Home / Florida / Boynton Beach
3600 Old Boynton Road, Boynton Beach, FL 33436 · Palm Beach County · (561) 736-9992
120 certified beds, about 114 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 105755 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 13, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Florida average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 15 health citations since July 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.72 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Florida and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.86 of those hours.
23.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Florida average 41.4%).
CMS links it to Excelsior Care Group, an affiliated group of 33 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor, implement and obtain treatment services from the physician in a timely manner for an identified trauma wound for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for 5 of 28 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to timely wash the resident's hair for Resident #53 and #17, failure to provide timely incontinence care for Resident #55 and #79, and failure to provide nail care for Resident #80.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, policy, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food in a form to meet the individual needs of residents for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #43, Resident #57) reviewed for pureed texture diets. This had the potential to affect 28 residents who were on pureed texture diets.
Inspectors wroteBased on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow an infection control program to help prevent infections for 5 of 7 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to ensure physician orders for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for Resident #2, #32, and #46, failure to properly maintain the indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #32, and failure to ensure proper hand hygiene and don gloves during eye drop administration for Resident #87. The facility also failed to maintain the laundry area in a manner to prevent the spread of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to initiate an immediate report in a timely manner in response to an allegation of abuse by 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse, Resident #10.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 3 of 28 sampled residents, as evidenced by, the failure to initiate interventions for proper positioning for Resident #95, failure to implement a brace to prevent edema and contractures for Resident #11; and failure to implement interventions in response to low blood sugar levels as per physician orders for Resident #18.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, an interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of interventions for nutrition for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #26) reviewed for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to have a doctor's order for the administration of enteral feeding, also known as tube feeding, for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #50), reviewed for dependence on enteral feeding to meet their needs for nutrition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions to reduce pain during personal care for 1 of 4 sampled residents, Resident #32, who was observed during personal care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly store resident's refrigerated laboratory specimens at the regulatory requirements of 36 degrees F (Fahrenheit) to 46 degrees F.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in 4 of 67 rooms observed (rooms #104, #111, #209, and the laundry room).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure implementation of the care pland to provide assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #27).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure medications left at bedside for 1 of 6 residents observed during medication pass (Resident #48); and failed to secure medications in a safe manner for 1 of 6 medication carts potentially affecting 19 residents on the 100 Pod.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the garbage dumpster in a clean, sanitary condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately complete PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Record Review) documents for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #72 and Resident #76).
5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 13, 2025, 1 on November 16, 2023, 2 on July 28, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Florida | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.72 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.86 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.51 | 3.49 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.60 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 23.9% | 41.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 46.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.81 on weekdays and 3.51 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.82 in April to June 2025 to 3.72 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.72 | 0.86 | 3.81 | 3.51 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 114 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.69 | 0.89 | 3.78 | 3.48 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.71 | 0.88 | 3.79 | 3.50 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 113 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.82 | 0.93 | 3.90 | 3.64 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 113 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Florida, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.76 | 0.70 | 3.90 | 3.44 | 1.1% | 0.2% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $17.33 to $20.34 | 96,960 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.70 | $28.14 to $31.11 | 38,620 |
| Registered nurses | $40.48 | $37.82 to $48.64 | 229,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Florida | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 8.7 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 9.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.6 | 8.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 41.8 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.3 | 9.1 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.5 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Heartland Nursing & Rehab Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (29.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
29.9% this home
Worse than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Florida: 169 better, 109 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
14.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Florida: 2 better, 35 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 84 eligible stays.
6.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Florida: 6 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 37 eligible stays.
72.1% this home
Median of homes: Florida55.1% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Florida1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 88 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Florida97.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 18 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HEARTLAND BOYNTON OPCO LLC. CMS links this home to Excelsior Care Group, a group of 33 nursing homes averaging 2.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heartland Boynton Intermediate Opco Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2023 |
| Flnho Capital Group LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2023 | |
| Palm Beach Health Partners LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2023 | |
| Fischel, Mayer | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Varghese, Mathew | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| George, Tia | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Landa, Benjamin | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Florida inspection record.
These are the official offices in Florida. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.