2060 Health Drive, Wyoming, MI 49519 · Kent County · (616) 333-1200
65 certified beds, about 61 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2018
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235723 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 4, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 43 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 16 fines totaling $93,847 in the last three years; the largest was $14,814, and the latest is dated October 8, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.75 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.09 of those hours.
58.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
CMS links it to Avon Healthcare, an affiliated group of 9 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 43 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and/or pharmacy when a medication was unavailable and the resident did not receive it for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (R1, R2, R3, and R4) for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an elopement for one of three resident's (Resident #100) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The deficient practice was corrected on 01/06/26, prior to the start of this survey and, therefore, this deficiency is considered Past Noncompliance. Resident #100 (R100)Review of an admission Record revealed R100 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of a recent hip fracture and Alzheimer's disease. During an interview on 01/14/26 at 8:20 AM, R100 laid in bed resting with her eyes open. R100 stated that she remembered being outside the building last week but I couldn't tell you why I did that, I just did. R100 stated that she was not harmed and felt safe and that she wouldn't be doing that again. Review of a Facility Reported Incident dated 01/05/26 reflected the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure prescription medications according to professional standards and facility policies for 5 of 5 resident's (Resident #25, Resident #10, Resident #39, Resident #56, and Resident #45) and for one of four medication carts reviewed.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 2680029. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to create and implement person centered care plans for two (R27 and R63) of 13 residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake 2680029. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for one (R27) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered toileting program for one (R63) of 1 resident reviewed for toileting.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation regarding the disposition of controlled substances for 1 of 2 resident's (Resident #62) reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #37) of 3 residents reviewed for care and treatment of pressure ulcers, resulting in harm and the deterioration of Resident #37's pressure ulcer.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medications upon admission in a timely manner for 1 resident (Resident #207) of 13 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure working spray bottles are labeled as to content, 2. Ensure water filters were being replaced as required on equipment, 3. Ensure ice machines food contact surface/equipment are clean and maintained, and 4. Ensure the 2nd & 3rd floor kitchenette/pantries flooring is clean and free of debris and the cooler unit's door, door seals, openings and bottoms, resulting in an increased potential of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness possibly affecting 52 residents that consume food from the kitchen and kitchenettes/pantries.
Inspectors wroteThis citation contains 2 Deficient Practice Statements (DPS), DPS A and DPS B. DPS A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their smoking policy and procedure for 1 resident (Resident #25) of 1 resident reviewed for smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained according to professional standards of practice for 4 residents (Resident #26, Resident #27, Resident #43 and Resident #48) out of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed personnel followed medication administration policy and procedures when a nurse pre-poured medications for eight residents (R9, R27, R30, R31, R35, R39, R50) and documented the administration of medications that had not been given to residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R20 and R26) of five residents reviewed for medication were properly assessed and monitored for self-administration of medication and failed to securely store and document medication self-administration after use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and notify the physician of clinical changes in condition for 1 resident (Resident #48) out of 13 residents reviewed for quality care from a total sample of 13 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were prescribed to treat a condition as diagnosed and documented with rationale in the clinical record for 1 resident (Resident #24) out of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to ensure proper use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents in Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 1 resident (Resident #37) of 13 residents reviewed for infection control.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to M100142556, M100143537, and M100143672. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents a list of pertinent contact information to the State Agencies (SA), advocacy groups and the like, a description of the requirements and procedures for establishing eligibility for Medicaid, and Medicare/Medicaid coverage, and how to file a complaint with the SA, how to file a grievance, and resources for information regarding returning to the community for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #5, Resident #11, Resident #12) of 4 residents reviewed. This deficient practice affects all 54 residents who reside at the facility. Resident #1 (R1) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes M100143672 AND M100142556. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an admission policy and procedure and provide admission packets for 3 (Resident #5, Resident #11, Resident #12) of 3 residents reviewed, resulting in residents being uninformed of their rights and resources, and the absence of written information available to the resident/responsible party regarding costs, policies, procedures, and services. This deficient practice affects all residents admitted to the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes M100142556, 143537, and 143672. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare for discharges, provide a safe home discharge, and allow a readmission post hospitalization for 2 (Resident #4 and Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for discharges, resulting in both residents needing to find placement at another long-term care facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes M100142556, M100143537, and M100143672 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize policies and procedures and notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of monthly discharges that includes the reason for transfer or discharge, date and the receiving entity. This deficient practice affects all residents discharged from the facility since July 2023.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes M100142556 and M100143672. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Bed Hold policies to residents upon admission and transfers to acute care or therapeutic leave for 12 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, and Resident #12). This deficient practice affects all residents admitted to the facility and residents who get sent out for acute care or therapeutic leave. Findings Include: Review of a Notice of Bed Hold Policy revealed ***This document must be signed by the patient upon discharge to the hospital or therapeutic leave*** If unable to sign, notification from the patient and/or family/DPOA (Designated Power of Attorney) must be documented. Complete top section upon admission with resident or responsible party. [...]
