8181 Harcourt Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46260 · Marion County · (317) 872-7261
100 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155149 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 9, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 37 health citations since October 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.64 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.43 of those hours.
42.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to American Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia was provided effective person-centered dementia care and was not relocated to locked memory care unit without a documented reason which resulted in a resident-to-resident altercation for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident H and G) This deficient practice resulted in an altercation between Resident H and G. Resident G received an intertrochanteric femur fracture (a broken hip around the upper thigh bone) which required surgical intervention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a relocation planning conference meeting was held with the resident's responsible party and the Executive Director prior to moving the resident onto a locked memory care unit and prior to moving the resident out of the locked memory care unit and back to the skilled unit for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for transfers. (Resident H)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse and intimidation (Resident B) by another resident (Resident C) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered, labs were obtained, and admission orders were transcribed according to the physician's orders for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident J and E)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the same size tracheostomy canula was kept at bedside as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were disposed of in a secure and safe method to prevent diversion and/or accidental exposure for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a provided diet was comparable and compatible to the diet ordered from a rehabilitation hospital on admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure speech therapy was initiated and provided to a resident who admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dysphagia (swallowing disorder) and on a therapeutic diet for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for therapy services. (Resident E)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated items were labeled with a received dated and disposed of by the discard date in 2 of 2 reach-in refrigerators reviewed in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 81 of 81 residents who received food from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment when entering isolation rooms and to ensure a 2-Step tuberculosis test was documented as completed in the recommended timeframe for 4 of 8 residents and 1 of 5 new employees reviewed for infection control. (Resident 44, 48, 53, 56 and Activity Assistant 7)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident or the resident's representative was informed of the risks and benefits of a medication, all available treatment options, and to document their chosen treatment option for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 72, 73 and 24)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document a resident's behaviors or distress which required the increase or addition of a psychotropic medication or the non-pharmaceutical interventions used to treat the behaviors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 72)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified of residents' discharge for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 21 and Resident 73)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) tracking assessment was transmitted as required for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for MDS. (Resident 12)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set on the correct liter flow according to the physician's order for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 62)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were free from loose pills, medications contained pharmacy labels, opened medications were labeled with the date the medication was opened, unopened medications which required refrigeration were stored properly, expired medications were not stored in the medication cart, and damaged medication packaging was not secured with tape for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication labeling and storage. (Willow Bend 2/Moving Forward cart and Augustes Cottage CB cart)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure furnishings remained in a safe and homelike condition in 1 of 1 dining room observed for environment. (Men's Memory Care Unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided in a safe and comfortable manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Resident B and C)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment was provided for 1 of 12 rooms reviewed for environment. (room [ROOM NUMBER])
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to privacy was provided during personal care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident 376)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for a resident with a hand splint for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident 33)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were obtained timely to support a resident's healthcare needs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident 376)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for side effects of antipsychotic medications with the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) according to the policy and procedure for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 37 and 45)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was complete and accurately reflected the care provided for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accurate documentation. (Resident 55 and 18)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had been assessed to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication administration. (Resident B)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure cups were free of film/build up from hard water prior to using the cups to serve drinks to residents for 1 of 1 dishwasher reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective person-centered dementia care was provided to a resident with known physically aggressive behaviors for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Residents H and J) This deficient practice resulted in an altercation between Resident H and J. Resident J received a fractured left wrist and a laceration above his right eye. The deficient practice was corrected on 7/10/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weights and physician notification were completed as ordered for residents with congestive heart failure (CHF), to document accu checks (finger stick blood sugars) and insulin administration and failed to ensure a resident with routine orders for Ativan and morphine received the medication as ordered for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 8, 10, 75 and 81)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications administered orally were separated from topical medications, to store cleaning supplies separately from medications, medication carts were clean and free of loose medications, medications were not relabeled for use for another resident, opened medications were dated, medications were stored in the refrigerator until opened, discontinued and expired medications were disposed of routinely and medication storage refrigerators were clean for 3 of 3 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed. (The women's memory care medication cart, the men's memory care medication cart, the [NAME] Bend medication cart #2 and the women's memory care medication storage room).
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation to show the resident/representative made the choice about the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) and to ensure the resident's financial representative was notified of the SNF ABN for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. (Resident 6 and 56)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a new PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level I when a resident was started on a new psychotropic medication for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 44 and 38)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was documentation in the Electronic Health Record to include if the resident went to the scheduled dialysis treatments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. Resident 39)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the narcotic count sheets were signed by two nurses to verify the correct count of controlled substances between shifts for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (the women's memory care medication cart and the [NAME] bend #2 medication cart)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of odors on the south hall and around the nursing station on the skilled unit for 1 of 3 units reviewed for environment. (Willow Bend Unit)
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse when the resident was reported to have been hit in the back of the head/neck by a staff member for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. The deficient practice was corrected on 10/13/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored safely in the original containers until the time of administration for 12 of 17 residents on the [NAME] Cottage Memory Care Unit. (Residents 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13)
21 fire safety citations on file: 8 on January 9, 2026, 5 on January 28, 2025, 8 on December 11, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 26, 2023 | Payment Denial | 19 days from January 26, 2024 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.64 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.43 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.14 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.95 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.4% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 4.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.85 on weekdays and 3.14 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.63 in April to June 2025 to 3.64 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.43 | 3.85 | 3.14 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 81 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.72 | 0.43 | 3.94 | 3.16 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 74 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.62 | 0.36 | 3.84 | 3.06 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 77 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.63 | 0.51 | 3.84 | 3.09 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 73 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.43 | $17.80 to $21.36 | 33,640 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.60 | $29.35 to $35.30 | 14,480 |
| Registered nurses | $40.14 | $37.86 to $48.28 | 68,980 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.9 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Harcourt Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (44.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
44.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Indiana: 111 better, 7 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.
9.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Indiana: 0 better, 17 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Indiana: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana60.0% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Indiana100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 2 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY. CMS links this home to American Senior Communities, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drummer, Carl | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Hanify, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Horn, Brenda | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Lazard, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2021 | |
| Mantravadi, Geeta | Corporate director | Individual | 07/21/2021 | |
| Payne, Monica | Corporate director | Individual | 08/09/2021 | |
| Babcock, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/30/2020 | |
| Caine, Virginia | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/1994 | |
| Harris, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/22/2003 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2011 | |
| Dice, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Hunter, Kimberly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/28/2026 | |
| Kalu, Chijioke | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2024 | |
| Smithers, Katlyn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/22/2026 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/17/2026 | |
| Dice, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Kalu, Chijioke | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2026 | |
| Smithers, Katlyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/24/2026 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.