. a decrease in mobility for one (#3) of 13 residents whose care plans were reviewed, and b. fall prevention interventions for one (#28) of 13 residents who were reviewed for accidents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/10/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide nail care for one (#34) of two sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/10/23, documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to turn and reposition a resident with limited range of motion (ROM) in order to increase ROM and/or prevent further decline for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for mobility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, documented 44 residents who required assistance with mobility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls for one (#39) of three sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to consistently implement interventions to prevent recurrence and evaluate interventions for effectiveness for a resident who had frequent falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident report documented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing bed or side rails; b. perform an entrapment risk assessment; c. review the risks or benefits with the resident and/or their representative; d. obtain an informed consent; and e. develop a care plan for side rail use for one (#39) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 16 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for one (#39) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 16 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained for code status for two (#26 and #1) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for code status. The DON identified 23 residents who were DNR's.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in status MDS was completed timely by the 14th calendar day after the determination the significant changes has occurred for one (#26) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 10/10/23, docuented 46 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of an unstageable pressure ulcer, provide appropriate treatment, and provide wound care in a way to help prevent infection for one (#33) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility documented an unstageable ulcer on 11/04/22 and the physician was not notified. On 12/07/22, during an observation of wound care, an additional pressure ulcer was observed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented two residents resided in the facility who had pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a new pressure ulcer for one (#33) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented two residents had pressure ulcers in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the residents status for three (#10, 29, and #32) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided to dependent residents for one (#1) of one resident who was reviewed for ADLs. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to assess for risks associated with smoking for one (#42) of one resident sampled for smoking. RN #1 identified three residents who smoked.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide physician ordered weekly weights for one (#29) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented two residents with unplanned weight loss or gain. The RN provided documentation of 15 residents who were to receive weekly weights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff completed required competency demonstrations annually. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse served in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain labs as ordered by the physician for one (#6) of five sampled residents reviewed for lab services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to perform proper hygiene during wound care for one (#33) of one observed for wound care and perform proper hand hygiene when delivering meals to residents. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. offer the influenza vaccination to each resident annually for two (#27 and #38) and b. administer the pneumococcal immunization for two (#2 and #6) of five sampled residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly assessment was completed no later than 14 days after the ARD for one (#10) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit MDS assessments to CMS within seven days of completion for one (#19) of one resident sampled for assessment transmission. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 43 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to revise a care plan related to pressure ulcers for one (#33) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 12/06/22, documented two residents have pressure ulcers.
4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on December 19, 2024, 3 on October 12, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| September 5, 2024 | Fine | $14,433 |
| September 5, 2024 | Payment Denial | 3 days from November 12, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.64 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.11 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.27 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.25 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.12 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.86 on weekdays and 4.11 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.22 in April to June 2025 to 4.64 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.64 | 0.12 | 4.86 | 4.11 | 0.0% | 14 of 90 | 71 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.32 | 0.16 | 4.60 | 3.61 | 0.4% | 1 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.35 | 0.14 | 4.60 | 3.72 | 0.0% | 3 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.22 | 0.12 | 4.47 | 3.60 | 0.0% | 16 of 91 | 66 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.7 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.8 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.8 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.4 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.7 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Glenhaven Retirement Village's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
61.9% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 75 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 90 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 47 eligible stays.
63.9% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
1.8% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 56 residents counted.
1.8% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 56 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GLENHAVEN CORPORATION.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton, Glenda | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 07/09/2004 | |
| Lance, Billy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 07/09/2004 | |
| Mason, Michael | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 05/01/2005 | |
| Mason, Patrick | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 07/09/2004 | |
| Trett, Jenny | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 07/09/2004 | |
| Hamilton, Glenda | Corporate director | Individual | 07/25/2005 | |
| Lance, Billy | Corporate director | Individual | 07/25/2005 | |
| Mason, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 07/25/2005 | |
| Mason, Patrick | Corporate director | Individual | 07/25/2005 | |
| Hamilton, Glenda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/09/2004 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.