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake M100143672. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective telephone communication system to the facility for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for communication from outside the facility. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who reside at the facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake M100143672. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist and provide written information on how to apply for and use Medicare and Medicaid benefits for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed, resulting in the resident/representative not having Medicaid coverage in a timely manner and had an out-of-pocket expense.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intakes M100142672 AND M100142556. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for readmissions after hospitalization, resulting in a resident who was pending Medicaid needing to find placement at another facility.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake M100144078. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #6), that required repositioning, assessment and monitoring, daily dressing care and/or wound vac (vacuum) care (a treatment that uses a special dressing and a pump to apply suction to a wound and promote healing).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respectful and dignified treatment of two facility residents (Resident #1 (R1) and R2) by a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA F) providing cares in an unprofessional manner.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure 1 of 3 medication carts (100 Hall Medication Cart) and properly label a medication in 1 of 3 medication carts (100 Hall Medication Cart), resulting in the potential for misappropriation of medications and the potential for complications from administration of expired or contaminated medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Clean food and non-food contact surfaces to sight and touch; 2. Ensure proper concentration of quaternary ammonium sanitizer; and 3. Properly store chemicals to minimize the risk of contamination. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 55 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1. During the initial tour of the facility, at 9:15 AM on 10/3/23, it was observed that an accumulation of debris was found on the underside corners of the juice machine in the kitchen. When asked how often this piece of equipment gets cleaned, Kitchen Supervisor (KS) N stated every Friday. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely submit Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) information for the Fiscal Year Quarter 3, 2023 (April 1 - June 30) resulting in no staffing data that is auditable or verifiable and the potential for inaccurate staffing information to be known to the state and federal entities.
Inspectors wroteThis citation has 2 parts. Part A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect clean and sanitary items from contamination and have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in contamination of clean and sanitary supplies and an increased risk of water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system possibly affecting any or all of the 55 residents in the facility. During a walkthrough of the facility, with Maintenance Director (MD) O, at 2:45 PM on 10/3/23, observation of the laundry room found an accumulation of trash and debris underneath the false bottom of the laundry bin. Further observation found a spray bottle containing a blue solution that was not labeled with a common name. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a valid Advance Directive was in place for one Resident (R192), resulting in the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA), that had not been activated, signing paperwork without the authority to do so and the potential for the Advance Directives to not reflect the medical wishes of all facility residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policy on the prevention of abuse resulting in an allegation of abuse to be not reported and investigated and the potential for allegations of abuse to not be identified for all facility residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline and comprehensive care plan for one post-surgical resident (R32) at risk for falls, resulting in a Resident with a history of falls with injury to remain at unmitigated risk for falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the At risk Comprehensive Care Plan for changing skin integrity for one Resident (R28), resulting in no care plan for actual wounds under treatment and the potential for all facility residents to not have their plan of care reflect their current physical or mental status.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions, evaluate and analyze hazards and risks after falls and implement effective interventions to mitigate accident hazards and prevent falls for one resident (Resident #3) out of 2 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in injury from repeated falls.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for 1 resident (R97) utilizing a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine, resulting in R97's CPAP equipment not being cleaned per facility policy and the potential for the spread of illness and disease.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and/or timely implement a pharmacy recommendation for 1 of 5 residents (R8), resulting in R8 not receiving a medication as per pharmacy recommendations and physician approval and a delay in implementing a pharmacy recommendation.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safeguard the confidentiality of medical records for one resident (R32), resulting in the potential for unauthorized access to the medical records, and the potential for the loss of resident privacy and confidentiality of their personal health information.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 14 sampled residents (R94) had a means to contact staff in the case of needing assistance, resulting in R94 having no way to contact staff for help when in distress and the potential for a serious negative outcome.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to address 2 Residents (R3 and R4) concerns in a timely manner resulting in R3 not receiving her medications as ordered and R4's concern of neglect and abuse not getting addressed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a complete and thorough investigation regarding incidents involving 3 Residents (Resident#2, Resident#4, Resident#7) resulting in mental anguish and discomfort for the residents with the potential for ongoing abuse and neglect for all residents living at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 Resident (R3) medications as ordered, resulting in R3 not sleeping well.
14 fire safety citations on file: 5 on December 4, 2025, 4 on October 8, 2024, 5 on October 6, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 8, 2024 | Payment Denial | 96 days from November 6, 2024 |
| February 20, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| February 12, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 22, 2024 | Fine | $14,814 |
| January 8, 2024 | Fine | $4,938 |
| January 2, 2024 | Fine | $4,587 |
| December 11, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
| November 20, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| November 13, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| November 6, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 30, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 23, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 17, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 10, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| October 2, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| September 25, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| September 18, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.75 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.09 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.03 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.53 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.13 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.9% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 4.01 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.04 on weekdays and 4.03 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.22 in April to June 2025 to 4.75 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.75 | 1.09 | 5.04 | 4.03 | 0.6% | 0 of 90 | 61 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.20 | 1.26 | 5.46 | 4.52 | 0.2% | 0 of 92 | 55 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.92 | 1.04 | 5.31 | 3.93 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 59 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.22 | 0.89 | 5.57 | 4.37 | 9.0% | 0 of 91 | 54 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.5 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.4 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 16.6 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.4 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Harbor Post Acute Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (67.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
67.8% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Michigan: 89 better, 22 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 227 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Michigan: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 235 eligible stays.
5.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Michigan: 1 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 132 eligible stays.
66.1% this home
Median of homes: Michigan57.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 109 residents counted.
1.5% this home
Median of homes: Michigan0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Michigan99.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 95 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HEALTHBRIDGE, LLC. CMS links this home to Avon Healthcare, a group of 9 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hpac Mi LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2025 |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 48% | 05/01/2025 |
| Freund, Eliyahu | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Harbor Avon Management | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Bowers, Bryanna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/11/2025 | |
| Miller, Erin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/21/2024 | |
| Wiltrakis, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2021 | |
| 2060 Health Drive LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Harbor Avon Management | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Harbor Post Acute Realty | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Bowers, Bryanna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/11/2025 | |
| Freund, Eliyahu | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Gottlieb, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 | |
| Wiltrakis, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/23/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.